戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 igating climate change and protecting Arctic biodiversity.
2 ges to our expanding understanding of marine biodiversity.
3 l, and biological factors thought to promote biodiversity.
4 ole of regional and local factors in driving biodiversity.
5 world will have profound impacts on mountain biodiversity.
6 d forests represent vital refugia for global biodiversity.
7 ochemical cycling, higher trophic levels and biodiversity.
8 f research into the mechanisms that maintain biodiversity.
9 mate change) degrades habitats and threatens biodiversity.
10 species, particularly in regions having high biodiversity.
11 tions and preserve much of Earth's remaining biodiversity.
12 ising policies to manage tropical carbon and biodiversity.
13 genic chytrids and prevent incipient loss of biodiversity.
14 sment of pesticides fails to protect aquatic biodiversity.
15 re ecologically destructive and can threaten biodiversity.
16 ly associated with negative consequences for biodiversity.
17 n has had severe consequences for vertebrate biodiversity.
18  consumption leads to considerable losses of biodiversity.
19 and directing climate mitigation actions for biodiversity.
20 earch skills and an unparalleled exposure to biodiversity.
21  to reveal key impacts on climate, water and biodiversity.
22 teractions, exacerbating negative impacts on biodiversity.
23 by a drastic reduction in local invertebrate biodiversity.
24 ing and assessment of the multiple facets of biodiversity.
25 their strategic value in safeguarding native biodiversity.
26      Small streams are important refuges for biodiversity.
27 agmentation have impacted global Phanerozoic biodiversity.
28  and protecting rare species, and estimating biodiversity.
29 n the U.S., which is a hotspot of salamander biodiversity.
30  role in the long-term maintenance of global biodiversity.
31 e considered in strategies to protect global biodiversity.
32 y could have other effects that enrich urban biodiversity.
33 o identify meaningful temporal baselines for biodiversity.
34 representative of damage to human health and biodiversity.
35  rural fisher livelihoods and flooded forest biodiversity.
36 rts to monitor and protect freshwater mussel biodiversity.
37 nd mitigate the impacts of climate change on biodiversity.
38 re a major threat to small streams and their biodiversity.
39 fy actions to enhance future conservation of biodiversity.
40 tely important for global carbon storage and biodiversity.
41 using it to investigate potential drivers of biodiversity.
42 n acknowledged to play a key role in shaping biodiversity.
43 ies are the most important threats to global biodiversity.
44 scale directly to the geographic gradient in biodiversity.
45 logical traps with profound consequences for biodiversity [4-6].
46 imately shifted the relative partitioning of biodiversity across time and space.
47 smal-habitat relationships, maintain natural biodiversity, advance spatial ecology, and facilitate ef
48                         Our sampling of fish biodiversity and aquatic habitat along ten 3-km sites wi
49 major role in the development of theories of biodiversity and biogeography.
50        The benefits of land sparing for both biodiversity and carbon storage suggest that safeguardin
51       Tropical forests are global centres of biodiversity and carbon storage.
52 sive forest loss, with associated effects on biodiversity and carbon-cycle feedbacks to climate chang
53 arine refugia using in situ data for pelagic biodiversity and climatically sensitive areas can help g
54 ompetitive network is an important driver of biodiversity and coexistence in natural communities.
55 e amplicon data were more robust across both biodiversity and community ecology analyses at different
56 shifts for native species, patterns of local biodiversity and community structure in high latitude ec
57 observed positive correlation between global biodiversity and continental fragmentation is not readil
58                                      Loss of biodiversity and degradation of ecosystem services from
59                                    Shifts in biodiversity and ecological processes in stream ecosyste
60  mediate impacts of anthropogenic warming on biodiversity and ecosystem function across all ecologica
61 ervational and experimental field studies of biodiversity and ecosystem function.
62                     The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) is most oft
63 e will determine the extent to which Earth's biodiversity and ecosystem functioning can be maintained
64 ted elsewhere, but ecological impacts on the biodiversity and ecosystem functioning of bivalve-domina
65 ests and contribute to worldwide declines in biodiversity and ecosystem functions.
66    Structural complexity strongly influences biodiversity and ecosystem productivity.
67 -habitat connectivity to maintain gene flow, biodiversity and ecosystem resilience.
68 Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) recognize th
69 0% of cropland with prairie strips increased biodiversity and ecosystem services with minimal impacts
70  in mitigating climate change and protecting biodiversity and ecosystem services.
71 may seriously compromise the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services.
72 ably, probably as a result of a reduction in biodiversity and fertility with depth.
