ライフサイエンスコーパス: beach

1 categories (such as forests vs mountains vs beaches).

2 orizing a scene as open, as outdoor, or as a beach.

3 ts popular, but chronically FIB-contaminated beach.

4 sources, varying by date, occurred at every beach.

5 ronounced as the herd spent more time on the beach.

6 ainment of pollution at a wave-dominant open beach.

7 re dries around our feet when we walk on the beach.

8 finger approaching a flat rock buried in the beach.

9 e best performing model types for California beaches.

10 ewport Bay and other urban-impacted enclosed beaches.

11 ntrollable, fecal source to suburban coastal beaches.

12 ace waters and tar balls from Gulf of Mexico beaches.

13 edunes are found on dissipative (reflective) beaches.

14 +/- 347.3 items/m(2)) on the surface of the beaches.

15 (Posidonia oceanica) found on Mediterranean beaches.

16 e of multiple contamination sources at these beaches.

17 en addressed in the intertidal zone of sandy beaches.

18 harge may be more important for coarser sand beaches.

19 levels of indicator bacteria at recreational beaches.

20 females to a series of predictably different beaches.

21 l samples collected from four Gulf of Mexico beaches 12-19 months after the Deepwater Horizon disaste

22 ing 64 of the 83 recaptured turtles to natal beaches (77.1%).

23 etections were more numerous when the EC/ENT Beach Action Value (but not when the Geometric Mean and

24 The "beach action value" was exceeded most often when using E

25 richia coli and enterococci, trigger coastal beach advisories and signal public health risks.

26 measured throughout the summer, resulting in beach advisories with social and economic consequences.

27 ncrease illness risks for swimmers and cause beach advisories.

28 tatistical regression models used to predict beach advisories.

29 days was found to be sufficient to trigger a beach advisory if eroded to surface water.

30 ng advisories due to FIB contamination at 25 beaches along the California coastline.

31 Enclosed beaches along urban coastlines are frequent hot spots of

32 and knee-deep waters at Chicago 63rd Street Beach, an embayed, tideless, freshwater beach with low c

33 es are key ecosystem drivers in marine sandy beaches, an important and dynamic environment; however,

34 abate gulls using a falconry program for the beach and an upland landfill.

35 re, we used genetic and phenotypic data from beach and creek ecotypes of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus

36 netic and phenotypic differentiation between beach and creek fish was high and significant in all sam

37 etlands, such as marshes and mangroves, sand beaches and dunes, seagrass beds, and coral and oyster r

38 site's inhabitants used seaweed from distant beaches and estuarine environments for food and medicine

39 ings of small turtles downcurrent of nesting beaches and in association with drifting organisms (e.g.

40 Results were highly variable among beaches and matrices; some correlations with environment

41 rsus usual care (5 Atkins, 4 WW, and 1 South Beach) and 2 head-to-head (1 of Atkins, WW, and Zone, an

42 n (DASH), Zone, Atkins, Mediterranean, South Beach, and Ornish diets were evaluated for consistency w

43 in the surf zone, sand, and wrack at Cowell Beach, and ruled out the storm drain, the river, the har

44 ze the scenes they encounter: an office, the beach, and so on.

45 merical model whereby FIB are delivered to a beach aquifer by wave-induced infiltration across the be

46 Simulated transport of E. coli in a beach aquifer is complex and does not correlate with con

47 lations indicate FIB rapidly accumulate in a beach aquifer with FIB primarily associated with sand ra

48 mulate As, creating a risk of high As in the beach aquifer.

49 he accumulation and distribution of FIB in a beach aquifer.

50 g the mobility of arsenic (As) in freshwater beach aquifers.

51 tribution in various matrices at Great Lakes beaches are limited.

52 xyhydrocarbons" in sand patties deposited on beaches are not well-known.

53 Here, they contaminate bathing beaches, are filtered and concentrated by shellfish eate

54 familiar surface gravity waves that break on beaches, are ubiquitous in the ocean.

