ライフサイエンスコーパス: be calculated by

1 (MD) and visual field index (VFI) forecasts were calculated by (1) extrapolation of linear regressio

2 th open fractures and high density fractures are calculated by 3-D counting.

3 This coefficient was calculated by a quantum-chemistry-based method with

4 ancy reported as quality-adjusted life-years were calculated by a decision analytic model that integr

5 =no lesion); CT numbers in noncalcium images were calculated by a third reader.

6 The percentage of overdiagnosis was calculated by accounting for the expected decrease i

7 tion to individual spectra, averaged spectra were calculated by accumulating free induction decays ov

8 The CEP scores are calculated by adding the weights of all the items co

9 ement; a completeness score (range, 0 to 14) was calculated by adding the number of elements reported

10 A score measuring the VEGF signaling pathway was calculated by adding the tumor cell expression value

11 ant for protein binding to the specific site is calculated by an approach in which the protein, after

12 Breakage rates were calculated by analyzing the capsular surrogate unde

13 ial pressure, regional myocardial work could be calculated by applying the standard LV pressure curve

14 oprevalence in Philadelphia during 2010-2013 was calculated by applying National Health and Nutrition

15 Time estimates were calculated by applying a previously established par

16 p, 5-year number-needed-to-treat estimations were calculated by applying an 18% relative CHD reductio

17 Measurement uncertainties of all elements were calculated by applying bottom-up approach.

18 tition coefficients (lipid-water, air-water) were calculated by applying the new concept of a polymer

19 CRS was calculated by assigning 1 point each for initial dis

20 A 4-point cardiac risk score was calculated by assigning 1 point each for renal failu

21 of your recommending our practice to others" was calculated by assigning a value (0-100) to the Liker

22 Destruction removal efficiency (DRE) was calculated by assuming a flare natural gas input com

23 -stream attenuation coefficients (k(stream)) were calculated by assuming first-order kinetics (negati

24 pecific bleaching response index (taxon-BRI) was calculated by averaging taxon-specific response over

25 Mean enhancement was calculated by averaging the signal intensity at the

26 code-level estimates of 24-hr average PM2.5 were calculated by averaging concentrations within ZIP c

27 Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by binary logistic regression.

28 tions, the electrical conductivity of SLMoS2 is calculated by Boltzmann equations.

29 RVol(MR) was calculated by both the proximal isovelocity surface

30 Incidence and remission rates were calculated by calibrating against real-world preval

31 e source categories to the ambient PM burden was calculated by combining primary emission, SOA produc

32 ident's overall performance for each station was calculated by combining scores of the individual ski

33 Model inputs were calculated by combining data from representative ho

34 1 (T1) Cu site in four multicopper oxidases were calculated by combining first principles density fu

35 For the consultation and death outcomes, VE was calculated by comparing consultation rates in the un

36 The know-do gap was calculated by comparing fractions of practitioners a

37 Enhancement factor was calculated by comparing the absorbance values measur

38 The PTE was calculated by comparing the effect of IOP on the ris

39 Percentage bone fill was calculated by comparing the preoperative and postope

40 ificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by comparing AUS findings to pathology r

41 Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing findings with final diagnos

42 ), pulmonary embolism, and arterial embolism were calculated by comparing observed and expected (usin

43 e sensitivity and specificity of ThermoSpots were calculated by comparing the device colour against '

44 Although invariants may be calculated by computational algebraic methods, such a

45 The V(2) and V(3) transition ratios were calculated by computing the percentage R-wave durin

46 Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were calculated by conditional logistic regression.

47 n achievable rate of secure key distribution is calculated by considering complementary choices betwe

48 The number of stromal nerves was calculated by counting the nerve trunks at the corne

49 The BRS was calculated by counting the number of biomarkers abov

50 dian prevalence of intimate partner homicide was calculated by country and region overall, and for wo

51 zed incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were calculated by country and sex.

52 RRs and 95% CIs were calculated by Cox proportional hazards models.

53 hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by Cox proportional hazards regression.

54 d hazard ratios (HRs) for development of HCC were calculated by Cox regression analysis.

55 Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by Cox regression.

56 PDR prevalence was calculated by demographics and codon, stratifying by

57 he enthalpy profile of the fixation reaction was calculated by density functional theory.

58 ent dipole moment on the sulfobetaine moiety was calculated by density functional theory.

59 he cyclic side product cyclohexene carbonate are calculated, by determining the rate coefficients ove

60 The PPVs were calculated by determining the ratio of the confirme

61 f free radical scavenging by flavonoid morin were calculated by DFT and PM6 methods in gas-phase, wat

62 relative energies of the MOLP and OA isomers were calculated by DFT methods, and the possibility of s

63 National rates were calculated by diagnosis group.

64 impurities/additives in light materials can be calculated "by difference" from the scattering calibr

65 The SUV ratio (SUVR) for each RR was calculated by dividing cortex activity by RR activit

66 Fraction of aspirated contrast was calculated by dividing estimated volume of aspirated

67 Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) was calculated by dividing left ventricular (LV) stroke

68 The dietary insulin index was calculated by dividing the dietary insulin load by t

69 Cost per SVR was calculated by dividing the median cost by the SVR ra

70 An excess mortality ratio (EMR) was calculated by dividing the risk-standardized predict

71 Mean proficiency scores were calculated by dividing the combined PT scores by th

72 alized changes in mean gradient (mm Hg/year) were calculated by dividing the difference between the m

73 Effect sizes were calculated by dividing the differences between prei

74 Risk scores were calculated by dividing the individual regression co

75 Annual mortality rates were calculated by dividing the Kaplan-Meier 5-year mort

76 Target-to-background ratios (TBRs) were calculated by dividing the mean fluorescence intens

77 s (SIRs), a proxy measure for relative risk, were calculated by dividing the observed number of subse

78 Functional volumes were calculated by dividing the volume of normal ventila

79 The Kd of anti-ATX aptamer was calculated by electrochemical methods as well as the

80 different time steps, with redundancy, which is calculated by employing dynamical time warping approa

81 e absorbed radiation dose for the whole body was calculated by entering the residence time in OLINDA/

82 d pore-water-concentration-based EC50 values were calculated by equilibrium partitioning using soil/p

83 Propensity scores for induction treatment were calculated by estimating probability of induction u

84 The rate constants are calculated by explicitly treating the structure and

85 Costs were calculated by extracting Diagnosis-Related Group co

86 ctive moisture diffusion coefficients (Deff) were calculated by Fick's diffusion model and their valu

87 PSS was calculated by finite element analysis in whole vesse

88 A list of putative contact residues was calculated by fitting high-resolution coordinates fo

89 dose (ID50) of 2.60 x 10(6) CFU for fetuses was calculated by fitting the data to a logistic model.

90 ibution of coral reefs and open sea plankton were calculated by fitting a Rayleigh distillation model

91 Mutation rates can be calculated by following mutant accumulation during gr

92 The genome quality score for each was calculated by four different assembly quality, numbe

93 n two steps and the noncoplanar conformation was calculated by gaussian program.

94 CHA2DS2-VASc-R score was calculated by giving 1 additional point for African-

95 The ASP score was calculated by grading the measured angle of attenuat

96 of clinical AIDS/death in HIV seroconverters was calculated by HB status.

97 raphy, and the degree of tissue inflammation was calculated by histological analyses.

98 The mineral apposition rate in vivo was calculated by identifying newly formed bone via calc

99 Isotopic values for the separate peaks are calculated by integrating the product of the water a

100 V(RM) was calculated by integrating the flow-time waveform dur

101 The expected lifetime was calculated by integrating the predicted survival cur

102 edicted prevalence in the general population were calculated by inverting 99% certainty tolerance lim

103 e analysis of allograft and patient survival was calculated by Kaplan Meyer.

104 The frequency of restenosis was calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and wa

105 dard automated perimetry and rates of change were calculated by linear regression analysis of mean de

106 riage before and after introduction of PCV10 were calculated by log-binomial regression.

107 tios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by logistic regression analyses.

108 Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment f

109 and statins in the 5 years before diagnosis were calculated by logistic regression, adjusted for a m

110 Australian Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) were calculated by logistic regression.

111 Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated by malignancy type.

112 ercent and absolute serum creatinine changes were calculated by maximizing sensitivity and specificit

113 on (n = 230), the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by means of a receiver operating characte

114 For each patient, a plasma flow map was calculated by means of deconvolution and the model w

115 The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated by means of the Modification of Diet in R

116 ues with maximal sensitivity and specificity were calculated by means of receiver operating character

117 The index is calculated by measuring the degree to which the test

118 ABL was calculated by measuring cemento-enamel junction and

119 The permeability was calculated by measuring the interstitial fluid veloc

120 ker, pooled odds ratios for clinical outcome were calculated by meta-analysis, and biomarkers were ra

121 The models are calculated by ModPipe, an automated modeling pipelin

122 The models are calculated by ModPipe, an automated modeling pipelin

123 The spontaneous curvature of palmitate was calculated by molecular dynamic simulations and was

124 nd the corresponding cross-linked peptide II were calculated by molecular modeling.

