コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 y in articulatory regions to increase (i.e., auditory feedback).
2 in response to inconsistent perturbations of auditory feedback.
3 bra finches maintain highly stable songs via auditory feedback.
4 s in perception, such as masking or altering auditory feedback.
5 th respect to a moment-by-moment reliance on auditory feedback.
6 ium (LMAN) mediates song plasticity based on auditory feedback.
7 patterns are insensitive to manipulations of auditory feedback.
8 nals that generate the song rather than from auditory feedback.
9 on signals are reproduced from memory, using auditory feedback.
10 correct for systematic real-time changes to auditory feedback.
11 of call frequencies in response to changing auditory feedback.
12 This process requires control of voice by auditory feedback.
13 maintenance of song, processes dependent on auditory feedback.
14 h, is a learned vocal behavior that requires auditory feedback.
15 providing a mechanism for context-dependent auditory feedback.
16 may actually rely on subtle cues provided by auditory feedback.
17 Adult song maintenance requires auditory feedback.
18 in response to a consistent perturbation of auditory feedback.
19 l of vocalization is critically dependent on auditory feedback.
20 ze neural responses to unexpected changes in auditory feedback.
21 can nevertheless be reshaped dramatically by auditory feedback.
22 rolled perceived song quality with distorted auditory feedback.
23 s) pitch perturbations at 100 Cents in their auditory feedback.
24 imitation that requires the availability of auditory feedback.
25 vocalizations and pitch perturbations in the auditory feedback.
26 utor song that they then vocally mimic using auditory feedback.
27 ortance to song perception and processing of auditory feedback.
28 to deteriorate, but how vocalization-related auditory feedback acts on neural circuits that control v
29 These findings shed light on where and how auditory feedback acts within sensorimotor circuits to s
30 ocal learning and maintenance, where and how auditory feedback affects neural circuits important to v
31 itory association cortex, which responded to auditory feedback alone, and from that within a left lat
33 different conditions they experienced normal auditory feedback, altered auditory feedback (asynchrono
34 ur experiments undergo adaptation to altered auditory feedback, an experimental model of speech motor
35 aking in a non-native language involves more auditory feedback and less auditory suppression than spe
36 during which vocalizations are evaluated via auditory feedback and progressively refined to achieve a
37 y are rapidly influenced by perturbations of auditory feedback and support the possibility that feedb
38 earning task involving adaptation to altered auditory feedback and they were subsequently tested for
39 important clues to how sensitive periods for auditory feedback and vocal plasticity are regulated dur
40 nsights into mirror neurons, the function of auditory feedback, and genes underlying social communica
41 parator circuits in which efferent commands, auditory feedback, and the memory of the tutor song are
42 ined on paths by using prosthetic vision and auditory feedback, and then were tested without auditory
43 ience with an adult (tutor) song pattern and auditory feedback are essential to vocal learning, close
44 btle deviations between predicted and actual auditory feedback as they moved their fingertip through
45 xperienced normal auditory feedback, altered auditory feedback (asynchronous delays or altered pitche
46 rimotor cortical network appears to underlie auditory feedback-based control of vocal pitch in humans
47 es real-time operator dose reporting through auditory feedback (Bleeper Sv; Vertec Scientific Ltd; Be
48 requency of their echolocation calls through auditory feedback both when the bat is at rest [resting
49 ning and maintenance of song is dependent on auditory feedback, but little is known about the presenc
50 adult zebra finches temporarily deprived of auditory feedback by chronic exposure to loud white nois
51 in both songbirds and humans the removal of auditory feedback by deafening leads to a gradual deteri
52 s mechanism in Bengalese finches: removal of auditory feedback by deafening reduces syllable repetiti
54 especially crucial in vocal control because auditory feedback can be contaminated by environmental n
55 me radiation monitoring device that provides auditory feedback can significantly reduce operator radi
59 Together, these results demonstrate that auditory feedback control of speech is sensitive to ling
60 ever, neuronal substrates and mechanisms for auditory feedback control of vocalizations are still mos
61 tput of HVCX cells is unaltered by distorted auditory feedback (DAF), deafening gradually weakens syn
64 bird sings the same sequence, and disrupting auditory feedback does not alter this singing-related ac
65 ng, detection, and processing of errors when auditory feedback does not correspond to the intended mo
67 ing time-varying, focal perturbations in the auditory feedback during multisyllabic, connected speech
70 e neural mechanisms underlying processing of auditory feedback during self-vocalization are poorly un
71 that song premotor circuitry is sensitive to auditory feedback during singing and suggest that feedba
78 hanisms that contribute to the processing of auditory feedback during the maintenance of song in adul
79 onkeys (Callithrix jacchus) are sensitive to auditory feedback during vocal production, and that chan
80 t were differentially sensitive to distorted auditory feedback during vocalization, compared with dur
84 ehavior requiring early sensory exposure and auditory feedback for its development and maintenance.