55 BEAL2 (neurobeachin-like 2), which encodes a BEACH/ARM/WD40 domain protein, cause GPS and that megaka

56 al indicators of fecal pollution rank Cowell Beach as the most polluted beach in California.

57 es (Caretta caretta), which leave their home beaches as hatchlings and migrate across entire ocean ba

58 Most sediment samples came from sandy beaches at the high tide line, and most seawater samples

59 ntricate nanostructures, such as a wireframe beach ball or square-toothed gears.

60 ment 'Janus' particles, and multi-sectioned 'beach ball' particles.

61 sion of neurobeachin, a protein containing a BEACH (beige and Chediak-Higashi) domain implicated in s

62 Bchs with the vesicle trafficking-associated BEACH (Beige and Chediak-Higashi) domain protein family

63 ed family characterized by the presence of a BEACH (Beige and Chediak-Higashi) domain, have been impl

64 hosphatase 2A, and the yeast kinase TOR1) or BEACH (beige and Chediak-Higashi) domains.

65 We found that neurons lacking the BEACH (beige-Chediak/Higashi) domain protein Neurobeachi

66 Our results suggest that modality in sandy beach benthic communities is unlikely to be explained by

67 extracted from coastal barrier stratigraphy, beach berm and dune-beach contact.

68 The multicenter, single-arm BEACH (Boston Scientific EPI: A Carotid Stenting Trial f

69 ice outpatient dermatology office in Newport Beach (CA, USA).

70 the seismogenic root of the NIF beneath Long Beach, California, and identify seismicity in an activel

71 ere regionally consistent (up to 40 km), but beach catchment variables (drains/creeks, impervious sur

72 es around the globe and highlights how local beach characteristics can drive incubation temperatures.

73 ants viewed photographs and line drawings of beaches, city streets, forests, highways, mountains, and

74 mental factors, providing a flawed basis for beach closure decisions.

75 ble for runoff-associated inland and coastal beach closures) in stormwater biofilters (a common type

76 ions resulting in more accurate estimates of beach closures.

77 elevated As concentrations observed at both beaches, combined with the distribution of other dissolv

78 rrence, and microbial sources at Great Lakes beaches comes largely from individual beach studies.

79 g intensified wave conditions at a fine sand beach, comparative characterization of the E. coli distr

80 Beach conditions were followed for three years after imp

81 For certain beach conditions, the amount of FIB accumulated in sand

82 al barrier stratigraphy, beach berm and dune-beach contact.

83 8-2000 cross-sectional study in western Palm Beach County, Florida, using a population-based random h

84 ions remained unmet at a southern California beach despite a suite of management actions carried out

85 Nesting suffers from beach development, egg poaching and the poaching of nest

86 and contact on the day of their visit to the beach (digging in the sand, body buried in the sand).

87 The BEACH domain contains a core of several partially extend

88 We show that GPS-causing mutations in its BEACH domain have profound and possible effects on the i

89 Our previous studies showed that the BEACH domain is preceded by a novel, weakly conserved pl

90 stal structure at 2.4 A resolution of the PH-BEACH domain of human LRBA/BGL.

91 Mutations in the BEACH domain resulted in formation of normal or slightly

92 The beige and Chediak-Higashi syndrome (BEACH) domain defines a large family of eukaryotic prote

93 to the family of beige and Chediak-Higashi (BEACH) domain proteins.

94 at three types of Beige and Chediak-Higashi (BEACH)-domain proteins contribute to both vacuolar prote

95 e results suggest that a cascade of multiple BEACH-domain proteins contributes to vacuolar protein tr

96 e a putative protein belonging to group D of BEACH-domain proteins, which possess kinase domains.

97 ed gene neurobeachin (nbea), which encodes a BEACH-domain-containing protein implicated in endomembra

98 intimate association between the PH and the BEACH domains, and surface plasmon resonance studies con

99 IIV on predator-prey interaction outcomes in beach-dwelling jumping spiders (Terralonus californicus)

100 Disruption of other BEACH-encoding loci in the gfs12 mutant showed that BEAC

101 onjunction with measurements of the physical beach environment.

102 st Coast, corresponding to anomalously large beach erosion across the region.

