戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 with WT RGS2 in a flow cytometry competition binding assay).
2 etagamma in a FRET-based Gbetagamma-PLC-beta binding assay.
3 .6 +/- 0.1 nM in a rat cortex P2X7R membrane binding assay.
4 y HSA-bound LCFAs such as the albumin-cobalt binding assay.
5 tion constants were evaluated by competitive binding assay.
6 hat were below the limit of detection in the binding assay.
7  fluorescence polarization-based PAR-protein binding assay.
8 d values measured by an indirect competitive binding assay.
9 ized the results obtained in the radioligand binding assay.
10  proteins to alpha4beta7 in an in vitro cell binding assay.
11 tein receptor); this was confirmed by a RELN-binding assay.
12  a detection limit of 58ngmL(-1) as a direct binding assay.
13 zyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-type binding assay.
14 mg (+/-0.64), was obtained with a saturation binding assay.
15 ated a fluorescence polarization competition binding assay.
16 wn in co-immunoprecipitation experiments and binding assays.
17 f Xvelo recruit both RNA and mitochondria in binding assays.
18 as inferred by competition and GTPgamma(35)S binding assays.
19 teractions that are not detected in solution binding assays.
20 using in silico predictions and MHC class II binding assays.
21 e mapping short peptide antigens in antibody binding assays.
22 when tested in the in vitro and in live-cell binding assays.
23 l with the values determined in radio ligand binding assays.
24 and LysRS for ES7 were confirmed by in vitro binding assays.
25 n recent years to embrace high speed protein binding assays.
26 eceptors and examined these events in direct binding assays.
27 trongly with the RFXAP component in in vitro binding assays.
28 nd mouse PEDF promoter regions, confirmed by binding assays.
29 ibrils, which cannot be mimicked by in vitro binding assays.
30 phoretic mobility shift and ethidium bromide binding assays.
31 using a yeast two-hybrid screen and in vitro binding assays.
32 immunohistochemical studies, and competition binding assays.
33 as frequent-hitting fragments in biophysical binding assays.
34        They are also employed in fluorescent binding assays.
35 using surface plasmon resonance and in vitro binding assays.
36 ene promoter regions and by the promoter DNA-binding assays.
37 ctivity with the other 3 GSTs using antibody binding assays.
38  molecular docking analysis and experimental binding assays.
39 HBP1-S107C in either cell-based or cell-free binding assays.
40 ocytosis assays and heterologous competitive binding assays.
41 dictate the caliber and robustness of ligand binding assays.
42 RP with one candidate, RhoC, by in vitro RNA binding assays.
43 espectively as calculated using fluorescence binding assays.
44  in inflamed tissue by mass spectrometry and binding assays.
45  applicable to pulldown and kinetic activity/binding assays.
46  GPCRs to be used for instance in FRET-based binding assays.
47 Rs were evaluated using flow cytometry-based binding assays.
48  validated through steady-state fluorescence binding assays.
49 rent dust contaminants in a radio-ligand TTR binding assay; 2,2',4,4'-tetrahydroxybenzophenone, perfl
50 were evaluated in a radioligand displacement binding assay, a [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assay, and in
51 iven luciferase induction in vivo, PPARgamma binding assays (affinity comparable to pioglitazone and
52  was confirmed by a comprehensive cell-based binding assay against a library of CTLA-4 mutants and by
53  an automated fluorescence-based competition binding assay, allowing the pKi values of several well-k
54   NMR titration experiments and in vitro DNA binding assays also show that, within the heterodimeric
55 n CPSF30, we identify using quantitative RNA-binding assays an N-terminal lysine/arginine-rich motif
56 to RAGE receptors were assessed by Congo red binding assay and a brown staining method.
