ライフサイエンスコーパス: biofeedback

1 iofeedback plus surgery vs. surgery alone or biofeedback alone) are also needed.

2 plus in-office, dual-channel electromyograph biofeedback and daily home pelvic floor electrical stimu

3 The addition of biofeedback and pelvic floor electrical stimulation did

4 The interaction between biofeedback and relaxation, highlighting activity unique

5 : biofeedback relaxation, relaxation without biofeedback and two corresponding control conditions in

6 target-specific botulinum toxin injections, biofeedback and, in severe refractory adults, psychosurg

7 perant conditioning of neural activity using biofeedback, and from BCI/BMI studies in which neural ac

8 nce were seen with repetitive task training, biofeedback, and training with a moving platform.

9 l-based computer-assisted sphincter pressure biofeedback; and (4) hospital biofeedback plus the use o

10 , meditation, controlled slow breathing, and biofeedback, are also appropriate to consider and merit

11 ly assigned to receive 8 weeks (4 visits) of biofeedback-assisted behavioral training (n = 73), 8 wee

12 s were randomized to 4 sessions (8 weeks) of biofeedback-assisted behavioral treatment, drug treatmen

13 nts were assigned randomly to receive either biofeedback-assisted cognitive-behavioral treatment (BF/

14 fers an important alternative to traditional biofeedback-based approaches and may be useful in the de

15 We implemented this method in a real-time biofeedback brain-machine interface, and found that monk

16 t increases in activity were associated with biofeedback compared with random feedback.

17 back plus the use of a home electromyelogram biofeedback device.

18 Anorectal biofeedback for children has been proposed, but its effi

19 regarding patient satisfaction: 75.0% of the biofeedback group, 85.5% of the verbal feedback group, a

20 ctive value of improved anal pressures after biofeedback has not been clearly established.

21 Behavioral treatment (biofeedback) has been reported to improve fecal incontin

22 ive, yet it has not been established whether biofeedback is an essential component that heightens the

23 that multicomponent behavioral training with biofeedback is safe and effective, yet it has not been e

24 se, progressive relaxation, electromyography biofeedback, low-level laser therapy, operant therapy, c

25 ting that Glut upregulation was related to a biofeedback mediated event.

26 -induced movement therapy, electromyographic biofeedback, mental practice with motor imagery, and rob

27 e confirmed its efficacy or compared it with biofeedback or other less invasive forms of treatment.

28 s important in predicting response to either biofeedback or surgery.

29 Trials assessing combined treatments (e.g., biofeedback plus surgery vs. surgery alone or biofeedbac

30 ncter pressure biofeedback; and (4) hospital biofeedback plus the use of a home electromyelogram biof

31 d therapies in NNVD, comparison of different biofeedback programs for treating dysfunctional voiding,

32 Subjects were trained to perform a biofeedback relaxation exercise that reflected electrode

33 canned performing repetitions of four tasks: biofeedback relaxation, relaxation without biofeedback a

34 relaxation, highlighting activity unique to biofeedback relaxation, was associated with enhanced ant

35 be important in predicting outcome following biofeedback retraining include the duration of fecal inc

36 Treatments for fecal incontinence (biofeedback, sphincteroplasty, antidiarrheal and laxativ

37 tinence be more clearly defined, that future biofeedback studies elaborate the predictive value of pr

38 raining, which includes the application of a biofeedback system to detect swallowing behavior.

39 dry weight using bioimpedance technology and biofeedback systems designed to prevent rapid fluctuatio

40 ications, transcranial magnetic stimulation, biofeedback, target-specific botulinum toxin injections,

41 ased therapies (n = 9); mindfulness (n = 1), biofeedback techniques (n = 3); cognitive behavioural th

42 Biofeedback techniques used to treat urinary and fecal i

43 n the importance of defecation disorders and biofeedback therapies.

44 ay be amenable to pelvic floor retraining by biofeedback therapy (such as dyssynergic defecation).

45 Education, antidiarrheals and biofeedback therapy are the mainstay of management; surg

46 al stimulation, sacral nerve stimulation and biofeedback therapy are under development, but as curren

47 ding dysfunction is equivalent in potency to biofeedback therapy for the treatment of recalcitrant vo

48 s increased after pelvic floor retraining by biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence; however, the

49 Pelvic floor biofeedback therapy is effective for treating LAS and de

50 Conservative approaches, including biofeedback therapy, are the mainstay for managing these

51 Biofeedback therapy, hypnotherapy, and peppermint oil ar

52 educed with EMG-guided, respiratory-targeted biofeedback therapy.

53 New research combining neural decoding and biofeedback to target neuroplasticity causally links ear

54 Biofeedback to teach pelvic floor muscle control, verbal

55 d to be predictive of successful outcomes in biofeedback treatment are the threshold for external ana

56 Biofeedback treatment, but not control sessions, reduced

57 essions) of EMG-guided, respiratory-targeted biofeedback treatment; 11 received 1 control session bef

58 ks (4 visits) of behavioral training without biofeedback (verbal feedback based on vaginal palpation;

59 Neither pelvic floor exercises nor biofeedback was superior to standard care supplemented b

60 nalysis showed that behavioral training with biofeedback yielded a mean 63.1% reduction (SD, 42.7%) i

61 Biofeedback yielded no greater benefit than standard car