1 All documents
were reviewed by 1 author, with selected review by coaut
2 Overall, 114 patient records
were reviewed by 18 IPs, the majority of whom specified
3 Evidence
was reviewed by 2 blinded reviewers with a formal assess
4 Spine magnetic resonance imaging
was reviewed by 2 neuroradiologists.
5 Each study
was reviewed by 2 observers and graded for methodologic
6 Histology specimens
were reviewed by 2 blinded pathologists.
7 All histopathologic sections
were reviewed by 2 dermatopathologists who examined all
8 color fundus photographs from eyes with PCC
were reviewed by 2 independent ophthalmologists.
9 Articles
were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers and independent
10 Radiographs
were reviewed by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists who were
11 Images
were reviewed by 2 nuclear medicine physicians in consen
12 The MRI studies
were reviewed by 2 pediatric neuroradiologists for optic
13 Death certificates
were reviewed by 2 physicians.
14 Papers identified
were reviewed by 2 reviewers to select those that mentio
15 idelines are uniquely interdisciplinary, and
were reviewed by 24 editors and experts chosen from the
16 Thirty-six of 74 articles met criteria and
were reviewed by 3 authors.
17 The images
were reviewed by 7 observers, who used a standardized in
18 Patient details
are reviewed by a peer surgeon (and in certain cases a s
19 This evidence has
been reviewed by a taskforce of the Dermatology section
20 Imaging
was reviewed by a blinded senior pancreatic surgeon.
21 Liver biopsy histology
was reviewed by a central pathology committee.
22 All biopsy material
was reviewed by a dedicated breast pathologist who perfo
23 Each analysis
was reviewed by a radiologist; errors were recorded and
24 Histology
was reviewed by a sarcoma pathologist and divided into 5
25 Histology at primary presentation
was reviewed by a sarcoma pathologist and subtyped into
26 All deaths
were reviewed by a blinded adjudication committee and ca
27 oratories, and records with abnormal results
were reviewed by a blinded panel of 3 cardiologists who
28 All images
were reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist, and
29 Their mammograms
were reviewed by a breast imaging specialist who was bli
30 Scans
were reviewed by a central facility and scored using the
31 biopsy within 6 months of clinical data that
were reviewed by a central pathology committee.
32 ma performing CABG (ICD-9 codes 36.10-36.20)
were reviewed by a Clinical Data Abstraction Center (CDA
33 All deaths
were reviewed by a clinical end-point committee, and the
34 occurring during and after the HALT-C Trial
were reviewed by a committee of investigators to determi
35 linical diagnosis was higher, when the cases
were reviewed by a core of pulmonologists (87%) or radio
36 The complete medical records
were reviewed by a gastroenterologist.
37 All cases
were reviewed by a gynecologic pathologist, and clinical
38 All available pathologic specimens
were reviewed by a hematologic pathologist.
39 pathologic specimens from the eight patients
were reviewed by a hematopathologist.
40 10,348 specimens, and all discordant images
were reviewed by a laboratory supervisor or director.
41 Periductal sections from all animals
were reviewed by a liver pathologist.
42 Results
were reviewed by a multidisciplinary expert panel, and i
43 d, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas
were reviewed by a multidisciplinary group (surgery, rad
44 Brain scans
were reviewed by a neuroradiologist (unaware of clinical
45 The images
were reviewed by a neuroradiologist with 12 years of exp
46 All baseline ECGs
were reviewed by a panel of 3 experienced electrocardiog
47 iled combination peginterferon and ribavirin
were reviewed by a panel of expert hepatopathologists.
48 Center Cancer Treatment Group protocol N9741
were reviewed by a panel of five medical oncologists not
49 ed approximately every 1 to 2 years; studies
were reviewed by a panel of neuroradiologists.