86 arest relatives--non-human primates--require auditory feedback for the development of species-typical
87 t age-limited song learners do not depend on auditory feedback for the maintenance of adult song.
89 , within non-native speakers, there was less auditory feedback for those with better verbal fluency.
91 hought to compute the difference between the auditory feedback from the bird's vocalizations and an i
92 the underlying mechanisms are linked, and if auditory feedback from the changing vocal output is need
99 rturbed the pitch (fundamental frequency) of auditory feedback in adult Bengalese finches using custo
100 pulated the fundamental frequency (pitch) of auditory feedback in Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata
101 echnical challenges involved in manipulating auditory feedback in precisely controlled ways during ru
105 se results highlight the systematic roles of auditory feedback in the online control of a highly over
106 during singing did not completely depend on auditory feedback in the short term, because neither the
109 One technique used to study the role of auditory feedback involves shifting the pitch of the fee
115 exists among species in the extent to which auditory feedback is necessary for song maintenance.
116 rs (Melopsittacus undulatus) to determine if auditory feedback is necessary for the production of nes
117 e regardless of exposure to other birds, but auditory feedback is required for the maintenance of sta
119 cal premotor activity after perturbations of auditory feedback, leading to the hypothesis that contri
120 The results suggest that the removal of auditory feedback leads to the generation of an instruct
121 speech perception when adaptation to altered auditory feedback led to speech production that fell int
123 Together, our results implicate a positive auditory-feedback loop with adaptation in generating rep
127 In both these vocal learners, however, how auditory feedback of self is processed in these brain ar
128 ocalizations of adult "tutors", and then use auditory feedback of self-produced vocalizations to grad
129 n response to +200 cents pitch shifts in the auditory feedback of self-vocalizations and complex tone
132 Here, we assessed real-time influences of auditory feedback on Bengalese finch song using a comput
134 In a 2 x 2 factorial design, visual and auditory feedback on one's own body were varied across c
135 wo acoustically different types of distorted auditory feedback or unaltered feedback while human part
137 s model directly, the authors used a delayed auditory feedback paradigm in which the subject hears hi
138 controversial due to the long latency of the auditory feedback pathway and technical challenges invol
140 neurons exhibit fast responses to disruptive auditory feedback presented during singing, but not duri
143 to the stationary index or ring finger, with auditory feedback provided to signal correct and incorre
144 ntrol system may be essential for regulating auditory feedback signals necessary for song learning an
145 vocal system, it requires the integration of auditory feedback signals with vocal motor commands.
147 tor-driven gene expression is independent of auditory feedback, since it occurs in deafened birds whe
149 ange in perception was not observed when the auditory feedback that subjects' received during learnin
150 peech production, irrespective of fluency or auditory feedback, the people who stuttered showed overa
151 dult birds correct vocal errors by comparing auditory feedback to a sensory target and suggest that l
153 learn to sing, and as adults, songbirds use auditory feedback to compare their own vocalizations wit
154 However, although humans continue to use auditory feedback to correct vocal errors in adulthood,
156 an instructive/learning mechanism that uses auditory feedback to guide vocal recovery, at least in t
157 zebra finch, a small songbird that relies on auditory feedback to learn and maintain its species-typi
159 re one of the few non-human animals that use auditory feedback to learn their vocalizations, thus aud
160 deafened adult zebra finches, which rely on auditory feedback to maintain their learned songs, to te
162 s sensorimotor learning, the young bird uses auditory feedback to perfect his motor performance, crea
163 stricted developmental period and then using auditory feedback to practice their own vocalizations.
164 ong, like human speech, relies critically on auditory feedback to provide information about the quali
165 microlesions, indicating that birds require auditory feedback to restore/relearn their vocal pattern
167 perturbations that manipulated the timing of auditory feedback trajectory (slow-down or speed-up), si
174 itory feedback, and then were tested without auditory feedback, with and without prosthetic vision.
175 ion of the song model (sensory template) and auditory feedback, with changes in night-time activity p
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。