1  63 +/- 11 years, 73% were male, and 38% had bicuspid valve.

2 but interest is increasing, particularly for bicuspid valves.

3 rome (5.5 +/- 2.7%) compared with those with bicuspid valves (0.55 +/- 0.21%) and control group patie

4 s significantly lower for flat versus doming bicuspid valves (0.73 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.94 +/- 0.14, p < 0.

5 -up (10.4 +/- 4.3%) compared with those with bicuspid valves (2.5 +/- 0.6%) and control group patient

6 ome (10.8 +/- 4.4%) compared with those with bicuspid valves (4.8 +/- 0.8%) and control group patient

7  PVR with a man-made polytetrafluoroethylene bicuspid valve and percutaneous PVR.

8 eas less flow dependence was associated with bicuspid valves and the features of rheumatic disease.

9 alva, congenital aortic valve stenosis (with bicuspid valve) and myocarditis.

10 ents, in 20 (53%) of the 38 AR patients with bicuspid valves, and in all 12 AR patients with tricuspi

11 ion of clonal expansions in the much younger bicuspid valve CAS cases.

12  been described for a subset of cases with a bicuspid valve, data are limited on the overall familial

13 d for aortic complications of patients whose bicuspid valves had gone undiagnosed.

14   The results of this study demonstrate that bicuspid valves induced significantly altered ascending

15 R was defined as TAVR in patients with known bicuspid valve, moderate aortic stenosis, severe mitral

16 4 men, 343 (59%) had either a unicuspid or a bicuspid valve; of the 348 women, 161 (46%) had either a

17 estimation of aortic dissection incidence in bicuspid valve patients irrespective of diagnosis status

18 tive endocarditis, 46 patients (38%; 15 with bicuspid valves); probable rheumatic heart disease, 8 pa

19 search for aortic dissections in undiagnosed bicuspid valves revealed 2 additional patients, allowing

20 ficantly >0 in 21 patients and was lower for bicuspid valves (slope 0.21 cm2/100 ml per s) than for t

21        Time-resolved (cine) 2D images of the bicuspid valves were coregistered with 4D flow data, dir