ライフサイエンスコーパス: aversive stimuli

1 , global recruitment of most cells by strong aversive stimuli.

2 D activated the left amygdala in response to aversive stimuli.

3 nergic mechanisms in responses to stress and aversive stimuli.

4 y different when rats taste rewarding versus aversive stimuli.

5 ow NAc cells respond to primary rewarding or aversive stimuli.

6 ird, dopamine release is increased following aversive stimuli.

7 of presumed dopamine neurons are excited by aversive stimuli.

8 diated behavior, particularly in response to aversive stimuli.

9 ulation of nondopamine neurons is excited by aversive stimuli.

10 will be inhibited by or will not respond to aversive stimuli.

11 long-term adaptations to drugs of abuse and aversive stimuli.

12 and/or selectivity of nociceptive neurons to aversive stimuli.

13 ent of the LHb in encoding and responding to aversive stimuli.

14 la and its connections in the recognition of aversive stimuli.

15 sensory processing of information related to aversive stimuli.

16 ence associated with failed expectations and aversive stimuli.

17 d by largely using generic and predominantly aversive stimuli.

18 cal ideology and responses to threatening or aversive stimuli.

19 ir firing in response to reward omission and aversive stimuli.

20 nergic system, which modulates processing of aversive stimuli.

21 ating anxiety-related behaviors to sustained aversive stimuli.

22 mygdala responses at rest and in response to aversive stimuli.

23 n-habenular inputs during exposure to highly aversive stimuli.

24 mes are critical to ensure rapid escape from aversive stimuli.

25 protect against heightened fear responses to aversive stimuli.

26 early excitation to all tested behaviorally aversive stimuli.

27 vation and predicted inhibition responses to aversive stimuli.

28 unted neural responses to both rewarding and aversive stimuli.

29 e pattern of activation as observed with the aversive stimuli.

30 appear to be depressed and others excited by aversive stimuli.

31 uring pain reflects higher-level encoding of aversive stimuli.

32 painful stimuli can be generalized to other aversive stimuli.

33 est that these neurons modulate responses to aversive stimuli.

34 process information about both rewarding and aversive stimuli.

35 d innate fear levels in response to innately aversive stimuli.

36 recognition that presumably does not involve aversive stimuli.

37 ts on learning and memory tasks that vary by aversive stimuli.

38 Aversive stimuli activated CA1 dendrite-targeting intern

39 earning but not after exposure to neutral or aversive stimuli alone.

40 by 2 types of predictable and unpredictable aversive stimuli, an unpleasant shock or a less aversive

41 sponse being activated by reward omission or aversive stimuli and inhibited by reward-predicting cues

42 LHb has been implicated in the processing of aversive stimuli and inhibitory control of monoamine nuc

43 e LHb, a brain region involved in processing aversive stimuli and negative reward prediction outcomes

44 ness to drugs of abuse, natural rewards, and aversive stimuli and point to the possibility that disti

45 levance of variability in brain responses to aversive stimuli and provide a model that leverages this

46 Prior studies revealed that aversive stimuli and psychostimulant drugs elicit Fos ex

47 neurons are innately tuned to rewarding and aversive stimuli and rapidly develop responses to predic

48 tal nucleus (RMTg) encodes a wide variety of aversive stimuli and sends robust inhibitory projections

49 (KO) mice displayed more robust responses to aversive stimuli and spent less time in the open arms of

50 l tegmental area neurons in response to mild aversive stimuli and suggest that dopamine input may con

51 are necessary for normal learning involving aversive stimuli and support the contention that dysregu

52 of SSRI treatment is to alter processing of aversive stimuli and that this is linked to DRN 5-HT1A r

53 tion patients showed similar enhancements to aversive stimuli and there were no significant group dif

54 m influences its perception of attractive or aversive stimuli and thus promotes adaptive behaviors th

55 sociated with variation in the processing of aversive stimuli and widely studied as risk factors for

56 N)), during which participants are safe from aversive stimuli, and two threat conditions-one in which

57 hether OFC also represents information about aversive stimuli, and, if so, whether individual neurons

58 signaled by a threat cue), and one in which aversive stimuli are administered unpredictably (U).

59 However, the degree to which appetitive and aversive stimuli are processed by the same or different

60 nisms may come into play when appetitive and aversive stimuli are simultaneously presented to the tas

61 It also senses aversive stimuli but reports their physical impact rathe

62 , contains cells responsive to pain and oral aversive stimuli, but does not apparently contribute dir

63 this modulation occurred only for rewards or aversive stimuli, but not both.

64 b) or amygdala-related regions in processing aversive stimuli, but their relationships to each other

65 revealing new insights into the encoding of aversive stimuli by dopaminergic neurons, and the organi

66 se to chronic exposure to both rewarding and aversive stimuli by regulating largely distinct subsets

67 However, both pleasant and aversive stimuli can elicit arousal and attention, and t

68 iral fiber neurons are active in response to aversive stimuli capable of eliciting escapes.