57 the Wnt9A promoter, shown by oligonucleotide-binding assay and by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay
58                   By ELISA-based DNA-protein binding assay and conventional gel shift assay, we succe
59 -11 were tested in vitro using a competitive binding assay and ex vivo using a rat aortic ring bioass
60 e evidence via motif predictions, an in vivo binding assay and genetic experiments that the Rpd3/Sin3
61                  We developed a modified C1q-binding assay and hypothesized that C1q-binding dnDSA co
62 induced activation of mGluR2 in the membrane-binding assay and in primate cortex, hippocampus, and st
63 for amyloid-beta was evaluated by saturation binding assay and in vitro autoradiography using post-mo
64 ed for nineteen M1 PAMs in the [(3)H]PT-1284 binding assay and the EC50 values of these ligands in a
65 . (2016) describe a novel cell-based peptide-binding assay and use it to analyze the binding specific
66 hich meet the requirements for use in ligand-binding assays and absorption, distribution, metabolism,
67 hIP-qPCR (quantitative PCR), oligonucleotide-binding assays and analytical ultracentrifugation.
68 tally validate our simulations, using ligand binding assays and antibodies to monitor the conformatio
69 Ia receptors was investigated in competition binding assays and autoradiography using a fresh cardiac
70 ical shift perturbation analysis, orthogonal binding assays and cell fluorescence microscopy studies
71                               Using in vitro binding assays and electron microscopy on recombinant fr
72 ergy transfer measurements, combined with PG-binding assays and fitting of the crystal structures of
73 d components were tested in mouse eosinophil-binding assays and flow cytometry-based cell death assay
74                         Here, we use protein binding assays and functional studies in Xenopus egg ext
75  sequences were evaluated using quantitative binding assays and HLA-DRB1 tetramers.
76  and 56 TFs extracted from in vitro HT-SELEX binding assays and in vivo ChIP-seq data, respectively.
77 hesized and evaluated in CB1 receptor (CB1R) binding assays and iNOS activity assays.
78 ly, quantitative fluorescence anisotropy RNA binding assays and isothermal titration calorimetry expe
79 e interactions are not predicted by in vitro binding assays and prevailing cell wall models.
80                             Through in vitro binding assays and saturation transfer difference (STD)
81 electron microscopy and radioligand receptor binding assays and shown to require beta-arrestin2, a mu
82                 Here, we use direct monobody-binding assays and single-channel recordings of a Fluc c
83 ing, which was extensively validated through binding assays and site-directed mutagenesis of function
84                 Equilibrium and stopped-flow binding assays and size exclusion chromatography were co
85              Pulldown and immunofluorescence binding assays and surface plasmon resonance were used t
86 ings are supported by results of competitive binding assays and the similarity of the x-ray structure
87 oth muscle cells (SMC) was measured by a DNA-binding assay, and ii) lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced
88 splacement binding assay, a [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assay, and in a competition association assay th
89    Genetic sequencing, glycan-array receptor-binding assays, and ferret studies reveal the H7N9 virus
90 Using crosslinking analogs, click chemistry, binding assays, and functional assays, we identified G-p
91 circular dichroism, fluorescence-based lipid-binding assays, and in silico structural prediction.
92 ted low-affinity binding to LRP6 in in vitro binding assays, and inhibition of LRP6 or critical signa
93 phomimetic (T73D/S189D) constructs, in vitro binding assays, and phosphatase activity assays, we demo
94 and performed autoradiography, [H-3]-AV-1451 binding assays, and quantitative tau measurements in pos
95 nding and increased CTCF binding in promoter-binding assays, and risk allele carriage diminished tran
96 el compounds were assessed using radioligand binding assays, and the compounds with the highest affin
97 s (5 and 27) were tested in [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assays, and their RTs appeared correlated to the
98 3 ECD proteins in Wnt signaling and receptor binding assays, and we engineer novel high-potency RSPOs
99                                              Binding assays are not yet available for GPR55 screening
100                                          NMR binding assays are routinely applied in hit finding and
101                                       Ligand-binding assays are the linchpin of drug discovery and me
102                      Implementation of a DNA binding assay as a prescreen and models in DNA allowed r
103 calorimetric, fluorescence, and hydrodynamic binding assays, as well as bulk solution and single fila
104                                  Competitive binding assays based on the lectin Concanavalin A (ConA)
