ライフサイエンスコーパス: bad

1 ted adverse effects (88.6% vs 79.8%; P=.06); bad taste (60.2% vs 37.9%; P=.001); nausea (29.3% vs 16.

2 d neurologic outcomes, 17% moderate, and 20% bad.

3 ainst various databases indicated that lsi-7 bad homology with several Escherichia coli genes involve

4 survival, approximately 10% (good) and 80% (bad) died.

5 A bad fit of the GFE can be a sign of high levels of measu

6 I) complex of the 1,2-vicinal catalyst and a bad substrate for the corresponding 1,3-distal regioisom

7 This was widely recognized as being a bad situation for fellow applicants and reflected poorly

8 without preexisting diabetes, and denotes a bad outcome.

9 would reassure the many patients who fear a bad death in their future and allow for a predictable re

10 The adjusted risk ratio for a bad outcome in the hypothermia group was 0.5 (95 percent

11 at 3 and 6 months (adjusted risk ratio for a bad outcome, 0.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to

12 Algae frequently get a bad press.

13 rapeutic hypothermia group, four (17%) had a bad outcome (pediatric cerebral performance category, 4-

14 in the normothermia group, three (12%) had a bad outcome and one (4%) died.

15 s having a good prognosis and 21 as having a bad prognosis.

16 However, a bad decade for forest outside the park proved a prospero

17 e four items showed a positive indication, a bad prognosis if three or more items were negative, and

18 e unclassified cases could be grouped into a bad prognosis branch, with expression of vascular endoth

19 situations in which containment will make a bad prognosis worse.

20 yet it is still regarded by many as merely a bad habit.

21 rol as females attempt to make the best of a bad job in response to male harassment.

22 Four scripted videos of a bad news conversation were created that differed only in

23 The relative risk of a bad outcome for patients with a Glasgow Coma Score of <

24 w mother and offspring to make the best of a bad start.

25 near an antiferromagnetic order and out of a bad-metal normal state, which has been interpreted as or

26 ng the child, using the EAI incorrectly or a bad outcome.

27 (spondyloarthropathy-like), from that with a bad prognosis (rheumatoid arthritis).

28 prognosis signature and the patients with a bad prognosis is 21.0 (95% CI:6.5-68.3), far higher than

29 s with a good prognosis from patients with a bad prognosis.

30 higus or liver dysfunction correlated with a bad prognosis.

31 recurrence whereas approximately 75% with a bad score had disease recurrence.

32 ness cost per unit time of courtship than a "bad" male.

33 male is willing to court for longer than a "bad" male; in this way the duration of a male's courtshi

34 t what constitutes a "good" compared with a "bad" implant.

35 negative fitness payoff from mating with a "bad" male.

36 Non-native plants were always bad neighbours, but the negative effect of non-natives o

37 features and image structure is higher among bad than good exemplars.

38 nausea (20% compared with 4%; P = 0.02), and bad-taste reactions (80% compared with 30%; P < 0.001),

39 also the proapoptotic proteins bax-alpha and bad.

40 bclx(-/-) MEFs expressing BAD and bad(-/-) MEFs both arrested in G0/G1 in low serum simila

41 male AVPV also had higher levels of bax and bad mRNA, but neither of these genes was regulated by ei

42 s, nongenetic experiences and exposures, and bad luck.

43 Fear of poisoned water, bad food, and bad air may have been of evolutionary advantage to early

44 PJ showed a differentiation between good and bad actions 2 s before the response in rdlPFC.

45 re shown to markedly differ between good and bad assignments.

46 learn to differentiate between the good and bad decks of the Iowa Gambling Task, and that healthy pa

47 Outcomes were dichotomized into good and bad depending on the presence of recurrence or metastasi

48 ysis of the image statistics of our good and bad exemplars shows that variability in low-level featur

49 that can quantitatively distinguish good and bad folders.

50 survivors and between subjects with good and bad neurologic outcomes.

