ライフサイエンスコーパス: barn owl

1 This is consistent with observations in the barn owl.

2 of an ITD map in the laminar nucleus of the barn owl.

3 that map high best frequencies in the adult barn owl.

4 the auditory nuclei of the brainstem of the barn owl.

5 of auditory space in the optic tectum of the barn owl.

6 the process of auditory localization in the barn owl.

7 T, superior colliculus in mammals), in awake barn owls.

8 ditory neurons responses recorded in vivo in barn owls.

9 issue was studied in the auditory system of barn owls.

10 idence detectors in the nucleus laminaris of barn owls.

11 inferior colliculus of adult male and female barn owls.

12 grated in the study of sound localization in barn owls.

13 bnormal experience in adult than in juvenile barn owls.

14 t-based saliency in the optic tectum (OT) of barn owls.

15 system that underlies sound localization in barn owls.

16 idbrain auditory localization pathway of the barn owl, a map of auditory space is relayed from the ex

17 l appears to be realized in the brain of the barn owl, an auditory specialist, and has been assumed t

18 The barn owl, an auditory specialist, is a classic model for

19 llels between the attentional systems of the barn owl and the rhesus macaque.

20 In both barn owls and chickens, Kv3.1 mRNA was expressed in the

21 of a sound source, may be very different to barn owls and to the model proposed by Jeffress.

22 nsisting exclusively of owls: the Tytonidae (barn owls) and the Strigidae (true owls), united by a su

23 ry and visual maps of space in the OT of the barn owl, and they lead to a number of experimental pred

24 Barn owls are capable of great accuracy in detecting the

25 When barn owls are raised wearing spectacles that horizontall

26 We found that, in barn owls, at each location there is a frequency range w

27 firmed these predictions using EFPs from the barn owl auditory brainstem where we recorded in nucleus

28 pproaches in the mammalian neocortex and the barn owl auditory localization pathway provide some of t

29 Here, we exploit a unique feature of the barn owl auditory localization pathway that permits retr

30 In the barn owl, both ITD detection and processing in the midbr

31 llularis (Ipc) from the optic tectum (OT) in barn owls by reversibly blocking excitatory transmission

32 he findings give rise to the hypothesis that barn owls, by active scanning of the scene, can induce a

33 Barn owls can localize a sound source using either the m

34 The optic tectum of the barn owl contains a map of auditory space.

35 al nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the barn owl contains an auditory map of space that is based

36 The optic tectum (OT) of barn owls contains topographic maps of auditory and visu

37 ntified sensitive periods for the developing barn owl during which visual experience has a powerful i

38 In barn owls, early experience markedly influences sound lo

39 of the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl has shed new light on this important question.

40 Barn owls hunt in the dark by using cues from both sight

41 ere we demonstrate that the brainstem of the barn owl includes a stage of processing apparently devot

42 atural and critically important behavior for barn owls, increases auditory map plasticity in adult ow

43 Behavioral studies in barn owls indicate that both the optic tectum (OT) and t

44 leus of the inferior colliculus (ICX) of the barn owl is calibrated by visual experience during devel

45 nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICX) of barn owls is highly plastic, especially during early lif

46 The barn owl midbrain contains mutually aligned maps of audi

47 vation of a single inhibitory circuit in the barn owl midbrain tegmentum, the nucleus isthmi pars mag

48 tual acuity in the auditory space map in the barn owl midbrain.

49 vents that lead to the reorganization of the barn owl NL take place during embryonic development, sho

50 NM axons and terminals in the region of the barn owl NL.

51 noreactivity along the tonotopic axis of the barn owl NM and NL and a less prominent gradient in the

52 Barn owls not only localize auditory stimuli with great

53 ope coding in the two cochlear nuclei of the barn owl, nucleus angularis (NA) and nucleus magnocellul

54 calibration of the auditory space map in the barn owl optic tectum.

55 omplemented by simulations of aspects of the barn owl phenotype and of the experimental environment.

56 Barn owls reared with horizontally displacing prismatic

57 o gaze control circuitry in the forebrain of barn owls regulates the gain of midbrain auditory respon

58 his process in the auditory space map of the barn owl's (Tyto alba) inferior colliculus using two spa

59 ure tone and noise stimuli in neurons of the barn owl's auditory arcopallium, a nucleus at the endpoi

60 The barn owl's head grows after hatching, causing interaural

61 Space-specific neurons in the barn owl's inferior colliculus have spatial receptive fi

62 lays to explain the detection of ITDs by the barn owl's laminaris neurons.

63 The barn owl's optic tectum contains a map of auditory space

64 he auditory spatial tuning of neurons in the barn owl's optic tectum in a frequency-dependent manner.

65 e that neurons in the retinotopic map of the barn owl's optic tectum specifically adapt to the common

66 In this study, we used the barn owl's sound localization system to address this que

67 In the barn owl, spatial auditory information is conveyed to th

68 s and auditory nerve fiber responses for the barn owl strengthens the notion that most OAE delay can

69 y responses by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl suggests that the central nervous system uses a

70 Here, we demonstrate that OT neurons in the barn owl systematically encode the relative strengths of

71 In the barn owl, tectal neurons reveal these associations in th

72 correlation analysis, we demonstrate in the barn owl that the relationship between the spectral tuni

73 eraural time differences (ITDs), in juvenile barn owls that experience chronic abnormal hearing.

74 We tested in barn owls the hypothesis that an ongoing delay, equivale

75 We found that, in the barn owl, the Ipc responds to auditory as well as to vis

76 In the barn owl, the ITD is processed in a dedicated neural pat

77 or responses and a demonstration that in the barn owl, the result is that expected by theory.

78 re ILD is detected in the auditory system of barn owls, the posterior part of the lateral lemniscus (

79 In barn owls, the visual system is important in teaching th

80 n of spatial working memory and that, in the barn owl, this region encodes auditory spatial memory.

81 In barn owls, this process takes place in the external nucl

82 uronal responses within the space map of the barn owl to sounds presented with this same paradigm.

83 Here we show that the ability of barn owls to orient their gaze towards and fly to the re

84 nd compare these results with those from the barn owl (Tyto alba) and the domestic chick (Gallus gall

85 aps of auditory space in the midbrain of the barn owl (Tyto alba) are calibrated by visual experience

86 receptive fields in the optic tectum of the barn owl (Tyto alba) is maintained through experience-de

87 The barn owl (Tyto alba) uses interaural time difference (IT

88 The cochlear nucleus angularis (NA) of the barn owl (Tyto alba) was analyzed using Golgi, Nissl, an

89 In the barn owl (Tyto alba), the external nucleus of the inferi

90 The present work shows that barn owls (Tyto alba) experience phase-ambiguity in the

91 y (SFOAE) otoacoustic emissions from a bird (barn owl, Tyto alba) and a lizard (green anole, Anolis c

92 In the optic tectum (OT) of the barn owl, visual and auditory maps of space are found in

93 Using gerbils and trained barn owls, we conducted the first (to our knowledge) fie

94 Raising young barn owls with a prismatic displacement of the visual fi