ライフサイエンスコーパス: biogeochemical

1 rease the occurrence and magnitude of pulsed biogeochemical activity, affecting carbon (C) and nitrog

2 mixing zones (hyporheic zones) have enhanced biogeochemical activity, but assembly processes governin

3 Here we use detailed biogeochemical analyses to track past penguin colony cha

4 activities for which sufficient knowledge on biogeochemical and biophysical effects exists but robust

5 dance of deciduous hardwoods, with potential biogeochemical and biophysical feedbacks to regional and

6 common land management activities for their biogeochemical and biophysical impacts, the level of pro

7 As life spread, biogeochemical and climate changes cyclically increased

8 ydrological regimes, sediment transport, and biogeochemical and contaminant fluxes from rivers to oce

9 ansitional habitats characterized by complex biogeochemical and ecological gradients that result in s

10 standing of supraglacial DOM cycling and the biogeochemical and ecological impacts of DOM export to d

11 y, the study also illustrates how integrated biogeochemical and economic assessments of multidimensio

12 does not imply the absence of hydrological, biogeochemical, and biological exchanges with nearby and

13 ity-level metabolic reconstruction, and soil biogeochemical assessment to understand the principles g

14 lages from layers beneath the chemocline had biogeochemical associations that differed from those in

15 partially explained the variability in many biogeochemical attributes such as C:N ratio and %TOC.

16 We found that the soil biogeochemical background corresponding to P inherited f

17 we experimentally characterize the principal biogeochemical barrier to SCN(-) biodegradation for an a

18 sions from streams are important to regional biogeochemical budgets.

19 ay help to explain discrepancies in deep-sea biogeochemical budgets.

20 s precluded a unified view of Southern Ocean biogeochemical change.

21 We investigated biogeochemical changes along a chronosequence of hydrolo

22 vironmental impacts of this process, yet the biogeochemical changes induced in the deep subsurface ar

23 ween catchments and lakes but at the cost of biogeochemical changes that release stored contaminants.

24 present in each lake, reflecting the unique biogeochemical characteristics of these environments.

25 Iron oxides are important structural and biogeochemical components of soils that can be strongly

26 ults from this 3-year study demonstrate that biogeochemical conditions present during reductive treat

27 0)Sr behavior and stability under a range of biogeochemical conditions stimulated by electron donor a

28 Although hydrological and biogeochemical connectivity is often episodic or slow (e

29 A key factor in determining ecological and biogeochemical consequences of turbulent stirring is the

30 has significant ecological, biophysical, and biogeochemical consequences.

31 ass and they have significant ecological and biogeochemical consequences.

32 Due to their complex biogeochemical controls and high spatial and temporal va

33 ) mining and processing, we investigated the biogeochemical controls of U bioavailability in the mode

34 The complex interactions of hydrodynamic and biogeochemical controls on emissions of this important g

35 To better understand the biogeochemical controls on PBDEs, 12 PBDE congeners were

36 jor iron source and emphasizing iron's tight biogeochemical coupling to major nutrients, a more compl

37 The complex biogeochemical cycle of Hg makes identifying primary sou

38 seawater analysis will shed new light on the biogeochemical cycle of marine arsenic.

39 Human activities have altered the biogeochemical cycle of mercury (Hg) since precolonial t

40 nium (Se) emissions play a major role in the biogeochemical cycle of this essential micronutrient.

41 provide a quantitative summary of the global biogeochemical cycle of vanadium (V), including both hum

42 The sulfur biogeochemical cycle plays a key role in regulating Eart

43 hylation is an important component of the As biogeochemical cycle that can influence As toxicity and

44 is a central process in the organoarsenical biogeochemical cycle.

45 ment effectively removing Hg from the active biogeochemical cycle; this results in a 27% lower presen

46 isms that play a major role in food webs and biogeochemical cycles (1) .