51 Intuitively, good and bad outcomes affect our emotional state, but whether the

52 onmental signals about the possible good and bad outcomes, and their probabilities, to select optimal

53 MT-3 staining between patients with good and bad outcomes.

54 tio of the demographic rates in the good and bad patches is given by a small parameter, denoted as ep

55 periodic landscapes of alternating good and bad patches, where the dispersal scale is greater than t

56 as been grabbing the headlines--for good and bad reasons--regularly for the past 15 years.

57 Summary tables conceal good and bad runs, and without risk adjustment they are difficult

58 l productivity and in the timing of good and bad years, which a purely random sample would likely hav

59 articipants evaluate morally laden (good and bad) everyday actions.

60 at, interpreting surprise findings (good and bad), and the overall quality of clinical trial reports.

61 r research to identify the effects, good and bad, caused by a high intake of folic acid from fortifie

62 The good- and bad-prognosis subgroups demonstrated differential tumor

63 robe was characterized by creating good- and bad-prognosis subgroups, on the basis of tumor enhanceme

64 HIV is evolution gone mad and bad.

65 rther, over time some markers are merged and bad samples are re-run under a different sample name.

66 ltimate consequences of misspelled names and bad taxonomy are erroneous scientific conclusions and fa

67 ysical conditions into good, fair, poor, and bad categories; gills and kidney tissues were then disse

68 es, strongly differentiating good, poor, and bad condition ranks.

69 so can result in severely biased results and bad clinical decisions.

70 e bcl-2 family (bax, bcl-x(L), bcl-x(S), and bad) was unaffected by estradiol treatment.

71 gestive and non-digestive GERD symptoms, and bad sleep quality.

72 gorise lamb steaks in good (i.e. tender) and bad (i.e. tough) based on WBSF values and sensory scores

73 ingle-stranded filaments were 15 nm wide and bad a mass per unit length of 62 kd/nm.

74 does not lead to lack of accountability and "bad" behavior in groups and crowds but rather causes gro

75 ivariate analysis suggested that "good" and "bad" aging from age 70-80 could be predicted by variable

76 ystem cannot distinguish between "good" and "bad" immune responses and thus drive general and systemi

77 wn about oxytocin, including its 'good' and 'bad' effects on human behavior and on higher-order funct

78 Why do we repeat choices that we know are bad for us?

79 mpounds of iron pnictide superconductors are bad metals with a collinear antiferromagnetic structure

80 tween unexpectedly low losses when times are bad versus unexpectedly high gains when times are good.

81 reminding women of the stereotype "women are bad at math" causes them to perform more poorly on math

82 -i.e., the "good" cytoplasms in females are "bad" in males--analogous to crossing reaction norms.

83 uggest that the reason why some neurons are "bad regenerators" is that they are already undergoing ap

84 to 4 (scored from 0 [not affected] to 6 [as bad as it could be]; minimal clinically important differ

85 s (based on a Likert scale, 0, normal; 6, as bad as it could be), visual analog symptom scales (0-100

86 ers use tobacco and alcohol as frequently as bad characters.

87 years had the same preference scores (ie, as bad) as the maximum risk of all adverse outcomes includi

88 good or very good while 29% described it as bad or very bad.

89 ts (insulitis) and diabetes were at least as bad in transgenic mice as in nontransgenic NOD mice, and

90 ch ranges from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("pain as bad as you can imagine") and for which a 1-point change

91 ndicating no pain and 10 indicating "pain as bad as you can imagine").

92 (range 0-10, where 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine).

93 nt rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine).

94 Residents reporting QOL "as bad as it can be" and emotional exhaustion symptoms dail

95 Quality of life was rated "as bad as it can be" or "somewhat bad" by 2402 of 16,187 re

96 representing no pain and 10 representing as bad as can be imagined.

97 Characters portrayed as "bad" were much more likely to die of an injury than othe

98 ers (bcl-w, bcl-2, bcl-xl, bcl-xs, bax, bak, bad).

