ライフサイエンスコーパス: bimanual

1 uggest that hand preferences for coordinated bimanual actions are not influenced by situational facto

2 er than a traditional model that treated the bimanual actions as unitary with a single value.

3 role often played by the nondominant arm in bimanual actions reflects its specialization rather than

4 Hand preference was measured by coordinated bimanual actions, and concordance percentages were compa

5 level right hand preferences for coordinated bimanual actions.

6 sured using a task that elicited coordinated bimanual actions.

7 arily in the execution of previously learned bimanual activities.

8 ependent phase transition is observed during bimanual anti-phase (asymmetric) tasks in healthy young

9 lves during movement planning by combining a bimanual arm crossing movement with a temporal order jud

10 terior parietal area 5 in macaque monkeys on bimanual behavior performed with and without visual guid

11 ination of performance over a wider range of bimanual challenges.

12 Bimanual co-ordination of skilled finger movements is a

13 iment subjects were asked to perform Luria's bimanual co-ordination task which involves either in-pha

14 d performance declines in the more difficult bimanual conditions, less optimal brain white matter (WM

15 ned how learning transfers between these two bimanual contexts by applying force fields to the arms.

16 We found that, in bimanual control, the elderly showed no preference for t

17 sal relationship between unimanual noise and bimanual control, we considered elderly people, whose un

18 d noise, and found a corresponding change in bimanual control.

19 Our findings confirm bimanual convergence at the earliest stage of cortical s

20 Deficits in bimanual coordination in ACC are present across differen

21 ata confirm previous findings of deficits in bimanual coordination in callosal absence, but using sig

22 onal anatomical role of the basal ganglia in bimanual coordination is unknown.

23 tex (M1) during the preparation of a complex bimanual coordination task in human.

24 were present in the cerebellar vermis during bimanual coordination tasks, with greater activation in

25 sum (ACC) was studied using the computerized Bimanual Coordination Test (cBCT).

26 tained attention tests and in visuomotor and bimanual coordination tests.

27 n trials involving angled paths that require bimanual coordination, the ACC group performed significa

28 red interhemispheric communication speed and bimanual coordination.

29 f the basal ganglia in the neural control of bimanual coordination.

30 and contralateral M1 that may play a role in bimanual coordination.

31 trongly influences the temporal precision of bimanual coordination.

32 their residual (handless) arm for typically bimanual daily tasks also showed more symmetrical functi

33 rate that the central nervous system changes bimanual feedback control and adaptation optimally accor

34 Subjects performed a visually paced bimanual finger-tapping task.

35 nnectivity was significantly correlated with bimanual function, but not unimanual function or somatos

36 After synchronous bimanual hand movements in which the viewed and felt mov

37 A bimanual infusion technique was used to introduce and po

38 d, a tool that incorporates state-of-the-art bimanual interaction and drop shadows to enable rapid co

39 iming between stimuli to evoke the strongest bimanual interactions, topographical distribution of eff

40 tterns that required rhythmical unimanual or bimanual (iso-directional/anti-directional) movements.

41 mmunication that are specifically related to bimanual learning and may be relayed through the corpus

42 in interhemispheric coupling associated with bimanual learning.

43 and advanced fluidics allow the safe use of bimanual microincision techniques for lens extraction.

44 Clinical results achieved with bimanual microincisional cataract surgery and new microi

45 o highlight the major issues associated with bimanual microincisional cataract surgery and to review

46 Bimanual microincisional cataract surgery has been perfo

47 Bimanual microincisional cataract surgery is a promising

48 the wrist was passively moving alone, during bimanual mirror symmetric passive synchronous movement,

49 electrically stimulated noninvasively during bimanual mirrored finger movements.

50 The nature and extent of deficiencies in bimanual motor coordination in individuals with agenesis

51 function in the aging brain, in relation to bimanual movement control.

52 We examined the coordination of bimanual movement kinematics in a female patient recover

53 ortical inhibition (SICI) induced by passive bimanual movement was assessed in dominant and non-domin

54 For a complex bimanual movement, studies using functional magnetic res

55 and 3) or out-of-phase (conditions 2 and 4) bimanual movements (factor one), while looking towards t

56 A new study shows that ambiguous mistakes in bimanual movements are corrected by the non-dominant han

57 Rhythmic bimanual movements are highly constrained in the tempora

58 ntally affected than the young by asymmetric bimanual movements compared to symmetric ones, and both

59 learning model that decomposed the values of bimanual movements into separate values for each effecto

60 The control and adaptation of bimanual movements is often considered to be a function

61 gets (two-cursor condition) or used the same bimanual movements to move a cursor presented at the spa

62 participants performed simple unimanual and bimanual movements with right and left index fingers.

