ライフサイエンスコーパス: axial length

1 rneal thickness; anterior chamber depth; and axial length.

2 ty, refractive error, corneal topography and axial length.

3 correlations with age, refractive error and axial length.

4 correlations with age, refractive error and axial length.

5 0.11/mm, r = 0.96, P < 0.01) were related to axial length.

6 ong (>/=24.5 to <26 mm), and long (>/=26 mm) axial length.

7 y 0.56 mm(3) (7.59%) for every millimeter of axial length.

8 he eye, including anterior segment power and axial length.

9 n macular choroidal volume and age, sex, and axial length.

10 rneal curvature, vitreous chamber depth, and axial length.

11 endent effect of age and IOP (P </= 0.01) on axial length.

12 rgely accounted for by ethnic differences in axial length.

13 ver the entire field of view, in relation to axial length.

14 opic, which is strongly related to increased axial length.

15 apy restored retinal function and normalized axial length.

16 ak minus trough) was inversely correlated to axial length.

17 , with a 16.1-cm ring diameter and a 12.7-cm axial length.

18 nts were associated with myopia and a longer axial length.

19 nce could be accounted for by differences in axial length.

20 ociation with age, gender, ONH diameter, and axial length.

21 he expansion of equatorial diameter, but not axial length.

22 een CBT measurements and refractive error or axial length.

23 ly associated with high myopia and increased axial length.

24 ngle nor BMO area was associated with age or axial length.

25 ssibly related to a slightly greater average axial length.

26 d after manual correction and adjustment for axial length.

27 correlation only with cup-to-disc ratio and axial length.

28 d predictability in eyes with short and long axial lengths.

29 ia (-1.00 to -16.00 diopters), and increased axial lengths.

30 cant difference before and after dilation in axial length (0.005 mm; P = .476), corneal power (0.001

31 black African Caribbean children had longer axial lengths (0.44 mm; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.57 mm and 0.30

32 (+13.5 OD and +14 OS diopters) with reduced axial length (16.27 mm OD and 15.93 mm OS).

33 .6 mum per decade, P < 0.001) and increasing axial length (21.4 mum/mm, P < 0.001).

34 How axial length-a sum of the anterior chamber depth, lens t

35 Cycloplegic refraction, axial length, accommodation amplitude, pupil diameter, a

36 DTRS rings was significantly correlated with axial length after adjustment for age (P < 0.0001), age

37 ly associated variables (including LV, PCAL, axial length, age, and iris area) explained 80.5% of the

38 To report the longitudinal change in axial length (AL) from the time of unilateral cataract s

39 ve proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and axial length (AL) of the eye upon the anatomical outcome

40 Axial length (AL) of the eyes was measured by non-contac

41 age age of 10.46 +/- 2.94 years, the average axial length (AL) was 23.33 +/- 0.89 mm; the average sph

42 The median (range) axial length (AL) was 24.2 mm (22.4-27.7 mm).

43 ent was -9.03 +/- 5.11 diopters (D) and mean axial length (AL) was 27.36 +/- 2.09 mm.

44 erence tomography, IOP, blood pressure (BP), axial length (AL), and anterior chamber depth (ACD).

45 intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, axial length (AL), and central corneal thickness (CCT).

46 The results of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and ante

47 Ocular biometry including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and cor

48 ted by using general linear mixed models for axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal

49 Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratom

50 ictor variables age, corneal curvature (CC), axial length (AL), CCT and IOP.

51 s who underwent an eye examination to obtain axial length (AL), central corneal thickness, vitreous c

52 Axial length (AL), corneal curvature (CC), and anterior

53 Evaluate agreement and repeatability of axial length (AL), corneal curvature, and anterior chamb

54 c data included values for refractive error, axial length (AL), corneal curvature, anterior chamber d

55 Axial length (AL), corneal thickness (CT), anterior cham

56 ), lens thickness (LT), vitreal length (VL), axial length (AL), lens position and relative lens posit

57 rmed to obtain anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AL), lens thickness, and vitreous cavity l

58 d to evaluate the correlation between CT and axial length (AL), refractive error, age, sex, and ethni

59 etry (IOPk), scleral pneumatonometry (IOPs), axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE), and centra

60 es in cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE), axial length (AL), visual acuity, pupil size, and accomm

61 s to evaluate the association between ocular axial length (AL), vitreous chamber depth (VCD) and both

62 After stratifying eyes by axial length (AL), we found higher unexpected refractive

63 ens thickness (LT), vitreous depth (VD), and axial length (AL), were measured and compared with a par

64 derived using the targeted CL power and the axial length (AL).

