ライフサイエンスコーパス: banding

1 ariatric surgery (gastric bypass and gastric banding).

2 en underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding).

3 and 2008 for patients who had prior gastric banding.

4 strectomy and 1 following adjustable gastric banding.

5 ls that had undergone exercise before aortic-banding.

6 blished cardiac dysfunction caused by aortic-banding.

7 sually correlated with recognized chromosome banding.

8 d enhances myofibrillogenesis and sarcomeric banding.

9 ene expression is determined before afferent banding.

10 hemodynamics were measured at 4-months post-banding.

11 on rate than laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

12 ore than doubled within 30 mins after aortic banding.

13 se hearts at 7, 14, and 21 days after aortic banding.

14 Newborn rabbits underwent aortic banding.

15 ular remodeling induced by transverse aortic banding.

16 te atrial pressure overload caused by aortic banding.

17 s observed at 3 wk but not at 1 wk after the banding.

18 - and total SGK1 increased 2 to 7 days after banding.

19 ter 3 months of progressive pulmonary artery banding.

20 nderwent upper endoscopy 10 to 14 days after banding.

21 nts losing equivalent weight through gastric banding.

22 >35% of animals died within 7 days of aortic banding.

23 have performed nonsurgical pulmonary artery banding.

24 ad undergone laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

25 ly in both groups at 1 and 3 wk after aortic banding.

26 in Yorkshire swine by partial pulmonary vein banding.

27 s, sleeve gastrectomy, or adjustable gastric banding.

28 have a surgical procedure other than gastric banding.

29 ongside mechanisms such as kinking and shear banding.

30 basis of morphology and reverse DAPI (rDAPI) banding.

31 ng II stimulation, as well as chronic aortic banding.

32 strectomy have a greater effect than gastric banding.

33 ocedures following failed adjustable gastric banding.

34 ocedures following failed adjustable gastric banding.

35 similar plastic morphology governed by shear banding.

36 tricular hypertrophy (LVH) induced by aortic banding.

37 elected for unbalanced 1q12 aberrations by G-banding.

38 3 breakpoints not previously identified by G-banding, 10 breakpoints that were underrepresented by G-

39 y patients underwent gastric bypass (13.2%), banding (18.7%), or vertical banded gastroplasty (68.1%)

40 ts in the bariatric-surgery cohort underwent banding (19%), vertical banded gastroplasty (69%), or ga

41 23.8+/-6.9 years) had prior pulmonary artery banding (2-stage ASO).

42 reater initial weight reduction than gastric banding (2.77 kg/mo).

43 anolol was significantly higher than that of banding (6/31 vs. 0/31; difference, 19.4%; P = .0098; 95

44 7%-54.2%) for patients who underwent gastric banding; 61.6% (56.7%-66.5%), gastric bypass; 68.2% (61.

45 With endoscopic banding, a ligator is attached to an endoscope and a tig

46 fically in the heart are resistant to aortic banding (AB)-induced cardiac hypertrophy, whereas mice l

47 sion was induced in rats by abdominal aortic banding (Ab).

48 sted RR, 16.6; 95% CI, 4.7-58.4) and gastric banding (adjusted RR, 6.9; 95% CI, 3.1-15.2).

49 s (RYGB) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (AGB) are 2 of the most commonly performed baria

50 gastric bypass (RYGB) or adjustable gastric banding (AGB) in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and En

51 study was to analyze the adjustable gastric banding (AGB) natural history on a national basis.

52 erans who underwent RYGB, adjustable gastric banding (AGB), or sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

53 ody weight (BW) more than adjustable gastric banding (AGB), which does not trigger increased GLP-1 se

54 Myocardial infarction and thoracic aortic banding amplified the NEC pool, increasing fibroblast di

55 detected all abnormalities as reported by G-banding analysis and revealed new abnormalities in 4/41

56 High-resolution banding analysis showed a wide but nonuniform distributi

57 is and assessment of karyotype by chromosome banding analysis.