50 Study Group Registry with indeterminate ALF
were reviewed by a pathologist blinded to all clinical d
51 Tissue sections from each patient
were reviewed by a pathologist, who was blinded to the c
52 The lung biopsies
were reviewed by a pathology core and 54 of 91 patients
53 medical records and daily chest radiographs
were reviewed by a pediatric radiologist to ascertain de
54 Images
were reviewed by a radiologist with expertise in lymphat
55 Pathology slides from these patients
were reviewed by a reference pathologist to confirm EGFR
56 ography scans during cetuximab-based therapy
were reviewed by a reference radiologist.
57 The initial screen and clinical reinterview
were reviewed by a senior clinician.
58 A subsample of histopathologic records
were reviewed by a senior dermatopathologist to determin
59 Endoscopic images
were reviewed by a single expert central reader.
60 All slides
were reviewed by a single pancreatic pathologist and cla
61 emistry of all the original biopsy specimens
were reviewed by a single pathologist and classified usi
62 Images
were reviewed by a single radiologist blinded to convent
63 , CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis
were reviewed by a single radiologist.
64 All CHDs
were reviewed by a specialist blinded to exposures.
65 Medical records and neuroimaging studies
were reviewed by a stroke neurologist or neurointensivis
66 Report drafts
were reviewed by a subcommittee and revised until agreem
67 All cases
were reviewed by a team of interventional cardiologists
68 the relevant literature published since 1998
was reviewed by all panel members.
69 he data assembled and analyzed by each group
were reviewed by all authors and combined into this manu
70 Studies
were reviewed by all authors, and data considered to be
71 Questions
were reviewed by American Indians from the communities i
72 end that infected health care workers (HCWs)
be reviewed by an expert panel and inform patients of th
73 A list of 47 potential indicators of RA
was reviewed by an expert Delphi panel of 6 rheumatologi
74 This study
was reviewed by an independent data safety monitoring bo
75 eference) populated with HSCT patients, data
were reviewed by an adjudication panel to determine the
76 ardiograms during atrial arrhythmia episodes
were reviewed by an electrophysiologist.
77 onths, a total of 666 deaths occurred, which
were reviewed by an Events Committee and initially categ
78 ll chest radiographs interpreted as positive
were reviewed by an experienced board-certified radiolog
79 The 198 deaths in the trial
were reviewed by an independent Events Committee and cla
80 erse events (SAEs) were used, and all events
were reviewed by an independent physician panel.
81 Self-reported exposures
were reviewed by an industrial hygienist, and improbable
82 Baseline and interim scans
were reviewed by an international panel of 6 nuclear med
83 Images
were reviewed by applying a multidetector CT-based gradi
84 The ASTRO guideline
was reviewed by ASCO content experts for clinical accura
85 Methods The ASTRO guideline
was reviewed by ASCO content experts for clinical accura
86 Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer
was reviewed by ASCO for methodologic rigor and consider
87 Titles, abstracts, and articles
were reviewed by at least 2 independent readers.
88 -field-of-view (FOV) images for each patient
were reviewed by at least one neuroradiologist and two b
89 Endoscopies
were reviewed by blinded gastroenterology pathologists.
90 ssion such as p53, E-cadherin and Ki-67 have
been reviewed by both single-marker studies and by micro
91 The statement
was reviewed by both parent committees (ie, the AACR SPG
92 g injury." DATA EXTRACTION: Selected studies
were reviewed by both authors, and data extracted based
93 Studies
were reviewed by both of us, and data considered to be p
94 othermia, and emerging therapies for HIE and
were reviewed by both of us.
95 All studies
were reviewed by consensus of 2 senior imaging specialis
96 Images
were reviewed, by consensus, by three radiologists blind
97 chocardiograms and computed tomography scans
were reviewed by core laboratories.
98 ociation between comorbidities and psoriasis
is reviewed by correlating the skin transcriptome and se
99 ks (MOFs), also called soft porous crystals,
are reviewed by covering the literature of the five year
100 herapy were identified in clinics, and notes
were reviewed by doctors trained in uveitis therapy.
