戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 actical application of these recommendations was evaluated by 2 clinical photographers with expertise
2  alcohol responsiveness of clinical symptoms was evaluated by 3 blinded raters with a standardized vi
3 ing equivalency of a 10% prespecified margin were evaluated by 95% CIs.
4                             Therapy response was evaluated by (99m)Tc-duramycin SPECT 24 h after the
5 GE) MRI, and myocardial perfusion/metabolism was evaluated by (99m)Tc-MIBI SPECT /(18)F-FDG PET imagi
6 ling 99% of the population, MDK99, which can be evaluated by a statistical analysis of measurements p
7                 The outcome of each strategy was evaluated by a large-scale screening using in vivo b
8  risk of oculonasal/asthmalike/both symptoms was evaluated by a multinomial logistic model.
9                                    Apoptosis was evaluated by a TUNEL assay.
10 acuum and conventionally fried potato crisps were evaluated by a 23-member panel.
11  percentage of patients (120 of 144 [83.3%]) were evaluated by a dermatologist through either teleder
12                       The extracted features were evaluated by a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) c
13                Predictors of time to relapse were evaluated by a mixed effects Cox model.
14  retrospectively and chest trauma CT studies were evaluated by a second reader.
15 der approximation of the enzymatic reaction) are evaluated by an exhaustive quantum mechanical search
16 asibility of the system to determine glucose was evaluated by an enzymatic assay using glucose oxidas
17 gocytosis and killing of NTHi by macrophages were evaluated by an in vitro assay.
18                            Included patients were evaluated by an ophthalmologist and a rheumatologis
19                         Method applicability was evaluated by analysing commercial cookies labelled e
20                   The accuracy of the method was evaluated by analysis of SRM 1573a with good agreeme
21    The applicability of the screening system was evaluated by analysis of various types of natural sa
22                           Expression changes were evaluated by analysis of variance (significant P va
23 ion efficiency of the proposed SEC-FD method was evaluated by analyzing 100 nm liposomes and albumin-
24                                   The method was evaluated by analyzing a wide range of milk powders
25                                        OMAAT was evaluated by analyzing an MSI data set of a high-thr
26 low TGF-beta1 concentrations in real samples was evaluated by analyzing spiked urine at different pg/
27                                   The system was evaluated by analyzing under- and overloaded aminopy
28                                This platform is evaluated by applying it to screen drug compounds tha
29                   Classification performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operator charac
30 into animals, and cryosections of the brains were evaluated by autoradiography, by histology, and for
31 ce, and further classification reliabilities are evaluated by bootstrap confidence scores.
32 he CR30 odds ratio with the PFS hazard ratio was evaluated by both linear regression (R(2)WLS) and bi
33                              Tumor targeting was evaluated by both PET and CLI.
34                     The expression stability was evaluated by box-plot, Cq analysis, NormFinder and B
35      Bronchial epithelial cell proliferation was evaluated by BrdU incorporation test.
36                    Cell growth and viability were evaluated by bright field microscopy.
37             Predictive performance of models was evaluated by C statistics.
38    Dielectric property of as-grown h-BN film is evaluated by characterization of Co(foil)/h-BN/Co(con
39 al importance of specific MPK features could be evaluated by characterizing CRISPR-induced allelic va
40    The functions of Zc3h12a(-/-) CD4 T cells were evaluated by checking the expression of TH2 cytokin
41 ic enhancement and fruity ester enhancement) were evaluated by chemical and sensory analysis.
42                     Specific mRNA expression was evaluated by classical and quantitative RT-PCR, and
43                              Ocular toxicity was evaluated by clinical findings and electroretinograp
44                              Ocular toxicity was evaluated by clinical findings and electroretinograp
45  large family with early-onset pain symptoms were evaluated by clinical examination and genomic scree
46 rmations of these molecules in solution have been evaluated by combining NMR experiments and molecula
47 OC) in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) export is evaluated by combining DOC measurements with observed
48 n of the most promising therapeutic molecule was evaluated by combining in vitro assays, to test the
49                            Their performance was evaluated by comparing predicted with actual finding
50   The improvement in classification accuracy was evaluated by comparing the AUC for the multiparametr
51     The predictive value of the RD-OGI Score was evaluated by comparing the original RD-OGI Scores of
52 ore dilute and concentrated acid extractions were evaluated by comparing model-predicted and measured
53 les of lung cancer patients and its accuracy was evaluated by comparison of the results of the propos
54                        A compound collection was evaluated by consensus virtual screening and a hit w
55                  Subclinical atherosclerosis was evaluated by coronary artery calcium scan and 2-dime
56                      The bi-enzyme biosensor was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry and constant potenti