99 Bcl-2 family (bcl-2, bcl-x, bcl-w, bax, bak, bad, bik, bnip3, bid, and bim).

100 d bax, but does not alter expression of bak, bad, bik, bid, or BNIP3.Abeta-induced downregulation of

101 48 h of POH treatment; p21(Cip1/WAF1), bax, bad, and annexin I were induced; cyclin E and cyclin-dep

102 Moreover, some tumors appear 'born to be bad', with subclone mixing indicative of early malignant

103 ger another such reorganization, it would be bad news for a world striving to feed 11 to 16 billion p

104 eurons that when axotomized are known to be "bad regenerators." Results in lampreys and mammals sugge

105 s most frequently, with common reasons being bad data format/bad connection and poor contact.

106 ted in which of two pictures a boy was being bad (Social condition) or which of two pictures was outd

107 te dissociation and subunit exchange between bad heterodimers.

108 , functional prions and why the line between bad and good amyloids might be more subtle than previous

109 The skills required to break bad news have been written about extensively and are tau

110 Breaking bad news is a balancing act that requires oncologists to

111 points of view of oncologists about breaking bad news to patients.

112 s can be used in situations such as breaking bad news, setting treatment goals, advance care planning

113 curriculum embraces CST modules in breaking bad news and discussing unanticipated adverse events, di

114 ch has been written on the topic of breaking bad news, the literature is in need of empirical work.

115 of successful training workshops on breaking bad news in a large British district hospital.

116 One explanation, motivated by the so-called bad metal behaviour of these materials proposes that mag

117 c questions about which aspects of conveying bad news are most beneficial.

118 These "good cop/bad cop" functions of p53 appear to place it at the nexu

119 We propose the ;good cop: bad cop' team of CSN-5 and KGB-1 imposes a balance on GL

120 s being less compassionate when they deliver bad news might be a contributor to physicians' reluctanc

121 y may adopt inappropriate ways of delivering bad news and coping with the emotional fall-out.

122 beliefs asymmetrically; we tend to discount bad news but embrace good news.

123 Humans show a natural tendency to discount bad news while incorporating good news into beliefs (the

124 ' recollections about what transpired during bad news interactions between physicians and themselves.

125 but the climate crisis requires that we face bad news head on.

126 nstruct statements even as simple as "I feel bad!" remain unclear.

127 ty and self-image concerns; individuals feel bad when they pay less than the "appropriate" price, cau

128 ctivities (e.g., play sports) when they felt bad, and to engage in useful but mood-decreasing activit

129 c adaptability of this fold for good and for bad.

130 activity was either equivalent or higher for bad than good scenes in these areas.

131 d criticism are the only viable remedies for bad science.

132 As a group, patients at risk for bad NAFLD outcomes had significantly worse liver injury

133 ac conditions that pose the highest risk for bad outcome should infective endocarditis occur and only

134 y, with common reasons being bad data format/bad connection and poor contact.

135 essive overtime at work, restricted freedom, bad living conditions, threats, or severe violence were

136 h the romantic problems seemed to arise from bad luck or poor choices.

137 Participants gave bad news to patients an average of 35 times per month.

138 estimates and Cox regression sometimes gives bad answers to good questions.

139 es spanning coil (good solvent) and globule (bad solvent) phases.

140 Death can be good, bad or indifferent for biodiversity.

141 Some patients (39%) had bad outcomes (permanent dialysis or early death).

142 the stories of individual women who had had bad experiences with the product.

143 n more than 2 SD below the control mean had "bad outcomes," defined as mechanical ventilation for >/=

144 s and the impact that the Genome Project has bad on their research.

145 ed MT-3 immunoreactivity in the group having bad outcomes.

146 ients from the emotional distress of hearing bad news.

147 les which positively judge a refusal to help bad people produce a poor correlation between reputation

148 The sensor is suitable for testing human bad breath and is at least 2 orders of magnitude more se

149 th defective synaptic development identified bad reception (brec).

