ライフサイエンスコーパス: bioenergy

1 elopment of specialized plant feedstocks for bioenergy.

2 f soil and biodiversity can be harvested for bioenergy.

3 sts to provide biomass for wood products and bioenergy.

4 ty of harvesting conservation grasslands for bioenergy.

5 medicine, biotechnology, bioremediation and bioenergy.

6 on was associated with a decline in cellular bioenergy.

7 c traits that are optimized for biofuels and bioenergy.

8 , biological devices, and energy storage and bioenergy.

9 in the search for sustainable and renewable bioenergy.

10 ignocellulose processing for biorefining and bioenergy.

11 Because of increasing demands for bioenergy, a considerable amount of land in the midweste

12 es that could be used to generate tomorrow's bioenergy and biochemical crops.

13 biogeochemical cycling, and applications in bioenergy and bioelectronics.

14 uction still hinders their widespread use as bioenergy and biomaterial feedstocks.

15 ral renewable resource for the production of bioenergy and biomaterials, and its enhanced use would a

16 nmentally significant industries such as the bioenergy and biorefining sectors.

17 iratorily versatile bacterium with promising bioenergy and bioremediation applications, Shewanella on

18 bilities dedicated to advancing genomics for bioenergy and environmental applications.

19 o improve biomass conservation properties in bioenergy and forage crops.

20 sumption because of a decline in reliance on bioenergy and higher conversion efficiencies of primary

21 n increasingly important source of renewable bioenergy and industrial feedstocks.

22 m industrial biotechnology to innovations in bioenergy and medical intervention.

23 convert solar energy and carbon dioxide into bioenergy and oxygen more than two billion years ago.

24 mic food crop with a potential of becoming a bioenergy and pharmaceutical crop.

25 globally) for the production of pulp, paper, bioenergy, and other lignocellulosic products.

26 ia, although important for biotechnology and bioenergy applications, remain incompletely understood.

27 sights into its physiology and potential for bioenergy applications.

28 tations include traits that may be useful in bioenergy applications.

29 lopment, and will be instrumental for future bioenergy applications.

30 d transportation that could be replaced with bioenergy are also provided.

31 sis in CLL lymphocytes by targeting cellular bioenergy as well as RNA transcription and translation o

32 he combined rate of formation of biomass and bioenergy (as ATP) was shown to be equivalent to the rat

33 Although bioenergy-biochar systems (BEBCS) can also deliver CDR,

34 They have emerging applications in bioenergy, bioproduction, and bioremediation.

35 crobial communities, to utilize microbes for bioenergy, bioremediation, etc.

36 but the wild claims of those who think that bioenergy can replace much of our dependence on foreign

37 lgae for the renewable production of several bioenergy carriers, including starches for alcohols, lip

38 bolic pathways for the synthesis of targeted bioenergy carriers.

39 ing the life cycle inventories of the entire bioenergy chain.

40 cent empirical findings show that cellulosic bioenergy concerns related to climate mitigation, biodiv

41 ents offers an option to reach high gasoline bioenergy content for E10-compatible cars.

42 of heat, electricity, and transport and 173 bioenergy conversion routes.

43 ficiencies and environmental performances of bioenergy conversions are derived using biochemical proc

44 -29% by 2050, but providing large amounts of bioenergy could increase global HANPP to 44%.

45 t of endophyte inoculations may be useful in bioenergy crop breeding and engineering programs.

46 vices is dependent not only on the choice of bioenergy crop but also on its location relative to othe

47 donax has attracted interest as a potential bioenergy crop due to a high apparent productivity.

48 diting, transgene expression regulation, and bioenergy crop engineering, with a focus on traits relat

49 red into several other plants, including the bioenergy crop Panicum virgatum (switchgrass).

50 ajor objective toward developing sustainable bioenergy crop plants.

51 Here, using activation tagging in the prime bioenergy crop poplar, we have identified a mutant that

52 hanges in forests, soil carbon dynamics, and bioenergy crop production on degraded/abandoned agricult

53 hen evaluating potential regional impacts of bioenergy crop production.

54 um bicolor), an important grain, forage, and bioenergy crop, at multiple developmental time points fr

55 switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), a perennial bioenergy crop, because later flowering allows for an ex

56 on of glycosyl hydrolases in a high yielding bioenergy crop, holds considerable promise for improving

57 4 grass with the potential to become a major bioenergy crop.

