ライフサイエンスコーパス: bilingual

1 ference to studies of people who are deaf or bilingual.

2 ing the results reported for older and early bilinguals.

3 ching the pattern observed in Chinese/French bilinguals.

4 rom the perspective of grammatical gender in bilinguals.

5 n made predictions for both monolinguals and bilinguals (33 patients; 18 males and 15 females; age at

6 ited larger MMN and P3a responses than early bilinguals, across all deviant conditions.

7 e to answer this question because proficient bilinguals activate the same brain regions irrespective

8 Additionally, bilinguals' activation of the basal ganglia was inversel

9 Therefore, the crucial assumption of the bilingual advantage hypothesis, that there is a close re

10 ther, our results predict that the so-called bilingual advantage should be limited to individuals who

11 Bilinguals also recruited more neural resources to manag

12 ve exclusively relied on comparisons between bilingual and monolingual individuals.

13 We tested Spanish-English bilinguals and control native speakers of English in a s

14 al organization in adults, in early and late bilinguals and in people who have acquired language thro

15 Bilinguals and monolinguals showed similar behavioural p

16 target letter in words and nonwords between bilinguals and monolinguals.

17 enting of attention between monolinguals and bilinguals as they processed complex tones.

18 experience-related tuning of attention, the bilingual auditory system becomes highly efficient in au

19 alibrated to their own experiences: Tests of bilingual babies reveal that an infant's sociolinguistic

20 l connectivity was observed for simultaneous bilinguals between the left and right IFG, as well as be

21 However, whether the bilingual brain differs from the monolingual in the effi

22 How does the bilingual brain distinguish and control which language i

23 Here we test whether the bilingual brain is affected by word class and word posit

24 only in native signers (hearing, ASL-English bilinguals) but not in those who acquired ASL after pube

25 merican monolingual children and 12 Japanese bilingual children with second-order false-belief story

26 ing is likely to explain previously observed bilingual cognitive advantages across the lifespan.

27 st direct evidence of a neural basis for the bilingual cognitive control boost in aging.

28 The advantage of being bilingual comes at the expense of increased processing d

29 control and the default mode networks in the bilingual, compared with the monolingual, AD patients.

30 executive function ability, suggesting that bilinguals compensated for lower levels of cognitive con

31 2, younger and older adult monolinguals and bilinguals completed the same perceptual task-switching

32 I suggest considering bilingual complexity including these demands and costs.

33 A 16-week bilingual controlled clinical trial compared a group rec

34 cial to the comprehension of a fully natural bilingual conversation recorded "in the wild." Our resul

35 al to evaluate the efficacy of exposure to a bilingual, culturally targeted website, Informate, for i

36 Bilinguals derive the same semantic concepts from equiva

37 y, we tested a single group of Welsh-English bilinguals engaged in a nonverbal conflict resolution ta

38 important modulator of auditory responses in bilinguals even when processing non-speech signals.

39 n by gender inconsistency in Spanish-English bilinguals, exclusively.

40 dings introduce a new level of plasticity in bilingual executive control dependent on fast changing l

41 c language of Gaul (modern France), by using bilingual Gaulish-Latin inscriptions.

42 anxiety disorder were more prevalent in the bilingual group assigned to English than in the group in

43 Most research with bilinguals has used speech stimuli to demonstrate differ

44 volumetric measurements of HG revealed that bilinguals have, on average, larger Heschl's gyri than m

45 Infants growing up in bilingual homes learn two languages simultaneously witho

46 For a bilingual human, every utterance requires a choice about

47 ed at cortical activation in Spanish-English bilinguals in response to phonological competition eithe

48 ted to age of second language acquisition in bilinguals in this cortical area.

49 Since the bilinguals in this study were not a self-selected group,

50 Whether the native language of bilingual individuals is active during second-language c

51 Highly proficient Arabic-English bilingual individuals participated in maximally parallel

52 These results suggest that bilingual individuals rely on adaptive language control

53 Notably, bilingual individuals were on average 5 y older than the

54 mes from research looking at early and older bilingual individuals who have been using both their fir

55 pometabolism was more severe in the group of bilingual individuals with AD.

56 In a naturalistic eye-tracking procedure, bilingual infants were more accurate at recognizing obje

57 was predicted and correctly simulated by the bilingual interactive-activation model (BIA+).

58 tory, and physical activity was collected by bilingual interviewers during pregnancy.

59 lingual English-speaking and monolingual and bilingual Japanese subjects.