125 n, and cell viability and metabolic activity was calculated by MTT assay.

126 Healthcare costs will be calculated by multiplying used healthcare services wi

127 Choroidal vessel volume was calculated by multiplying the average CVD by macular

128 The central macular CVV was calculated by multiplying the average CVD by macular

129 eover, the risk reduction potential of foods was calculated by multiplying the RR by optimal intake v

130 SSDE was calculated by multiplying the size-dependent convers

131 inding conformation of the A1 domain; VWF:TA was calculated by multiplying VWF:Ag by VWF:AF.

132 Values of the DLP were calculated by multiplying measured CT dose index va

133 Years lived with disability (YLDs) were calculated by multiplying prevalence (based on syst

134 sts and length of stay for each complication were calculated by multiplying the independent cost of e

135 Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by multivariable logistic regression mod

136 Odds ratios were calculated by multivariable logistic regression, wi

137 farct patterns and good outcome at discharge was calculated by multivariate logistic regression with

138 Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis and compare

139 Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

140 Biodegradation rate constants were calculated by nonlinear regression and were not sig

141 ion using digital image analysis, and strain was calculated by normalizing the change in alveolar per

142 Cumulative AUC was calculated by numerical integration using non-linear

143 Hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions were calculated by numerical integration of the individu

144 Summary effect measures were calculated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence in

145 A weighted CST lesion load (wCST-LL) was calculated by overlaying the patient's lesion map on

146 ve perfusion parameters, such as blood flow, were calculated by parametric deconvolution for each myo

147 Correlations were calculated by Pearson correlation (or Spearman rank

148 CMR RVol(AR) was calculated by phase-contrast velocity mapping at the

149 on volume, and mean transit time) parameters were calculated by placing regions of interest in the la

150 nated amines, pK values of basic amino acids were calculated by plotting the fraction of protonated a

151 ominant species at a physiological pH of 7.4 were calculated by PM6 and DFT methods in gas-phase, wat

152 Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated by Poisson regression analysis.

153 Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated by Poisson regression to determine diffe

154 evalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by Poisson regression.

155 The degree of deacetylation was calculated by potentiometric titration and (1)H NMR.

156 oronary territory basis, and ischemic burden was calculated by quantitative segmentation of the volum

157 The NIS data thus obtained have also been calculated by quantum mechanical (QM) density funct

158 Population-based rates of hospitalization were calculated by race for ARI and laboratory-confirmed

159 ecific survival, and relative survival rates were calculated by race, age, and time period of diagnos

160 of these parameters on predicting responders were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (RO

161 lations between MRI and functional variables were calculated by repeated measures analysis of varianc

162 The affinity and number of receptors present were calculated by Scatchard and best-fit analyses.

163 Benefit scores are calculated by scoring of cost, durability, and corro

164 New cases of adult-onset severe obesity were calculated by sex, race/ethnicity, and adolescent w

165 Additionally, long-run scenarios are calculated by simulating the total cost of ownership

166 The binding affinity of MIP was calculated by static and kinetic adsorption study.

167 e indoor compartment over their service life was calculated by statistically analyzing data from 50 p

168 E and T(i), marginal 95% CIs for K(i) values were calculated by stepwise univariate regression analys

169 The OR for the metabolic syndrome was calculated by substituting one serving of beans for

170 stainable water quantity available to humans is calculated by subtracting an annual estimate of the w

171 ic market (assumed equal to invisible sales) is calculated by subtracting the registered, also called

172 Effectiveness was calculated by subtracting from 1 the rate ratios for

173 Specific binding of (18)F-florbetapir was calculated by subtracting nonspecific from total bin

174 Autotrophic respiration (Ra) was calculated by subtracting Rh from Rs.

175 RPR was calculated by subtracting the foveal spherical equiv

176 Attributable mortality was calculated by subtracting the in-hospital mortality

177 The subcutaneous fat area at each site was calculated by subtracting the lean/visceral area fro

178 the adjacent tooth at the interproximal area was calculated by subtracting the radiographic crestal B