58 of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) as a dedicated bioenergy crop.

59 n studying gene regulation in this important bioenergy crop.

60 switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), a dedicated bioenergy crop.

61 To explore the impact of different bioenergy cropping systems on soil microorganisms, the c

62 suggests that expanded production of annual bioenergy crops (e.g., corn and soybeans) on marginal la

63 replacement of annual with diverse perennial bioenergy crops (e.g., mixed grasses and forbs) is expec

64 pothetical conversion of annual to perennial bioenergy crops across the central United States impart

65 of genetic variants in native populations of bioenergy crops and direct manipulation of biosynthesis

66 sources for the delignification of dedicated bioenergy crops and other sources of lignocellulosic bio

67 Different bioenergy crops are expected to vary in their effects on

68 foliar carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N) in these bioenergy crops at harvest is significantly higher than

69 preserved near their present-day extent, and bioenergy crops emerge as an effective mitigation option

70 The high biomass productivity of bioenergy crops in a longer growing season linked tightl

71 While cultivation of isoprene-emitting bioenergy crops may be appropriate at some scales and in

72 The expanding production of bioenergy crops may impact regional air quality through

73 d Survey to forecast the impact of potential bioenergy crops on avian species richness and the number

74 Producing bioenergy crops on marginal lands--farmland suboptimal f

75 Here we show that perennial bioenergy crops provide an alternative to annual grains

76 ates could be converted to second generation bioenergy crops such as miscanthus and switchgrass.

77 kg(-1), both similar to dedicated herbaceous bioenergy crops such as switchgrass.

78 ion from managed landscapes, particularly of bioenergy crops that have low nitrogen requirements.

79 apture the eco-physiological acclimations of bioenergy crops under climate change, and (ii) predict h

80 Inoculation of bioenergy crops with plant growth-promoting endophytes h

81 he rational manipulation of lignin in future bioenergy crops, augmenting the previous successful appr

82 en proposed as a means to improve forage and bioenergy crops, but frequently results in stunted growt

83 its of a biofuel industry based on perennial bioenergy crops, rather than corn ethanol and soy biodie

84 ght-resistance varieties is a major goal for bioenergy crops, such as poplar (Populus), which will be

85 oted to the cultivation of second-generation bioenergy crops, such as switchgrass and miscanthus.

86 ies to genetically design plants, especially bioenergy crops, with a high WUE and better photosynthet

87 ing lignin modification in sorghum and other bioenergy crops.

88 ion of what types of plants may be useful as bioenergy crops.

89 mass of fermentable cell wall components in bioenergy crops.

90 rgatum L.) are being evaluated as cellulosic bioenergy crops.

91 g this pathway into existing food, feed, and bioenergy crops.

92 e food crop and a model grass for studies of bioenergy crops.

93 ersion of existing maize cropping to support bioenergy demand.

94 To meet emerging bioenergy demands, significant areas of the large-scale

95 rtificial photosynthetic systems to underpin bioenergy development.

96 farming for sustained food security and agro-bioenergy development.

97 quantity of biomass in a biochar system to a bioenergy district heating system which replaces natural

98 ologies (METs) are one of the emerging green bioenergy domains that are utilizing microorganisms for

99 of the same sustainably procured biomass for bioenergy, except when fertile soils are amended while c

100 utionary biology, breeding, conservation and bioenergy feedstock development.

101 The bioenergy feedstock grass Miscanthus x giganteus is exce

102 Switchgrass is a leading dedicated bioenergy feedstock in the United States because it is a

103 lue-added products, and for development as a bioenergy feedstock.

104 hese perennial grasses, instead of maize, as bioenergy feedstocks can improve soil ecosystem nitrogen

105 microorganisms have significant potential as bioenergy feedstocks, but the sustainability of large-sc

106 the ecological costs and benefits of growing bioenergy feedstocks--primarily annual grain crops--on m

107 elimination of incentives for land-demanding bioenergy feedstocks.

108 ant for plant fitness and the engineering of bioenergy feedstocks.

109 me of which are being developed as dedicated bioenergy feedstocks.

110 s for increasing the production of crops and bioenergy feedstocks.

111 iohydrogen, lipids, and carbohydrates, three bioenergy foci.

112 eration, which provides cells with efficient bioenergy for G2/M transition and shortens overall cell-

113 r, due to limited supply and competition for bioenergy from other energy sectors.