73 s in conservation efforts addressing aquatic biodiversity and fishery resources in the central Amazon
74 e highlight the need to: better document the biodiversity and functional roles of mountain glacier mi
75 ldwide, to quantify the interim reduction of biodiversity and functions occurring during the recovery
76 portant to estimate any resulting deficit in biodiversity and functions.
77 f distinctive hydrology which support unique biodiversity and globally significant stores of soil car
78 d areas (PAs) are intended to provide native biodiversity and habitats with a refuge against the impa
79 plex and critically important to terrestrial biodiversity and human civilization, but impacts of vira
80        While invasive species often threaten biodiversity and human well-being, their potential to en
81 hysical processes influencing persistence of biodiversity and identify a conservation network resilie
82 eDNA to examine temporal shifts in ecosystem biodiversity and in an ecologically important group of m
83 d opportunities to further unravel bacterial biodiversity and its worldwide role from human health to
84 cloud forests (TMCFs) harbour high levels of biodiversity and large carbon stocks.
85 e.g., amino acids and fatty acids), and both biodiversity and life history traits.
86 en suggested as causes of global patterns of biodiversity and phenotypic variation.
87 gap given ongoing human-caused alteration of biodiversity and plant community structure at the global
88 h this practice may have negative effects on biodiversity and populations of individual species, it m
89 alls in marine environments can harbour high biodiversity and provide natural protection from bottom-
90  is restricted to a small fraction of insect biodiversity and to a recent evolutionary timeframe, the
91 ctors including habitat degradation, loss of biodiversity and wildlife population reductions resultin
92   Urban centers are important foci for plant biodiversity and yet widespread planting of wildflower g
93  impacts on carbon and hydrological cycling, biodiversity, and ecosystem services.
94 g brings another dimension to exploration of biodiversity, and large-scale mitochondrial DNA cytochro
95 ationships among microbial metal resistance, biodiversity, and metal sorption capacity.
96 ow tropical cyclones currently affect marine biodiversity, and pelagic species in particular, is limi
97 also explored in the context of abiogenesis, biodiversity, and searches for future exoplanets.
98 mental covariates, increases in biomass with biodiversity are stronger in nature than has previously
99 reas will coalesce, and while the effects on biodiversity are uncertain, we hypothesize that they cou
100 logical invasions can have strong impacts on biodiversity as well as ecosystem functioning.
101 e is a primary driver of the distribution of biodiversity as well as of ecosystem boundaries.
102  a primary threat to species persistence and biodiversity at a global scale.
103 ficant and continuous increases in all three biodiversity attributes until ca. 2000, followed by a sl
104         We studied wildflower viewing, a key biodiversity-based CES in amenity-based landscapes, in S
105 ng sustainable food production, by promoting biodiversity beneficial to agricultural production throu
106 tent differences in relative partitioning of biodiversity between time and space across habitats.
107 o forecast the improvement that any proposed biodiversity budget would achieve under various scenario
108 ed to boost food production while protecting biodiversity, but alone these proposals are unlikely to
109 esized that plate tectonics regulates global biodiversity by changing the geographic arrangement of c
110 een offers opportunities for the increase of biodiversity by facilitating challenging conditions for
111 t Goals of human development and maintaining biodiversity, by predicting the dynamic changes in conse
112 gi facilitated a better understanding of how biodiversity can be jointly shaped by large-scale histor
113 process since microbial metal resistance and biodiversity can play a direct role in the bioremediatio
114      Our results highlight the positive role biodiversity can play in ecosystem restoration and call
115             Understanding global patterns of biodiversity change is crucial for conservation research
116 ting knowledge of environmental degradation, biodiversity change, and ecosystem processes across larg
117 t a global level limits our understanding of biodiversity changes and their local-scale drivers.
118                          In natural systems, biodiversity changes are often part of a bigger communit
119                            We also show that biodiversity changes in signatory countries can be predi
120  at an unprecedented rate through changes in biodiversity, climate, nitrogen cycle, and land use.
121 roblem while providing greater potential for biodiversity conservation and fishery rebuilding if over
122 ped CAFC maps aim to facilitate decisions on biodiversity conservation and reforestation programs in
123            Worldwide, enormous potential for biodiversity conservation can be realized by upgrading e
124      The situation is a lost opportunity for biodiversity conservation globally.
125 include impacts on human health, culture and biodiversity conservation more generally.
126                                              Biodiversity conservation projects confront immediate an
127                                              Biodiversity conservation requires reliable species asse
128 ty to be measured over time, the targets for biodiversity conservation to be defined and conservation
129 one of the highest returns on investment for biodiversity conservation worldwide.