65 Axial length (AL); anterior chamber depth (ACD), defined

66 ve error and ocular components measurements (axial length [AL], anterior chamber depth [ACD], corneal

67 sing myopic refractive error, and increasing axial length (all P < .001).

68 Axial lengths (ALs) and 45 degrees fundus photographs we

69 o treatment groups with respect to change in axial length (ANCOVA, P = 0.37) or change in the steepes

70 Difference between measured preoperative axial length and age-matched mean axial length (prior st

71 tear-film break-up time, Schirmer I testing, axial length and anterior chamber depth measurement, cor

72 ale subjects (P = 0.16) after adjustment for axial length and between ethnic groups (P = 0.41) after

73 unidentified serine protease (PRSS56) alters axial length and causes a mouse phenotype resembling ACG

74 Axial length and choroidal thickness tended to fluctuate

75 he MH closure rate, the relationship between axial length and closure rate, the best-corrected visual

76 niso-astigmatic eyes were more asymmetric in axial length and corneal astigmatism than eyes without a

77 orefraction and ocular biometric measures of axial length and corneal curvature.

78 PPCIs were compared and correlated with the axial length and corneal power in both groups of eyes, a

79 rwent a full biometric evaluation, including axial length and corneal power measurements, and macular

80 onnaire and ocular evaluations that included axial length and cycloplegic autorefraction at the begin

81 affected and fellow eyes after adjusting for axial length and intraocular pressure.

82 ses enable reliable and repeatable IOLMaster axial length and K-reading measurements.

83 Axial length and keratometry were measured and repeated

84 relate RNFL thickness (overall average) with axial length and magnification.

85 ular parameters (intraocular pressure [IOP], axial length and mean ocular perfusion pressure [MOPP])

86 ns between subfoveal choroidal thickness and axial length and myopic refractive error were obtained (

87 nd area measures of RNFL cross sections when axial length and ONH shape are included.

88 Age, ethnicity, axial length and optic disc size can affect the machine'

89 ty was quantified by the relative changes in axial length and refraction.

90 nducted for 10 days, the relative changes in axial length and refractive error were still significant

91 Axial length and scleral thickness were measured after s

92 No associations with axial length and smoking were observed.

93 ed that visual impairment is associated with axial length and spherical equivalent and may be unavoid

94 ce of visual impairment rose with increasing axial length and spherical equivalent, with a cumulative

95 ve of less structural support such as longer axial length and thin central corneal thickness were ide

96 Axial length and visual field mean deviation are the mai

97 The median (interquartile range, [IQR]) axial length and visual field mean deviation were 24.5 (

98 er depth significantly differed from normal; axial length and vitreous chamber depth demonstrated a l

99 al equivalent and negatively associated with axial length and vitreous depth.

100 Experimental glaucoma led to increases in axial length and width by comparison to fellow eyes (6%

101 Although lens thickness, vitreous length, axial length, and anterior chamber volume were moderatel

102 Refractive error, axial length, and BCVA correlated significantly with mac

103 clude thinner RNFL, older age, longer ocular axial length, and being male.

104 Measurement of refractive error, axial length, and complete ophthalmic examination.

105 heavier had thicker cornea and lens, longer axial length, and flatter corneal curve.

106 associated with shorter baseline AOD750 and axial length, and greater baseline anterior chamber dept

107 mass index, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, axial length, and intraocular pressure (IOP), decreased

108 ects (all P > 0.05) after adjusting for age, axial length, and intraocular pressure.