114 onsiderable progress in identifying relevant bioenergy genes and pathways in microalgae, and powerful

115 to evaluate the interplay between potential bioenergy grass (Miscanthus, Cave-in-Rock, and Alamo) pr

116 cusing on biomass derived from the perennial bioenergy grass Miscanthus.

117 Bioenergy grasses can maintain high productivity over ti

118 One advantage of bioenergy grasses is that they mitigate nitrogen leachin

119 hen grown without applying N fertilizer; and bioenergy grasses, especially Miscanthus, generally requ

120 productivity in several major food crops and bioenergy grasses, including maize (Zea mays), sugarcane

121 se relative of several major feed, fuel, and bioenergy grasses.

122 ed to other C3 species, and comparable to C4 bioenergy grasses.

123 However, current bioenergy growth patterns may, in the long term, only be

124 site for understanding and further improving bioenergy harvesting.

125 e impacts of future environmental change and bioenergy harvests on regional forest carbon storage hav

126 ystem which replaces natural gas combustion, bioenergy heating systems achieve 99-119% of the climate

127 omass pyrolysis) can provide carbon-negative bioenergy if the biochar is sequestered in soil, where i

128 the algal bioreactor), and the production of bioenergy in electricity and algal biomass through bioel

129 erent visions of land use and management for bioenergy in the U.S. are currently being used both for

130 important short rotation woody crop for the bioenergy industry.

131 ake Actinobacteria a promising group for the bioenergy industry.

132 costs is of critical importance to a growing bioenergy industry.

133 stocks at scale is a crucial concern for the bioenergy industry.

134 The Joint BioEnergy Institute Inventory of Composable Elements (JB

135 are critical for effective incorporation of bioenergy into the national energy portfolio.

136 Bioenergy is efficiently produced in the mitochondria by

137 Bioenergy is often considered an important component, al

138 Biomass production for bioenergy may change soil microbes and influence ecosyst

139 In addition, dissipation of cellular bioenergy may impose a lethal effect on these quiescent

140 eases in harvesting woody biomass--e.g., for bioenergy--may open forest canopies and accelerate therm

141 that administration of resveratrol modulates bioenergy metabolism, substrate utilization, oxidative s

142 nosine triphosphate (GTP), are signaling and bioenergy molecules to mediate a range of cellular pathw

143 cial traits in crop plants to meet society's bioenergy needs.

144 ng biochar production entails a reduction in bioenergy obtainable per unit biomass feedstock.

145 water treatment plants (WWTPs) to produce of bioenergy offers many potential synergies.

146 iological processing strategies that produce bioenergy or biochemicals while treating industrial and

147 isms for industrial use (e.g., production of bioenergy or biofuels).

148 ns producing bulk and fine chemicals, and in bioenergy, particularly considering increased methane av

149 These results suggest that alternative bioenergy pathways have large differences in how efficie

150 offering twice the carbon sequestration and bioenergy per unit biomass, BEBCS may allow earlier depl

151 on of starch-rich cereals and cellulose-rich bioenergy plants must grow substantially while minimizin

152 Our study suggests that bioenergy policy that supports coordinated land use can

153 in the conterminous U.S.-to estimate primary bioenergy potential (PBP).

154 ngly, realistically constrained estimates of bioenergy potential are critical for effective incorpora

155 and plant tissue nitrogen (N) as metrics of bioenergy potential from mixed-species conservation gras

156 , was not known, and the factors that affect bioenergy potential from these systems have not been ide

157 We simulated the bioenergy potential of pure even-aged high-forest stands

158 Our measurements of bioenergy potential, and the factors that control it, ca

159 s models to determine factors that influence bioenergy potential.

160 into the feasibility of current estimates of bioenergy potential.

161 xpanding meat consumption, and proliferating bioenergy pressures, concerns have recently been raised

162 bacteraceae, members of which participate in bioenergy production and in environmental bioremediation

163 sustainability's sake, the establishment of bioenergy production can no longer overlook the interact

164 To improve bioenergy production from photosynthetic microorganisms

165 * The major obstacle for bioenergy production from switchgrass biomass is the low

166 Potential bioenergy production from these abandoned lands using a

167 endeavor of optimizing the sustainability of bioenergy production in Denmark, this consequential life

168 s approach can help to analyze the impact of bioenergy production on ecosystem dynamics and services

169 ce to a broad variety of disease states, the bioenergy production phenotype has been widely character

170 t estimates of additional land available for bioenergy production range from 320 to 1411 million ha.