101 Each case
was reviewed by eight network investigators and categori
102 rature on the concept of "vulnerable plaque"
was reviewed by examining 463 abstracts of primary and r
103 The toxicity profile of HDI
was reviewed by examining data from the United States co
104 ared and read by the satellite laboratorians
were reviewed by experienced microbiologists at the cent
105 Neuroimaging and neuropathology
were reviewed by experienced neuroradiologists and neuro
106 ams, which replaced the Part I and II exams,
were reviewed by five nutrition professionals.
107 val and 86 screening-detected breast cancers
were reviewed by four breast radiologists and compared w
108 ase summaries from an infant behavior clinic
were reviewed by four experienced clinicians.
109 = 9], and bone scintigraphic images [n = 1])
were reviewed by four radiologists with consensus agreem
110 Images
were reviewed by four radiologists, with final opinion a
111 lobe, which left 27 patients whose CT scans
were reviewed by four radiologists: Group A (n = 12) wer
112 CC slides
were reviewed by gastrointestinal cytopathologists who w
113 All cases
were reviewed by GI gastrointestinal pathologists, and p
114 Data
were reviewed by individuals knowledgeable of in-country
115 Reports
were reviewed by individuals with expertise in serotonin
116 re department in which antibiotic strategies
are reviewed by infectious disease specialists three tim
117 Angiography reports
were reviewed by investigators blinded to the results of
118 attributable causes of death should perhaps
be reviewed by local infection control teams regardless
119 onsecutive arm port placements (44 patients)
was reviewed by means of chart review (hospital, office,
120 ion strategies for medication-related events
are reviewed by medication use process node (prescribing
121 ned in the formal evidence-gathering process
were reviewed by members of the working group.
122 Magnetic resonance images
were reviewed by MS neurologists (J.S.G., E.W., B.N., an
123 n results of the review were qualitative and
were reviewed by neurofibromatosis clinical directors wo
124 All documents
were reviewed by one author, with selected review by coa
125 The patients' medical records
were reviewed by one author.
126 All scans
were reviewed by one of three fellowship-trained abdomin
127 se images and three-dimensional reformations
were reviewed by one of two radiologists.
128 All slides on every patient
were reviewed by one pathologist.
129 cal procedure and subsequent clinical course
were reviewed by pancreatic surgeons and radiologists.
130 ation from consecutive patients at each site
were reviewed by panels of four expert hematopathologist
131 Slides from potential cases
were reviewed by pathologists.
132 ublished characteristics of adrenal hematoma
were reviewed by readers who were unblinded to the initi
133 , tests, and prescriptions and, if positive,
were reviewed by reading full text.
134 rating MCH and immunization service delivery
were reviewed by searching journal databases and Web sit
135 The guideline
was reviewed by selected experts and approved by the boa
136 The guideline
was reviewed by selected experts in the field and the AS
137 His case
was reviewed by several specialists to develop alternati
138 ined in 64 patients with focal liver disease
were reviewed by six independent reviewers in a randomiz
139 brain and nonbrain tissues per participant,
were reviewed by study pathologists.
140 The RTS,S/AS01 malaria candidate vaccine
was reviewed by the European Medicines Agency and receiv
141 level of evidence of these selected studies
was reviewed by the panel methodologist.
142 y information about symptoms and weight that
was reviewed by the patients' clinicians.
143 d strength of recommendation, then the draft
was reviewed by the relevant subcommittee.
144 Studies
were reviewed by the authors to assess the quality of th
145 The titles and abstracts of these articles
were reviewed by the authors, and 364 were selected for
146 valuation forms, but when they did, 28 of 31
were reviewed by the chair (90%).
147 Ultimately, 11 of these cases
were reviewed by the consensus panel for potentially aty
148 Diagnostic tumor biopsies
were reviewed by the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patho
149 All patients
were reviewed by the medical emergency team from July 20
150 Data that changed the previous guidelines
were reviewed by the panel (according to section).
151 s and a random sample of nondysplastic sites
were reviewed by the pathologists.