60 tended to be over-optimistic when predicting bilingual language outcomes: our bilingual patients tend

61 Bimodal bilingual language provides further evidence for the vie

62 If bilingual language recruits qualitatively different netw

63 , Branigan & Pickering (B&P) briefly discuss bilingual language representation, focusing primarily on

64 ctural priming drives real-life phenomena of bilingual language use beyond the priming of unilingual

65 We make efforts to extract a bilingual lexicon from English and Chinese discharge sum

66 Here, we measured fMRI in human bilingual listeners and reveal that response patterns to

67 We found that adolescent bilinguals, listening to the speech syllable [da], encod

68 Spanish-English bilinguals living in an L2 environment named pictures in

69 A bilingual medical lexicon of Chinese and English is need

70 However, monolinguals and bilinguals might have different baseline cognitive abili

71 es native language translations in the human bilingual mind.

72 king evidence from infancy to adulthood that bilinguals monitor their languages for efficient compreh

73 During a 12-month intervention, bilingual nurses counseled patients on diet, medication

74 However, like younger adults, bilingual older adults outperformed their monolingual pe

75 social programs and interventions to support bilingual or multilingual education and the maintenance

76 predicting bilingual language outcomes: our bilingual patients tended to have poorer language skills

77 e activation is present even when proficient bilinguals perform a task only in one language.

78 Japanese-English bilinguals performed a semantic categorization task in t

79 Bilinguals performed significantly better than predicted

80 An interviewer-administered bilingual questionnaire collected immigration, reproduct

81 nt 1 ERPs were recorded while French-English bilinguals read pure language lists of French and Englis

82 Adult bilinguals read short stories in English containing 8 ta

83 e implicit access to the first language when bilinguals read words exclusively in their second langua

84 glish monolingual and 16 early Welsh-English bilingual readers undergoing event-related brain potenti

85 Here, we show that balanced Welsh-English bilinguals reading in English unconsciously apply a morp

86 Using data from a bilingual region in Austria, we show that the most impor

87 from 33 to 75 years were interviewed by two bilingual researchers in a Midwestern state.

88 Bilingual respondents from the Latino section of the NLA

89 External factors like bilingual schools or parish language have only a minor i

90 In Experiment 1, older adult bilinguals showed better perceptual switching performanc

91 Specifically, bilinguals showed enhanced encoding of the fundamental f

92 ched for disease duration (45 German-Italian bilingual speakers and 40 monolingual speakers) were inc

93 rained with monolingual patient data, are to bilingual stroke patients who had been ordinarily reside

94 or monolinguals might not generalize well to bilingual stroke patients.

95 The Japanese bilingual subjects use a model more like English when pe

96 cond languages acquired in adulthood ('late' bilingual subjects) are spatially separated from native

97 ge acquisition stage of development ('early' bilingual subjects), native and second languages tend to

98 In both late and early bilingual subjects, the temporal-lobe language-sensitive

99 duction of manual work required to compile a bilingual sydictionary of clinical terms.

100 ons accounted for 82% of the variance in the bilingual task-switching reaction time advantage.

101 alysis showing larger gray matter volumes in bilinguals than in monolinguals.

102 lated with age of acquisition for sequential bilinguals; the earlier the second language was acquired

103 (second language learned after age 5 years) bilinguals using a seed-based resting-state MRI approach

104 aled higher fractional anisotropy values for bilinguals vs. monolinguals in several WM tracts that ha

105 tions of German-English and Japanese-English bilinguals, we suggest that the left caudate plays a uni

106 mage in the same sets of regions, though the bilinguals were more sensitive than the monolinguals.

107 ls and a group of proficient Spanish-English bilinguals were presented with a multiple-deviant oddbal

108 Chinese-English bilinguals were required to decide whether English words

109 Proficient German-English adult bilinguals were scanned whilst either translating or rea

110 d by words determines language activation in bilinguals, where potentially disturbing stimuli trigger

111 fMRI to look at simultaneous and sequential bilinguals who differed only in age of acquisition, and

112 Heschl's gyrus by comparing Spanish-Catalan bilinguals who have been exposed to two languages since

113 ask matched those observed in Chinese/French bilinguals who have had continual exposure to Chinese si

114 en language and cognitive control regions in bilinguals who learned their two languages simultaneousl

115 P3b results show that bilinguals who learnt to read simultaneously in an opaqu

116 visual modality, and (iii) normally hearing bilinguals who were native signers of ASL and speakers o

117 Late bilinguals, who learned English after age 10, exhibited

118 dence showing cross-language permeability in bilingual word recognition, a phenomena that was predict

119 stigated whether young, highly immersed late bilinguals would also show structural effects in the WM