130 cations for fields as divergent as medicine, biodiversity conservation, agriculture and space explora
131 rained by food security, fiber security, and biodiversity conservation-is 23.8 petagrams of CO2 equiv
132 ning protected areas (PAs) are key tools for biodiversity conservation.
133 nown repercussions for local communities and biodiversity conservation.
134 ols to advance these goals for multi-faceted biodiversity conservation.
135                                    As global biodiversity continues to decline steeply, it is becomin
136                                  The ongoing biodiversity crisis increases the importance and urgency
137 nderestimations of the extent of the current biodiversity crisis.
138                                              Biodiversity damage was mainly related to the energy and
139 mal timing of decisions balances the rate of biodiversity decline (e.g., the relaxation of extinction
140 s desperately needed to fight against global biodiversity declines resulting from human impacts.
141  efforts to protect habitat given continuing biodiversity declines.
142 s, and secondarily driven by other important biodiversity drivers such as climate, soil spatial heter
143 uilding more complete and accurate models of biodiversity dynamics that can inform ecological and evo
144                 Pests are a global threat to biodiversity, ecosystem function, and human health.
145 knowledge gap, we tested whether a number of biodiversity, ecosystem functions and ecosystem conditio
146 ost-extinction compensatory mechanisms alter biodiversity-ecosystem function relations following non-
147          A major gap in our understanding of biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships concerns t
148 logical stoichiometry, metabolic theory, and biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships), all in t
149               This work supports a mutualist biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship, highlig
150 y of forest ecosystems at global scale using biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships.
151                                              Biodiversity enhances many of nature's benefits to peopl
152 reatens the sustainability of coastal marine biodiversity, especially in tropical developing countrie
153 ities, and priorities for the different bird biodiversity facets are more similar than those of mamma
154                                         Soil biodiversity, fertility and plant productivity are stron
155 positive feedback relationships between soil biodiversity, fertility and plant productivity are unive
156 r soil layer, the relationships between soil biodiversity, fertility and plant productivity weaken co
157 uld potentially break the links between soil biodiversity-fertility and/or fertility-plant productivi
158 diversity losses due to GHG emissions in the biodiversity footprint increases with income; (iii) food
159 de their territorial boundaries; and (v) the biodiversity footprint per dollar consumed is lower for
160 sumption-based biodiversity losses, in short biodiversity footprint, for 45 countries and world regio
161 ngs highlight the importance of surface soil biodiversity for soil fertility, and suggest that any lo
162 sitively correlated with the state of global biodiversity for tens of millions of years afterward.
163   Our findings indicate that the generalized biodiversity-function relation curve, as derived from mu
164 tant implications for the marine-terrestrial biodiversity gradient, and studies of biodiversity gradi
165 strial biodiversity gradient, and studies of biodiversity gradients in general.
166 rable manipulation intensity was as follows: biodiversity>grazing>precipitation>N.
167 s follows: precipitation>grazing>temperature>biodiversity>N.
168 er filtration, flood buffering, soil health, biodiversity habitat, and enhanced climate resilience.
169  change the availability and connectivity of biodiversity habitat.
170 evels of exclusive and critically endangered biodiversity harboured by current patches of the Afromon
171   The Coral Triangle is a hotspot for marine biodiversity held in its coral reefs, seagrass meadows,
172 nd sites located in the Brazilian Cerrado, a biodiversity hotspot.
173 est of Brazil are two of the most fragmented biodiversity hotspots.
174    Montane environments around the globe are biodiversity 'hotspots' and important reservoirs of gene
175 are expressed in terms of climate change and biodiversity impacts due to water and land use.
176 highlights the importance, in evaluating the biodiversity impacts of land use, of measuring populatio
177 here aimed at broadly capturing the enormous biodiversity in antibody profiles that may emerge follow
178 nded as the most appropriate measure of food biodiversity in diets.
179  facilitate effective conservation of native biodiversity in human-altered ecosystems.
180 ass production, and suggest that the role of biodiversity in maintaining productive ecosystems should
181                                         This biodiversity in response makes future ecosystems predict
182 e, however, little is known about meiofaunal biodiversity in sediment communities, which are a vital
183                            The importance of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem functioning is gene
184 widespread predatory mollusc that structures biodiversity in temperate rocky shores.
