ライフサイエンスコーパス: bacterial adhesion

1 uired for Fap1 biogenesis and Fap1-dependent bacterial adhesion.

2 strating the role of the Fap1 polypeptide in bacterial adhesion.

3 that is capable of mediating shear-enhanced bacterial adhesion.

4 ression as detected by antibody staining and bacterial adhesion.

5 y important roles in governing leukocyte and bacterial adhesion.

6 iciencies of up to 80% at the early stage of bacterial adhesion.

7 epithelium, may be responsible for increased bacterial adhesion.

8 ation is required for fimbria biogenesis and bacterial adhesion.

9 did not affect Fap1, fimbrial expression or bacterial adhesion.

10 nst adhesin fragments in attempts to inhibit bacterial adhesion.

11 he design of materials that are resistant to bacterial adhesion.

12 t with intimate attaching and effacing (A/E) bacterial adhesion.

13 o bacteria yielded significant reductions in bacterial adhesion.

14 ntimicrobial surfaces that prevent long-term bacterial adhesion.

15 ating the advantage of paper-based anode for bacterial adhesion.

16 wer the SFE difference, the higher degree of bacterial adhesion.

17 ynamic measure for quantitatively predicting bacterial adhesion.

18 phy, and stiffness of substratum material on bacterial adhesion.

19 all or assemble fiber-like pili that promote bacterial adhesion.

20 type IVb pilus group, which can function in bacterial adhesion.

21 e vasculature, capture of nanoparticles, and bacterial adhesion.

22 lates EGFR- and MUC1-dependent signaling and bacterial adhesion.

23 magglutination (HA) functional cell assay of bacterial adhesion.

24 with a role of mucin O-glycans in preventing bacterial adhesion.

25 tion (1.5-fold) and diminished MUC1-mediated bacterial adhesion (38-56%) and signaling (73%).

26 for neutrophil L-selectin and receptors for bacterial adhesion, a finding with interesting implicati

27 15 proteins that were up-regulated following bacterial adhesion and 30 proteins that were down-regula

28 ed adhesin, EtpA, resulting in modulation of bacterial adhesion and accelerated delivery of the heat-

29 Furthermore, the BapA1-mediated bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation are independent

30 lum, and most of these mutations also affect bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation by Yersinia spe

31 The LINORel combination greatly reduces bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation of two most com

32 n the paper have implications in controlling bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on solid surfac

33 tive or implant materials) for prevention of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation.

34 eptococcus parasanguinis and is required for bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation.

35 ptococci and staphylococci are important for bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation.

36 wer in these mutant strains, suggesting that bacterial adhesion and cellulose solubilization are inex

37 These results indicate that, by facilitating bacterial adhesion and cytosolic invasion, CLA-1 and CLA

38 EsaI/EsaR QS system, is required for proper bacterial adhesion and development of spatially defined,

39 This study demonstrated that bacterial adhesion and electron collection should be opt

40 e rapid screening of potential inhibitors of bacterial adhesion and for the quantitative evaluation o

41 s of epithelial cell glycocalyces, prevented bacterial adhesion and growth.

42 ability, and flexibility required to sustain bacterial adhesion and incite intestinal disease.

43 Inhibition of Epac1 suppresses bacterial adhesion and invasion.

44 Differentiation-induced changes in bacterial adhesion and killing capacity underlie the tro

45 Glycosylation of SRRPs is important for bacterial adhesion and pathogenesis.

46 that actively elute antimicrobials to avert bacterial adhesion and promote killing; and 3) surfaces

47 Among the numerous strategies to prevent bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation, sur

48 termed Green coatings, reduced Gram-positive bacterial adhesion and supported mammalian cell spreadin

49 The bacterial adhesion and the biofilm thickness were consid

50 Bacterial adhesion and the subsequent formation of biofi

51 c ablation of cell surface sulfation reduces bacterial adhesion and thereby alters the kinetics of T3

52 We further observed that COMP reduces bacterial adhesion and uptake by human lung epithelial c

53 To test the role of microvilli in bacterial adhesion and uptake, we developed polarized in

54 To assess in vitro bacterial adhesion and viability after liquid perfluoroc

55 resistant to nonspecific protein adsorption, bacterial adhesion, and biofilm formation.

