戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 r systematic reviews of empirical studies in bioethics.
2 n they were unable to give more attention to bioethics.
3 67 to 2001 (MEDLINE, AIDSLINE, PsycINFO, and Bioethics); a hand search was conducted of reprint files
4  American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics advises against this and recommends that clini
5     For the last several years, the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) has considered seve
6                                 The National Bioethics Advisory Commission has proposed new safeguard
7 pinion and federal regulations, the National Bioethics Advisory Commission's report on research invol
8                                 The National Bioethics Advisory Commission, which is about to underta
9 s at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Bioethics and Health Law.
10 practices is inconsistent with principles of bioethics and international human rights.
11 nment has mandated education and training in bioethics and issues relevant to human research.
12 ntly modernized field at the intersection of bioethics and neuroscience, is founded on centuries of d
13 ics, cost-effectiveness modeling, pathology, bioethics, and patient advocacy to identify factors to c
14 sis of past ethical scandals, as well as the bioethics apparatus that emerged in response to them, is
15 Ethics Group, administered by the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania Health Syste
16 studies consisted of expert presentations on bioethics, biostatistics, unipolar depression, and bipol
17 n this manner, students and practitioners of bioethics can better appreciate how modern health profes
18 eatures, and recommend that the research and bioethics communities lead a wide-ranging inquiry aimed
19 ics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation explored core competencies and re
20  difficult and costly to treat, she asks the bioethics consultation service for assistance in determi
21 iety for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioet
22 e clinicians on the medical ward requested a bioethics consultation.
23 t how one such body, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, contributes to public and policy debates, and
24  of 16 human rights issues in their required bioethics curricula.
25           To determine the current status of bioethics education of undergraduate biology students in
26 exposure science, toxicology, public health, bioethics, engineering, medicine, and policy.
27                                              Bioethics has become a common course of study in medical
28                                       Modern bioethics has reinforced this individualistic approach.
29                                         Good bioethics is about enabling science to move forward.
30               This historical perspective on bioethics is invaluable and demonstrates how, for exampl
31                                     That is, bioethics needs to emphasize why and how such events occ
32                            Discussion of the bioethics of human stem cell research has transitioned f
33                                  Medical and bioethics organizations have produced guidelines and rec
34 cine, pediatrics, nursing, patient advocacy, bioethics, philosophy, and law.
35                                              Bioethics pushes scientists to acknowledge that they ope
36          When some scientists hear the word "bioethics," they break out in intellectual hives.
37 n 30 years of work in medical humanities and bioethics to rigorously understand human variables in me
38 ademy of Pediatrics Section of Nephrology or Bioethics were surveyed.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。