47 stand the impact of microbial communities on biogeochemical cycles and (2) reframe current theory and

48 yanobacteria are an integral part of Earth's biogeochemical cycles and a promising resource for the s

49 and minerals plays a critical role in global biogeochemical cycles and climate evolution.

50 information on function of marine food webs, biogeochemical cycles and copepod health.

51 he rise of pelagic calcifiers - have changed biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem dynamics.

52 tary Cu isotope compositions in the study of biogeochemical cycles and oceanic redox balance in the p

53 ir of genetic diversity with great impact on biogeochemical cycles and organismal health.

54 this framework for the evolution of Earth's biogeochemical cycles and the rise of atmospheric oxygen

55 treams harbor diverse microorganisms driving biogeochemical cycles and, consequently, influencing eco

56 icroorganisms that drive the pelagic ocean's biogeochemical cycles are currently facing an unpreceden

57 Carbon (C) and silicon (Si) biogeochemical cycles are important factors in the regul

58 in the Mediterranean abyssal ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles are to be expected.

59 er in sediments is an important component of biogeochemical cycles because marine sediments are criti

60 ox evolution is informed by our knowledge of biogeochemical cycles catalysed by extant biota.

61 otentially important implications for global biogeochemical cycles especially in view of the recent a

62 s the potential to foundationally impact all biogeochemical cycles in the environment.

63 mitation, with broad implications for global biogeochemical cycles in the future ocean.

64 nformation on potential microbially mediated biogeochemical cycles in tundra ecosystems.

65 pproaches to quantifying and predicting soil biogeochemical cycles mostly consider microbial biomass

66 f hydroxyaluminosilicates is integral to the biogeochemical cycles of aluminium and silicon.

67 o characterize the stoichiometry between the biogeochemical cycles of C and Si.

68 have shown that global changes decouple the biogeochemical cycles of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and p

69 l and longstanding role it has played in the biogeochemical cycles of Earth over billions of years.

70 d have large effects on the trophic webs and biogeochemical cycles of estuaries and coastal areas by

71 een invoked as a key mechanism governing the biogeochemical cycles of forest ecosystems.

72 understanding of the interaction between the biogeochemical cycles of iron and methane.

73 ways and thus provides new insights into the biogeochemical cycles of nitrogen and other elements in

74 gs highlight crucial links between Tc and Fe biogeochemical cycles that have significant implications

75 Microbial communities drive biogeochemical cycles through networks of metabolite exc

76 l implications of these top-down changes for biogeochemical cycles via consumer-mediated nutrient dyn

77 the USA, impacts to drinking water quality, biogeochemical cycles, and aquatic ecosystems are estima

78 roles in the regulation of marine food webs, biogeochemical cycles, and Earth's climate.

79 lobal climate resonate in plankton dynamics, biogeochemical cycles, and marine food webs.

80 t directly probes governing processes in CO2 biogeochemical cycles, Delta(17)O (=ln(1 + delta(17)O) -

81 Archaea are major contributors to biogeochemical cycles, possess unique metabolic capabili

82 re frequent floodplain fires, and changes to biogeochemical cycles, transport of organic and inorgani

83 are complex but are important for downstream biogeochemical cycles.

84 ials that contribute significantly to global biogeochemical cycles.

85 ate organic matter degradation and influence biogeochemical cycles.

86 e the degree to which microbes regulate soil biogeochemical cycles.

87 tical to evaluating their influences on soil biogeochemical cycles.

88 n drivers of the sulfur, nitrogen and carbon biogeochemical cycles.

89 hat drive transformations central to Earth's biogeochemical cycles.

90 t fuel marine food webs and influence global biogeochemical cycles.

91 y contributes to long-term changes in global biogeochemical cycles.

92 to the impacts on air quality, climate, and biogeochemical cycles.

93 inked to the coevolution of life and Earth's biogeochemical cycles.

94 a major role in both terrestrial and oceanic biogeochemical cycles.