58 d as a rescue procedure after failed gastric banding and (2) study trends in the frequency of reopera

59 frequency of reoperations related to gastric banding and associated short-term outcomes are unknown.

60 es an animal model for nonadjustable gastric banding and characterizes the effect of gastric banding

61 by describing the competition between shear banding and diffusive relaxation processes, and is remin

62 n of rhythmic features such as compositional banding and foliation in rocks that are reacting or diss

63 ictive procedures such as adjustable gastric banding and gastroplasty were excluded.

64 s, including laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

65 Using gel banding and retardation as a read-out for protein adsorp

66 lays various patterns, including nodulation, banding and scallops and fingers.

67 documented benefit for combination therapy (banding and sclerotherapy).

68 Weight banding and size correction methods for normalizing dose

69 ere, chronic (2 years) LVH induced by aortic banding and then were compared with controls.

70 olecular karyotype arrays, Giemsa banding (G-banding) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) ex

71 % sleeve gastrectomy, 10% adjustable gastric banding, and 1% other.

72 breakpoints that were underrepresented by G-banding, and 4 previously unrecognized translocations: d

73 -Y bypass, 62% (95% CI, 46-79) after gastric banding, and 60% (95% CI, 51-70) after sleeve gastrectom

74 s, 13% underwent gastric bypass, 19% gastric banding, and 68% vertical-banded gastroplasty.

75 Mice were subjected to aortic banding, and A20 expression was examined.

76 paroscopic), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, and biliopancreatic diversion (with or without

77 Rats were subjected to aortic banding, and expression of total and phosphorylated SGK1

78 istone H3 dimethylated at lysine 4 and for C-banding, and forms huge condensed middle chromosome regi

79 alve repair or replacement, pulmonary artery banding, and implantation of an assist device into the s

80 tric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

81 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, and most recently sleeve gastrectomy for both s

82 oughly 4-fold in WT at both 1 and 3 wk after banding, and significantly less, P < 0.05, in AC5-/-.

83 c bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, and their effects on weight loss, comorbidities

84 nhanced cardiac hypertrophy following aortic banding, Ang II infusion, isoproterenol infusion, or phe

85 This is an extension of the temporal banding approach including a Temporal Error Score that f

86 The use of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding approached one-third (32.1%) of all procedures b

87 median time, 24 days) and 27 patients in the banding arm (median time, 24 days).

88 y distributed, without apparent gradients or banding arrangements.

89 Although laparoscopic gastric banding as a primary treatment of morbid obesity has bee

90 after gastric bypass and 1.9% after gastric banding at latest follow-up (P < 0.001 for both groups).

91 ped gradually over 1 to 2 years after aortic banding, baseline LV function was well compensated.

92 Second, we analysed effects of aortic banding because NCX1 currents do not mirror the increase

93 izens who received gastric bypass or gastric banding between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2012,

94 ere prepared, showing the reproducibility of banding between sister chromatids, homologue pairs and f

95 xaggerated hypertrophy in response to aortic banding (BS alphaMHC403/+ LVAW=1.30+/-0.13 mm; BS wild-t

96 Thoracic aortic banding caused greater increases in myocardial oxidative

97 These findings suggest that gastric banding causes esophageal outlet obstruction and subsequ

98 When subjected to the new protocol, banding characteristic of L. purpureus were detected whi

99 1.5-fold; P<0.05) was detected 3 hours after banding, coinciding with peak NF-kappaB activation.

100 logical cardiac hypertrophy following aortic banding, confirming and extending our previous data that

101 After mechanical overload obtained by aortic banding constriction, the Ca(2+) transient was prolonged

102 tic abnormalities, identified by classical G-banding, correlate with prognosis.

103 iety of different mechanisms including shear banding, crack formation and delamination.

104 racterized as causing increased (conotruncal banding, CTB) or reduced (left atrial ligation, LAL) hem

105 increasing the spatial frequency of axial OS banding decreases OS rigidity, reducing its fragility.

106 nt primary prophylaxis (sclerotherapy and/or banding, depending on age and weight).

107 We show that visual banding develops at a given stress and host-rock permeab

108 of the couples were almost identical, minor banding differences existed between the source and susce

109 Rats with POH (ascending aortic banding) evolved into either compensated-concentric POH

110 subjected to oxidative stress by transaortic banding exhibited exaggerated cardiac hypertrophy and su

111 elasticity theory, representing the axial OS banding explicitly via a spring-bead model.

112 Using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and spectra

113 form higher order structures, and mimics the banding found in natural collagen fibers.

114 to their widespread distribution and regular banding frequency.

115 ion fraction (LVEF) fell in WT at 3 wk after banding (from 70 +/- 2.8 to 57 +/- 3.9%, P < 0.05), and

116 se include a series of ranges known as Texas banding (from the Texas Risk Reduction Program) as well

117 esolution molecular karyotype arrays, Giemsa banding (G-banding) and fluorescent in situ hybridizatio

118 ty, 13 to RY gastric bypass; 71 gastroplasty/banding (GP/B): all revised to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

119 cantly higher in the propranolol than in the banding group (4/31 vs. 0/31; difference, 12.9%; P = .04

120 ry procedure after failed adjustable gastric banding (group 2).

121 Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has been demonstrated to permit important weight

122 It is likely that migratory banding has evolved because it gives substantial protect

123 cadianly regulated spore formation (conidial banding), has remained an integral tool in the study of

124 m mice that have undergone transverse aortic banding have increased MDM2 levels associated with decre

125 astric bypass procedure after failed gastric banding have more adverse outcomes than those undergoing

126 ve operations, especially adjustable gastric banding, have a lower risk but are somewhat less effecti

127 Manometric measures were equivalent prior to banding in all groups.

128 tered buoyant density and can be purified by banding in cesium chloride (CsCl) gradients.

129 Density banding in coral skeletons provides a record of growth o

130 ng different methods: cytological chromosome banding in human cells and DNA isotopic-labeling techniq

131 Most secreted RNA was noninfectious, banding in isopycnic gradients at a density of 1.04-1.07

132 te that fibroblast accumulation after aortic banding in murine hearts arises almost exclusively from

133 no changes in motility or lipopolysaccharide banding in the mutants, implying a role that is limited

134 Aortic-banding in untrained non-Tg controls led to pathological

135 of GRK5 is enhanced in myocytes after aortic banding in vivo and in vitro in myocytes after increased

136 in recurrence was due to the need for repeat bandings in the RBL group.

137 ressure overload, induced by thoracic aortic banding, in mice in which type 5 AC, a major cardiac AC

138 ations after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding include stomal stenosis, malpositioned bands, po

139 fibre remains displaying approximately 67 nm banding, indicating the possible preservation of the ori

140 Compared with WT mice, aortic banding induced a similar degree of cardiac hypertrophy

141 Pressure overload induced by aortic banding induced heart failure and greatly increased card

142 In a model of aortic banding-induced chronic pressure overload, heart functio

143 ia or Monocrotaline) versus pulmonary artery banding-induced RVH (PAB-RVH).

144 atomistic simulations demonstrate that shear banding instability no longer afflicts the 5- to 10-nm-t

145 and 171) exhibited reduced and more diffuse banding intensity and slightly upshifted mobility (HBc 1

146 in N. dutertrei and suggest that diurnal Mg-banding is an intrinsic component of biomineralization i

147 The observed banding is consistent with tandem coassembly of alternat

148 However, routine chromosome banding is not sensitive enough to detect subtle chromos

149 The number of reoperations after gastric banding is rapidly increasing in the United States.

150 Strain localization (shear banding) is observed on the boundaries of the flows at i

151 kg/m(2)) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) (n = 10, BMI 46.5 +/- 8.8 kg/m(2)).

