ライフサイエンスコーパス: biceps

1 evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from biceps.

2 s measured by motor evoked potentials in the biceps.

3 iceps (C-25ms-Bi); click alone (C only); and biceps alone (Bi only).

4 aying of the articular aspect of the labrum, biceps anchor avulsion, inferiorly displaced bucket hand

5 s FSHD or control with 90% accuracy based on biceps and 80% accuracy based on deltoids.

6 more gradually distributed activation of the biceps and deltoid motoneuron pools.

7 ssed between affected and control samples of biceps and deltoid muscle tissues, respectively, with 29

8 genic cells and muscle biopsies derived from biceps and deltoid muscles of FSHD affected subjects and

9 valuation of deep tendons such as the distal biceps and peripheral nerves.

10 In contralateral biceps and quadriceps the responses had high thresholds

11 spinal conditioning of the stretch reflex of biceps and quadriceps was abnormal in both hemizygous ma

12 cluded transverse and longitudinal images of biceps and supraspinatus tendons and articular cartilage

13 Results, relative to biceps and trapezius for left and right arm, clearly dem

14 Surface EMG was recorded from biceps and triceps brachii, pectoralis major and deltoid

15 Acute tendon injuries (biceps and triceps ruptures) require early (< 4 weeks) s

16 Distal biceps and triceps tendon injuries may result in elbow d

17 study, the best directions of SMUs in human biceps (both heads) and deltoid (anterior, medial, and p

18 r (Pmajor) and posterior deltoid (Pdeltoid); biceps brachii (Bi) and Tri brachii (Tri), and linking m

19 e recorded in the surface EMG of contracting biceps brachii (Bi), evoked by taps applied to the tendo

20 the stone would employ a two-muscle chain of biceps brachii and latissimus dorsi.

21 ar enthesis organs were seen at 2 sites, the biceps brachii and patellar tendon insertions.

22 ospinal tract and responses were recorded in biceps brachii and quadriceps femoris.

23 e acquired high-density EMG signals from the biceps brachii in 5 male transhumeral amputees who under

24 he effects on the oxidative status of liver, biceps brachii muscle and serum were also tested.

25 rected to the motor cortex representation of biceps brachii muscle during the adaptation phase of the

26 same recordings were also performed from the biceps brachii muscle of additional 5 able-bodied indivi

27 red with single- and paired-pulse TMS in the biceps brachii muscle proximal to INB.

28 hibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF) to the biceps brachii muscle proximal to the level of deafferen

29 Spasticity of the biceps brachii muscle was assessed using the modified As

30 asound were recorded simultaneously over the biceps brachii muscle.

31 magnetic stimulation (TMS) in small hand and biceps brachii muscles before, during and after INB of t

32 array was used to record surface EMG of the biceps brachii muscles from both impaired and non-impair

33 M-wave recordings for bilateral biceps brachii muscles were also made.

34 he rotator interval and the long head of the biceps brachii tendon are anatomically closely associate

35 instability patterns of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon are difficult.

36 ted with instability of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon.

37 mous, monosynaptic Group Ia projections from biceps brachii to both the antagonist triceps brachii an

38 Small taps were delivered to the tendon of biceps brachii using an electromechanical tapper.

39 scharge characteristics of 53 motor units in biceps brachii were recorded after being recruited durin

40 The surface EMG was recorded from biceps brachii when two different types of sinusoidally

41 erent input were observed in the homonymous (biceps brachii) and antagonist (triceps brachii) motor n

42 tor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi, biceps brachii, tibialis anterior, extensor dig. brevis,

43 post-stroke patients with spasticity of the biceps brachii, we found involuntary microscopic contrac

44 ed in the finger and wrist extensors and the biceps, but no response or inhibitory responses were obs

45 before click (Bi-10ms-C); click 25 ms before biceps (C-25ms-Bi); click alone (C only); and biceps alo

46 tion of RVR was seen during 15 s involuntary biceps contractions (engages only muscle reflexes) and L

47 but it hampered certain strength increases (biceps curl).

48 xteen subjects performed 36 elbow flexions ("biceps curls") at one of two submaximal workloads that e

49 ressure (Pdi) in six healthy subjects during biceps curls, bench press, power lift, and sit-ups.

50 re evaluated in the Semimembranosus (SM) and Biceps femoris (BF) muscles of pork legs for composition

51 luate its potential for discrimination among biceps femoris and semimembranosus muscle from two hams,

52 The results obtained in Biceps femoris and Semimembranosus muscles showed that 5

53 chium and semimembranosus (SM) and conjoined biceps femoris and semitendinosus (BF-ST) tendons and ev

54 Of all the muscles examined, the VL and biceps femoris long head were the most responsive to dis

55 ere significantly increased (P < .05) in the biceps femoris muscle 2 days after running.