185 sults show that almost all of the meiofaunal biodiversity in the benthic habitat has yet to be charac
186                            Conserving native biodiversity in the face of human- and climate-related i
187 , our results show climate change impacts on biodiversity in the hyperdiverse Cape Floristic Region a
188                  Theory predicts that higher biodiversity in the tropics is maintained by specialized
189 egulators to conserve and enhance freshwater biodiversity in urbanized landscapes whilst also facilit
190 genic stressors on hydrologic alteration and biodiversity in US streams and isolate the impacts stemm
191            Temporal baselines are needed for biodiversity, in order for the change in biodiversity to
192 ldflower communities vary with components of biodiversity, including species richness?; (ii) How do a
193                                   Effects of biodiversity indicators on productivity were comparable
194 es, we have little understanding of how this biodiversity influences the biological carbon pump other
195 gnparser) is a fast, high precision tool for biodiversity informaticians and biologists working with
196 bined tree distribution data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, EUFORGEN, and forest
197                                      Limited biodiversity information is widely recognized as a major
198 stand the causes of cycle gain and loss, how biodiversity interacts with population cycling, and how
199 lity and we hypothesized that this may alter biodiversity-invasion relationships.
200 lternatively, recent evidence indicates that biodiversity is best conserved by minimizing human intru
201 ation of phytoplankton species and microbial biodiversity is necessary to assess water ecosystem heal
202 ower gardens in cities to sustain pollinator biodiversity is on the rise, without full consideration
203 wo fundamental axes, space and time, but how biodiversity is partitioned along both axes is not well
204 onse of ANPP to changes in precipitation and biodiversity is saturating, so we expected larger effect
205 etween the stability of ecosystems and their biodiversity is still not well understood.
206           The hazard plastic debris poses to biodiversity is well established, but mitigation and pla
207 e species, a significant threat to worldwide biodiversity, is predicted to increase due to climate-in
208 ) is the most commonly assessed attribute of biodiversity, it misses the potential functional or phyl
209 eiofauna) using metabarcoding to investigate biodiversity levels in sediment communities of the Antar
210 recent past) and are expected to drive major biodiversity loss and changes in ecosystem functioning.
211 inability challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss and food security, improving our under
212 Anthropogenic landscapes are associated with biodiversity loss and large shifts in species compositio
213  that sociopolitical instability can lead to biodiversity loss and undermine the benefit of existing
214 al average of 40%; (iv) more than 50% of the biodiversity loss associated with consumption in develop
215 etheless, global goals to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss have mostly not been achieved.
216       Consensus has been reached that global biodiversity loss impairs ecosystem functioning and the
217 quantify how conservation investment reduced biodiversity loss in 109 countries (signatories to the C
218  consumption is the most important driver of biodiversity loss in most of the countries and regions,
219                                       Global biodiversity loss is a critical environmental crisis, ye
220                               Halting global biodiversity loss is central to the Convention on Biolog
221 nmental changes are accelerating the rate of biodiversity loss on Earth.
222              Our results showed that (i) the biodiversity loss per citizen shows large variations amo
223 experiments have collectively suggested that biodiversity loss reduces ecosystem productivity and sta
224                                              Biodiversity loss substantially diminishes several ecosy
225 lar intensity of manipulation, the effect of biodiversity loss was 4.0, 3.6, and 1.5, times larger th
226 f nutrient excretion would be 28% greater if biodiversity loss was random or 84% greater if there wer
227 uilding on these lessons to turn the tide of biodiversity loss will require bold and innovative actio
228                 Hunting is a major driver of biodiversity loss, but a systematic large-scale estimate
229     Global challenges such as food security, biodiversity loss, water scarcity and human health are a
230 intensification is a leading cause of global biodiversity loss, which can reduce the provisioning of
231 ring ecosystem structure and contributing to biodiversity loss.
232 lone these proposals are unlikely to staunch biodiversity loss.
233 r-capita income increases; (ii) the share of biodiversity losses due to GHG emissions in the biodiver
234 and services by presenting consumption-based biodiversity losses, in short biodiversity footprint, fo
235 obal environmental change, urbanization, and biodiversity losses.
236 tion targets aimed at restoring or reversing biodiversity losses.
237 riencing land-use changes and where wildlife biodiversity (mammal species richness) is high.
238 r limitation increases under climate change, biodiversity may become even more important to support h
239 a processing methods can skew sequence-based biodiversity measurements from corresponding relative bi
240 ed as a major factor shaping plant community biodiversity, metabolic processes, and ecosystem dynamic
241 tly link desired conservation objectives and biodiversity metrics.
