ライフサイエンスコーパス: auditory evoked potential

1 tory percept, evidenced by changes in the N1 auditory evoked potential.

2 ry gating assessed by P50 suppression of the auditory evoked potential.

3 iated with diminished suppression of the P50 auditory evoked potential.

4 sound sensitivity, and specific patterns of auditory evoked potentials.

5 he attack and strong intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials.

6 chizophrenia-like decreases in amplitudes of auditory evoked potentials.

7 al auditory brainstem responses and cortical auditory-evoked potentials.

8 peritoneal epinephrine enhances the cerebral auditory evoked potential (AEP), an effect that is depen

9 le responses in A1 of the awake monkey using auditory evoked potential (AEP), multiple-unit activity

10 e detection has been associated with a human auditory-evoked potential (AEP), the mismatch negativity

11 ditory processing capabilities, long-latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) were recorded to synth

12 To test this hypothesis, we analysed auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) which were recorded fr

13 Auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) have become a widely u

14 The amplitude of auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) in the hippocampus inc

15 ve-language experience on sensory-obligatory auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) was investigated in na

16 Local field and auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) were recorded from pri

17 Auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) were triggered in real

18 The effects of gender on auditory evoked potential amplitude suggest dimorphic si

19 The human P1/P50 midlatency auditory evoked potential and the startle response (SR)

20 These results suggest that gating of auditory evoked potentials and PPI of startle measure di

21 lay in the FIV-induced effects on brain stem auditory evoked potentials, and demonstrated a trend tow

22 Brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) abnormalities occur in

23 tatus, along with measurements of brain stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) changes.

24 Our objective was to examine brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in rat CS as a measur

25 auditory system, as assessed with brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs).

26 Recording of free-field cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) responses to speech tok

27 uces changes in the latency of both cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and VEPs and a decrea

28 o study the N1 and P2 components of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) evoked by 70, 80, 90,

29 esthetic depth using the bispectral index or auditory evoked potentials has greatly improved feedback

30 c rats to directly record inferior colliculi auditory-evoked potentials (ICEPs).

31 ectrophysiological recordings of the P20-N40 auditory evoked potential in anesthetized DBA/2 mice, wh

32 , the amplitude of the N100 component of the auditory evoked potential in response to the target tone

33 We recorded cortical auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing children an

34 rug reversed disrupted latent inhibition and auditory-evoked potential in mice and rats, respectively

35 Human studies with auditory evoked potentials indicate that FXS is associat

36 Diminished suppression of the P50 auditory evoked potential is a phenotype used in studies

37 The N1 peak in the late auditory evoked potential (LAEP) decreases in amplitude

38 on of temporal components of the mid-latency auditory evoked potential (MAEP) recorded with a multich

39 of hearing loss and hearing aids on cortical auditory evoked potential measurements in response to sp

40 Data from our laboratory suggest that auditory evoked potentials of DBA/2J mice differ from th

41 We simultaneously measured auditory evoked potentials over a large swath of primary

42 ition") were the most impaired on brain stem auditory evoked potentials (P=.005); those (n=13) with s

43 to wave III interpeak latency of brain stem auditory evoked potentials (P=.02), greater interocular

44 Intracortical auditory evoked potentials paralleled noninvasive neurop

45 vealed distinct infection-induced changes in auditory-evoked potential peak latencies that persisted

46 ng inbred mouse strains in sensory gating of auditory evoked potentials, prepulse inhibition (PPI) of

47 easured at the output of the hearing aid and auditory evoked potentials recorded while the listener w

48 vidence of current or past psychosis and had auditory evoked potentials recorded.

49 Mice lacking NeuroD protein exhibit no auditory evoked potentials, reflecting a profound deafne

50 The P50 auditory evoked potential response to paired stimuli was

51 s associated with failure to inhibit the P50 auditory evoked potential response.

52 ial magnetic resonance imaging and brainstem auditory evoked potential results have improved dramatic

53 This study addresses whether diminished P50 auditory evoked potential suppression represents a pheno

54 izophrenia patients do not inhibit their P50 auditory evoked potential to the second of duplicate aud

55 Auditory evoked potential topics include an overview of

56 ngs from each wire were made while the local auditory-evoked potential was also recorded.

57 The P20, N40, and P80 components of the auditory evoked potential were examined in male and fema

58 ia Rating Scale, and the latency of the P300 auditory evoked potential were used as indices of prefro

59 Auditory evoked potentials were similar in OSAS and cont

60 Auditory evoked potentials were used to investigate brai

61 Auditory-evoked potentials were recorded at all sites.

62 ntrast, FIV-associated changes in brain stem auditory-evoked potentials were slow to develop in the m

63 Indeed, we found an enlarged N1 auditory evoked potential when subjects perceived illusi

64 neurons showed the greatest gating of local auditory-evoked potentials, while the auditory cortex sh