109 er and had better BCVA, less myopia, shorter axial length, and less staphyloma than those in group 2.

110 Axial length, and myopic ammetropy are highly associated

111 They were masked to the refractive error, axial length, and OCT findings.

112 dom sample of manual cases with similar age, axial length, and preoperative cylinders.

113 nalysis demonstrated an effect of ethnicity, axial length, and refractive error on BMO-based paramete

114 groups (P = 0.41) after adjustment for age, axial length, and RNFL thickness.

115 Although the magnitude of the effect of age, axial length, and sex are small, these factors should be

116 even when variables such as age, ethnicity, axial length, and sex were taken into account.

117 , sex, race/ethnicity, eye color, refraction/axial length, and smoking status were evaluated as was m

118 eight, Tanner stage of pubertal development, axial length, and spherical equivalent refractive error.

119 he nontreated group after adjusting for age, axial length, and spherical power.

120 he latter adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, axial length, and the use of both eyes in the same subje

121 ence in macular thickness and anisometropia, axial length, and VA.

122 kness and magnitude of myopic anisometropia, axial length, and visual acuity (VA) were investigated.

123 lopentolate) autorefraction, and measures of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and corneal curvat

124 onstrated a leptokurtic distribution as well.Axial length, anterior chamber depth, and vitreous chamb

125 is study is to determine the normal range of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, an

126 mirnov tests showed that the distribution of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, an

127 Age and axial length are inversely correlated with choroidal vol

128 Male sex, younger age, and shorter axial length are the factors independently associated wi

129 tion of EL and are associated with increased axial length as compared to FBN1.

130 Anisometropic eyes had greater axial length asymmetry than nonanisometropic eyes.

131 OK eye there was no change from baseline in axial length at 12 months (-0.04+/-0.08 mm; P=0.218).

132 ve reduction of RGCs, and a mild increase in axial length at 6 and 12 weeks after bead injection.

133 lus intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and axial length at age 5 years.

134 Axial length (AXL) and radius of corneal curvature were

135 Macular thickness, axial length, best-corrected VA, and refraction were mea

136 P < 0.001), age (beta = -0.083, P < 0.001), axial length (beta = -0.87, P = 0.001), and male sex (be

137 l thickness in the entire group, followed by axial length (beta = -11.8; P = 0.002).

138 central corneal thickness, WtW, ACD, LT, and axial length both before and after cycloplegia.

139 entation and increasing corneal diameter and axial length but a negative relationship was noted with

140 rneal curvature, vitreous chamber depth, and axial length) but distinct for others (lens thickness an

141 at a decrease in ONH diameter by 100 mum and axial length by 1 mm increased the odds of ONHD presence

142 was corrected for individual differences in axial length by ocular biometry.

143 The axial length, central corneal thickness, aqueous depth,

144 aterality, refraction, intraocular pressure, axial length, central corneal thickness, mean retinal ne

145 fferences in myopia progression (0.19 D) and axial length change (0.14 mm) between groups were small

146 characterized by microcornea with increased axial length, coloboma of the iris and of the optic disc

147 was in the mid range, nonetheless, studying axial length components showed that the Iranian populati

148 In this prospective, case-control study, the axial length, corneal curvature radius, anterior chamber

149 ing refractive error (spherical equivalent), axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber de

150 not cause a clinically relevant increase in axial length, corneal curvature, or myopia relative to s

151 on of postoperative lens position, including axial length, corneal power (K), preoperative anterior c

152 il dilation on the IOLMaster measurements of axial length, corneal power, and corresponding theoretic

153 fractive error at baseline, parental myopia, axial length, corneal power, crystalline lens power, rat

154 The parameters compared were axial length, corneal power, cylinder, and the correspon

155 Sex, axial length/corneal curvature ratio, and peak expirator

156 Alcohol consumption, age, axial length/corneal curvature ratio, cataract surgery,

157 The axial lengths did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .

158 calculated, and was defined as age-adjusted axial length difference (ALD) (minus and plus denotes my

159 Although increase in axial length drives refractive change during childhood a

160 In 3 cross-sectional studies with data on axial length, each millimeter increase in axial length w

161 Apparent shortening of axial length early in OK lens wear may reflect the contr

162 Axial length elongation and myopia progression with OK w

163 osition (LP and RLP, respectively), and lens axial length factor (LAF).