105 bsequent computational modeling and liposome binding assay both suggest that the conformational flexi
106 gnizes sialylated sulfated glycans in glycan-binding assays, but the identities of endogenous sialosi
107  + and 15 who were AMR-, were assayed in C1q-binding assays (C1q Screen; One Lambda, Inc. Canoga Park
108 r reporter strains, in vivo and in vitro DNA-binding assays combined with 5'RACE, that BrlR binds to
109                                       Direct binding assays, combined with site-directed mutagenesis,
110                          Subsequently, using binding assays, computational docking and cellular studi
111                                    Gel-shift binding assays confirm that N1 methylation interferes wi
112                          Cell-based receptor binding assays confirm that Q8 is a CysLT1 antagonist an
113                           Activity and lipid-binding assays confirm that these peptides act via a rec
114                                        Lipid binding assays confirm the role of the two basic patches
115                        The Blitz competition binding assay confirmed target binding of NUCC-555 to th
116                                  An in vitro binding assay confirmed that RTA selectively recognizes
117          Immunoprecipitation and ELISA-style binding assays confirmed a direct interaction between EM
118                            Fluorescent lipid-binding assays confirmed that the protein is highly sele
119                         Enzymatic and lectin binding assays confirmed that WT and R345W F3 are both p
120            Immunohistochemistry and in vitro binding assays confirmed the involvement of macrophageli
121                                       A RELN-binding assay confirms that CTR truncation significantly
122                             In a competition binding assay, DAB4 bound EL4 murine thymic lymphoma cel
123                     Biochemical and in vitro binding assay data demonstrated that xylan chains are at
124                                   NovaScreen binding assay data for ER (human, bovine, and mouse) and
125                       Co-immunoprecipitation binding assays demonstrate phosphorylated Mad and Dullar
126 /deuterium exchange experiments and in vitro binding assays demonstrate that Lsm11, in addition to in
127                                   Whole cell binding assays demonstrated BBA33-dependent binding to h
128        In contrast, solid-phase activity and binding assays demonstrated reduced specific activity an
129             Flow cytometry and PIP2 reporter-binding assays demonstrated that ABCA1 led to PIP2 redis
130 ed with transcriptome analysis and Runx1 DNA-binding assays demonstrated that granulocytic/monocytic
131                                              Binding assays demonstrated that PEDF-R bound the 44-mer
132  complementation assays and affinity capture-binding assays demonstrated that soluble G37R-hSOD1 effi
133 vitro screening with radioligand competition binding assays demonstrated variable affinity for mu (MO
134 y, combining electrophysiological and direct binding assays, demonstrates that hEAG1 channels are sub
135                              Split ubiquitin-binding assays detected interactions between Hsp90 and C
136  preparations makes conventional competition binding assays difficult to interpret.
137                               In radioligand binding assays, EGF and TGFalpha exhibited increased aff
138 eptor using a high-concentration radioligand binding assay enabled the identification of moderate aff
139                             Microarray-based binding assays facilitate the discovery of protein ligan
140 hromatin immunoprecipitation assay, in vitro binding assay, flow cytometry, and confocal microscopy.
141 binding and presented a new method to ligand binding assay for D1R.
142 s inactive in a [(3)H]astemizole competitive binding assay for hERG liability screening.
143  development of a fluorescence-based, direct binding assay for the detection of type II and III DFG-o
144 odular way consisting of orthogonal in vitro binding assays for ligand screening and verification of
145 se chain reaction, Western blotting, and DNA binding assays (for transcription factors).
146 ompounds includes, among others, cannabinoid binding assays, functional studies, and surface plasmon
147 latory motif prediction, in vivo protein-DNA binding assays, genetic analyses and monitoring of epige
148 ffinities were measured (pH, temperature and binding assay) had significant effects on prediction acc
149                               Our label-free binding assays have further provided the interaction str
150 ious endothelial cells (ECs) and in in vitro binding assays (ii) MYPT1 targets and stimulates PP1c to
151  peptide was determined using GLP-1 receptor binding assays, immunocytochemistry for the receptor and
152  and the scintillation proximity radioligand binding assay improved our understanding of substrate bi
153 ined with a homogenous conformation-reporter binding assay in a microfluidic device, that a substanti
154 s of purified PllA with a glycan array and a binding assay in solution.