103 llness for Campylobacter jejuni at the study beaches, especially where recreational water quality cri

104 . ovata also exposure to the aerosols on the beach evoked respiratory symptoms in humans.

105 ion is the result of thinning of cliff-front beaches, exacerbated by regional storminess and anthropo

106 ifer by wave-induced infiltration across the beach face.

107 and E. coli was transported deeper below the beach face.

108 ves on subsurface salinity distribution on a beach face.

109 The BEACH family proteins LvsA and LvsD were identified in a

110 d, Aylan Kurdi, lying face-down on a Turkish beach, filled the front pages of newspapers worldwide.

111 s to creeks were shallower bodied than other beach fish, and male strays from creeks to beaches were

112 MTI PhotoScreener [PhotoScreener, Inc., Palm Beach, FL]).

113 ic and Clinical Advances," was held in Miami Beach, Florida from November 30 to December 3, 2010.

114 2010 and the flow of oil toward Panama City Beach, Florida, in June 2010.

115 eposited in the swash zone on Gulf of Mexico beaches following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

116 All participants remained at a sunny beach for 3(1/2) hours at midday.

117 Using genetics, we identified natal beaches for 288 turtles that were live-captured off the

118 these methods has not been examined at most beaches for expectation of health risk and management de

119 ssecting the different functional domains of BEACH (for beige and human Chediak-Higashi syndrome) pro

120 nge of images that we might categorize as a "beach", for example, some will be more representative of

121 Here, we used field data on an estuarine beach foreshore with numerical simulations to show that

122 s (3 genera, at least 8 species) on adjacent beaches from 1900 to 2012, to help assess population sta

123 0%, respectively, in samples collected along beaches from April 2011 through August 2012.

124 collected 36 intertidal samples at 12 sandy beaches from four regions that spanned distances from 0.

125 f causing water quality and health risks for beach-goers.

126 The findings suggest that beach grooming for wrack removal is not justified as a m

127 Beach grooming was generally associated with either no c

128 The impacts of beach grooming, to remove wrack, were investigated at Co

129 hich ENT from beach sands are transported to beach groundwater where they may be discharged to coasta

130 All beaches had detections of human and bovine viruses and p

131 Of these locations, Jupiter Florida/Vero Beach has the highest settlement rate in the model and i

132 ion to surface waters, and some recreational beaches have used gull control measures to improve micro

133 factor affecting beach water quality, while beaches having a deteriorating water quality trend or lo

134 ncoding loci in the gfs12 mutant showed that BEACH homologs acted in a cascading manner for PSV traff

135 pistatic genetic interactions observed among BEACH homologs were also found in the ETI responses of t

136 ected during a predominantly dry summer at a beach impacted by nonpoint source pollution.

137 se reference levels with measurements from a beach impacted by nonpoint sources of contamination.

138 cooperative modeling approach for freshwater beaches impacted by point sources in which insights deri

139 y 30,000 animals along approximately 1 km of beach in 2011.

140 ution rank Cowell Beach as the most polluted beach in California.

141 to remove wrack, were investigated at Cowell Beach in Santa Cruz, California using a long-term survey

142 sex and age of walruses hauled out on Alaska beaches in 2010-2011.

143 Here, using yearlong data sets measured at beaches in Alaska Prince William Sound, we performed spe

144 Study of multiple beaches in different geographic settings provided new in

145 Waterborne pathogens were measured at three beaches in Lake Michigan, environmental factors for pred

146 ll storm drains on FIB pollution at enclosed beaches in Newport Bay, the second largest tidal embayme

147 swimming and wading in marine and freshwater beaches in six U.S. states, and CHEERS, which evaluated

148 lony in NW France, (ii) adults found dead on beaches in Southern Portugal, (iii) breeding birds atten

149 of samples collected at three Lake Michigan beaches in summer, 2010.

150 n 2010, and other oiled samples collected on beaches in the northern Gulf of Mexico from July 2010 un

151 ertebrate body sizes from a variety of sandy beaches in the UK to test the hypothesis that these comm

152 cific (SE) DNA sequence at seven Great Lakes beaches, in algae, water, and sediment.

153 Higher waves associated with dissipative beaches increase the disturbance of strand species, whic

154 ring of the eight kill localities at Wally's Beach indicates these animals were killed over a short p

155 MDL) implementation at a southern California beach involved ultraviolet treatment of watershed draina

156 been made that the wrack accumulating on the beach is a major source of FIB to the surf zone.

157 rce tracking methods indicate the FIB at the beach is of human and bird origin.

158 ling confirmed that the source of FIB to the beach is terrestrial rather than marine.

159 t urban waterways, lakes, and coastal marine beaches is responsible for costs that should be accounte

160 on, cost efficiency, and collaboration among beach jurisdictions.

161 nfirm the highly non-stationary behaviour of beach levels at Duck.

162 areas where magnetic signatures of adjacent beach locations converged over time, whereas nesting den

163 and significant in all sampling years, with beach males having deeper bodies than creek males.

164 odels of beach water quality may help reduce beach management errors and enhance protection of public

165 Traditional beach management that uses concentrations of cultivatabl

166 The monitoring approach selected by beach managers may be a combination of available tools t

167 1r allele is present in Florida's Gulf Coast beach mice but not in Atlantic coast mice with similar l

168 Natural populations of beach mice exhibit a characteristic color pattern, relat

169 ion in the melanocortin-1 receptor (Mc1r) in beach mice, which decreases receptor function.

170 On highly impacted beaches, microplastic concentrations (<1mm) can reach 3%

171 ater (n = 4), were collected in Wrightsville Beach, NC.

172 m September through October 2010 on a public beach near Rovinj, Croatia but stayed undetected by publ

173 marine aerosol at Sant Andreu de Llavaneres beach (northwestern Mediterranean Sea).

174 A beach nourishment with approximately 1/3 fine-grained se

175 um to compare to a tar ball collected on the beach of Louisiana.

176 sources, we collected 12 TB samples from the beaches of Gujarat (Tithal, Maroli, Umbergam, and Nargol

177 how dramatic this increase is likely to be: beached oil has an environmental residence of years, whe

178 paper presents data collected at a fine sand beach on Lake Huron, Canada over three field events.

179 e followed a massive bloom event on a public beach on the northern Adriatic coast near Rovinj, Croati

180 erved 1-2 m below the shoreline at two sandy beaches on Lake Erie, Ontario, Canada.

181 consisting of a screen background image of a beach or mountains, accompanied by corresponding sounds.

182 1.82; P = 0.061), and wearing a shirt at the beach or pool rarely (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.54; P =

183 Our goal was to identify nesting beach origins for turtles foraging here.

184 d inorganic nitrogen (DIN) concentrations in beach pore water along the Santa Barbara, California coa

185 We coupled measurements of beach pore water residence time, determined using the ra

186 y a finger pushing slowly into the sand on a beach) presents an interesting physics problem that is c

187 ersers from a different habitat (nearby lake beaches) produced half as many offspring.

188 Here we show that the Drosophila BEACH protein Bchs (Blue cheese) acts during development

189 Our previous work showed that the BEACH protein NBEAL2 and the Sec1/Munc18 protein VPS33B

190 assays demonstrate that the PH domain in the BEACH proteins cannot bind phospholipids.

191 interesting possibility that Bchs and other BEACH proteins may regulate vesicle traffic via interact

192 BEACH proteins, an evolutionarily conserved family chara

193 We recruited beachgoers at Boqueron Beach, Puerto Rico, during the summer of 2009.

194 prove public health protection at California beaches relative to current practices.

195 that gull removal can be a highly successful beach remedial action to improve microbial water quality

196 so found that heterogeneity greatly affected beach response.

197 rize the magnetic coordinates of their natal beach, returning to that combination of parameters to la

198 Conservative estimates for a Mediterranean beach reveal that tourism activities during a summer day

199 ral disasters-earthquakes, El Nino flooding, beach ridge formation, and sand dune incursion-at approx

200 n of demography, economy, and El Nino-driven beach-ridge formation on the Chira beach-ridge plain of

201 no-driven beach-ridge formation on the Chira beach-ridge plain of Northwestern Peru has changed the n

202 ns and entombed within coatings of dripstone beach-rock silica cement.