57                                       The DR was evaluated by cytokeratin-7 immunohistochemistry in l
58               Furthermore, virion properties were evaluated by density fractionation.
59                Twenty other different models were evaluated by descriptive analysis.
60                          The proposed method was evaluated by determination of the dyes in processed
61                The reliability of the models was evaluated by determining the confidence interval, wh
62                         Gradient performance was evaluated by determining the gradient step accuracy.
63                        The fractal dimension was evaluated by dimensional detrended fluctuation analy
64                       The studied monolayers were evaluated by DNA surface coverage and further infor
65 operties were analysed, antioxidant activity was evaluated by DPPH assay and antibacterial activity a
66 rroloquinoline quinone (PQQ)-based biosensor were evaluated by dynamic constant potential amperometry
67                                     Patients were evaluated by echocardiography, cardiovascular magne
68                Currently, blueberry bruising is evaluated by either human visual/tactile inspection o
69 havior of commercial roasted coffee products were evaluated by electroanalysis, whereas high performa
70 camu, acai, acerola and cranberry red fruits was evaluated by electroanalytical approaches.
71      The construction steps of the biosensor were evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
72                     Mitochondrial morphology was evaluated by electron microscopy and mitochondrial f
73 A165b ) and lymphangiogenic (VEGF-C) factors were evaluated by ELISA.
74 l benefits of maternal influenza vaccination are evaluated by estimating detectable risk ratios and n
75                                 TLR function was evaluated by exposing the EEC aggregates to viral an
76 ty of the new magnetic ion-imprinted polymer was evaluated by extraction and determination of trace P
77 ness (reduction in leg vascular conductance) was evaluated by femoral artery tyramine infusion.
78 onductor with promising hole mobility, which was evaluated by field-effect transistor measurements.
79  s(-1)) and half-life (10 ns) of CO2(*-) can be evaluated by fitting the collection efficiency vs dis
80                                   EL_PSSM-RT is evaluated by five-fold cross-validation using PDNA-62
81 Engraftment of human hematopoietic cells can be evaluated by flow cytometry 8-16 weeks after transpla
82 pounds against human leukemia K562 cell line was evaluated by flow cytometry in vitro.
83 ession of muscarinic and nicotinic receptors was evaluated by flow cytometry or qRT-PCR.
84                          The phenotype of DC was evaluated by flow cytometry, the production of cytok
85                 Cell proliferation and cycle were evaluated by flow cytometry.
86                                 All patients were evaluated by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission t
87 ke receptors and cellular adhesion molecules were evaluated by fluorometric enzyme-linked immunosorbe
88 calase digestions until 120min of hydrolysis were evaluated by gel electrophoresis, relative fluoresc
89 on electropherograms and change in structure was evaluated by 'gel gazing.' SHAPE data is now routine
90 on rate (eGFR) and proximal tubular function were evaluated by generalized linear models, with adjust
91 patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia were evaluated by gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasono
92        Liver pathologies in mice and rabbits were evaluated by gross pathology and histopathology, an
93                             Cellular removal was evaluated by H&E, DAPI and DNA quantification.
94                              Enzyme activity was evaluated by halo-assays and microcalorimetric proce
95 ction of human neutrophils with MSU crystals was evaluated by high-throughput live imaging using conf
96          Disease severity and cartilage loss were evaluated by histopathological analysis of arthriti
97 able for 27 patients and 24 biopsy specimens were evaluated by histopathology, immunohistochemistry (
98 232 (high risk; with day 29 MRD <0.1% by FC) were evaluated by HTS and FC for event-free (EFS) and ov
99  that of intradermal immunization whether it was evaluated by humoral or cellular immunity.