164 AOSLO was used to image 18 healthy eyes with axial lengths from 22.86 to 28.31 mm.

165 The GP lens-wearing eye showed progressive axial length growth throughout the study.

166 opia (spherical equivalent >/=-6 diopters or axial length >/=26 mm) and 96 eyes of 62 healthy patient

167 the Wang-Koch (WK) adjustment for eyes with axial length >25.0 mm on 4 of the formulas.

168 Forty-seven highly myopic eyes (with axial length >26 mm) were included in the study group an

169 Exclusion criteria were axial length>/=25 mm, lattice degeneration, intraoperati

170 After 6 months of lens wear, axial length had increased by 0.04+/-0.06 mm (mean+/-sta

171 Choroidal thickness, refraction and ocular axial length had no detectable effect on rod-mediated da

172 In the high myopia group, axial length had the best correlation with choroidal thi

173 While effects of axial length have been reported, the effects of anterior

174 and Yoruba ethnic groups, illiteracy, longer axial length, higher IOP, lower MOPP, greater severity o

175 his protease also cause a severe decrease of axial length in individuals with posterior microphthalmi

176 hange in both spherical refractive error and axial length in younger children when compared with teen

177 Adjustment of measured RNFL thickness by axial length, in addition to age, may lead to a tighter

178 WT and Slitrk6-deficient mouse eyes revealed axial length increase in the mutant (the endophenotype o

179 Anatomic outcomes tended to decrease when axial length increased (P = 0.066).

180 Axial length increased by a mean of 0.84 mm (P < 0.0001)

181 Corneal power remained unchanged, but axial length increased.

182 Axial lengths increased 59 +/- 10 microm with SofLens38

183 Axial length influenced the absolute prediction error wi

184 n multivariate linear regression models with axial length, IOP history, and mouse strain as independe

185 Axial length is especially associated with choroidal thi

186 Axial length, lens thickness, and vitreous length were o

187 Nanophthalmos was defined as an axial length less than 20.0 mm and/or refractive error g

188 we isolated 16 eyes from 10 patients with an axial length <26.5 mm for further analysis.

189 clinical characteristics, refractive error, axial length, macular choroidal thickness, and best-corr

190 Longer axial length may increase the risk of anatomic failure.

191 Axial length (mean 16.25 mm [range 14.88-19.88]) had str

192 RSS56 mutations were associated with shorter axial lengths (mean 15.72 mm) than missense PRSS56 mutat

193 Axial length, mean deviation, and their interaction show

194 oidal volume as well as the association with axial length, mean ocular perfusion pressure, or IOP was

195 the children with microphthalmos had ocular axial lengths measured.

196 Exact ray-tracing was carried out after the axial length (measured either by immersion ultrasound bi

197 d examination, optical coherence tomography, axial length measurement, audiometry, visual evoked resp

198 All participants underwent axial length measurement, keratometry, corneal pachymetr

199 After a comprehensive eye examination and axial length measurement, RNFL and macular thickness mea

200 Ophthalmologic examination included axial length measurement, spectral domain optical cohere

201 Bland-Altman plots show good correlation for axial length measurements (95% limits of agreement rangi

202 ry (Topcon), Pentacam HR, IOL Master (Zeiss) axial length measurements and fundus optical coherence t

203 rations for ocular volume as calculated from axial length measurements did not alter regression analy

204 The Bland-Altman analysis of axial length measurements with the IOL Master 500 and IO

205 ues to existing PCI tracings of human ocular axial length measurements, a signal modeling algorithm w

206 Application of the WK axial length modification generally resulted in a shift

207 0.51, P < 0.001) were associated with longer axial lengths (multilevel model: P < 0.001).