152 Three hundred twenty-two comments
were reviewed by the Steering Group and used as the basi
153 All clinical data
were reviewed by the team to adjudicate optimal treatmen
154 397 cases from January 2006 to December 2011
were reviewed by the Victorian Melanoma Service, and 144
155 n obtained in the evidence-gathering process
were reviewed by the working group.
156 All x-rays and clinical data
were reviewed by three clinicians for acute lung injury
157 All studies
were reviewed by three independent investigators.
158 edibility of Web site information, Web sites
were reviewed by three independent reviewers on the basi
159 Clinical and neuroimaging data
were reviewed by three neurologists to confirm CLIPPERS
160 hest pain or suspected myocardial infarction
were reviewed by three other cardiologists with no knowl
161 ts, 109 of whom had multiple lobes biopsied,
were reviewed by three pathologists.
162 ), and ultrasonographic (US) imaging studies
were reviewed by three radiologists in consensus.
163 Ultrasound examinations
were reviewed by three radiologists working together, an
164 CT scans
were reviewed by three radiologists, and a consensus int
165 Studies
were reviewed by title and abstract screening, and full-
166 42,335 patient records from 58 institutions
were reviewed by trained research associates.
167 Each patient's medical chart
was reviewed by two independent investigators who rated
168 Each imaging case
was reviewed by two independent radiologists, and all pu
169 Each incident report
was reviewed by two of the authors, and, by scrutinising
170 Each set
was reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the diagnosi
171 The radiographic images
were reviewed by two authors to determine the morphology
172 Initial biopsy specimens
were reviewed by two dermatopathologists and classified
173 Serial echocardiograms
were reviewed by two echocardiographers who were blinded
174 10 CT, three MR, and two angiographic images
were reviewed by two experienced abdominal radiologists.
175 (proved by bronchoalveolar lavage or biopsy)
were reviewed by two experienced pulmonary radiologist a
176 s proved by bronchoalveolar lavage or biopsy
were reviewed by two experienced pulmonary radiologists
177 a tertiary lung center between 2009 and 2012
were reviewed by two experienced pulmonary radiologists
178 Radiologic findings
were reviewed by two experienced, blinded observers and
179 Operation notes and imaging reports
were reviewed by two independent experienced physicians.
180 Scans
were reviewed by two independent neuroradiologists who w
181 The findings
were reviewed by two independent panels and used to esti
182 All five affected patients
were reviewed by two independent surgeons experienced in
183 Mammograms and sonograms
were reviewed by two mammographers using the Breast Imag
184 nd 28 patients with noninfected arthroplasty
were reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists for th
185 after MR imaging for possible osteomyelitis
were reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists workin
186 Images
were reviewed by two neuroradiologists, and susceptibili
187 104 patients with angiographically proved PE
were reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians and two
188 Thin-section CT scans
were reviewed by two observers blinded to the diagnoses
189 Microscopic sections of all 136 patients
were reviewed by two pathologists blinded to the clinica
190 udies in 23 children with a liver transplant
were reviewed by two pediatric radiologists, and appeara
191 Studies of 68 patients
were reviewed by two physicians in consensus.
192 Data
were reviewed by two radiologists in consensus.
193 All MR images
were reviewed by two radiologists who were blinded to pa
194 Cases with false-positive results
were reviewed by two readers blinded to patient outcome,
195 rcomas who had undergone neoadjuvant therapy
were reviewed by two readers during three sessions: conv
196 histologically proved and karyotyped ccRCCs
were reviewed by two readers with experience in abdomina
197 tients with biopsy-proved NSIP and a CT scan
were reviewed by two thoracic radiologists in consensus.
198 ents hospitalized on a locked inpatient unit
was reviewed by using a standardized alliance scale.
199 The images
were reviewed by using a picture archiving and communica
200 sections (on original and compressed images)
were reviewed by using an interactive workstation.
201 University of California, San Francisco, can
be reviewed by visiting its World Wide Web site at http: