ライフサイエンスコーパス: bed rest

1 participated in a 5-day bed rest challenge (BED REST).

2 th LEU: -1.5 +/- 0.3 and -1.0 +/- 0.3 kg) of bed rest.

3 ), can protect skeletal muscle health during bed rest.

4 oung persons to muscle loss after short-term bed rest.

5 d muscle anabolic and catabolic responses to bed rest.

6 with no music, white noise, and undisturbed bed rest.

7 abnormal GS site 2+2a phosphorylation after bed rest.

8 uring the clamp were lower after than before bed rest.

9 scles, may also reduce some complications of bed rest.

10 (HU) is an animal model of microgravity and bed rest.

11 nd heart rate were measured after a 5-minute bed rest.

12 e similar to those observed after 17 days of bed rest.

13 . m(-2)) were subjected to 1 week of strict bed rest.

14 Treatment is supportive with bed rest.

15 Empirical treatment includes bed rest, administration of caffeine, corticosteroids or

16 nt position, indication for lumbar puncture, bed rest after puncture, or clinician specialty.

17 tion on three occasions: before (PRE), after bed rest and after rehabilitation.

18 x activities involving the back, and days of bed rest and days of limited activity due to back pain w

19 t normal comparison subjects after overnight bed rest and following orthostatic challenge.

20 lved with conservative therapy consisting of bed rest and hydration with hypotonic intravenous fluids

21 During prolonged bed rest and immobilization, circulating sclerostin incr

22 onally, preoperative posturing consisting of bed rest and positioning is prescribed to patients with

23 bilitating fatigue that is not improved with bed rest and worsens after physical activity or mental e

24 BR did not exercise during bed-rest and had a 17 and 40% decrease in whole muscle s

25 ion of the MHC I fibres was more affected by bed-rest and less influenced by the resistance exercise

26 Bed rest, and its associated mechanisms, may play an imp

27 f drains, irrigation of the hematoma cavity, bed rest, and treatment of recurrences following CSDH ma

28 ependent and clinically important in ageing, bed-rest, and cachexia, where muscle weakening leads to

29 of ambulation and deconditioning effects of bed rest are one of the most predictable causes of loss

30 Bed rest can cause several complications that may delay

31 e results support the idea that ground-based bed rest can serve as a model of human spaceflight.

32 ourteen young adults participated in a 5-day bed rest challenge (BED REST).

33 ross-links were measured before bed rest; on bed rest days 5-6, 12-13, 19-20, and 26-27; and daily du

34 Bed rest decreased postabsorptive MPS by 30% +/- 9% (CON

35 2.6 [CI, 1.9 to 3.7]) and at least 1 day of bed rest due to back pain (OR, 6.7 [CI, 4.4 to 10.2]) an

36 ence-based methods to reduce the duration of bed rest during critical illness may be important for im

37 The duration of bed rest during critical illness was consistently associ

38 Treatments include bed rest, epidural blood patching, percutaneous placemen

39 In a bed rest experiment, use of high-precision isotope ratio

40 vastus lateralis before and after 84 days of bed-rest from six control (BR) and six resistance-exerci

41 Bed rest has a profoundly negative effect on muscle meta

42 Bed rest has been prescribed in the past for several oth

43 ver, in more recent times, deep sedation and bed rest have been part of routine medical care for many

44 Head down-tilt bed rest (HDBR) serves as a microgravity analog because

45 ic adaptation of the heart to head-down tilt bed rest (HDTBR) or acute hypovolemia alone.

46 ibres showed no change in size or V(o) after bed-rest; however, P(o) was 19% lower (P < 0.05), result

47 Patients were admitted to the ward for bed rest in anticipation of surgery and were positioned

48 lling and protein synthesis increased before bed rest in both age groups (P < 0.05).

49 lowing weightlessness simulated by head-down bed rest in humans, and is proposed as a mechanism respo

50 failed to demonstrate beneficial effects of bed rest in most of these conditions.

51 orrelated with pyridinium cross-links before bed rest in the EX group (r = 0.83), in the EX group dur

52 ake and work performance and requirement for bed rest in the year after injury.

53 (peak torque/kg leg lean mass) after 14 d of bed-rest inactivity (CON compared with LEU: -9% +/- 2% a

54 flight or resumption of normal posture after bed rest, individuals often exhibit cardiovascular decon

55 Bed rest induced a 29 +/- 5% decrease in whole-body insu

56 Finally, rehabilitation restored bed rest-induced deficits in lean mass and strength in o

57 This bed rest-induced insulin resistance occurred together wi

58 Bed rest-induced muscle loss and impaired muscle recover

59 Orthostatic intolerance after bed rest is characterized by hypovolemia and an excessiv

60 Bed rest is frequently prescribed for critically ill pat

61 Bed rest is not more helpful than activity as tolerated

62 ntensive care unit-acquired weakness include bed rest itself, sepsis, and corticosteroid exposure.

63 Two weeks of head-down-tilt bed rest leads to a smaller, less distensible left ventr

64 The cardiovascular adaptation to bed rest leads to orthostatic intolerance, characterized

65 l of loading via microgravity, paralysis, or bed rest leads to rapid loss of muscle mass and function

66 Prior to and after bed rest, lean body mass (dual-energy X-ray absorptiomet

67 Bed rest led to a reduction in plasma volume (17%), base

68 pyridinium cross-links were measured before bed rest; on bed rest days 5-6, 12-13, 19-20, and 26-27;

69 No bed rest or activity restriction was recommended.

70 ocolysis drugs, 1276 (27%) were treated with bed rest or hydration and 2248 (48%) received no treatme

71 2.2 [CI, 1.5 to 3.1]) and at least 1 day of bed rest (OR, 7.9 [CI, 4.9 to 12.9]) and 7 days of limit

72 ne loss that plagues long-term space flight, bed rest, or immobilization caused by paralysis.

73 chanical loading due to physical inactivity, bed rest, or immobilization.

74 r (V(o)), and 54 and 24% less powerful after bed-rest (P < 0.05).

75 nal limited-activity days and 1 to 2 days of bed rest per year.

76 to determine if rehabilitation could reverse bed rest responses.

77 Bed rest resulted in 1.4 +/- 0.2 kg lean tissue loss and

78 ntical twins were assigned to 1 of 2 groups: bed rest (sedentary, or SED, group) or bed rest with sup

79 ure a period of immobility such as prolonged bed rest should resume their daily activities in additio

80 e rate observed by densitometry in long-term bed rest studies.

81 ium intake may affect bone in ambulatory and bed-rest subjects.

82 In conclusion, 1 week of bed rest substantially reduces skeletal muscle mass and

83 crease in SV during orthostatic stress after bed rest than hypovolemia alone, potentially contributin

84 EX group (r = 0.83), in the EX group during bed rest week 1 (r = 0.84), and in the SED group during

85 ek 1 (r = 0.84), and in the SED group during bed rest week 2 (r = 0.72) but not during either chamber

86 d with N-telopeptide in the SED group during bed rest weeks 3 and 4 (r = 0.77 and 0.80) and during th

87 Cervical lymphadenopathy and initial bed rest were associated with, or predicted, a fatigue s

88 ly means of studying this in human beings is bed rest, which is resource intensive and inconvenient f

89 leg glucose extraction both before and after bed rest, which was accompanied by higher GS activity in

90 owed no change in size, P(o) and power after bed-rest, while V(o) was elevated 13% (P < 0.05).

91 saline infusion before and after 2 weeks of bed rest with -6 degrees head-down tilt (n=12 subjects a

92 oups: bed rest (sedentary, or SED, group) or bed rest with supine treadmill exercise in a lower-body

93 g, healthy male subjects completed 7 days of bed rest with vastus lateralis muscle biopsies obtained

94 ULLS at rates comparable to those seen with bed rest, without alteration in limb fluid volumes thus