208 os, with mean refraction of +11.8 D and mean axial length of 17.6 mm.

209 We found a mean axial length of 23.14 mm (95% confidence interval [CI],

210 (1.3) for participants aged 75 years with an axial length of 24 to less than 26 mm and greater than 9

211 from 15.3 to 37.8 mm; 819 individuals had an axial length of 26 mm or greater.

212 han 26 mm and greater than 90% (8.1) with an axial length of 30 mm or greater.

213 A-scan biometry is superior in measuring the axial length of children.

214 CRF and CH varied with IOPg, age, sex, and axial length of the eye.

215 ificant positive association between IOP and axial length of the eye.

216 t worldwide, results from an increase in the axial length of the eyeball.

217 The mean axial length of the eyes with a posterior staphyloma was

218 The axial length of the premature infant eye increases rapid

219 gh-performance separations and (ii) the full axial length of the separation gel.

220 iation may have been biased by the effect of axial length on fundus image magnification and, therefor

221 When controlling for axial length, only the macular inner circle thickness wa

222 re performed to determine the correlation of axial length or CME with RNFL thickness.

223 g, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.26; P<0.001), longer axial length (OR per mm, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.22-1.80; P<0.00

224 ia (OR, 1.7; 95%, CI, 1.1-2.5; P<0.001), and axial length (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.2 per millimeter; P

225 ge (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; P < .001), longer axial length (OR, 2.57; P < .001), presence of rhegmatog

226 ticipants with more severe myopia and longer axial length (P < .001).

227 r age (P < 0.0001), age after adjustment for axial length (P < 0.0001), and sex after adjustment for

228 between amplitude of CT and age (P = 0.032), axial length (P < 0.001), and spherical equivalent (P <

229 h (P < 0.0001), and sex after adjustment for axial length (P < 0.05).

230 as age (P = .31), keratometry (P = .32), and axial length (P = .27) of the patient.

231 n multivariate analyses, age (P < 0.001) and axial length (P = 0.03) predicted GC/IPL measurements in

232 nt (P < 0.001), worse VA (P < 0.001), longer axial lengths (P = 0.004), and higher proportions of mod

233 angle in multivariate analyses (P = .044 for axial length, P = .039 for mean deviation, and P = .028

234 eoperative axial length and age-matched mean axial length (prior studies) was calculated, and was def

235 t correlated strongly and inversely with the axial length (R = -0.62; P<0.0001).

236 ith PMF height (R = 0.68; P<0.0001), inverse axial length (R = -0.71; P<0.0001), and corneal power (R

237 diopter [D]) absolute error over the entire axial length range, and was comparable with the formulas

238 known methods and was better over the entire axial length range.

239 sity and eye size ( approximately 6-12 mm in axial length) range between approximately 2 and 4 cycles

240 Axial length ranged from 15.3 to 37.8 mm; 819 individual

241 od-intercept or the dark adaptation rate and axial length, refraction, gender or age.

242 ing baseline CT, and is correlated with age, axial length, refractive error, and change in systolic b

243 elated significantly with cup-to-disc ratio, axial length, refractive error, astigmatism, and posteri

244 patients with ADAMTSL4 mutations, increased axial length, relative to age-matched controls, was obse

245 er trabeculectomy, especially IOP change and axial length, require further investigation.

246 ify WNT7B as a novel susceptibility gene for axial length (rs10453441, Pmeta=3.9 x 10(-13)) and corne

247 Axial length seemed to be a major parameter at the 15q14

248 als with ACG often have a modestly decreased axial length, shallow anterior chamber and relatively la

249 pressure, increased lens thickness, shorter axial length, shallow anterior chamber depth, anteriorly

250 iations with greater lens vault were shorter axial length, shallower anterior chamber depth(ACD), hig

251 Posterior staphylomas in myopic eyes with an axial length shorter than 26.5 mm exhibit features resem

252 an accurate assessment should also consider axial length, size of the optic nerve head (ONH), blood

253 hat RNFL thickness depended significantly on axial length (slope = -3.1 mum/mm, 95% CI = -4.9 to -1.3

