戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 d scavenging (rainout) coefficient in Taiwan are calculated as 0.20 +/- 0.07 cm/s and 6.5 +/- 0.2 x 1
2  peanut protein Ara h 1 and its antibody can be calculated as 0.52 nM from the variation in different
3 ltammetry (DPV) whose lowest detection limit was calculated as 0.001ngmL(-1).
4 The detection limit of the prepared material was calculated as 0.030 nM.
5 e accumulated by the fruits during this time was calculated as 0.07 kGy; this is the maximal reported
6 ty, and the limit of detection toward biotin was calculated as 0.102 ng mL(-1) (equivalent to 6 muL o
7 The total cardiac clearance of amitriptyline was calculated as 0.316 L/h.
8                                         LODs were calculated as 0.071, 0.023, 0.016 and 0.034ngmL(-1)
9         K(M)(app), Imax, LOD and sensitivity were calculated as 0.229 mM, 42.37 nA, 3.3 x 10(-4)nM an
10            The detection limits of AA and AD were calculated as 0.96 muM and 0.38 muM, respectively.
11 lidation R(2) for simple calibration and PLS were calculated as 0.989 and 0.951, respectively.
12 tten records, and vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated as 1 - [(risk of measles in vaccinated in
13                                           VE was calculated as 1 - adjusted odds ratio of vaccination
14               The vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated as 1 - OR.
15                                           VE was calculated as 1 minus the odds ratio for influenza i
16  The average effective dose for coronary CTA was calculated as 1.11 mSv (0.47-2.01 mSv) for method A
17                        Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1 - adjusted odds ratio [aOR])100%; a
18                        Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1 - matched odds ratio) x 100%.
19                                           VE was calculated as (1 - odds ratio) x 100, where the odds
20                        Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1-odds ratio)x100.
21                   Conventional lesion volume was calculated as (1/6)xpix(AxB(2)+CxD(2)/2).
22                           In this design, VE is calculated as 100% x (1 - odds ratio) for vaccine rec
23                     Pulse pressure variation was calculated as 100 x (PPmax - PPmin)/PPmean and calcu
24  for monovalent pandemic vaccine and TIV and was calculated as 100 x [1 - adjusted odds ratio], where
25 notransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio (APRI) was calculated as = 100*(aspartate aminotransferase [AST
26                        Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as 100x(1-OR).
27 t, limit of detection (LOD), and sensitivity were calculated as 12.0+/-0.05pM and 3.3772nAnM(-1)cm(-2
28 aximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of BA were calculated as 13.93microM and 25.66microM for diphe
29 lobal Warming Potential (GWP) for (CF3)2CFCN was calculated as 1490, a factor of 15 less than that of
30 he quadratic model, the optimal range of INR was calculated as 2.1 to 2.5.
31 detection (LOD) for the complementary strand was calculated as 2.32 nM.
32      The sensitivity of the developed sensor was calculated as 2.6Hz/pg.
33               The limit of detection (S/N=3) was calculated as 2.92 pmol of target sequence in a 100-
34                                      The NNV was calculated as [2 parents/(parent-attributable infant
35 ug L(-1) (n=21), the preconcentration factor was calculated as 200 and the relative standard deviatio
36  contribution from the mantle of 2.9%, which is calculated as 21 Gmol/y.
37        The inactivation energy of the enzyme was calculated as 218kJmol(-1).
38                              Young's modulus was calculated as 22.6 +/- 9.2 MPa in patients and 13.8
39         For guaiacol, the Km and Vmax values were calculated as 24.88mM and 3.23EU/mL, respectively f
40 ported by bridging ligands, the bond lengths being calculated as 3.229 A for [Re2Cp2(CO)6]2+ (1(2)2+)
41 bsequent analysis and dissociation constants were calculated as 3.24-5.24x10(-8) M.
42             For H2O2, the Km and Vmax values were calculated as 3.247mM and 0.799EU/mL, respectively
43 maging-detected malignant or benign lesions) were calculated as 30.7% (95% CI confidence interval : 2
44 he ratio of analyte signal to chemical noise was calculated as 31 for DMMP and 106 for 1-hexanol.
