ライフサイエンスコーパス: bioelectrical

1 This study defined cellular and bioelectrical abnormalities in patients with CUNV, inclu

2 Bioelectrical activity from face and scalp electrodes wa

3 contractions are controlled by an underlying bioelectrical activity.

4 imens obtained by biopsy forceps for ex vivo bioelectrical and biochemical laboratory analyses; and i

5 ce suggests that biophysical, molecular, and bioelectrical asymmetries exist much earlier in developm

6 an integrated summary of the biophysical and bioelectrical bases of this approach is lacking.

7 any age, yielding viable specimens for CFTR bioelectrical/biochemical analyses.

8 By applying well direct bioelectrical contacts with cancer cells, SiNWs can dete

9 ks, cell behavior is regulated by endogenous bioelectrical cues originating in the activity of ion ch

10 These chemical and bioelectrical effects are prevented by pretreatment with

11 nstrated little success in correcting the CF bioelectrical functional defect, reflecting the ineffici

12 It has long been recognized that slow bioelectrical gradients can control cell behaviors and m

13 m anthropometry (ages 4, 6, and 8 years) and bioelectrical impedance (ages 6 and 8 years).

14 The usefulness of bioelectrical impedance (BI) with anthropometry to measu

15 easured anthropometry, body composition with bioelectrical impedance (with population-specific isotop

16 If bioelectrical impedance accurately determines body compo

17 There is little information on whether bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) accurately predic

18 The whole-body bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) approach for esti

19 The phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) can be interprete

20 btaining accurate, precise, and reproducible bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) data.

21 The fatness-specific bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) equations of Sega

22 I review the utility of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for assessing cha

23 Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has potential in

24 measurements through use of single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in 332 subjects,

25 ions that influenced the decision to include bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in a national nut

26 Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a promising to

27 Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is an attractive

28 gh its association with fat-free mass (FFM), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) offers an alterna

29 ased on triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to estimate chang

30 Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) variables and sel

31 tiometry (DXA), skinfold thicknesses (SFTs), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and body mass in

32 y fat was estimated from skinfold thickness, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and dual-energy

33 Phase angle, determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), detects changes

34 ed techniques, hydrostatic weighing (HW) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), in adults.

35 It was our purpose, using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), to measure total

36 t, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), total body potas

37 using the Durnin-Womersley formula (DWF) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

38 and fat mass were estimated by monofrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

39 aim of this study was to evaluate leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (LBIA) using a four-con

40 We examined body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis and isotope dilution (1

41 Key terms in the derivation of bioelectrical impedance analysis are described and the r

42 nd and had a body-composition measurement by bioelectrical impedance analysis at the Geneva Universit

43 uterus and at least one ovary who completed bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessment of body

44 ient of the validation cohort also underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis for the calculation of

45 n biochemical and physiological status using bioelectrical impedance analysis in 128 gastrointestinal

46 lts of body composition studies performed by bioelectrical impedance analysis in 1415 adults from 2 c

47 s determined by using skinfold-thickness and bioelectrical impedance analysis measurements along with

48 l features needed to critically evaluate the bioelectrical impedance analysis method.

49 estimated with the use of a single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis system.

50 Bioelectrical impedance analysis was the least acceptabl

51 A deuterium dilution technique or bioelectrical impedance analysis was used to estimate FF

52 traction force and fat-free mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis were measured.

53 n concentrations and body compositions (with bioelectrical impedance analysis) measured.

54 ed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry or bioelectrical impedance analysis, adjusted for sex, age,

55 ry, underwater weighing, deuterium dilution, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and anthropometry were

56 ssessment, handgrip strength, multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, and REE measurements w

57 n by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis, and skinfold-thickness

58 Each underwent anthropometric measurements, bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray abso

59 The techniques studied included bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray abso

60 (men) and >/=8.2 (women) measured by using a bioelectrical impedance analysis.

61 Fat mass was estimated with the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis.

62 icknesses, isotope dilution (H(2)(18)O), and bioelectrical impedance analysis.

63 Body composition was determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis.

64 response of fat-free mass (FFM) measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis.

65 ; percentage of body fat was estimated using bioelectrical impedance analysis.

66 used rather than the values reported by the bioelectrical impedance analyzer.