69 a deficit in basic electrodermal response to aversive stimuli, consistent with the emotional blunting

70 ear learning, sensory input from neutral and aversive stimuli converge in the lateral nucleus of the

71 a indicate that processing of appetitive and aversive stimuli converges at the single cell level in O

72 suggest that information about rewarding and aversive stimuli converges in individual neurons in OFC.

73 Deficits in responses to aversive stimuli could contribute to both the behavioura

74 atory synapses on DA neurons by rewarding or aversive stimuli depends on the brain area to which thes

75 sociated with decreased performance; 3) more aversive stimuli during obedience were associated with m

76 h poorer obedience performance; 2) increased aversive stimuli during protection exercises were associ

77 i during obedience were associated with more aversive stimuli during protection; and 4) handlers used

78 n the nucleus accumbens (NAc) while discrete aversive stimuli elicit pauses in dopamine neuron firing

79 formation about both potential rewarding and aversive stimuli, even though these stimuli differed in

80 Rewarding and aversive stimuli evoke very different patterns of behavi

81 Collectively, aversive stimuli exposure produced heterogeneous firing

82 hasic activations and/or Fos induction after aversive stimuli (footshocks, shock-predictive cues, foo

83 c inhibition as a mechanism for exclusion of aversive stimuli from hippocampal contextual representat

84 n the neural representation of rewarding and aversive stimuli have been well-described in patients wi

85 ying behavior), but not passive avoidance of aversive stimuli (i.e., exploration of open arms of the

86 e weeks after treatment (P70), reactivity to aversive stimuli (i.e., social defeat stress, forced swi

87 e of mesoprefrontal dopamine (DA) neurons to aversive stimuli in addition to some fear-related behavi

88 amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex respond to aversive stimuli in both the olfactory and gustatory mod

89 First, exposure to conditioned aversive stimuli in males trained to inhibit sexual beha

90 We found that exposure to aversive stimuli in mice increased LHb excitatory drive

91 ERK induction by exposure to the conditioned aversive stimuli in mPFC and OFC.

92 during protection; and 4) handlers used more aversive stimuli in protection compared with obedience e

93 We establish a circuit for the processing of aversive stimuli in the context of an innate visual beha

94 Aversive stimuli in the form of noxious heat and unpleas

95 fied a network of brain regions that process aversive stimuli, including anger.

96 We observe that aversive stimuli, including foot-shocks, excite LHb neur

97 Second, aversive stimuli increase firing in a minority of putati

98 ating dendrite-targeting interneurons during aversive stimuli increased CA1 pyramidal cell population

99 We found that aversive stimuli induced a pronounced activation of the

100 he superior colliculus: when it is inactive, aversive stimuli invoke a single pattern of dopaminergic

101 resumed dopamine neurons that are excited by aversive stimuli is actually not dopaminergic.

102 in teleost fish whose firing in response to aversive stimuli is correlated with short-latency escape

103 The brain circuitry processing rewarding and aversive stimuli is hypothesized to be at the core of mo

104 f lateral amygdala (LA) pyramidal neurons by aversive stimuli is thought to drive the formation of th

105 their attractiveness to mates, as opposed to aversive stimuli like predator cues.

106 broadly, the findings of muted reactivity to aversive stimuli may reflect a 'bradylimbic' affective d

107 professions that require reacting quickly to aversive stimuli near the body, such as firemen, policem

108 may reflect altered emotional reactivity to aversive stimuli not learning deficits.

109 artle reflex can be modulated by exposure to aversive stimuli or other conditions which evoke a state

110 r conditions, notably with appetitive versus aversive stimuli or positive versus negative emotions, i

111 Exposure to various aversive stimuli ('stressors') as well as positively-rei

112 ures of individual resiliency in the face of aversive stimuli such as persistent pain and potentially

113 rewarding stimuli such as morphine, but also aversive stimuli such as stress, activate CRE-mediated t

114 tly diminished while inhibitory responses to aversive stimuli, such as air puff-predictive cues or ai

115 midbrain exhibit heterogeneous responses to aversive stimuli that are thought to provide a critical

116 apid regulation of dopamine signaling by the aversive stimuli that cause drug seeking is not well cha

117 gh information about potential rewarding and aversive stimuli to make decisions and to regulate their

118 redator odors may provide a species relevant aversive stimuli to study the central effects of stress

119 ng and in modulating behavior in response to aversive stimuli, we suggest that these changes may resu

120 gnaled by a cue, a second condition in which aversive stimuli were administered unpredictably, and a

121 edictably, and a third condition in which no aversive stimuli were anticipated.

122 to rewarding stimuli, whereas activations to aversive stimuli were increased in the lateral orbitofro

123 xposed to one condition in which predictable aversive stimuli were signaled by a cue, a second condit

124 pessimistic-like interpretation of ambiguous aversive stimuli whereas depressed individuals tend to a

125 s displayed a net enhancement of activity to aversive stimuli, whereas the firing rate of identified

126 adian rhythm, and responses to rewarding and aversive stimuli, which are all abnormal in depressed pa

127 al shell were modified by both rewarding and aversive stimuli, which presumably reflects saliency.

128 urons largely respond to either palatable or aversive stimuli, while GC responses tend to reflect the