45 alpha of 0.05 and power 80%, the sample size was calculated as 35 patients for each group with a drop
46             The Forster distance R(0) values are calculated as 41 to 65A for these dye/quencher pairs
47  of SPECT HMR with UM and that of planar HMR was calculated as 5.5 and 1.6, respectively.
48         K(D) of the antibody used toward PSA was calculated as 9.46 x 10(-10) M, indicating high affi
49 d 50-100, and the corresponding Delta(r)G(o) was calculated as 9.8-11.5 kJ/mol.
50 tion, the diffusion coefficient of carbonate is calculated as (9.03 +/- 0.91) 10(-6) cm(2) s(-1), whi
51 A105 over its target (intraocular TNF-alpha) was calculated as 96-fold (cohort III) to 359-fold (coho
52 ity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated as 98.1, 94.4, 94.5, and 98.1 %, respect
53 y range is from 10(1) to 10(7)CFU/ml and LOD is calculated as 9x10(2)CFU/ml.
54                   The partition coefficients are calculated as a function of chain length, degree of
55                        The additional forces are calculated as a gradient of the correlation coeffici
56                     Its performance can thus be calculated as a function of the host platform's peak
57 kinetics of breaking the kissing interaction is calculated as a function of force and cation concentr
58 separation, the local viscosity distribution is calculated as a function of the volume RBC rate.
59 eta) of the probe reacting with two proteins is calculated as a ratio of conversion factors (k(obs) v
60              Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated as a composite end point of progressive e
61                 Residual cancer burden (RCB) was calculated as a continuous index combining pathologi
62                         Dietary insulin load was calculated as a function of the food insulin index,
63 g the degree of diffuse myocardial fibrosis, was calculated as a function of the ratio of T1 change o
64                                 Bayes factor was calculated as a measure of statistical evidence, wit
65                        The kappa coefficient was calculated as a measure of the reliability of intero
66 ated with the self-assembly of macrocycle 3b was calculated as a measure of the solvophobic interacti
67         The Net Reclassification Improvement was calculated as a measure to estimate any overall impr
68 ) of each metabolite variable in a PLS model was calculated as a metric for the reliability of measur
69             Choroidal vascular density (CVD) was calculated as a percent area occupied by choroidal v
70                                The ITC index was calculated as a percentage of the angle that was clo
71 ometric analysis, the newly formed bone area was calculated as a percentage of the total area.
72 is, mean density in the region of the defect was calculated as a percentage relative to the native bo
73 een commercial and threatened species ranges was calculated as a proxy of the potential threat posed
74 bserved in both species, and an entropy rate was calculated as a quantitative measure of degree of pr
75 min CZT SPECT and (13)N-ammonia PET, and MFR was calculated as a ratio of hyperemic over resting MBF.
76 served positive rate (OPR) in each follow-up was calculated as a ratio of number of red pixels within
77             The variability of these neurons was calculated as a ratio of spike count variance to its
78                          Relative fetal size was calculated as a standard deviation score at each dat
79                               The global PTD was calculated as a sum of individual PTD values, rangin
80 IR score, a correlate of insulin resistance, was calculated as a weighted combination of size and con
81 rient-metabolite profiles and cell viability were calculated as a function of cell density and disc s
82 All-cause and cause-specific mortality rates were calculated as a function of cumulative low, moderat
83 ectra, relative isomerization quantum yields were calculated as a function of excitation energy.
84                    Permeability coefficients were calculated as a function of time and tissue depth.
85 alyzed, and precursor-to-product PUFA ratios were calculated as a marker of the capacity of tissues (
86 ndard deviations of the torque moments (STD) were calculated as a measurement of postural stability a
87  between predicted and observed MD (DeltaMD) were calculated as a reliability measure.
88  Cortical (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B values were calculated as a standard uptake value ratio normali
89  out and the value of (G + C)/(A + T) of DNA was calculated as about 0.77 for various DNA samples.