254 In univariate analyses, axial length, spherical equivalent, and mean deviation w

255 ectives: To evaluate the association between axial length, spherical equivalent, and the risk of visu

256 Corneal diameter decreases with decreasing axial length, suggesting posterior microphthalmos and na

257 PM and its significant correlation with the axial length, the PMF severity and keratometry establish

258 ting for central corneal thickness, age, and axial length, the relationship of CH and CRF to RNFL thi

259 The axial length variability remained constant (P = 0.18), m

260 The distributions of axial length, vitreous chamber depth, and lens thickness

261 l choroidal thickness in relationship to the axial length was -43.84 mum/mm.

262 The mean increase in axial length was 0.27+/-0.25, 0.28+/-0.28, and 0.41+/-0.

263 Forty-three eyes were studied; mean axial length was 18.1 +/- 1.1 mm (in 23 eyes, it was <18

264 Mean axial length was 22.74 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]:

265 +/-1.77(-4.25 to +5.00) diopters and average axial length was 23.5+/-1.0 (21.5 to 25.8)mm.

266 The mean axial length was 23.84 +/- 0.78 mm.

267 Mean axial length was 27.49 +/- 2.53 mm.

268 The mean axial length was 28.5+/-2.2 mm in highly myopic eyes and

269 54.4 +/- 18.2 years (range, 18-99) and mean axial length was 29.17 +/- 2.44 mm (range, 26.00-35.63).

270 The mean axial length was 29.37+/-1.92 mm.

271 After controlling for LV and PCAL, axial length was a poor determinant of ACD (partial R(2)

272 nformation about LV and PCAL were available, axial length was a poor determinant of ACD, whereas lens

273 h BCVA, whereas neither refractive error nor axial length was a significant predictor of BCVA.

274 A negative correlation between the SFCT and axial length was also detected (P < 0.001).

275 on axial length, each millimeter increase in axial length was associated with a decreased odd of prev

276 Shorter axial length was associated with early AMD in both Singa

277 n limbus-anterior chamber angle distance and axial length was established.

278 Compared to other studies, axial length was in the mid range, nonetheless, studying

279 annually by cycloplegic autorefraction, and axial length was measured annually by A-scan ultrasound.

280 Axial length was measured by A-scan ultrasonography.

281 ucing their value by -1.19 diopters (D); the axial length was measured by immersion biometry, and the

282 rror was measured with an autorefractor, and axial length was measured with an optical biometer.

283 n retinal density (P < 0.05) with increasing axial length was observed at 0.30 mm eccentricity but no

284 ereas for secondary congenital glaucoma only axial length was positively correlated.

285 ver, in the GP eye, the 12-month increase in axial length was significant (0.09+/-0.09 mm; P<0.001).

286 meter were comparable in both groups but the axial length was significantly longer in primary congeni

287 Ocular biometric analysis revealed that axial length was the most likely trait underlying the re

288 Axial length was the strongest determinant of RE (SRC =

289 of total ganglion cells and eye size (35 mm, axial length), we estimated upper limits of spatial reso

290 glion cell peak density and eye size (29 mm, axial length), we estimated upper limits of spatial reso

291 e R(2) values for anterior chamber depth and axial length were 0.39 and 0.27 for TISA750, respectivel

292 Age and axial length were associated with choroidal parameters i

293 ubclinical ONHD with smaller ONH and shorter axial length were found.

294 equivalent and 9074 individuals with data on axial length were included in the study; right eyes were

295 Age, gender, ONH diameter, and axial length were obtained from participants.

296 and systemic factors studied, age, sex, and axial length were the only significant predictors of cho

297 ely 2-5 mum diameter and approximately 4 mum axial length) were hydrogenated to develop a probe capab

298 ican deficiency in mice results in increased axial length with fibromodulin deficiency and thinner sc

299 r chamber angle distance with AS-OCT and the axial length with IOLMaster.

300 aphy and pachymetry with Scheimpflug camera, axial length with non-contact partial coherence interfer