179 PCI-related delay was calculated by subtracting the XDB from the door-to-n

180 Absolute excess risks were calculated by subtracting cause-specific mortality

181 Pandemic-associated excess mortality rates were calculated by subtracting observed rates during pan

182 Intraplatelet (IP) levels of 5-HT were calculated by subtraction of plasma 5-HT from serum

183 Years in each dependency state were calculated by Sullivan's method.

184 wders where total vitamin A content data can be calculated by summing the innate long-chain vitamin A

185 Potentially preventable spending was calculated by summing costs for avoidable emergency

186 A genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated by summing the number of risk alleles ove

187 genetic risk score (GRS) for each individual was calculated by summing the number of risk-increasing

188 Differences in volume and defect depths were calculated by superimposition of the scans and test

189 wPRx was calculated by taking the cosine of the wavelet trans

190 with the previous survey for each parameter was calculated by taking the ratio of the maximum and mi

191 reduced models based on exact QSS, which can be calculated by the computational packages provided in

192 5-year relative survival was calculated by the Ederer-2 method.

193 Uveoscleral outflow was calculated by the Goldmann equation.

194 Survival probability was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognosti

195 Overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

196 ichotomous data as an odds ratio with 95% CI was calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel or the DerSimonian

197 A weighted genetic risk score was calculated by the natural log of the odds ratio mult

198 icient (ADC) of the thymic epithelial tumors was calculated by the same observer at two settings and

199 Flow signal was calculated by the split-spectrum amplitude-decorrela

200 rences in (31)P NMR shifts upon complexation were calculated by the gauge-independent atomic orbital

201 of value (CV) of the endothelial cell layer were calculated by the instruments' built-in software.

202 e together with the known prognostic factors were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated

203 Overall and rectal cancer-specific survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

204 and absolute risk (AR) estimates +/- 95% CIs were calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel method.

205 expectancies for the three regions combined were calculated by the Sullivan method, which applies th

206 ECD spectra of 1 and 4 were calculated by time-dependent density functional the

207 children aged from 18 weeks to 23 months and was calculated by unconditional logistic regression.

208 metric data), and differences between groups were calculated by unpaired t test (or Mann-Whitney U te

209 Nitrate intake from vegetables was calculated by use of a newly developed comprehensive

210 ratio of HIV among MSM relative to adult men was calculated by use of direct age-stratification.

211 the nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) was calculated by use of the simplified reference tissue

212 Rate constants were calculated by use of a 3-compartment model.

213 5% confidence interval for volume categories were calculated by use of logistic regression for each Q

214 95% confidence intervals for each predictor were calculated by use of random effects models.

215 The minimum sample size can be calculated by using a sample size formula that incorp

216 The coexpression between two genes can be calculated by using a traditional Pearson's correlati

217 f 2-furanylnitrene and 3-furanylnitrene have been calculated by using spin-flip coupled-cluster metho

218 The edge tension of a lipidic pore is calculated by using the theory to quantitatively acco

219 ate of aneurysm detection for subsequent DSA was calculated by using a fixed-effects model.

220 p were necessary to acquire 80% power, which was calculated by using a one-sided alpha level of 2.5%.

221 ne-based association signals in each pathway was calculated by using a weighted Kolmogorov-Smirnov pr

222 Interobserver agreement was calculated by using Cohen kappa values.

223 re 2009 H1N1-associated neurologic incidence was calculated by using estimates of 2009 H1N1 illnesses

224 (REE) of the perfusion curves of each joint was calculated by using in-house developed software.

225 The relative prevalence (RP) of AD was calculated by using log-linear binomial regression.

226 Baseline bleeding risk was calculated by using modified Mehran bleeding risk sc

227 Relative risk (RR) was calculated by using random-effects models and was te

228 scale, and categorical intermethod agreement was calculated by using the Cohen kappa.

229 Specificity was calculated by using the control population.

230 Interreader agreement was calculated by using the Fleiss kappa.

231 Survival was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

232 Median survival was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

233 en prospective and retrospective assessments was calculated by using the kappa statistic.

234 Lesion diameter was calculated by using the measured length and width of

235 Association with observer's scores was calculated by using the Pearson correlation coeffici

236 The target CL power was calculated by using the postoperative refraction at

237 Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was calculated by using the root mean square average coe

238 Significance was calculated by using the Student t test.

239 At imaging, FF was calculated by using two-, three-, or six-echo method

240 r detecting 50% or greater arterial stenosis were calculated by using a bivariate summary receiver op

241 HRs and 95% CIs were calculated by using a Cox proportional hazards anal

242 ces in comfort and radiation dose reductions were calculated by using a mixed logistic regression mod

243 Case-mix adjusted rates were calculated by using a multivariate logistic regress

244 Differences between samples were calculated by using a nonparametric Wilcoxon Mann-W

245 ined by using bootstrap resampling; P values were calculated by using a t test.

246 Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by using a time-varying Cox proportional

247 nuclear explosions at North Korean test site were calculated by using an empirical Green's function a

248 Rates were calculated by using census population estimates.

249 Fat fraction maps were calculated by using combined compressed sensing and

250 Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using combined results of both techni

251 RRs and 95% CIs were calculated by using conditional logistic regression

252 artiles of analyte concentration to NHL risk were calculated by using conditional logistic regression

253 r the 90th compared with the 10th percentile were calculated by using conditional logistic regression

254 Multivariable ORs and 95% CIs were calculated by using conditional logistic regression

255 ve CS with vaginal delivery as the reference were calculated by using Cox regression.

256 Direct and indirect costs were calculated by using data from national registries.

257 Diet scores were calculated by using data from up to 7 food frequenc

258 MR imaging-derived RV and LV functional data were calculated by using dedicated software.

259 nitored for 5 h postingestion, and GI values were calculated by using different area under the curve

260 Global, endocardial, and epicardial MBF were calculated by using Fermi-constrained deconvolution

261 heats of formation and detonation properties were calculated by using Gaussian 03 and EXPLO5 v6.01 pr

262 Relative risks (RRs) were calculated by using general linear models adjusted

263 Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated by using general population incidence da

264 tween the beneficiary and the laser provider were calculated by using Google Maps distance and travel

265 d nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio within the tumor were calculated by using image-based segmentation on fou

266 ch tumor, RENAL nephrometry and PADUA scores were calculated by using imaging-derived tumor morpholog

267 Incidence rates were calculated by using incident cases as the numerator

268 y DNA target with the immobilized DNA probes were calculated by using kinetic evaluation software, an

269 Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using leave-one-out cross validation.

270 hanges and injuries and descriptive analysis were calculated by using logistic regression and Fisher

271 ive odds of maternal asthma with viral cause were calculated by using logistic regression.

272 95% binomial proportion confidence intervals were calculated by using methods described by Clopper an

273 HRs and 95% CIs were calculated by using multivariable Cox proportional

274 Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated by using pathologic diagnosis as the ref

275 ymptoms (binary outcome) and severity scores were calculated by using Poisson and linear regression,

276 Rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by using Poisson regression to evaluate

277 Data were extracted, and mean effect sizes were calculated by using random effects models.

278 dividual studies and the overall pooled beta were calculated by using random-effects meta-analysis.

279 r-age, weight-for-height, and weight-for-age were calculated by using the 2006 WHO growth standards,

280 lues at rest and at adenosine-induced stress were calculated by using the Fermi function model.

281 meal GI and GL and insulin index (II) values were calculated by using the incremental area under the

282 and interobserver agreement of aortic volume were calculated by using the intraclass correlation coef

283 urvival and relapse-free survival statistics were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method for sta

284 Actuarial rates of LR were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

285 The z scores were calculated by using the observed and expected effec

286 pharmacokinetic parameters of breast cancer were calculated by using the Tofts model with T1 values

287 Confidence intervals were calculated by using the Wilson method, without corr

288 or control period and 12 months of follow-up were calculated by using Trimbos and Institute of Medica

289 Structural volumes were calculated by using U.S. Food and Drug Administrati

290 fic odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by using unconditional logistic regressi

291 Offspring body mass index z scores (BMIZs) were calculated by using weight and length or height mea

292 es of the prostate and seminal vesicles (SV) were calculated by using whole-volume segmentation on T2

293 sensitivity and specificity of these methods were calculated by using, as reference method, the manua

294 T, normalized sodium signal-to-noise ratios were calculated, by using region-of-interest analysis.

295 ty average molecular weight of beta-chitosan was calculated by viscometry and size average molecular

296 Composite measures of hemispheric Abeta load were calculated by volume-weighted mean values of neocor

297 Plaque, lumen, and vessel volume indexes were calculated by volume/measured length (mm/mm) in the

298 sions (RDEs) and fuel consumption (FC) rates were calculated by weighted averaging of the results fro

299 Incidence rates were calculated by year and by region (National Health S

300 Admission rates were calculated by year, age, sex, and county of residen