90 vely and at 1 month (RLV1M), volumetric gain was calculated as absolute (RLV1M-RLV) or relative regen
91 tween March 2011 and May 2012, fetal density was calculated as actual birth weight at delivery divide
92              The energies of the microstates are calculated as additive contributions from hydrogen b
93                           Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) was calculated as (age x AST)/(platelet x radical alanin
94 al information by combining relevance, which is calculated as an average F-statistic value across dif
95               Kynurenine to tryptophan ratio was calculated as an estimate of trp degradation.
96                        The kappa coefficient was calculated as an indicator of the concordance betwee
97 and treatment in hospitals and nursing homes was calculated as annual cost for Flanders, per patient,
98                           Plaque progression was calculated as annualized change in common coverage b
99 pping efficiency of the isolated chromosomes was calculated as approximately 0.01-0.02.
100                                   Adipose DI was calculated as ATIS: (1/GlyRa x fasting insulin) x fi
101                                The CCP score was calculated as average expression of 31 CCP genes, no
102                          Recovered S. aureus was calculated as cfu/g.
103 e of aortic root dilation before cardiac MRI was calculated as change in echocardiographic aortic roo
104                         Relative weight gain was calculated as change in SD score (SDS) during differ
105                        Ejection fraction (%) was calculated as changes between 0 and 120 minutes.
106 ials without an available reference standard were calculated as cryptotanshinone-bioequivalents.
107 h MD site and cutaneous vascular conductance was calculated as CVC = LDF/MAP and expressed as per cen
108                                          AEE was calculated as DEE - BEE, and physical activity level
109 DEE - BEE, and physical activity level (PAL) was calculated as DEE/BEE.
110   A coronary vascular resistance index (CVR) was calculated as diastolic BP/CBV.
111 remental cost effectiveness and cost utility were calculated as dollars for one case of infection avo
112                                 TTE RVol(AR) was calculated as Doppler left ventricular outflow minus
113                               Impact of DMSA was calculated as end-course VBLL as a percentage of pre
114                                        Rates were calculated as events/100 person-years at risk (PYR)
115                          Adipo-IR and Hep-IR were calculated as (FFA0-120min ) x (Ins0-120min ) and (
116                               Fibrosis index was calculated as fibrosis score (0-4)/ years posttransp
117                 Femoral vascular conductance was calculated as flow/pressure.
118  (CDFS3) estimates at "x" year after surgery were calculated as follows: CDFS3 = DFS(x+3)/DFS(x).
119              Affect balance style categories were calculated as follows: healthy (high PA/low NA), lo
120           The electrochemical rate constants are calculated as functions of overpotential for the con
121          Relative risks of incident HF in RA were calculated as hazard ratios (HRs).
122  value predicting survival, independently of being calculated as HVPG-Free or HVPG-IVC.
123                                Net emissions are calculated as increased system emissions from chargi
124                   Simulated diagnostic yield was calculated as initial screening yield x positive pre
125                  The precursor purity metric is calculated as "intensity of a selected precursor divi
126                           Percent difference was calculated as (interobservation difference/mean)x100
127                                    Precision was calculated as intra-day repeatability (RSD in the 5-
128                  Bioactivity quotients (BQs) are calculated as iR/OED to obtain estimates of potentia
129                               Inhibitor risk was calculated as Kaplan-Meier incidence with cumulative
130  rates for DAPT cessation and adverse events were calculated as Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to the
131          Left atrial functional index (LAFI) was calculated as ([LA emptying fraction x left ventricu
132 uously; cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was calculated as laser-Doppler flowmetry/mean arterial
133         Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was calculated as LDF/mean arterial pressure and normali
134 ted from concentrations in blood, and the LC was calculated as ln(1 - E*)/ln(1 - E).
135                       The limit of detection was calculated as low as 0.25pgL(-1) (from SWSV) and 3.0
136                                Energy intake was calculated as mean kcal/d.
137                                  The effects were calculated as mean differences or standardized mean
138                            Physical activity was calculated as metabolic equivalent task hours per da
139 durations of sleep across several correlates were calculated as multivariable odds ratios.