242              Setting temporal baselines from biodiversity monitoring data would therefore underestima
243  temporal baselines that could be drawn from biodiversity monitoring schemes in Europe and compare th
244                                         Most biodiversity monitoring schemes were initiated late in t
245  additional research efforts beyond standard biodiversity monitoring to reconstruct the impacts of ma
246 sults show that effects of climate change on biodiversity must be analyzed in the context of historic
247 onding to the influence of climate change on biodiversity must consider a broad array of ecological p
248 vide novel evidence of several thresholds in biodiversity (namely species richness of ectomycorrhizal
249                        Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity occurs almost exclusively in ice-free areas
250 n, evolution, and ecology of the exceptional biodiversity of Amazonian forests.
251 ins of oak diversity is key to understanding biodiversity of northern temperate forests.
252 he study contributes to our understanding of biodiversity on the QTP.
253                          Different facets of biodiversity other than species numbers are increasingly
254          Similar to findings for terrestrial biodiversity, our data suggest that the marine speciatio
255 nd apparently pristine as the Antarctic, the biodiversity outlook is similar to that for the rest of
256 zation levels provide a truncated picture of biodiversity over time.
257 ate variability is more important in shaping biodiversity patterns rather than gradual changes in lon
258  maximize basic representation of the global biodiversity pool than to maximize local diversity.
259  is optimal, and uncertainty surrounding how biodiversity produces services makes it optimal to prote
260 ggest that safeguarding natural habitats for biodiversity protection and carbon storage alongside pro
261           Our work shows that large gains in biodiversity protection are possible, while also highlig
262                                     How much biodiversity protection would result from this modified
263 , quantitative and comprehensive approach to biodiversity protection, most insights are still focused
264 ergy concerns related to climate mitigation, biodiversity, reactive nitrogen loss, and crop water use
265            Consideration of these effects of biodiversity redistribution is critical yet lacking in m
266 g income to hedge financial risk, increasing biodiversity, reducing soil erosion, and improving nutri
267  advancements in metagenomics, much of their biodiversity remains uncharacterized.
268         Effective conservation of freshwater biodiversity requires spatially explicit investigations
269 d global-change biology is to understand why biodiversity responds differently to similar environment
270                                   Contingent biodiversity responses may depend on how disturbance and
271 s is necessary in order to properly describe biodiversity responses to climate change rather than the
272  role in mediating biotic homogenisation and biodiversity responses to environmental change.
273 ey as a model for engaging undergraduates in biodiversity science.
274 ights are still focused on a single facet of biodiversity-species.
275 o measure the drivers underpinning ecosystem biodiversity, status and trajectory.
276 nue for standardized citizen science on bird biodiversity surveys worldwide.
277  conservation across three key dimensions of biodiversity-taxonomic, phylogenetic, and traits-and (ii
278 nown about its effect on other components of biodiversity that may be at risk.
279 of the most fundamental phenomena in nature: biodiversity that seems to be excluded by the principle
280 ferences and consider multiple dimensions of biodiversity that underpin CES supply.
281 ic habitat types disproportionately increase biodiversity, these keystones should be incorporated int
282 ntal crisis, yet the lack of spatial data on biodiversity threats has hindered conservation strategie
283 ribute to both local livelihoods and protect biodiversity throughout Myanmar during economic growth.
284 ive symmetry-breaking mechanisms can promote biodiversity to a broader extent than previously thought
285 for biodiversity, in order for the change in biodiversity to be measured over time, the targets for b
286 for the processes that generate and maintain biodiversity to continue.
287 eneralize responses of this major feature of biodiversity to future environmental change.
288  our abilities to make predictions on future biodiversity under any range of scenarios.
289 ntial for realistic forecasts of patterns of biodiversity under climate change, with implications for
290 conservation would facilitate persistence of biodiversity under climate change.
291 algorithms, previous studies that quantified biodiversity using such bioinformatic tools should be vi
292 of a nature connection, given disparities in biodiversity values of private gardens in relation to so
293 es in their neighborhoods in relation to the biodiversity values of those spaces, in three New Zealan
294 Using birds as an indicator taxon of wetland biodiversity, we model time-series abundance data for 46
295  Californian grassland, a hotspot for global biodiversity, we used a seed vacuum to increase dispersa
296 bitat has yet to be characterised, levels of biodiversity were higher than expected and similar to te
297 dequate responses to avert further losses of biodiversity when population and incomes increase.
298 ing key insight as to how and when losses in biodiversity will impact ecosystem function.
299 ing interest in the historical generation of biodiversity within this region.
300 ing opinion of the previous two decades that biodiversity would have rare or weak effects in nature,

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top