155 -Barre syndrome, which was confirmed by cell binding assays in all four patients.
156 tibody binding to beta1-integrin subunit and binding assays in different cell lines, primary neurons,
157 t]) was determined using in vitro homogenate binding assays in human, monkey, and rat cerebellum.
158  Abeta and SORLA was further corroborated by binding assays in rat kidney extracts.
159                                              Binding assays in the absence and presence of actin reve
160 ulting ASO conjugates were evaluated in ASGR binding assays, in primary hepatocytes, and in mice.
161  synthetic mimics of trehalose dimycolate in binding assays, in structural studies by x-ray crystallo
162 a patens as well as in vivo and in vitro RNA binding assays indicate that HCF145 has been recruited i
163                     Conversely, steady-state binding assays indicate that more rigid lipid compositio
164                                     Importin binding assays indicate that nuclear access occurs via a
165           Surface plasmon resonance and cell-binding assays indicated that both antibodies likely int
166  of vaccine-induced F-specific antibodies by binding assays indicated that packaging conferred substa
167                          Human serum albumin binding assays indicated that the retained carboxyl grou
168                                    Substrate binding assays indicated that UDP and fructose, respecti
169 e approach, coupled with subsequent in vitro binding assays, indicated that BBA33 binds to collagen t
170  Capture also correlated with results of Env binding assays, indicating that greater immunogenicity r
171 ked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based ligand-binding assays, it is difficult to evaluate the residual
172  workflow is presented by hybridizing ligand binding assay (LBA) with liquid chromatography-high-reso
173   Screening of a compound library in a DRAK2 binding assay led to the identification of an isothiazol
174 urement of EDA levels combined with receptor-binding assays might be of relevance to aid in the diagn
175                 The results from fluorescent binding assays, molecular docking and dynamics demonstra
176 nd Cry1Ca protein in the food chain; and (2) binding assays of Cry1Ac, Cry2Aa and Cry1Ca to midgut br
177                   Spectroscopic and SDS-PAGE binding assays of Sin a 2 and Ara h 1 with different pho
178                  In vitro(99m)Tc-HYNIC-TCP-1 binding assays on HCT 116 cells indicated a mean Kd of 3
179                                Unlike ligand-binding assay, our method is not prone to interferences
180 erence did not reach significance with a C1q-binding assay (P=0.06).
181 ate concentrations measured by using protein-binding assays (PBAs) also showed this pattern but to a
182                                              Binding assays performed in microtiter plates, by two-di
183                                          The binding assay, performed on isolated islets, showed a li
184          These models, combined with peptide binding assays, provide evidence for multiple interactio
185            Mutagenesis analysis and in vitro binding assays provided additional evidence to show that
186                       The topology-dependent binding assay provides a robust and easily implemented m
187                                A novel URAT1 binding assay provides support for direct interaction wi
188            In solid phase ELISA-based ligand binding assays, purified pentameric H2O2-treated CRP bou
189 lower IC50 than aflibercept in VEGF receptor binding assays (RBAs) and retaining activity upon releas
190 or VEGF binding, inhibition of VEGF receptor binding assays (RBAs), and VEGF-driven in vitro models o
191 protein (gCDeltamuc) in cell culture and GAG-binding assays, respectively.