56 microbial resistance, heavy metal transport, bacterial adhesion, and extracytoplasmic substrate traff

57 ycoprotein-rich salivary fluids that enhance bacterial adhesion, and propagation, and biofilm formati

58 d optimization of potent small-molecule FimH bacterial adhesion antagonists based on alpha-d-mannose

59 motility is a critical factor in determining bacterial adhesion, as long as the aquatic chemical cond

60 pramolecular structures for cell, virus, and bacterial adhesion, as well as biomaterial and biodevice

61 -2, ATCC, Rockville, MD) cells were used for bacterial adhesion assays.

62 The intimate bacterial adhesion associated with A/E lesion formation

63 a novel type IV secretion system involved in bacterial adhesion; (b) the newly discovered toxin, cyto

64 ich quantitatively explains the reduction of bacterial adhesion based on the extended Derjaguin, Land

65 n energy are often elusive in predicting the bacterial adhesion behavior.

66 provides an alternative explanation for the bacterial adhesion behavior.

67 Bacterial adhesion behaviour included enterotoxigenic Es

68 lost shear-enhanced binding properties, with bacterial adhesion being inhibited by shear forces and l

69 Sortase A is involved in the process of bacterial adhesion by anchoring LPXTG-containing protein

70 Bacterial adhesion can be controlled by applying electri

71 shi et al. and Sano et al. shed light on how bacterial adhesion can cue intestinal epithelial cells t

72 ential to repel organic foulants and inhibit bacterial adhesion can effectively reduce the frequency

73 othesized that zirconia might have a reduced bacterial adhesion compared with titanium; however, resu

74 We hypothesized that mechanical forces in bacterial adhesion could regulate thioester reactivity t

75 ophilic polydopamine (PDA) coatings decrease bacterial adhesion forces at short bacterium-membrane co

76 to bacteria, and increased susceptibility to bacterial adhesion (>3-fold), the epithelium remained re

77 Examination of bacterial adhesion has been difficult both because it is

78 on, the North American cranberry, to prevent bacterial adhesion has been used to advantage in the pre

79 vels of Rac1 self-association at the site of bacterial adhesion in a PBR-dependent fashion.

80 es in order to monitor the peptide effect as bacterial adhesion inhibitor, thanks to the carrier/conc

81 Bacterial adhesion interference and the susceptibility o

82 on on host Hsp60 expression and LAP-mediated bacterial adhesion, invasion, and transepithelial transl

83 Bacterial adhesion is an important initial step in biofi

84 Insight into the mechanisms underlying bacterial adhesion is critical to the formulation of mem

85 The initial step in bacterial adhesion is the interaction of cells with a su

86 testinal epithelial cells and contributes to bacterial adhesion, LT delivery, and colonization of the

87 In order to minimize bacterial adhesion, material surface modifications are c

88 This makes bacterial adhesion mechanistically comparable with the i

89 ral variations often result in variations in bacterial adhesion mediated by pili.

90 vent is mediated, in part, by binding of the bacterial adhesion molecule intimin to a second bacteria

91 Intimin is a bacterial adhesion molecule involved in intimate attachm

92 Neither fluorescein staining nor bacterial adhesion necessarily predict or enable corneal

93 protein and carboxyl groups, indicating that bacterial adhesion occurring over longer time scales is

94 ay, the presence of purified rHagB decreased bacterial adhesion of P. gingivalis or E. coli-HagB to H

95 rylation of proteins adjacent to the site of bacterial adhesion on host gastric epithelial cells.

96 Good bacterial adhesion on the spiral anode is clearly shown

97 Bacterial adhesion onto mineral surfaces and subsequent

98 Bacterial adhesion onto solid surfaces is of importance

99 ivity in human-derived cells enhanced either bacterial adhesion or adhesion and entry in an InlF-inde

100 Polymers that can interfere with bacterial adhesion or the chemical reactions used for qu

101 caused concentration-dependent reductions in bacterial adhesion (P < 0.007 and P < 0.02, respectively

102 Furthermore, the bacterial adhesion phenotype correlates with the ability

103 Our results imply that bacterial adhesion, rather than invasion or release of a

104 during biofilm formation, including initial bacterial adhesion, subsequent development, and final ma

105 ography, usually at the nanoscale, decreases bacterial adhesion sufficiently to retard establishment

106 s of Fap1 biogenesis, fimbrial assembly, and bacterial adhesion, suggesting that the three proteins i

107 separation distances where the irreversible bacterial adhesion takes place can be determined relativ

108 same ex vivo fluids competitively inhibited bacterial adhesion to airway epithelia, and MUC1-ED immu

109 Consequently, bacterial adhesion to an in vitro tooth model was also r

110 the deletions and the parental wild type for bacterial adhesion to and internalization by HEp-2 cells

111 ent factor C3, might partially contribute to bacterial adhesion to and invasion of epithelial cells.