56 We found, in biceps femoris muscle, decreased Akt(Ser473), FOXO1(Ser2

57 branosus, Semitendinosus, Rectus femoris and Biceps femoris muscles of the hams was computed and expr

58 The rectus femoris and biceps femoris muscles showed no clear reflex activity w

59 cators in Semitendinosus, Rectus femoris and Biceps femoris muscles.

60 iceptive reflex withdrawal recorded from the biceps femoris of the stimulated leg.

61 Two hundred biceps femoris porcine muscle samples from Spanish dry-c

62 trodes were implanted into vastus lateralis, biceps femoris posterior, lateral gastrocnemius and tibi

63 or, medial gastrocnemius, rectus femoris and biceps femoris).

64 lateral gastrocnemius, vastus lateralis and biceps femoris).

65 tivation of erector spinae, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, soleus and intrinsic foot (toe flexor) m

66 lation elicited responses bilaterally in the biceps femoris, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, medial

67 0-10 numerical rating scale in an isometric biceps hold-task and was used as a secondary measure of

68 ntrol spindle feedback from a single muscle (biceps/iliofibularis).

69 he glenohumeral joint clearly delineates the biceps-labral complex and glenohumeral ligaments, extern

70 The biceps-labral complex was best visualized on oblique cor

71 The LLSR was significantly enhanced in the biceps muscle (on average by 49%) after the Bi-10ms-C pa

72 c challenge, as well as greater decrement in biceps muscle force.

73 uts that drive M1 output was measured in the biceps muscle using a modified twitch interpolation tech

74 trical stimuli around motor threshold to the biceps muscle via surface electrodes.

75 s present (in either the cleidobrachialis or biceps muscle) was not significantly different from the

76 dose of MK-801 given intravenously or in the biceps muscle.

77 e in the weight ratios of the quadriceps and biceps muscles to the whole body.

78 xed biopsies of control and FSHD deltoid and biceps muscles, snap-frozen at resting length, were cryo

79 The amplitude of biceps phasic stretch reflex increased with muscle contr

80 In tests for stationarity the amplitude of biceps phasic stretch reflex varied <10% in the first si

81 ging, but with both methods the magnitude of biceps phasic stretch reflex varied linearly with tap fo

82 I afferents of tibialis posterior, posterior biceps-semitendinosus and gastrocnemius soleus were also

83 s soleus, flexor digitorum longus, posterior biceps-semitendinosus and popliteus (mainly within L7).

84 follows: 0.40 (weight at week 37, kg)+ 0.16 (biceps skinfold thickness at week 37, mm) + 0.15 (thigh

85 Biceps skinfold thickness had the highest predictive val

86 6 - (7.34 x sex) + (0.32 x weight) + (0.38 x biceps skinfold) (R2 = 0.84, P < 0.001, SEE = 4.85).

87 Diaphragm and biceps specimens obtained from brain-dead organ donors w

88 We tested the following four paradigms: biceps stimulus 10 ms before click (Bi-10ms-C); click 25

89 ontrolling for chronologic age, was triceps, biceps, subscapular, suprailiac, and thigh (SEE = 2.87),

90 and thigh (SEE = 2.87), and for girls it was biceps, subscapular, suprailiac, thigh, and calf (SEE =

91 ned by DXA, and subcutaneous fat at triceps, biceps, subscapular, suprailiac, thigh, and calf sites w

92 or glenohumeral ligament (SGHL), presence of biceps tendinopathy, and rotator cuff tears adjacent to

93 ed were displacement of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) relative to the subscapularis tendo

94 fragment, and extension of the tear into the biceps tendon fibers.

95 movement was replaced by stimulation of one biceps tendon with a 50-Hz vibratory stimulus (a selecti

96 us, accompanied by medial dislocation of the biceps tendon with degeneration and tear.

97 glenohumeral joint, acromioclavicular joint, biceps tendon, scapulothoracic articulation, and sternoc

98 The bicipitoradial bursa enveloped the biceps tendon, with internal septation seen in two cases

99 subscapularis, and 65%-85% and 100% for the biceps tendon.

100 subscapularis, and 55%-65% and 100% for the biceps tendon.

101 ion of tears and grade of involvement of the biceps tendon.

102 iments using vibratory stimuli, vibration of biceps tendons in normal subjects elicited flexion of th

103 number of differentially expressed genes in biceps to 188 and in deltoid to 7.

104 The biceps, triceps, suprailiac, subscapular, thigh, calf, a

105 rements (i.e., BMI, waist/hip circumference, biceps/triceps/subscapular/suprailiac skinfold thickness

106 However, biceps vibration (1) scaled the amplitudes of two bursts

107 Ipsilateral responses in biceps were smaller, with higher thresholds and delayed

108 analyzed using GeneChip Gene 1.0 ST arrays: biceps, which typically shows an early and severe diseas