63 increased force ratios during unimanual and bimanual movements, compared with control subjects, indi

64 For bimanual movements, interhemispheric communication betwe

65 In contrast, during bimanual movements, reaches executed by our patient usin

66 each side of a mirror and making synchronous bimanual movements, the mirror-reflected hand feels like

67 reat difficulty in performing sequential and bimanual movements.

68 rm that plays a significant role only during bimanual movements.

69 ctions that may underlie the coordination of bimanual movements.

70 Human participants performed a fast bimanual number comparison task on masked digits present

71 SII areas, and has behavioral importance for bimanual object manipulation and exploration.

72 omatosensory regions and their relevance for bimanual object manipulation and exploration.

73 ric passive synchronous movement, and during bimanual passive asynchronous movement.

74 Bimanual pelvic examination was reported with similar fr

75 ancer screening consisted of mammography and bimanual pelvic examinations.

76 hysiological processes underlying successful bimanual performance and skill acquisition.

77 tructural and functional networks regulating bimanual performance decline in older adults, as well as

78 (IHIs) are assumed to be responsible for the bimanual performance deficits in older adults.

79 regulation of IHI, ultimately accounting for bimanual performance deficits.

80 neurophysiological function resulted in poor bimanual performance in older adults.

81 een interhemispheric communication speed and bimanual performance in the two age groups.

82 ly the task-related changes in IHI predicted bimanual performance in young adults.

83 ostructure, neurophysiological function, and bimanual performance were interrelated in older adults,

84 in the aging brain that underlie declines in bimanual performance.

85 reduced, which also correlated with impaired bimanual performance.

86 chamber under continuous irrigation using a bimanual pull-through technique to facilitate spontaneou

87 y, the graft can be easily delivered using a bimanual pull-through technique.

88 Right-handed human participants performed bimanual reaching movements while only one arm was subje

89 ferences between young and older adults in a bimanual reaching task where the goal is to bring two ob

90 Training improved bimanual sequence performance (from 58.3+/-24.1 to 83.7+

91 nual finger-tapping sequences into one novel bimanual sequence, before and after a 30-min training pe

92 Nineteen subjects completed a bimanual simulated laparoscopic task both with and witho

93 ivation of human sensorimotor regions during bimanual skill acquisition.

94 ric interactions during early integration of bimanual somatosensory information in different somatose

95 cts found in human psychophysical studies of bimanual stimulation.

96 s (95.7%) by use of a previously established bimanual submerged preparation technique.

97 osal fibres may make unique contributions to bimanual synchronization, depending on whether responses

98 tosensory perceptual experiences specific to bimanual tactile object exploration derive, at least in

99 ry cortical regions and correlated them with bimanual tactile task performance.

100 SII source activity correlated directly with bimanual tactile task performance.

101 from 18 chimpanzees tested on a coordinated bimanual task before death.

102 ease group co-ordinated the two limbs in the bimanual task effectively and in a fashion similar to th

103 This research examined hand preference for a bimanual task in 45 tufted capuchin (Cebus apella) and 5

104 We considered a bimanual task in which people chose how much force to pr

105 se group were differentially impaired on the bimanual task nor that movement deficits increased with

106 Participants practised a complex bimanual task over four days while receiving either of f

107 nodal tDCS had little effect on learning the bimanual task regardless of the stimulation sites and le

108 Hand preferences for a coordinated bimanual task were assessed in 109 chimpanzees (Pan trog

109 Hand preferences for a coordinated bimanual task were assessed in a sample of 31 captive go

110 asks, i.e. the standard unimanual task and a bimanual task which increased the control and coordinati

111 ples of responsibility assignment by using a bimanual task, in which the left and right hands jointly

112 left M1 or left DLPFC in learning a complex bimanual task.

113 d individuals as determined by a coordinated bimanual task.

114 with increasing accuracy demands and in the bimanual task; any such differences should be absent or

115 ay show deficits in the acquisition of novel bimanual tasks but not necessarily in the execution of p

116 Compared with previous bimanual tasks, the cBCT is more specifically reliant on

117 These findings demonstrate that, similar to bimanual tasks, the coordination dynamics associated wit

118 After training, interhemispheric (bimanual) TRCoh decreased again, thereby approaching lev

119 ings noted for chimpanzees which performed a bimanual tube task in a previous study.