95 o the role of freshwaters in global C and Si biogeochemical cycles.

96 mentally stable and can participate in local biogeochemical cycles.

97 rine food webs and the functioning of global biogeochemical cycles.

98 processes, such as primary productivity and biogeochemical cycles.

99 ely to play a different role in ocean global biogeochemical cycles.

100 hich may have broad effects on food webs and biogeochemical cycles.

101 ke ecosystems and play central roles in lake biogeochemical cycles.

102 ole(s) of pyrogenic organic matter (PyOM) in biogeochemical cycles.

103 DOS removal and active involvement in marine biogeochemical cycles.

104 role in climate regulation and global sulfur biogeochemical cycles.

105 ected for, altering linkages among the major biogeochemical cycles.

106 plankton assemblages and its role in aquatic biogeochemical cycles.

107 king it an integral component of the ocean's biogeochemical cycles.

108 t interactions and physiology as controls on biogeochemical cycles.

109 mal vent microbial communities in deep ocean biogeochemical cycles.

110 of sediment bioturbation - a key mediator of biogeochemical cycling - to determine whether post-extin

111 lobal ocean volume, plays important roles in biogeochemical cycling [2], and holds potentially huge f

112 speciation and carbon isotope data suggests biogeochemical cycling across a dynamic redox boundary,

113 s of host diversity, population dynamics and biogeochemical cycling and contribute to the daily flux

114 ury, our findings document the potential for biogeochemical cycling and multi-trophic interactions al

115 globally and advancing our understanding of biogeochemical cycling and other ecosystem processes.

116 fungi, which are critical for plant fitness, biogeochemical cycling and other processes.

117 r each, we discuss the role of microbiota in biogeochemical cycling and outline ecological and hydrol

118 bility, were clear drivers of differences in biogeochemical cycling and resulted in substantially dif

119 ty drives changes in microbial diversity and biogeochemical cycling between the aerobic surface layer

120 vel Nitrospirae bacteria might contribute to biogeochemical cycling in natural habitats.

121 nked roles of the most abundant organisms in biogeochemical cycling in the aquifer sediment.

122 ystem dynamics, ecological interactions, and biogeochemical cycling of both cellular and acellular co

123 ctions propel the engine that results in the biogeochemical cycling of individual elements, and they

124 ine to more crystalline forms, affecting the biogeochemical cycling of iron and the behavior of any s

125 detailing of the historical controls on the biogeochemical cycling of silicic acid [Si(OH)4] on the

126 of these clades appear to participate in the biogeochemical cycling of sulfur and nitrogen, filling p

127 sms provides important information about the biogeochemical cycling of the element and transfer throu

128 tant roles in the environment, especially in biogeochemical cycling of toxic elements in aquatic syst

129 Ocean microbes drive biogeochemical cycling on a global scale.

130 es may play previously unrecognized roles in biogeochemical cycling through mechanisms that include e

131 scale is essential to better understand it's biogeochemical cycling to improve Se transfer into diets

132 e, we use models for erosion, weathering and biogeochemical cycling to show that this can be explaine

133 They also make major contributions to global biogeochemical cycling, and ameliorate atmospheric accum

134 like conductivity of the pili, their role in biogeochemical cycling, and applications in bioenergy an

135 ciation in relation to Fe and C dynamics and biogeochemical cycling, and the mechanisms responsible f

136 ing pressures on phytoplankton and hence for biogeochemical cycling, higher trophic levels and biodiv

137 ms play key roles in ecosystem processes and biogeochemical cycling, however, the relationship betwee

138 ence ecosystems, sea ice, species diversity, biogeochemical cycling, seafloor methane stability, deep

139 of organisms includes an additional class of biogeochemical cycling, this being the flow and transfor

140 bining these effects in a model of long-term biogeochemical cycling, we reproduce a sustained +2 per

141 o the microbial loop, aquatic food webs, and biogeochemical cycling.