192 otential target of resveratrol, and in vitro binding assay results using resveratrol-conjugated Sepha
193                                  Equilibrium binding assays reveal that the POT1-TPP1 complex binds G
194                         Facilitated allergen-binding assays revealed a highly significant (P < .001)
195                                          Our binding assays revealed an association of LANA with NAP1
196                                              Binding assays revealed direct interaction between Kar1
197                       Cell-free carbohydrate binding assays revealed that AMPK autophosphorylation ab
198 cally, in silico docking, gene reporter, and binding assays revealed that His323 of the PPARgamma lig
199 iguingly, coimmunoprecipitation and in vitro binding assays revealed that mortalin facilitates PP1alp
200                                  Protein-DNA binding assays revealed that MtRecD binds efficiently to
201                                  Competition binding assays revealed that the anti-SEE antibodies rec
202 gical evaluation in calcium mobilization and binding assays revealed the importance of alkyl substitu
203  integrase were identified using AlphaScreen binding assays, revealing that the integrase interacts w
204 ding due to technological advances in glycan binding assays, reverse genetic systems for influenza an
205 irst measured with the use of a radioprotein-binding assay (RPBA) (1988-2006) and, afterwards, with t
206          Furthermore, the dimeric rsFcgammaR binding assay sensitively detected greater Fc receptor a
207                            Using solid-phase binding assays, serum and recombinant L-ficolins were sh
208 lycine in the binding pocket, whereas ligand-binding assays show that glycine binds with nanomolar af
209                                            A binding assay showed a specific interaction between GPVI
210                                              Binding assays showed high affinity and selectivity of s
211                                              Binding assays showed strong interaction of purified Fli
212 y, immunohistochemical staining and in vitro binding assays showed that apoE co-localized and bound m
213                                     In vitro binding assays showed that Eaf3/5/7 specifically stimula
214                        Furthermore, in vitro binding assays showed that TH directly binds the substra
215                                              Binding assays showed that the decrease in killing was l
216 th cross-linking experiments and competition-binding assays showed that the fully disordered isolated
217             The structure, together with RNA binding assays, shows that the selection of 5'-splice si
218 nd competitive S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) binding assay suggest that these compounds likely confer
219                              In vitro ligand-binding assays suggest that CTDP-32476 is a potent and s
220                                 In vitro DNA binding assays suggest that Zta has high affinity for al
221            Transcriptional profiling and DNA-binding assays suggested that Cmr directly represses dos
222 he establishment of a homogeneous BRET-based binding assay suitable for both detailed kinetic studies
223 ntial measurements, and charged nanoparticle binding assays support a negative surface charge state f
224                                              Binding assays supported this hypothesis, highlighting a
225  this reporter assay and our previous ligand binding assay tested on the same dust extracts.
226 onstrate using a fluorescence anisotropy DNA-binding assay that the previously reported XPA DBD binds
227 ocetin cofactor activity assay, and collagen-binding assays that provide insight into a different fun
228  This was supported by the use of nucleotide-binding assays that revealed an increase in the affinity
229 ncoded binding pathways, so we utilized cell binding assays that specifically detect binding mediated
230 f novel chimeric HA proteins and competitive binding assays, that sequential infection of ferrets wit
231 nd an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-type binding assay, the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd
232                 Using an ELISA-based protein-binding assay, the interaction of recombinant calmodulin
233                In a fluorescence competitive binding assay, the selective ligand binding was observed
234 factor (VWF) activity include a new platelet-binding assay, the VWF:GPIbM, which is subject to less v
235                                    In glycan-binding assays, the H10 viruses preferentially bound "av
236                   In addition, a competitive binding assay to detect cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) was us
237 s study was to assess the ability of the C1q-binding assay to identify clinically significant de novo
238 y available fluorescence polarization ligand binding assay to investigate the binding potency of flam
239                                Applying this binding assay to two yeast TFs, we demonstrate that sequ
240 We used the data from three in vitro ToxCast binding assays to assess OASIS, a quantitative structure
241 n design, phage display, and high-throughput binding assays to create an improved light inducible dim
242                     In this study, we use Ab-binding assays to demonstrate that Streptococcus pneumon
243  NMR, X-ray crystallography, mutagenesis and binding assays to determine the structure and function o
244  direct telomerase activity and nucleic acid binding assays to explain how naturally occurring mutati
245 recipitation (RIP) combined with competitive binding assays to identify novel primary targets of miR-
246  we have employed single molecule telomerase binding assays to investigate the function of the TEN do
247  autoradiography, and [H-3]-AV-1451 in vitro binding assays to the study of postmortem samples from p
248 ncers, together with high-throughput in vivo binding assays, to systematically dissect the contributi
249 ys, far-UV CD spectroscopy, the thioflavin T binding assay, transmission EM, and molecular dynamics s
250                                          DNA binding assays uncovered the DNA-binding site of ThrR an
251 and unbound motifs, we performed an in vitro binding assay using 12,000 mouse RNA sequences with the
252 )Lu-PSMA I&T was determined in a competitive binding assay using LNCaP cells.