100                              Observed comets were evaluated by image analysis.
101                               Intestinal ST2 was evaluated by immunofluorescence.
102                              BAP1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining of formali
103 niature domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) were evaluated by immunohistochemical visualization of c
104 d DNA damage markers (pRPA32 and gamma-H2AX) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 289 MBC samples
105 , Ki-67 and doublecortin, in the hippocampus was evaluated by immunohistochemistry or immunofluoresce
106 mation and the role of caveolin-1 signalling were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western
107               Biliary mass and proliferation were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin 1
108  glial, neuronal, and inflammatory molecules were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in the core of ty
109  cells, neural fibers, and endothelial cells were evaluated by immunohistochemistry.
110 Biliary mass and cholangiocyte proliferation were evaluated by immunohistochemistry.
111 and monocytes within the PBMC subpopulations was evaluated by immunostaining and flow cytometry.
112 nin expression and Ki-67 labeling index (LI) were evaluated by immunostaining.
113 fect on bioadhesion and precorneal retention were evaluated by in vivo imaging technique and ocular p
114 ithium from black, Earl Grey, and green teas were evaluated by inductively coupled plasma mass spectr
115 e of Pak in airway smooth muscle contraction was evaluated by inhibiting acetylcholine (ACh)-induced
116 s of sofosbuvir and its metabolite GS-331007 were evaluated by intensive plasma sampling at day 7 in
117 ng donor milk and 190 receiving formula) who were evaluated by intent-to-treat analysis (median birth
118 modynamic effect of RVA, RVS, and LVS pacing was evaluated by invasive LVdP/dtmax measurements.
119                         The compound library was evaluated by investigating the effects on integrin-m
120             After study treatment, responses were evaluated by investigators per the 2014 Lugano clas
121 sed and pseudo-unexposed groups, a DRS model is evaluated by its ability to retrieve an unconfounded
122 me to 30-day in-hospital all-cause mortality was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportiona
123  Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and analyses of
124                                Heterogeneity was evaluated by likelihood ratio test.
125         The endotoxin-leukocyte relationship was evaluated by linear regression in the National Healt
126                            Predictors of AAO were evaluated by linear regression.
127 ons between pollutant exposure and ARDS risk were evaluated by logistic regression controlling for ag
128                      Microvascular perfusion was evaluated by low-power contrast ultrasound perfusion
129 tivities of various gene reporter constructs were evaluated by luciferase assays.
130 yr; apnea-hypopnea index, 0.2-96.6 events/h) were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging.
131 hereby the performance of a microwave device is evaluated by mapping local field distributions using
132 l-mediated cytotoxicity against chondrocytes was evaluated by means of 18-h (51)Cr-release assay.
133                                           ED was evaluated by means of flow-mediated dilatation (FMD)
134              Expression of MUC4 and MUC4beta was evaluated by means of real-time PCR, Western blottin
135                    Sensory-motor integration was evaluated by means of short afferent inhibition (SAI
136               Signature concordance with EMT was evaluated by means of validation in a publicly avail
137                                 All patients were evaluated by means of a Scheimpflug camera combined
138 ipheral blood and airway neutrophil function were evaluated by means of flow cytometry ex vivo and ex
139    With syringe pump injection, the detector is evaluated by measuring a few common chemicals in DI w
140                  The risk of atherosclerosis was evaluated by measuring (1) presence of subclinical a
141 nce the shelf life of anhydrous cow milk fat was evaluated by measuring Free Fatty Acids, peroxide va
142       The sensitivity of these QCM-P devices was evaluated by measuring mass changes for both deposit
143               Assessment of aortic stiffness was evaluated by measuring pulse wave velocity, aortic s
144                                   This model was evaluated by measuring the absorbance and fluorescen
145 fect of TRX80 on NLRP3 inflammasome activity was evaluated by measuring the level of interleukin-1bet
146                 Blockade Ab relative avidity was evaluated by measuring the slope of blockade Ab neut
147                             Their activities were evaluated by measuring chlorophyll content of dark-
148 nal, seasonal, and demographic heterogeneity were evaluated by meta-regression.