140 using a new comparative parameter "n", which was calculated as: n=c0DPPHIC100 (mol/L(mol/L)(-1), (mol
141 angiographic reference vessel diameter (RVD) was calculated as (nominal stent diameter-RVD)/RVDx100 (
142         Nonresting energy expenditure (NREE) was calculated as NREE = TEE - (REE +TEF).
143    HIV incidence based on HIV seroconversion was calculated as number of events/100 person-years.
144                  Focal changes in brightness were calculated as numerical ring breakup (RBU) values,
145                                   Prevalence was calculated as observed proportion with 95% confidenc
146                               Risk estimates were calculated as odds ratios and 95% confidence interv
147 ercentage effective filtration length (PEFL) was calculated as PEFL = FL/TL x 100%, where TL = total
148                                   Planar HMR was calculated as per standard guidelines (manual tradit
149               Change in mammographic density was calculated as percentage change from baseline.
150                                         YLDs were calculated as prevalence of 1160 disabling sequelae
151                   Vertebral tortuosity index was calculated as previously described.
152                              Oxylipin ratios were calculated as proxy markers of in vivo sEH activity
153 ermined by immunonephelometry, and the AIJCV was calculated as published.
154 f the aortic regurgitation (AR) index, which is calculated as ratio of the gradient between diastolic
155         Finally, simplified outcome measures were calculated as ratio, with reference to cerebellar c
156 dation, prediction, and RPD ratios (SD/SECV) were calculated as references for the model effectivenes
157                              Summary effects were calculated as relative risk and relative log surviv
158     Global and regional left ventricular MFR was calculated as stress/rest myocardial blood flow usin
159                             Hospital volumes were calculated as suggested by the Leapfrog Group evide
160 o (SUR) of each volume of interest and voxel was calculated as (target uptake - reference uptake) / r
161                                          PBF was calculated as TBF divided by total mass multiplied b
162            Activity energy expenditure (AEE) was calculated as [TEE(0.9) - RMR].
163                                 Mercury BAFs are calculated as the fish Hg concentration (Hg(fish)) d
164 sessing prognosis than WHVP-IVC, HVPG should be calculated as the gradient between WHVP and FHVP, but
165    The filtration efficiency of a filter can be calculated as the sum of the contributions of individ
166  permits direct monitoring of HDX, which can be calculated as the sum of the fractional peak magnitud
167                       Tooth replacement rate is calculated as the difference between the number of da
168          The thickness of the weathered zone is calculated as the difference between the predicted to
169 cal significance, as expressed in a P-value, is calculated as the fraction of permutation values that
170 age structure metric, fractional size, which is calculated as the length of an individual divided by
171                                      The CCI is calculated as the sum of all complications that are w
172 cedure-specific cost variation burden, which was calculated as the aggregate sum of absolute cost dif
173                     Loss of economic welfare was calculated as the amount of deadweight loss in exces
174                                       Length was calculated as the amount of telomeric DNA (T) divide
175 orrected for the water content of drinks and was calculated as the amount of water retained at 2 h af
176 st spin-echo MR images, the cecal tilt angle was calculated as the angle between the imaging table an
177     The peripheral ischemia or leakage index was calculated as the area of capillary nonperfusion or
178                       The cumulated activity was calculated as the area under the curve of the organ
179              For each image, mean gray level was calculated as the average of eight preset regions, a
180         Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation was calculated as the change in augmentation index in re
181                                NO production was calculated as the conversion rate of arginine to cit
182 e to citrulline; de novo arginine production was calculated as the conversion rate of citrulline to a
183 ity of climatic conditions along the flyways was calculated as the correlation and slope between onse
184 The individual mealtime protein distribution was calculated as the CV (i.e., SD divided by the mean)
185            Protein distribution across meals was calculated as the CV of protein ingested per meal, w
186        The visual acuity decrement due to VI was calculated as the difference between BCVA and 20/30,
187 phetamine-induced change in BPND (DeltaBPND) was calculated as the difference between BPND in the pos
188 %CVC(max) between the control and NOS-I site was calculated as the difference between C and NOS-I sit
189                  Low-luminance deficit (LLD) was calculated as the difference between LLVA and BCVA.
190                             Survival benefit was calculated as the difference between post-transplant
191 -lamina cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) was calculated as the difference between the IOP and ICP
192                 The organic selenium content was calculated as the difference between total Se and in
193                               CT enhancement was calculated as the difference in aortic wall densitie
194                                         NITM was calculated as the difference in distance refractive
195                                         NITM was calculated as the difference in posttask distance re
196                                      DeltaR1 was calculated as the difference in R1 between mice with
197      Regional treatment response, DeltaR(r), was calculated as the difference in regional gas distrib
198                               Energy balance was calculated as the discrepancy between EI and EE and
199                Maternal-to-fetal Ca transfer was calculated as the enrichment in cord blood at delive
200                  The mean single-nephron GFR was calculated as the GFR divided by the number of nephr
201                               Sedentary time was calculated as the heart rate observations (in minute
202                               RP progression was calculated as the loss of EZ width over time for all
203  residence time in the remainder of the body was calculated as the maximum possible residence time mi
204 ion (standardized uptake value ratio [SUVr]) was calculated as the maximum standardized uptake value
205            Monthly school meal participation was calculated as the mean number of daily meals served
206                     Urinary sodium excretion was calculated as the mean of two 24-h urine excretions.
207 e) by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and was calculated as the mean value of both eyes without op
208                           The Hedges g value was calculated as the measure of effect size.
209                    Standardized uptake value was calculated as the net tracer uptake in the pancreas
210 ld of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer formation was calculated as the number of dimerizable conformation
211                                    Adherence was calculated as the number of doses taken divided by d
212                         The annual incidence was calculated as the number of incident cases divided b
213                                    Incidence was calculated as the number of new cases divided by the
214     The medication administration error rate was calculated as the number of observed doses administe
215                                      Outcome was calculated as the odds ratio (OR) using a random eff
216                           An asymmetry ratio was calculated as the peak velocity of the slower eye mo
217                   Cerebrovascular reactivity was calculated as the percent increase of normocapnic to
218                                      The GTI was calculated as the percentage of (133)Xe gas retentio
219                                    Adherence was calculated as the percentage of days on which a dose
220                   The yield of each reaction was calculated as the percentage of initial sucrose conv
221     Incremental increase in cancer detection was calculated as the percentage of mammographically occ
222                                 Infarct size was calculated as the percentage of the area at risk and
223 ysiologic intereye percent difference (PIPD) was calculated as the PID divided by the measurement mea
224 ally worthwhile and relevant to the patient, was calculated as the probability that a random patient
225                       Cerebral O(2) delivery was calculated as the product of arterial O(2) content a
226 eterization, as an index of the RV MVO2, and was calculated as the product of systolic pulmonary arte
227                            Relative exposure was calculated as the proportion of all advertising pers
228                          Binocular summation was calculated as the ratio between binocular and better
229                               Myocardial CCL was calculated as the ratio between insoluble and solubl
230 nd the rate of progression of LGE (LGE-rate) was calculated as the ratio between the increment of LGE
231                                Flow velocity was calculated as the ratio of distance between CT detec
232                                         MPRI was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to resting myoc
233  Side-to-side asymmetry in patients with TLE was calculated as the ratio of ipsilateral to contralate
234                          LV-MV ring mismatch was calculated as the ratio of LV to ring size (LV end-d
235                 Pulmonary flow reserve (PFR) was calculated as the ratio of pulmonary blood flow velo
236                           Reporting accuracy was calculated as the ratio of reported sodium intake to
237                                          RLE was calculated as the ratio of signal intensity measurem
238                          The incretin effect was calculated as the ratio of the OGTT-betaCGS to the 2
239     Myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) index was calculated as the ratio of the stress and rest K1 va
240              Daily atrophy rate (DeltaTdi/d) was calculated as the reduction in percentage from the p
241                                     Fidelity was calculated as the similarity between pairs of foragi
242            Each month's adherence percentage was calculated as the sum of daily adherence percents, d
243                                         RSDc was calculated as the sum of difference between peak rad
244  exposure), a hazard index (HI) for each man was calculated as the sum of HQs for the individual phth
245                                     The PRAL was calculated as the sum of major mineral nonbicarbonat
246                                 Polyp burden was calculated as the sum of the diameters of polyps.
247 cients, and a predictive score (IPSYS score) was calculated as the sum of the weighted scores.