203 constructed to estimate the probability of a beach sample exceeding 4 mug/L microcystin.

204 able spatially and temporally along the nine beaches sampled in Central California.

205 along with the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (San Pedro Bay Ports) in 2006 passed regulations e

206 differential decay of wastewater bacteria in beach sand and in seawater provides a kinetic explanatio

207 Elevated fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in beach sand and pore water represent an important nonpoin

208 was contrasted by the increase in indigenous beach sand and seawater microbiota, and the overall micr

209 a and the change of microbial communities in beach sand and seawater.

210 a reference level guideline for pathogens in beach sand and to compare these reference levels with me

211 Although evidence shows that beach sand can harbor high concentrations of fecal indic

212 ecal pathogens, illness risk associated with beach sand contact is not well understood.

213 Recent studies of beach sand fecal contamination have triggered interest a

214 wer decrease of total bacterial densities in beach sand than in seawater.

215 showed significantly smaller decay rates in beach sand than in seawater.

216 in transporting microbial contaminants from beach sand to coastal water is unknown.

217 suspended in seawater through medium-grained beach sand under transient and saturated flow conditions

218 on three different types of floor surfaces: beach sand, a paved street or grass.

219 e often-observed higher abundance of FIBs in beach sand, and the NGS-based microbial community analys

220 venger-assisted magnesiothermic reduction of beach sand.

221 Foreshore beach sands and pore water may act as a reservoir and no

222 an important pathway through which ENT from beach sands are transported to beach groundwater where t

223 nterococci (ENT) from naturally contaminated beach sands to the groundwater table via infiltrating se

224 o cENT through laboratory columns containing beach sands.

225 d, groundwater, and beach sites, including a beach scour pond and tidal creek.

226 mapA abundance in water was correlated with beach seasonal mean log10 E. coli concentration.

227 Beach seasonal mean mapA abundance in water was correlat

228 Beach sediment and sand are recognized as nonpoint fecal

229 Oiled beach sediment, tar ball, and marsh samples were collect

230 order, from fastest to slowest: high energy beach sediments > low energy beach sediments > marsh > t

231 st: high energy beach sediments > low energy beach sediments > marsh > tar balls.

232 camel in North America occurs at the Wally's Beach site, Canada.

233 s collected from watershed, groundwater, and beach sites, including a beach scour pond and tidal cree

234 ties were associated with enteric illness at beach sites.

235 ltration velocity (i.e., beaches with higher beach slope and wave height, and lower terrestrial groun

236 ach, the Cape Hatteras Tropical Limit/Myrtle Beach South Carolina, and Florida Keys/Ten Thousand Isla

237 The stream- and beach-spawning ecotypes exhibited striking morphological

238 Variation in beach-specific results suggests that site-specific facto

239 n blubber collected from fishery bycatch and beach-stranded specimens for 40 females of known reprodu

240 Artificial beach structures proved to dramatically reduce settling

241 Lakes beaches comes largely from individual beach studies.

242 At one beach, stx2 gene abundance was positively correlated wit

243 d bird-associated Catellicoccus, through the beach subsurface.

244 E. coli distribution at a coarse sand-cobble beach suggests that interstitial pore water flow and dis

245 Beach surface water and groundwater collected in Sendai

246 We found that the response of the beach system was characterized by fluctuations of embedd

247 model FIB dynamics in the coupled watershed-beach system.