149                      The therapeutic effects were evaluated by microcomputed tomographic imaging of p
150  relative rates of reaction of these species was evaluated by modeling of concentration profiles obta
151 Cost effects of the urinary testing strategy were evaluated by modeling observed biopsy results and p
152           The affinity of isoflavones to ERs was evaluated by molecular modelling and isothermal titr
153  performance of these high-surface-area PANs is evaluated by monitoring the electrophysiological and
154                              Silver toxicity was evaluated by monitoring microalgal growth and photoc
155             The performance of immunosensing was evaluated by monitoring the kinetic bioaffinity bind
156             Hearts from (57)Fe-enriched mice were evaluated by Mossbauer spectroscopy.
157 hologic changes in specific cell populations were evaluated by multi-photon confocal microscopy.
158 t-related factors on 30-day readmission risk was evaluated by multilevel logistic regression analysis
159 cted during episodes of BK viral replication were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry after st
160 and symptoms as predictors of DHF and/or DSS was evaluated by multivariate analysis.
161 honey samples and their volatile composition was evaluated by multivariate statistical tools.
162 DNA, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT-derived parameters were evaluated by multivariate-analysis.
163 ecovery, and susceptibility-weighted images, was evaluated by neuroradiologists by using a modified v
164 ransport parameters using thin ionomer films was evaluated by numerical modeling of the current trans
165                      This method's potential was evaluated by observing and quantifying the generatio
166 the absolute difference from baseline, which was evaluated by paired Student t tests.
167 its were assessed; multiplicity of infection was evaluated by PCR that targeted the polymorphic msp-1
168 dema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) were evaluated by Pearson correlation and linear regress
169 ent of the method's precision and robustness is evaluated by performing shape restorations from simul
170 apability for imaging highly dynamic objects were evaluated by phantoms to characterize system perfor
171 l ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties were evaluated by piezoresponse force microscopy combine
172                                          MRD was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction analysis of I
173 n, bone resorption, and implant inflammation were evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), micro
174 nse, penile swab, and vaginal swab specimens were evaluated by polymerase chain reaction followed by
175                   The voltammetric procedure was evaluated by prescreening of SCs in 12 confiscated s
176 o concentrations of nano-Cu (10 and 20 mg/L) was evaluated by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spect
177                           Exposure to Neu5Gc was evaluated by quantifying anti-Neu5Gc antibody levels
178                  Endothelial cell activation was evaluated by quantifying nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B
179    The expression of differentiation markers was evaluated by quantitative PCR and Western blot.
180                       Leptin receptor (Ob-R) was evaluated by quantitative PCR.
181  pattern-recognition receptors and microRNAs was evaluated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction
182                               HSC activation was evaluated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction
183 )Tc-RYM1 binding to aneurysm and specificity were evaluated by quantitative autoradiography in apolip
184            Retinal sections and whole-mounts were evaluated by quantitative, immunohistochemical, and
185      Radiochemical stability of (99m)Tc-RYM1 was evaluated by radio-high-performance liquid chromatog
186 al radius defects (1.5 cm) in a rabbit model was evaluated by radiography and histology.
187                       Gene expression levels were evaluated by real-time PCR.
188 ation of responder and nonresponder patients was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve
189                     The discriminative power was evaluated by Receiver-Operating Characteristic.
190 matin interactions are highly dynamic, which are evaluated by recovery half time (t1/2) in seconds, d
191                                     Accuracy was evaluated by recovery assays and ranged from 91 to 1
192          The accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated by recovery tests, by analysis of referenc
193                The fundus and the optic disc were evaluated by repeated ophthalmoscopy, color fundus
194 on spectrometry and the digestion efficiency was evaluated by residual carbon content.
195                                    Knowledge was evaluated by responses to 3 questions for each disea
196                   The gingival transcriptome was evaluated by RNA sequencing of mRNA.
197                             The core samples were evaluated by routine light microscopy, including im
198 g affinity of (123)I-ABC577 for amyloid-beta was evaluated by saturation binding assay and in vitro a
199                      Disk surface morphology was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy.
200      Protein degradation during in vitro GID was evaluated by SDS-PAGE and by measuring the nitrogen
201                                   Senescence was evaluated by senescence-associated beta-Galactosidas
202 reduction in pizza crust without any topping were evaluated by sensory analyses.