150 ifferent responder groups can be identified: bad or nonresponders (approximately 15% of all patients)

151 5 of the 6 environments and at night and in bad weather compared with the control dyads.

152 prediction equally plausibly: individuals in bad circumstances should take greater risks in order to

153 art codons--following structured 5'-UTRs, in bad AUG context, within few nucleotides from 5'-end of m

154 ly improved people's tendency to incorporate bad news into their beliefs by disrupting the function o

155 s of chronic established epilepsy inevitably bad?

156 inflammation is indeed something inherently bad that needs to be dampened.

157 However, in the absence of insult, "bad neighbor" effects could also occur (i.e., where bein

158 For anthocyanin, generalization is bad for TB from 2013 but presents state-of-the-art absol

159 Avoiding what you know is bad is a major challenge for recovering addicts.

160 dictions - that is, believing p and not-p is bad.

161 tional medical wisdom states that smoking is bad for smokers' health.

162 that will allow the user to remove isolated bad data points, and reversibly test the effect of remov

163 , difference between the worst and the least bad losses).

164 Disgust-literally 'bad taste'-is another important emotion, with a distinct

165 ers with idiopathic epilepsy tend to be mad, bad, and commonly dangerous, whereas characters with pos

166 es that we propose, including the good-minus-bad coverage (GMB), the good-to-bad-ratio (RGB), the ave

167 primary outcomes were duration of moderately bad or worse cough (0 to 28 days; minimal clinically imp

168 solution at 48 hours, duration of moderately bad symptoms (based on a Likert scale, 0, normal; 6, as

169 ither duration of symptoms rated "moderately bad" or worse (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.96-1.18; p=0.

170 e was duration of symptoms rated "moderately bad" or worse.

171 t participants receiving efavirenz had more "bad dreams" during the first week of therapy (P = 0.038)

172 by luck (good), preconceived notions (mostly bad), and proper timing (essential).

173 or outcome (n = 11) with one false negative (bad outcome after borderline MRS result) and no false po

174 ating good news into beliefs (the "good news-bad news effect"), an effect that may help explain seemi

175 thereby eliminating the engrained "good news/bad news effect." Our results provide an instance of how

176 ilar to those in the trypsin complex with no bad contacts.

177 are energetically reasonable, i.e., with no bad van der Waals contacts, and which can be combined to

178 or selection in favor of the nonfunctional, "bad" stators.

179 imely prophylactic antibiotic measure is not bad care, there is little evidence to suggest that it is

180 people benefit from their good looks is not bad per se.

181 d the poor intrinsic regenerative ability of bad-regenerating neurons.

182 -oncologist encounter during the breaking of bad news, comprising essential aspects of the communicat

183 bate has concentrated on the contribution of bad luck to cancer development.

184 Cleaning raw datasets of bad data points (incorrect pedigree relationships, unrel

185 The delivery of bad news by oncologists to their patients is a key momen

186 bout withdrawing life support or delivery of bad news were likely to occur.

187 ses, defined as the increased expectation of bad outcomes [9-11].

188 However, a large fraction of bad heterodimers were regenerated and rebound to GroEL.

189 with down-regulation of bcl-xL, induction of bad, and the displacement of bax from bcl-xL:bax heterod

190 f bcl-xL and bax and absence of induction of bad.

191 alleles are more likely to segregate out of bad genetic backgrounds and onto good genetic background

192 oach increases the distress of recipients of bad news, may exert a lasting impact on their ability to

193 ion to the ongoing research into the role of bad luck in human tumorigenesis.

194 simulation we demonstrate that the timing of bad weather within a period of mortality can have an imp

195 his was accompanied by the transformation of bad heterodimers to their "good" or productive counterpa

196 ourse of 'anxious' and increased ratings of 'bad drug effects,' as compared with placebo.

197 for strict quality control and screening of 'bad' replicates, which can drastically affect the gene r

198 (53%), altered immunity (49%), and chance or bad luck (46%).

