ライフサイエンスコーパス: binocular disparity

1 ever, generally share preferences for depth (binocular disparity).

2 n images formed on the two retinae (known as binocular disparity).

3 t to different positions on the two retinas (binocular disparity).

4 in their horizontal coordinates (horizontal binocular disparity).

5 an primary visual cortex are finely tuned to binocular disparity.

6 manner expected for a mechanism that encodes binocular disparity.

7 urface properties such as texture, motion or binocular disparity.

8 ts from both eyes but lacked selectivity for binocular disparity.

9 ect borders, illusory contours, and relative binocular disparity.

10 strongly selective for motion direction and binocular disparity.

11 ar to the known clustering of MT neurons for binocular disparity.

12 and how these neurons also signal depth from binocular disparity.

13 c responses than random dot patterns without binocular disparity.

14 it is based on perceiving depth by detecting binocular disparity.

15 an predict the selectivity or sensitivity to binocular disparity.

16 ision relies on cortical signals that encode binocular disparity.

17 lues that are not sufficient to encode large binocular disparities.

18 ecent studies show how single neurons detect binocular disparities.

19 ight different directions of motion and nine binocular disparities.

20 in macaque: (1) color versus luminance, (2) binocular disparity, (3) luminance contrast sensitivity,

21 Gradients of binocular disparity across the visual field provide a po

22 , RF phase disparities cover a wide range of binocular disparities and exhibit dependencies on orient

23 ional displacement, or 'pseudodisparity', to binocular disparities and orientations of occluding and

24 A test stimulus defined by horizontal binocular disparity and a distracter stimulus defined by

25 gnals from their constituents, instantaneous binocular disparity and monocular retinal motion.

26 of depth is based on a variety of cues, with binocular disparity and motion parallax generally provid

27 Binocular disparity and optical looming provide two sour

28 based on motion parallax, in the absence of binocular disparity and pictorial depth cues.

29 -12 years with displays depicting depth from binocular disparity and relative motion and made measure

30 ponses are more discriminable when two cues (binocular disparity and relative motion) concurrently si

31 o investigate the effects of two depth cues, binocular disparity and relative size.

32 -reduced P2 complex could be an indicator of binocular disparity and stereopsis.

33 ost, however, were tuned for orientation and binocular disparity and were strongly suppressed by larg

34 tation was consistent across depth position (binocular disparity) and position within the 2D classica

35 ted largely by relative rather than absolute binocular disparity, and depth is perceived primarily fo

36 neurons along the visual pathway that encode binocular disparities are found in the visual cortex.

37 isual areas V1, MT and MST that are tuned to binocular disparity are also tuned to orientation, motio

38 Neurons selective for binocular disparity are found in a number of visual cort

39 Perceptual judgments of relative depth from binocular disparity are systematically distorted in huma

40 d, and the differences between their images (binocular disparity) are used to see depth.

41 The two half-images had a binocular disparity at the circular grating patch area,

42 The joint coding of relative luminance and binocular disparity at the neuronal population level may

43 visual depth rely crucially on the relative binocular disparity between two visual features.

44 nly on relative judgments of depth (relative binocular disparity) between objects, rather than judgme

45 When the local maps for ocular dominance and binocular disparity both had measurable gradients at a g

46 ed to the registration and interpretation of binocular disparity but that it relies on half-occluded

47 rily convey modality-specific information on binocular disparity, but that they also contribute to th

48 popped out amid stationary distractors with binocular disparity, but z-motion did not pop out.

49 ween the images seen by the two eyes, called binocular disparities, can be used to recover the volume

50 We find that, in humans, color versus binocular disparity columns extend one full area further

51 ese results also hold in models that include binocular disparity computations, providing a platform f

52 However, binocular disparity could also be coded in headcentric i

53 have correspondingly shown that texture and binocular disparity cues for object orientation are comb

54 animals' psychophysical performance during a binocular disparity discrimination task.

55 We investigated this in a binocular-disparity discrimination task.

56 e esotropia have striking maldevelopments of binocular (disparity-driven) convergence and use accommo

57 Using binocular disparity estimation as a concrete test case,

58 Neurons selective for binocular disparity form the neural substrate for stereo

59 h requires the integration process to obtain binocular disparity from the two eyes, one eye's image c

60 wever, a precise functional architecture for binocular disparity has never been demonstrated in any s

61 For almost 200 years, binocular disparity has remained synonymous with retinal

62 of monkeys are known to respond to specific binocular disparities; however, little is known about th

63 ges is primarily specified by the pattern of binocular disparities in the two eyes' views.