203              Linear gradient reproducibility was evaluated by separating a three-component polycyclic
204                        The off-target effect was evaluated by sequencing two putative off-target site
205 nths post-MI, cardiac structure and function were evaluated by serial echocardiography and terminal i
206                 The severity of pancreatitis was evaluated by serum amylase activity, pathological sc
207 e in regulating glycolysis in human sarcomas was evaluated by short- and long-term rapamycin treatmen
208                                     Fibrosis was evaluated by sirius red/fast green staining and by q
209                 The effect on STAT4 function was evaluated by site-directed mutagenesis using a lymph
210 c cardiomyopathy patients without AF history were evaluated by (speckle-tracking) echocardiography.
211  BBB disruption, cerebral apoptosis, and CBF were evaluated by SPECT/CT up to 14 d after MCAO.
212           The vitreomacular interface status was evaluated by spectral-domain optical coherence tomog
213 lity of Al(3+) and Fe(3+) chelates in pH 6-7 were evaluated by spectrophotometry (380-700nm) and colo
214                                 The accuracy was evaluated by spiked experiments (80 to 119%).
215                                       Images were evaluated by staff at a central reading center.
216             A total of 78.4% of the patients were evaluated by stroke specialists within 24 hours aft
217 f ELMO1 to the lysosome degradation pathways was evaluated by studying pH and cathepsin B activity.
218                                    This fact was evaluated by submitting the different seasonings und
219 f the PD-L1-binding Affibody ligand ZPD-L1_1 was evaluated by surface plasmon resonance.
220          Sampling considerations with IHCmuA were evaluated by taking three tissues with varying leve
221 ted and uninfected THP-1-derived macrophages was evaluated by tandem-mass-spectrometry and difference
222                     The cell-based biosensor was evaluated by testing LPS isolated from 14 bacteria.
223 oscopy, and the accessibility of Au25 (SG)18 is evaluated by the 4-nitrophenol reduction reaction.
224  for transportation of thin delicate objects is evaluated by the optimum mechanical strength of the L
225                            Exercise capacity was evaluated by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT).
226 IC techniques and the antimutagenic activity was evaluated by the Ames test.
227                   The accuracy of the method was evaluated by the analysis of certified reference mat
228 h imaging feature to predict mutation status was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating c
229                               Discrimination was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating c
230                Its photocatalytic reactivity was evaluated by the degradation of methyl blue.
231 ial drug perfusion through the biofilm model was evaluated by the earlier devised procedure.
232 oxidation assays; the antibacterial activity was evaluated by the hole plate and MIC techniques and t
233       The validity of digitized filling flow was evaluated by the immunoassay, using liquids with a w
234                          Basophil activation was evaluated by the mean fluorescence intensity of CD20
235  antioxidant status of two functional pastas was evaluated by the novel Antioxidant/Oxidant Balance (
236                      Behavioural performance was evaluated by the open field test and the elevated pl
237                           Arsenic metabolism was evaluated by the proportions of iAs, MMA, and DMA ov
238                        The model performance was evaluated by the root mean square error of predictio
239                           Cognitive behavior was evaluated by the use of eight-arm radial maze.
240        The serological response (IgG) to SVA was evaluated by the weekly testing of sow and piglet se
241                                     The data were evaluated by the chi(2) test at P <0.05 levels.
242                                  The devices were evaluated by the determination of nitrate in a soil
243        The immunomodulatory abilities of TZD were evaluated by the expression of type I IFN pathway g
244                                    Fractions were evaluated by the ORAC method and the more active on
245                 The most representative ICNs were evaluated by the performance of three machine learn
246 munosorbent assay, and the bacterial numbers were evaluated by the reverse transcription-polymerase c
247             Avidity-based testing algorithms were evaluated by their (1) mean duration of recent infe
248 c shad, European wels catfish, common bleak) was evaluated by thermal methods.
249 ed to all laboratories, and the remaining 90 were evaluated by three laboratories.