253  combination of an in vitro lysophospholipid binding assay using purified protein and transport assay
254                                      A URAT1 binding assay using radiolabeled verinurad revealed that
255 analysis of a panel of conventional affinity binding assays using a suite of aptamers for the small m
256                                              Binding assays using fluorescent 2'/3'-O-(N-methylanthra
257 inding affinity was measured via competition binding assays using hB1R-expressing Chinese hamster ova
258  = 97, total) were synthesized and tested in binding assays using purified A*0101 and B*0801 molecule
259                                     In vitro binding assays using purified proteins showed strong aff
260                                              Binding assays using purified recombinant proteins demon
261  bromelain IgE inhibition and concanavalin A binding assays using sera of cypress pollen-sensitized p
262   Furthermore, using a virus overlay protein-binding assay (VOPBA) in combination with far-Western bl
263                The prognostic value of a C3d-binding assay was further confirmed in an independent co
264                                  An in vitro binding assay was performed on COLO205 cells treated wit
265                               A novel AdoMet binding assay was used to accurately determine the equil
266                   Using a novel fluorescence binding assay, we find that an aromatic residue at this
267 d affinity matrices and a radiolabeled lipid binding assay, we reveal that S1P directly interacts wit
268                         Here, using in vitro binding assays, we examined the relationship between the
269 ation methodologies and quantitative protein-binding assays, we explored the folding state of heterol
270                               Using in vitro binding assays, we find that RNF11 can directly compete
271 performing a promoter activity assay and DNA binding assays, we firmly demonstrated the key role of t
272                                           In binding assays, we found that phosphorylation of Thr(6)
273 ed in our head-to-head comparison of aptamer binding assays, we further developed and evaluated a set
274 ysis, LPCAT3 promoter assays, and direct DNA binding assays, we have mapped the functional PPAR-respo
275 opy, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and binding assays, we offer evidence that a structural alte
276                Through mutation analysis and binding assays, we show that Gle1 inhibits Ded1 by reduc
277            Here, using quantitative in vitro binding assays, we show that the IQ domain of IQGAP1 is
278            By molecular docking and receptor binding assays, we showed that c-CA itself is neither an
279 ll as monoamine oxidase (MAO) and functional binding assays were conducted to investigate possible ne
280            Steady-state kinetic analyses and binding assays were consistent with Sirt1 S-nitrosation
281                           First, radioligand binding assays were performed to determine affinity and
282                                     In vitro binding assays were performed with (18)F-FPyKYNE-losarta
283                          In vitro kinase and binding assays were used to identify the most potent com
284                                       Ligand-binding assays were used to quantitate ligand affinity.
285                              Recent in vitro binding assays, which exclude the effects of the cellula
286 ditionally been characterized by radioligand-binding assays, which have low temporal and spatial reso
287                     A BRET-based competition binding assay with 4 was also established and used to de
288                                 Using ligand binding assays with cysteine-rich domains-fused p75 neur
289 species, are designed as surface-competitive binding assays with fluorescence readouts.
290 ll receptor of type I NKT cells in real time binding assays with high affinity, only a few activate t
291 fluorescence, autoradiography and homogenate binding assays with homologous and heterologous blockade
292 ated part of the sensor chip, and subsequent binding assays with label-free lectins.
293                       Using [(3)H]dofetilide-binding assays with membranes of human Kv11.1-expressing
294       Modeling of ligand binding to CB1R and binding assays with native and mutant (Ile105Met) hCB1Rs
295                                              Binding assays with phage expressing NP41 confirmed bind
296                                              Binding assays with purified recombinant proteins showed
297 mbined expression studies and in situ ligand-binding assays with the analysis of genetically altered
298   Selected probes were tested in competition binding assays with unlabeled competitors in order to de
299 tial effects on the radioligand used for the binding assay, with (R,R)-68 potentiating the radioligan
300 ns, this work is the first to utilize direct binding assays, X-ray crystallography, and modeling, to

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top