152 ss (RYGB) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are not well described.

153 The enthusiasm for laparoscopic adjustable banding (LAGB) has been tempered by high reoperation rat

154 s induced by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surger

155 t studies of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) reported data on 352 patients (mean BMI 4

156 pass (RYGB), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), and an intensive lifestyle weight loss i

157 ss (RYGB) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), we assessed percent weight change from b

158 re and after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).

159 ho underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).

160 ss [RYGB] or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding [LAGB]) followed by low-level lifestyle interven

161 set, in which all patients were treated with banding ligation, MELD predictions were accurate up to t

162 Patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric banding lost less weight (change in BMI, 6.4 +/- 0.7) th

163 rwent the same stress using pulmonary artery banding (Low-PAB).

164 Further modifications to the carbon banding may be made as requested for risk assessment.

165 compared our method with the other temporal banding method.

166 Classical banding methods provide basic information about the iden

167 equences not identifiable using conventional banding methods.

168 DAC inhibitors in a physiologically relevant banding model of hypertrophy, observing dose-responsive

169 ional RV hypertrophy in the pulmonary artery banding model showed normal expression of peroxisome pro

170 In the aortic banding model, the sensitivity of systolic Ca(2+) to LCC

171 ax avenae subsp. citrulli (Aac), chilli vein-banding mottle virus (CVbMV, potyvirus), watermelon silv

172 2 most common procedures, adjustable gastric banding (n = 109) and gastric bypass (n = 109), were com

173 Adjustable or nonadjustable banding (n = 61), vertical banded gastroplasty (n = 227)

174 Procedures included laparoscopic gastric banding (n=1053), gastric bypass (795), and sleeve gastr

175 (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, n = 162; gastric banding, n = 32; sleeve gastrectomy, n = 23), a mean exc

176 ric surgery (laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding; n = 30).

177 ssive RV pressure overload (pulmonary artery banding, not associated with structural alterations of t

178 Animals then underwent thoracotomy and banding of ascending aorta producing left ventricular fa

179 By performing pulmonary artery banding of different diameters for 7 weeks, mild RV dysf

180 tains a ciliary root with a pronounced cross-banding of electron-dense material that should be import

181 a periodicity consistent with the D-periodic banding of higher-order fibers assemblies.

182 Banding of metaphase spreads of these mutants, and of a

183 In contrast, under elevated CO2 no banding of Mg is recognisable and overall Mg concentrati

184 Transverse aortic banding of mice with or without an Arg403Gln cardiac myo

185 Banding of the DLQI will aid the clinical interpretation

186 levels and blunts cardiac hypertrophy after banding of the thoracic aorta.

187 ding and characterizes the effect of gastric banding on esophageal physiology.

188 with alternating dark and light "tiger tail" banding on polarized light microscopy.

189 wined fiber morphologies, each with periodic banding on the nanometer scale.

190 nd two were stable after esophageal variceal banding or diuretic therapy of ascites.

191 with those who underwent adjustable gastric banding (OR, 8.37 [95% CI, 7.44-9.43]; OR, 21.43 [95% CI

192 2(-/-) mice to a pathological stress (aortic banding) or a physiological stress (exercise training).

193 diabetic patients undergoing either bypass, banding, or very low calorie diet were followed up for 4

194 oss, 72% (16/22) of bypass and 17% (2/12) of banding patients (P = 0.001) fulfilled the definition of

195 Significantly more propranolol than banding patients had esophageal variceal hemorrhage (4/3

196 ix hemorrhage, and cumulative mortality than banding patients.