250                  Control specimens (n = 865) were evaluated by tissue (n = 542) and cell-based (n = 3
251                      Each pathology specimen was evaluated by two hepatopathologists according to the
252                                Each scenario was evaluated by two interprofessional raters.
253               The bilateral substantia nigra was evaluated by two neuroradiologists for the presence,
254 ations in plasma metabolites in these groups were evaluated by untargeted ultra-performance liquid ch
255 tibilities of 17 mutants in this codon range were evaluated by use of the same recombinant phenotypin
256           MATERIAL/METHODS: Patients with HC were evaluated by USG elastography.
257 fluoroscopic assessments of ureteral patency was evaluated by using a Clopper-Pearson exact binomial
258                                   The method was evaluated by using a suite of five previously offlin
259 tional guidelines; knowledge of ICS function was evaluated by using a validated 10-item questionnaire
260                        Extraction efficiency was evaluated by using acetonitrile:water and ethanol:wa
261                            IPH volume change was evaluated by using both a visual rating scale and an
262  association of PAr with risk of lung cancer was evaluated by using conditional logistic regression.
263                               Sample storage was evaluated by using contrived and fresh samples befor
264                    When nutritional adequacy was evaluated by using least-cost diets produced from fo
265                          Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by using logistic generalized linear mixed
266 rthermore, the performance of full cell LIBs was evaluated by using MSNS anode and a LiCoO2 cathode w
267                    Corticosteroid resistance was evaluated by using nasal endoscopy.
268                 Radiographic JSN progression was evaluated by using Osteoarthritis Research Society I
269                                TJ expression was evaluated by using real-time quantitative PCR and im
270                                ICS technique was evaluated by using scales derived from instructions
271 n top of risk factors including baseline CAC was evaluated by using survival analysis, C-statistics,
272                       Discriminating ability was evaluated by using the area under the receiver opera
273       The methodologic quality of each study was evaluated by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnos
274 clinicopathologic relevance and significance was evaluated by using tissue microarray and immunohisto
275                     Interleukin 8 expression was evaluated by using wild-type strains and their corre
276 ating characteristic curves, and differences were evaluated by using 83.8% confidence intervals.
277 onfidence in the assessment of calcification were evaluated by using a four-point scale (4 = excellen
278 ,720 females (32%) and 2,958 athletes (20%), were evaluated by using a health questionnaire, physical
279 derived from allergen-binding single B cells were evaluated by using ELISA, Western blotting, and pep
280      Changes related to age, sex, and height were evaluated by using fitted nonlinear polynomial func
281 ncluded in these cultures, and their effects were evaluated by using flow cytometry and ELISA.
282 es, and immune phenotype and immune function were evaluated by using flow cytometry, ELISA, and histo
283                         ILC2s and Treg cells were evaluated by using in vitro suppression assays, cel
284 outcome, and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by using logistic regression and Cox prop
285 S duration, and corrected QT interval [QTc]) were evaluated by using multivariable regression analyse
286       Predictors of neoplasms and malignancy were evaluated by using multivariate logistic regression
287 IFN-gamma and IFN-gamma-inducible chemokines were evaluated by using real-time PCR in the liver and s
288                      Pain perception and QOL were evaluated by using specific questionnaires.
289 es in measurements among pathologic entities were evaluated by using t tests.
290                        Categorical variables were evaluated by using the Fisher exact test and linear
291                         Psychiatric symptoms were evaluated by using the Hospital Anxiety and Depress
292                                  Differences were evaluated by using the paired Student t test.
293 ct of partial hydrolysis of squaramides, has been evaluated by UV spectroscopy at 37 degrees C in the
294 tical performances of the modified electrode were evaluated by UV-vis absorption and fluorescence spe
295                  Forearm and calf blood flow were evaluated by venous occlusion plethysmography, MSNA
296                   Maintenance of proficiency was evaluated by video assessments 6 months after traini
297 stogenic factor of activated T-cells (SOFAT) was evaluated by Western blotting.
298 in B1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen were evaluated by Western Blot and liver injury was asse
299                        Biochemical processes were evaluated by Western blotting or immunofluorescence
300 differentiation and onset of steroidogenesis was evaluated by whole-genome expression in 67 first tri

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top