199 or withdrawing life support was discussed or bad news was delivered.

200 s the notion that chemicals might be good or bad depending on their use, arsenic must be it.

201 ticipants passively viewed blocks of good or bad exemplars from the same six categories.

202 Whether a piece of news is good or bad is critical in determining whether it will alter our

203 o stratify patients into groups with good or bad outcomes (P < .0005 for both analyses).

204 treated group of mesotheliomas into good or bad prognosis categories.

205 tified a separation of patients with good or bad prognosis in an independent GEP data set based on un

206 ganism interacts with the world, how good or bad things are at the moment, the value of the current s

207 cept, requires an estimation of how good (or bad) the likely outcomes will make us feel [1].

208 re were more possible paths (whether good or bad) in their own futures than their peers' futures.

209 tions or to identify gross outliers (good or bad) may be practicable in some patient-care systems, bu

210 ns were pragmatically or hedonically good or bad) of a wide variety of actions.

211 (rating whether actions were morally good or bad) or non-moral evaluations (rating whether actions we

212 likely outcomes of actions, whether good or bad.

213 -validated and categorized as either good or bad.

214 utcomes may be due to limited information or bad strategy.

215 ing in which good performance is rewarded or bad performance punished results in transient behavioral

216 y critical in determining whether "good" or "bad" stem cells are involved in local repair, and theref

217 determines whether the male is a "good" or "bad" type from the female's point of view, according to

218 ing a consensus of what is indeed "good" or "bad" vascular remodeling, concepts that have continued t

219 ulted in the generation of nonproductive or "bad" heterodimers, which were unable to undergo spontane

220 communication that physicians use in other "bad news" situations.

221 ality metrics to the CNV calls to filter out bad ones, as well as to statistically genotype the disco

222 gn is to set cutoff thresholds to filter out bad quality probes.

223 to physiological ("good") and pathological ("bad") vascular remodeling.

224 The first set permits bad data points to be flagged with respect to a number o

225 and downregulation of bcl-2, phosphorylated bad, bcl-XL, phosphorylated Akt, phosphorylated IKB, pho

226 powerfully good moral effects and powerfully bad moral effects, but these are due to aspects of relig

227 determine significant factors for predicting bad outcomes.

228 ave taken place to address these preventable bad outcomes.

229 e of the disease and thus help in preventing bad outcomes from disease progression or unnecessary tre

230 the expression of the proapoptotic protein, bad, in the context of impaired akt2 expression results

231 the "good old days" (they were really quite bad), young physicians who hope to become clinical inves

232 the original finding was spurious-reflecting bad luck for researchers rather than a shortcoming of Am

233 Complex karyotypes and relatively bad chromosome morphology are typical of transformed non

234 and the other discrepant group that reported bad vision but had a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (o

235 ty was less common in participants reporting bad or very bad health than in those reporting very good

236 d was significantly lower in those reporting bad or very bad health than in those reporting very good

237 , increasing to about 60% in those reporting bad or very bad health.

238 the research on the impact that giving sad, bad, and difficult news has on doctors and patients, and

239 , unreliable marker assays, suspect samples, bad genotype results etc.) requires expert exploration o

240 Our results suggest that simple bad luck-inhabiting a home range with high vector densit

241 was rated "as bad as it can be" or "somewhat bad" by 2402 of 16,187 responding residents (14.8%).

242 In every medical specialty bad, sad, and difficult information must be given to pat

243 approximately 120 K from a high-temperature 'bad metal' conducting phase to a low-temperature insulat

244 howed higher decoding accuracy for good than bad exemplars in the PPA, RSC and V1.

245 ccurate and faster at categorizing good than bad exemplars of natural scenes.

246 uld categorize "good" exemplars better than "bad" exemplars of six scene categories and then explored

247 Patients reported that bad taste, receiving the local anesthetic, and excessive

248 cancer risk of the same tissue suggests that bad luck has an important role to play in tumor developm

249 The bad-regenerating neurons also undergo a delayed form of

250 s effects may work for both the good and the bad of an organism.