197 analysis of EBV terminal repeats revealed a banding pattern consistent with the integration of het D

198 The protocol yielded a distinct triple-banding pattern for L. purpureus, whereas L. synagris an

199 The banding pattern is characterized by an axially repeating

200 C-terminal Panx2 truncation mutant showed a banding pattern more consistent with an octamer.

201 L. synagris and O. chrysurus showed a double banding pattern of different sizes, thereby allowing dif

202 te status, which is defined as an incomplete banding pattern of HTLV protein Gag (p19 or p24) or Env

203 as generated by allelic replacement, and the banding pattern of O-PS was observed by immunoblot analy

204 Furthermore, the protein banding pattern of PrP-res in these cells changed over t

205 or generating the characteristic 6-nt ladder banding pattern of telomeric DNA products in vitro.

206 An unexpected upshift banding pattern of the SDS-treated full-length particles

207 at their light coloration stems from a novel banding pattern on individual hairs produced by an incre

208 itudinal cell walls and was distributed in a banding pattern perpendicular to the longitudinal axis v

209 s resulting in an alternating dark and light banding pattern provide a tool by which abnormalities in

210 Expression of EAAT4 follows a parasagittal banding pattern that allows us to compare regions of hig

211 smooth mini-fibrils with the cross-striated banding pattern typical of fibrillar collagens.

212 The same banding pattern was observed using Ca2+ imaging.

213 nternal transcribed spacer) and protein band banding pattern were most similar to a subset of B. baci

214 These fibrils are characterized by a banding pattern with a D-period of 67 nm.

215 nonclassic protease-resistant prion protein banding pattern, with a prominent approximately 8-kDa pr

216 lypeptides corresponding to 14+15 and type 2 banding pattern.

217 e level, we detect no difference between the banding patterns along chromosomes from primary lymphocy

218 ased typing techniques that generate complex banding patterns and lack uniform interpretation criteri

219 ential predictive relationships between PFGE banding patterns and particular serotypes.

220 Chromosome banding patterns are correlated with unique patterns of

221 rom the same patient exhibited identical LPS banding patterns by silver staining and indistinguishabl

222 In the periphery, the banding patterns for both proteins were shorter, whereas

223 However, only the banding patterns from the ERIC primers and BOX primers w

224 ally assessed by direct visualization of the banding patterns from whole-cell lysates on SDS-PAGE gel

225 Genetically, the isolates differed in the banding patterns generated from amplified fragment lengt

226 Banding patterns generated with ERIC primers, REP primer

227 rategy for band mapping that uses background banding patterns to facilitate lane calling and size cal

228 Banding patterns were analyzed both visually and with Bi

229 Four different genomic banding patterns were identified by Rep-PCR.

230 Five RS-PCR banding patterns were identified.

231 Although the retrotransposon banding patterns were unstable after prolonged incubatio

232 ted to ELISA, essentially identical SDS-PAGE banding patterns, and similar cellulase specific activit

233 infection revealed distinctly different msp2 banding patterns, in contrast to a pattern suggesting id

234 wn USA types into 11 clusters and six unique banding patterns.

235 of chromosomes on the basis of their unique banding patterns.

236 and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) banding patterns.

237 distinctly identified by unique ladder-like banding patterns.

238 istent and clearly defined immunofluorescent banding patterns.

239 re calculated to predict electrophoretic gel banding patterns.

240 i) variable ligand-stabilized trypsin digest banding patterns; and (iii) differential transcriptional

241 d from different individuals showed distinct banding patterns; only samples obtained from the same pa

242 the benA amplicon with BccI generated unique banding patterns; the results were validated by screenin

243 d to reducing resting pulse by > or =25%) or banding (performed monthly until varices were eradicated

244 d prebanding, at 2-week intervals during the banding period (up to 14 weeks), and 2 and 4 weeks after

245 iseus having larger centromeres with large C-banding positive regions.

246 is drastically reduced following the aortic banding procedure; however the cells are able to compens

247 rils with a PrP(res)-like protease-resistant banding profile.

248 onic pathway densities in compensated aortic banding rats maintain Ca(2+) function and efficiency.

249 Banding remains the therapy of choice for this group of

250 Adjustable gastric banding represented the most common bariatric procedure

251 , 0.12-11.49) for gastric bypass and gastric banding, respectively.