171 In this paper, a bioenergy production system based on heathland biomass i

172 cell growth, with applications ranging from bioenergy production to human health.

173 ios regarding the types of land suitable for bioenergy production using coarse-resolution inputs of s

174 oal of guiding research towards intensifying bioenergy production using established principles of com

175 ing high-rate, high-yield N2O production for bioenergy production with combined N and P removal from

176 molecular mechanisms that mediate microbial bioenergy production, and optimizing existing microbial

177 resting for light-harvesting applications in bioenergy production, in optogenetics applications in ne

178 al applications, such as waste treatment and bioenergy production, using engineered phototrophic micr

179 hum (Sorghum bicolor), a strategic plant for bioenergy production, were deduced from crystal structur

180 ghum bicolor; SbPAL1), a strategic plant for bioenergy production, were deduced from crystal structur

181 o generate the maps of land availability for bioenergy production.

182 ion to biofuels can improve the economics of bioenergy production.

183 s tropical grass in temperate zone grain and bioenergy production.

184 or environmental remediation applications or bioenergy production.

185 ass crop grown for grain, forage, sugar, and bioenergy production.

186 ocatalytic processes and their potential for bioenergy production.

187 s to increase annual U.S. biofuel (secondary bioenergy) production by more than 3-fold, from 40 to 13

188 e changes from an expanded global cellulosic bioenergy program on greenhouse gas emissions over the 2

189 nt tool for engineering plants with improved bioenergy properties.

190 bolic engineering of sugarcane feedstock for bioenergy purposes.

191 s stream can enable effective treatment with bioenergy recovery.

192 thorough evaluation of costs and benefits of bioenergy-related land-use change must include potential

193 rocesses and pathways underlying biomass and bioenergy-related traits using a segregating Eucalyptus

194 Sustainable production of biomass for bioenergy relies on low-input crop production.

195 s a potential feedstock and model system for bioenergy research due to recent worldwide interest in d

196 ht relate to functions that are important in bioenergy research.

197 The BioEnergy Science Center (BESC) is undertaking large exp

198 application of lab-on-a-chip systems to the bioenergy sciences.

199 is increasing interest and investment in the bioenergy sector.

200 We conclude that NAD(+)-dependent bioenergy shifts link metabolism with the early and late

201 uin 1 (SIRT1) coordinates the epigenetic and bioenergy shifts.

202 Therefore, bioenergy should maximize land-use efficiency when addre

203 ochemical cycles, bioremediation and several bioenergy strategies, but the mechanisms for the stimula

204 ve model predictions of root productivity in bioenergy switchgrass, but the edaphic factors we measur

205 opportunities for analyzing microbe-mediated bioenergy synthesis.

206 quantifying annual root production of three bioenergy systems (continuous corn, triticale/sorghum, s

207 ntly improves agricultural yields, with pure bioenergy systems being otherwise preferred.

208 roduction, and optimizing existing microbial bioenergy systems have been made.

209 It has potential utility in a range of bioenergy systems in vitro, but a major obstacle in its

210 This paper expands on the Geospatial Bioenergy Systems Model (GBSM) to evaluate the effect of

211 f biomass are the conversion efficiencies of bioenergy technologies and the kind and quantity of foss

212 ited for use as delivery vehicles for future bioenergy technologies.

213 Anaerobic digestion is the most successful bioenergy technology worldwide with, at its core, undefi

214 in MFCs and the prospects for this emerging bioenergy technology.

215 oxylan in human and animal nutrition and for bioenergy, the enzymes adding the arabinosyl substitutio

216 led can reap benefits in fields ranging from bioenergy to human medicine.

217 contribute to phenotypic variance of several bioenergy traits.

218 cifically engineered for improved biomass or bioenergy traits.

219 benefits of substituting fossil energy with bioenergy were calculated for all approximately 1500 com

220 ) energy policy includes an expectation that bioenergy will be a substantial future energy source.

221 Rapid growth in demand for lignocellulosic bioenergy will require major changes in supply chain inf

222 n the energy sector would be delivered using bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS).

223 ing direct air capture, enhanced weathering, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage and afforestat

224 har could be implemented in combination with bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

225 efficient catalytic conversion of biomass to bioenergy would meet a large portion of energy requireme

226 diversity grasslands had increasingly higher bioenergy yields that were 238% greater than monoculture