64 compare the ability of MT neurons to signal binocular disparity in moving versus stationary random-d

65 neuronal responses to temporal modulation of binocular disparity in striate cortex of awake monkeys.

66 tion in electric fish and the computation of binocular disparity in the avian and mammalian visual sy

67 Inferring depth from binocular disparities is a difficult problem for the vis

68 Binocular disparity is a powerful depth cue for object p

69 Estimating depth from binocular disparity is extremely precise, and the cue do

70 These results indicate that binocular disparity is mainly encoded through RF phase d

71 s converge onto a single neuron, encoding of binocular disparity is thought to begin in this region.

72 uning of V1 cells for relative luminance and binocular disparity is well matched to a predicted distr

73 olution (the finest detectable modulation of binocular disparity) is much poorer than luminance resol

74 se local arrangement of ocular dominance and binocular disparity maps provide new clues regarding how

75 lex orientation, motion direction, speed and binocular disparity may help to solve the binocular matc

76 entation encouraged the inquiry into whether binocular disparity might not similarly be represented a

77 cortical areas have been found to represent binocular disparities, new representations of disparity

78 For a given binocular disparity, observers perceived more depth when

79 Binocular disparities of retinal image locations are cor

80 he relationship between ocular dominance and binocular disparity of individual cells used single-unit

81 a disproportionate degradation of tuning for binocular disparity of MT neurons, relative to direction

82 rval between saccades, MT neurons signal the binocular disparity of stationary stimuli with high fide

83 eurons in visual cortex represent depth from binocular disparity or motion parallax, but little is kn

84 Stereoscopic depth perception relies on binocular disparities, or small geometric differences be

85 plicate area MT in depth perception based on binocular disparities, our results suggest that area MT

86 The human ability to detect modulation of binocular disparity over time is poor compared with dete

87 The eyes estimate shape using binocular disparity, perspective projection, etc.

88 on exists between the relative luminance and binocular disparity preferences of neurons in macaque pr

89 In contrast, binocular disparity preferences of spikelets and the pri

90 In the realm of binocular disparity processing, an equivalent role for t

91 well matched to a predicted distribution of binocular disparities produced by natural scenes.

92 When an observer is looking straight ahead, binocular disparities provide information about distance

93 ve projections of the two eyes' half images (binocular disparity) provide a cue for the sensation of

94 ifferences in the two retinal images, called binocular disparities, provide us with a stereoscopic se

95 ectively to stimulus variations in color and binocular disparity, respectively.

96 The binocular disparity response functions for sensory and m

97 We characterized the binocular disparity selectivity and heading tuning of MS

98 gle cells, ocular dominance was unrelated to binocular disparity selectivity or sensitivity.

99 primates, MD also disrupts the emergence of binocular disparity selectivity, a cue resulting from in

100 a precise functional micro-architecture for binocular disparity selectivity.

101 However, the binocular disparity sensitivity of V2 neurons was signif

102 ven under binocular viewing conditions, when binocular disparity signals conflict with depth informat

103 First, we consider the processing of binocular disparity signals, examining performance on si

104 al search task, targets defined by motion or binocular disparity stand out effortlessly from stationa

105 uned to combinations of spatial and temporal binocular disparities, suggesting a possible neural subs

106 can be judged by combining information from binocular disparity, texture and perspective.

107 ought to begin with the analysis of absolute binocular disparity, the difference in position of corre

108 Binocular disparity, the differential angular separation

109 Neurons in primary visual cortex respond to binocular disparity, the raw material of stereoscopic de

110 To encode binocular disparity, the visual system determines the im

111 ere are two possible mechanisms for encoding binocular disparity through simple cells in the striate

112 The visual system utilizes binocular disparity to discriminate the relative depth o

113 ferent information, and the brain uses this 'binocular disparity' to interpret stereoscopic depth.

114 ferences between the images in our two eyes, binocular disparities, to generate depth perception?

115 ion causes a disproportionate degradation of binocular disparity tuning relative to direction tuning

116 ual neurons, ocular dominance cannot predict binocular disparity tuning.

117 Thus active dendrites could contribute to binocular-disparity tuning in complex cells.

118 Neurons that respond selectively to binocular disparity were first described three decades a

119 a long distance is associated with a smaller binocular disparity, whereas an equal depth interval at

120 ng for 4 cues (shading, motion, texture, and binocular disparity) with corresponding 2D and elementar

121 static random dot (RD) presentations with no binocular disparity (ZD) or with horizontal disparity (H