67 Six commercial bioelectrical impedance analyzers were evaluated to dete

68 and body cell mass) was determined by using bioelectrical impedance and resting metabolic activity (

69 diposity were derived from anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance data at baseline and anthropomet

70 However, bioelectrical impedance equations do not yield more accu

71 Measures of bioelectrical impedance for body fat, reproductive hormo

72 Bioelectrical impedance is a promising technique for the

73 Bioelectrical impedance may lack the precision to detect

74 adiposity outcomes (skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance measurement of body fat) at age

75 tments after absorption, it is expected that bioelectrical impedance measurements may correlate with

76 al subcutaneous and visceral adipose depots, bioelectrical impedance measurements of body fat mass, a

77 sing a combination of skinfold thickness and bioelectrical impedance measurements, with a prediction

78 Anthropometric and bioelectrical impedance measures were obtained from 4,27

79 Although use of the bioelectrical impedance method for the indirect assessme

80 The practical advantages of the bioelectrical impedance method necessitate concerted res

81 ical factors that affect the validity of the bioelectrical impedance method.

82 le to a wide variety of patient populations, bioelectrical impedance offers no advantage over standar

83 Childhood anthropometric and bioelectrical impedance outcomes included body mass inde

84 Bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) may provide a

85 ic regression with body mass index (BMI) and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS)-derived estim

86 rch setting, measuring body composition with bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy enabled the estimat

87 d based on height-weight models derived from bioelectrical impedance studies.

88 Although the bioelectrical impedance technique is widely used in huma

89 These results support the use of bioelectrical impedance to determine body cell mass in h

90 ionale, methods, and existing data for using bioelectrical impedance to determine drug pharmacokineti

91 At each visit, height, weight, and %BF by bioelectrical impedance were measured.

92 The purpose of this study was to compare bioelectrical impedance with metabolic activity in healt

93 ion (fat mass and fat-free mass, assessed by bioelectrical impedance) and self-reported, mobility-rel

94 m), and anthropometric and body composition (bioelectrical impedance) measurements were also made.

95 The best formulas use skinfold thicknesses, bioelectrical impedance, and a 4-compartment model.

96 l-energy X-ray absorptiometry, body density, bioelectrical impedance, and total body water, and 4-com

97 skeletal muscle deficits: muscle mass using bioelectrical impedance, quadriceps, respiratory muscle

98 (densitometry), isotope dilution (H(2)18O), bioelectrical impedance, skinfold thicknesses, corporal

99 ody composition at age 3 y was made based on bioelectrical impedance, weight, and height.

100 Application of bioelectrical impedance-derived equations to a different

101 waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and bioelectrical impedance-derived measures of fat mass, le

102 Body composition was assessed with bioelectrical impedance.

103 rait with a threshold of 40%) as assessed by bioelectrical impedance.

104 sociated with two or more anthropometric and bioelectrical measures of high nutritional status.

105 sociated with two or more anthropometric and bioelectrical measures of low nutritional status; and 3)

106 rsing home residents with anthropometric and bioelectrical measures of lower and higher nutritional s

107 y correlated with all the anthropometric and bioelectrical measures of nutritional status in women, a

108 s index (BMI)] with other anthropometric and bioelectrical measures of nutritional status, not availa

109 the first detailed mechanistic synthesis of bioelectrical, molecular and cell-biological events unde

110 gap junctions are gated posttranslationally, bioelectrical networks have their own characteristic dyn

111 e anatomical semantics encoded in non-neural bioelectrical networks, and of improved biophysical tool

112 of how patterning information is encoded in bioelectrical networks, which may require concepts from

113 ritten by a brief perturbation of endogenous bioelectrical networks.

114 Ussing chambers to determine transepithelial bioelectrical parameters and Na(+), K(+), and Cl(-) flux

115 Beta dispersion as one of intrinsic bioelectrical properties of the cell membrane in blockin

116 s and calf skinfold-thickness measurements), bioelectrical resistance (BR; with the Kushner el al equ

117 ion that facilitate the determination of the bioelectrical response mode of higher plants under stres

118 ents in vivo have identified novel roles for bioelectrical signaling and revealed the molecular pathw

119 els (NaVs), obligatory membrane proteins for bioelectrical signaling, has been linked to a number of

120 Recording intracellular (IC) bioelectrical signals is central to understanding the fu

121 simple algebraic summation of the resultant bioelectrical signals that coincide in time.