252 atients receiving gastric bypass and gastric banding, respectively.

253 I, 0.08-3.56) for gastric bypass and gastric banding, respectively.

254 I, 0.40-3.75) for gastric bypass and gastric banding, respectively.

255 ure-overload in the ventricle by conotruncal banding results in a significant expansion of endocardia

256 Nonadjustable gastric banding results in impaired esophageal body motility, a

257 frq-null strains under conditions in which a banding rhythm was elicited.

258 gery, stratified by type of surgery (gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, o

259 Moreover, pulmonary artery banding-RV tissue exhibited preserved transcription fact

260 The broad indication for gastric banding should be reaffirmed for the US population.

261 as well as HBc 167, exhibited no detectable banding signal, indicating loss of capsid integrity or s

262 Surgical management (gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, and Roux-en Y gastric bypas

263 bariatric surgery models, including gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (R

264 r 10-20 mum in length, with a quantifiable D-banding spacing variation of 0.2%.

265 PG) from aqueous solutions to form nanosized banding structures whose sizes can be systematically tun

266 The gastric banding subset was composed of 800 (74.7%) women and 271

267 reason for revision with adjustable gastric banding surgery.

268 murine hearts subjected to transverse aorta banding surgery.

269 With chronic pulmonary artery banding, systolic RV pressure increased from 34+/-7 to 7

270 Accordingly, transverse aortic banding (TAC) was performed in mice to determine the eff

271 e's efficiency is the development of a novel banding technique for multiple RNA alignment.

272 , upon exposure to pressure overload (aortic banding), TG hearts developed more eccentric remodeling,

273 .5-folds within 14 days of transverse aortic banding that induced cardiac hypertrophy in adult mouse

274 a group of snake species with variable black banding, the genera Sonora, Chilomeniscus, and Chionacti

275 During banding, there was a 36% decrease in baseline mean resti

276 r when young animals are subjected to aortic banding, they develop an unexpected phenotype of progres

277 from 49% for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to 76% for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

278 ductal stent and bilateral pulmonary artery banding to a 2-mm diameter.

279 The use of gastric banding to treat obesity has increased drastically in th

280 lowed by 1 week of pressure overload (aortic-banding) to induce pathological remodeling.

281 es to confine any initial deformation (shear banding) to the glassy regions separating dendrite arms

282 c bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding-to treat T2DM in severely obese patients.

283 After 4 weeks of aortic banding (transverse aortic constriction (TAC)), increase

284 ilk from mammary glands infected with RS-PCR banding type 1 (RSP type 1) than in milk from those infe

285 h frequency for the colour (pink/yellow) and banding (unbanded/banded) loci has been examined for a l

286 Shear banding was initiated with both microcompression and nan

287 sis and psoriatic arthritis, whereas gastric banding was not.

288 pertrophy (PoH) produced by ascending aortic banding, we correlated mechanical and structural changes

289 ary atresia or stenosis and pulmonary artery banding were associated with decreased mortality.

290 undergoing either gastric bypass or gastric banding were followed up for 36 months.

291 tient radiation doses normalized with weight banding were not significantly different from those that

292 l sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding were performed in 66%, 28%, and 6% of patients,

293 not amenable to endoscopic sclerotherapy or banding were prospectively randomized to undergo TIPS or

294 samples, which were previously analyzed by G-banding, were tested using CGH arrays to determine not o

295 ion remained stable until 7 to 8 weeks after banding, when there was significant deterioration (fract

296 Combining bilateral pulmonary artery banding with arterial duct stenting, the hybrid approach

297 rocedure combining surgical pulmonary artery banding with catheterization stenting of the ductus arte

298 Our purpose was to compare endoscopic banding with propranolol for prevention of first varicea

299 calcium loading and myofibrillar contraction banding, with tolerance improved by K(ATP) channel opene

300 eatment for diabetes than adjustable gastric banding within 6 to 12 months.