251 at the physician did while communicating the bad news.

252 ate that our approach is able to counter the bad effects of labelling errors in terms of predictive p

253 ting molecules necessary for eliminating the bad attachments and by regulating the turnover of the ki

254 ly disentangle the potentially good from the bad influences of inflammatory cells during tissue repai

255 challenge traditional views of the good, the bad, and the ugly of opioids.

256 This review summarizes "the good, the bad, and the ugly" of current and evolving knowledge reg

257 receptors were expressed selectively in the bad-regenerating neurons and had overlapping cellular di

258 Because of the bad prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma and the sizeable mor

259 Growth of the bad-1 null yeast was inhibited by 5 mm EGTA, and re-expr

260 It is suggested that the bad news process can be understood from the transactiona

261 Satisfaction with the bad news transaction was high.

262 low density lipoprotein, also known as the "bad cholesterol" that is directly implicated in atherosc

263 e same molecule exerts adverse effects (the "bad" effects), favouring cancer cell proliferation.

264 protein, which is the precursor to LDL (the "bad cholesterol").

265 ened mindset is seen as having replaced the "bad old days" of physicians behaving immorally.

266 ood' partner and did so only weakly for the 'bad' partner, suggesting that prior social and moral per

267 purity are predicted to operate deep in the 'bad-cavity', or superradiant, regime, where the bare ato

268 health debate with the dissemination of the 'bad luck' hypothesis.

269 ples of "functional amyloid" challenges this bad reputation and indicates that many organisms can emp

270 Are there "good" helminths in addition to bad?

271 tumor masses and are strictly correlated to bad prognosis, yet their role in lung cancer is controve

272 ficial and (b) introduction of errors due to bad estimates of attenuation correction factors resultin

273 Some of the problems are traceable to bad habits carried over from older studies of translatio

274 The majority is due to "bad luck," that is, random mutations arising during DNA

275 alence of a food is switched from "good" to "bad" as occurs during conditioned taste aversion.

276 e good-minus-bad coverage (GMB), the good-to-bad-ratio (RGB), the average Z-score (AZ) and the averag

277 e world agricultural system has not done too bad a job over the past 35 years.

278 ptions (win/win decisions) compared with two bad options (lose/lose decisions), whereas negative lear

279 btained through the MEDLINE database, using "bad news" as the primary descriptor and limiting the sou

280 On a scale from 0 (a very bad death) to 9 (a very good death), the median score fo

281 ns for a pair of structural isomers are very bad.

282 icantly lower in those reporting bad or very bad health than in those reporting very good health (men

283 common in participants reporting bad or very bad health than in those reporting very good health (men

284 to about 60% in those reporting bad or very bad health.

285 an be very good-your mother's baking-or very bad-your father's cooking.

286 y good while 29% described it as bad or very bad.

287 Patients of all ages with very-bad-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and/or FLT3-ITD (inte

288 Fear of poisoned water, bad food, and bad air may have been of evolutionary adva

289 its transcytosis out of the brain, whereas "bad" receptors bind oligomeric forms of Abeta that are l

290 chromosome 17 gain and its association with bad prognostic factors suggest an important role for thi

291 with good or neutral characters dueling with bad characters (ie, using violence as a means of reachin

292 -7], learned avoidances of odors paired with bad-tasting toxins are mediated by dopamine.

293 was significantly increased in patients with bad outcomes compared to those with good outcomes.

294 to them, associating the warning sounds with bad taste.

295 All articles dealing specifically with bad news were examined.

296 vity, resulting in behavior consistent with "bad metal" phenomenology.

297 asible using 16-frame gated MPS even without bad-beat rejection, resulting in normal limits similar t

298 wear, possibly due to the fact that <2% wore bad shoe types, making it difficult to see any relations

299 14 having recurring disease within 5 years (bad outcome).