248 nd limits of the model; Jupiter Florida/Vero Beach, the Cape Hatteras Tropical Limit/Myrtle Beach Sou

249 se spatial proximity, yet dispersal from the beach to the streams was more common than dispersal betw

250 Male strays from beaches to creeks were shallower bodied than other beach

251 d seawater, and resin pellets sampled on the beach, to investigate the origin and uniqueness of plast

252 These findings suggest that through-beach transport of ENT may be an important pathway throu

253 The BEACH trial results demonstrate that CAS with the WALLST

254 .5% for the primary composite end point, the BEACH trial results met the pre-specified criteria for n

255 planation for the empirical relation between beach type and foredune size, in which large (small) for

256 ere is insufficient clinical evidence that a beach umbrella alone can provide adequate sun protection

257 A beach umbrella alone may not provide sufficient protecti

258 ure sunburn protection offered by a standard beach umbrella compared with that provided by sunscreen

259 The shade provided by a beach umbrella or protection provided by sunscreen with

260 andomly assigned to 2 groups: 1 using only a beach umbrella, and the other using only sunscreen with

261 tudy, gulls were chased from a Lake Michigan beach using specially trained dogs, and water quality im

262 et for 83 foraging turtles traced to nesting beaches using flipper tags and/or PIT tags (n = 72), or

263 onitoring outcomes expected at Lake Michigan beaches using protocols for indicator bacteria including

264 e of Health, Memphis VA Medical Center, Long Beach VA Healthcare System, Department of Veterans Affai

265 Autorefractor (Right Manufacturing, Virginia Beach, VA), and SureSight Vision Screener (Welch Allyn,

266 autorefractor (Right Manufacturing, Virginia Beach, VA), SureSight Vision Screener (Welch-Allyn, Inc.

267 not diligently wear sunscreens except during beach vacations.

268 Beach visitors at 7 US beaches were enrolled in the Nati

269 of debris (up to 4,496.9 pieces/m(2)) on the beach was buried <10 cm in the sediment.

270 ches, we tested enrichment cultures from 273 beach water and 22 tributary samples for EC, ENT, and ge

271 ng the migration and exchange of FIB between beach water column and sediment is desired to better pre

272 t factor associated with all REI-Bs studied (beach water exposure [OR for Salmonella infection, 28.3

273 s have a disproportionate impact on enclosed beach water quality for five reasons: (1) dry weather su

274 system may be the best option for improving beach water quality in Newport Bay and other urban-impac

275 thogen gene quantification may be useful for beach water quality management.

276 Predictive, nowcast models of beach water quality may help reduce beach management err

277 gement and can be used to develop predictive beach water quality models.

278 l abatement BMP was associated with improved beach water quality, and this appears to be the first re

279 re did not provide sufficient improvement of beach water quality, prompting further assessment.

280 all/flow related dominating factor affecting beach water quality, while beaches having a deterioratin

281 akes based on water quality results from 182 beach water samples collected from seven Ohio lakes.

282 Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentration in beach water, previously observed at marine sites, has al

283 The PH-BEACH-WD40 (PBW) protein family members play a role in c

284 n and LRBA belong to a distinct subfamily of BEACH-WD40 domain-containing proteins.

285 Using 12 representative beaches, we tested enrichment cultures from 273 beach wa

286 to examine the efficacy of the Atkins, South Beach, Weight Watchers (WW), and Zone diets, with a part

287 with salinity close to seawater, pumped from beach wells in coastal aquifers which penetrate beneath

288 ed in sand at a nonpoint source recreational beach were lower than the reference levels.

289 r beach fish, and male strays from creeks to beaches were deeper bodied than other creek males.

290 Beach visitors at 7 US beaches were enrolled in the National Epidemiological an

291 k into structures, such as sand dunes on the beach, whose overall stability is determined by the aver

292 onbuoyant discharge at an alongshore uniform beach with constant slope using a wave-resolving hydrody

293 reet Beach, an embayed, tideless, freshwater beach with low currents at night (approximately 0.015 m

294 Beaches with finer particle sizes and more heterogeneous

295 Beaches with good performing models usually have a rainf

296 te and vertical infiltration velocity (i.e., beaches with higher beach slope and wave height, and low

297 Beaches with higher wave-induced infiltration rate and v

298 ethod results were generally high, except at beaches with historically high concentrations of EC.

299 study investigates one nonfecal FIB source, beach wrack (decaying aquatic plants), and its impacts o

300 erature loggers were buried at depths and in beach zones representative of turtle nesting sites.