248                          A total brain score was calculated as the summed scores in the individual re
249                            Sleep opportunity was calculated as the time between end of the overnight
250               The time to the cataract event was calculated as the time between recruitment and the d
251                                          UTR was calculated as the time derivative of LV twist.
252                       Patient follow-up time was calculated as the time from hospital discharge until
253                                           Vt was calculated as the time-weighted average over the fir
254                                          dGI was calculated as the weighted average of GIs from foods
255 lized to injected activity (residence times) were calculated as the area under the curve of the time-
256 lized to injected activity (residence times) were calculated as the area under the curve of the time-
257 O age- and sex-adjusted z scores, deviations were calculated as the change in z score between adjacen
258             Intra- and interreader agreement were calculated as the Cohen kappa.
259 ing for critically ill patients, total costs were calculated as the combination of hospitalization co
260 ut the study, and the low-luminance deficits were calculated as the difference between the letter sco
261                                  Net margins were calculated as the difference between total hospital
262                                 Phase shifts were calculated as the difference in timing of dim light
263                             Mean differences were calculated as the mean of all the individual percen
264                        Incidence rate ratios were calculated as the measure of relative risk.
265         Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated as the observed numbers of ovarian cance
266     Images were scanned, and nerve densities were calculated as the percentage of each 1-mm(2) area o
267                            DO2_IR and MO2_IR were calculated as the products of F and O2A, and F and
268                       Frequency effect sizes were calculated as the proportion of studies reporting a
269                        Pricing differentials were calculated as the proportions (%) obtained by divid
270 st-enhanced (DCE) imaging, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated as the ratio of odds of cancer of two co
271                              The multipliers were calculated as the simple inverses of the proportion
272 overall compliance, PRISMA and AMSTAR scores were calculated as the sum of adequately reported domain
273                   Total direct medical costs were calculated as the sum of hospitalizations, outpatie
274     Total doses for lungs, heart, and breast were calculated as the sum of the dose from localizer ra
275                                        Costs were calculated as the sum of the value of resources rep
276       Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were calculated as the sum of years of life lost (YLLs)
277                              ADIRs and ADBRs were calculated as the total number of events divided by
278                                         Gaps were calculated as time (days) between the last sexual e
279                                      The OSI was calculated as [(TOS/TAOC) x 100].
280                               The H/CL ratio was calculated as total counts in a region of interest o
281                  Activity energy expenditure was calculated as total energy expenditure (assessed ove
282                  Cumulative fluid overload % was calculated as [(total fluid in - out in L)/admission
283                         LC for (1)(8)F-FDGal was calculated as (V*(max)/K*(m))/(V(max)/K(m)).
284             Target-to-background ratio (TBR) was calculated as valvular/blood activity.
285 al contraction (VOLbac) were measured; LAPEF was calculated as (VOLmax-VOLbac)/VOLmaxx100.
286 ade, and change within the patients with LGG was calculated, as was minimal detectable change.
287                        Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m)(2) Compared wit
288                              Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height
289 , symptom prevalence, and diagnostic methods were calculated as weighted proportions.
290 lty score based solely on difficulty ratings was calculated, as well as 3 adjusted scores accounting
291 difference in the mean between 2007 and 2013 was calculated, as well as the 95% confidence intervals
292 cause-specific annual age-standardized rates were calculated as well.
293 ciency, and the rates of these complications were calculated as well.
294 Lake Huron and through the Chicago Diversion were calculated, as well as flows related to the interna
295          Lesional standardized uptake values were calculated, as well as lesion-to-contralateral cort
296 ansversal slice (SUVmax(9)) of the PET scans were calculated, as well as PET-segmented gross tumor vo
297 er the ROC curves (AUCs) for each model pair were calculated, as well as sensitivity, specificity, ac
298        Rates of perioperative adverse events were calculated, as were midterm death and reinterventio
299 and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated, as were T2 relaxation time and proton s
300                   Pipe-years and cigar-years were calculated as years from self-reported age of start

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top