112 its activity to be associated with increased bacterial adhesion to and invasion of respiratory epithe

113 Bacterial adhesion to and subsequent colonization of sur

114 Also, whereas bacterial adhesion to bladder epithelial cells was prese

115 ilm or human plaque samples were applied for bacterial adhesion to each type of disk, which after 72

116 or that contributes to virulence by reducing bacterial adhesion to EPC cells and facilitating intrace

117 EseJ inhibits bacterial adhesion to EPC cells from within bacterial ce

118 clonal antibodies that blocked FimH-mediated bacterial adhesion to epithelial cells and urinary bladd

119 , F1 inhibits bacterial uptake by inhibiting bacterial adhesion to epithelial cells, whereas Psa seem

120 Instead, invasion increased due to increased bacterial adhesion to epithelial monolayers with comprom

121 Notably, bacterial adhesion to fibrinogen and fibrinogen binding

122 in A (DbpA) of Borrelia burgdorferi mediates bacterial adhesion to heparin and dermatan sulfate assoc

123 ctive entry is not associated with increased bacterial adhesion to host cells or with morphological c

124 ance colonization and infection by mediating bacterial adhesion to host cells, invasion across endoth

125 n shown that this interaction contributes to bacterial adhesion to host cells, invasion of host tissu

126 nce factors that aid in disease-by promoting bacterial adhesion to host cells, subsequent invasion of

127 irect evidence to support a central role for bacterial adhesion to host gastric epithelial Lewis anti

128 Bacterial adhesion to host receptors is an early and ess

129 MDX also increased bacterial adhesion to human intestinal epithelial cell m

130 region were the most effective at inhibiting bacterial adhesion to immobilized fibrinogen, although a

131 mphocytes, synapse formation in neurons, and bacterial adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells.

132 c force microscopy showed that SdrF mediates bacterial adhesion to keratin 10 through strong and weak

133 Msp2s of A. phagocytophilum are involved in bacterial adhesion to ligands on host myeloid cells befo

134 the presence of antibodies, the strength of bacterial adhesion to mannose is increased similar to th

135 ever, molecular mechanisms mediating initial bacterial adhesion to morphologically intact endocardium

136 Furthermore, filamentous phage promoted bacterial adhesion to mucin and inhibited bacterial inva

137 amage and death during the initial phases of bacterial adhesion to NF membranes and raises a key ques

138 ppear to generally play an important role in bacterial adhesion to pIgR.

139 Bacterial adhesion to platelets is mediated via a range

140 All viruses enhanced bacterial adhesion to primary and immortalized cell line

141 Respiratory viruses promote bacterial adhesion to respiratory epithelial cells, a pr

142 resulted in a significant inhibition of the bacterial adhesion to saliva-conditioned hydroxyapatite.

143 h co-ordinates glycoside hydrolase assembly, bacterial adhesion to substrate and polysaccharide hydro

144 Bacterial adhesion to surfaces occurs ubiquitously and i

145 genesis of Flp pili, which are necessary for bacterial adhesion to surfaces, biofilm formation, and p

146 trostatic interactions and therefore inhibit bacterial adhesion to surfaces, induce the expression of

147 st step during colonization and infection is bacterial adhesion to the cornified envelope of corneocy

148 Intimate bacterial adhesion to the intestinal epithelium is a pat

149 meric autotransporter subfamily and mediates bacterial adhesion to the respiratory epithelium.

150 lets and von Willebrand factor (VWF) mediate bacterial adhesion to the vessel wall and the cardiac va

151 sylated ligands and increased by severalfold bacterial adhesion to urothelial cells.

152 ts with the tips of ETEC flagella to promote bacterial adhesion, toxin delivery, and intestinal colon

153 Bacterial adhesion triggered the transient recruitment o

154 ssed on the bacterial surface, and decreased bacterial adhesion under flow conditions.

155 Bacterial adhesion was associated with pathogen phagocyt

156 We found that bacterial adhesion was unambiguously mediated by the SFE

157 of mannoside-presenting SAMs, inhibitors of bacterial adhesion were easily screened by observing the

158 Short- and long-range force components of bacterial adhesion were obtained by Poisson analysis of

159 gens suggests a potential common pattern for bacterial adhesion, whereas participation of conserved r

160 Perflubron and FC-77 appear to decrease bacterial adhesion, whereas Rimar does not.

161 can be used to analyze the initial events in bacterial adhesion with unprecedented resolution.