142 ated by the effect of microbial processes on biogeochemical cycling.

143 eby highlighting the complexities of arsenic biogeochemical cycling.

144 OTUs to hypotheses about processes governing biogeochemical cycling.

145 r might affect sediment-water dSi fluxes and biogeochemical cycling.

146 remediation products and understanding of Se biogeochemical cycling.

147 ons for contaminant remediation and nutrient biogeochemical cycling.

148 ophytes) contributes significantly to global biogeochemical cycling.

149 local oxygenic photosynthesis on Pacific AMZ biogeochemical cycling.

150 lves and are critical contributors to marine biogeochemical cycling.

151 oubtedly impact the understanding of mercury biogeochemical cycling; however, there is a lack of cons

152 ltaneously consider interacting climatic and biogeochemical drivers when assessing forest responses t

153 ms, yet our understanding of these microbial-biogeochemical-ecological interactions is limited by a l

154 We used the biogeochemical ecosystem model N14CP, which considers in

155 evidence for a long-held hypothesis that the biogeochemical effect of urban aerosol or haze pollution

156 spur the development of a new generation of biogeochemical electron flux models that focus on the ba

157 rbation is localized due to distinct physico-biogeochemical environments and relatively long time sca

158 rating dinoflagellate molecular, fossil, and biogeochemical evidence, we propose a revised model for

159 ion zones, we find elevated biomass within a biogeochemical facies that occurred at the transition be

160 pling the spatial distribution of subsurface biogeochemical facies with biomass-facies relationships

161 Here, we characterize three biogeochemical facies-oxidized, reduced, and transition-

162 buted carbonate microbialites and associated biogeochemical facies.

163 the transition between oxidized and reduced biogeochemical facies.

164 umulated U(IV) speciation, and to define the biogeochemical factors controlling its reactivity.

165 Reactions mediated by PCM can impact the biogeochemical fate of pollutants and lead to useful str

166 ach in 2011, however, incorporating sediment biogeochemical feedbacks is required to reproduce the ob

167 t, ecosystem functioning and climate through biogeochemical feedbacks, but their response to contempo

168 These biogeochemical findings suggest that the relatively grea

169 -driven glacial/interglacial oscillations in biogeochemical fluxes at and near the ocean margins, wit

170 STEs) are of major importance for land-ocean biogeochemical fluxes.

171 While the biogeochemical forces influencing the weathering of spil

172 trogen pool is crucial for understanding its biogeochemical function and reactivity in the environmen

173 key, but understudied, component of riverine biogeochemical function.

174 ing by matching taxa to known taxon-specific biogeochemical functions.

175 odel, suggesting that these groups performed biogeochemical functions.

176 aces (SWIs) are often characterized by steep biogeochemical gradients determining the fate of inorgan

177 ific organisms, drove community assembly and biogeochemical gradients in the model ocean.

178 terial adaptations to the extreme and unique biogeochemical gradients of ice-covered lakes in the McM

179 , up-to-date and comprehensive collection of biogeochemical groundwater monitoring data.

180 ations to microbial metabolism, resulting in biogeochemical hotspots and moments.

181 Consistent with previous observations of biogeochemical hotspots at environmental transition zone

182 bacteria, fungi, and detrital matter) act as biogeochemical hotspots by controlling important fluxes

183 and rivers or lakes have been identified as biogeochemical hotspots with steep redox gradients.

184 underlying mechanisms that make PPR wetlands biogeochemical hotspots, which ultimately leads to their

185 ll critical gaps in our understanding of the biogeochemical impact of viruses in the ocean.

186 s in marine ecosystems, but their integrated biogeochemical impacts remain unclear.

187 s into the m5C methylation landscape and its biogeochemical implications in an important marine N2 -f

188 ing (BONCAT) - for studying the activity and biogeochemical influence of marine viruses.

189 inimicrobia metabolism is sparse, making the biogeochemical influence of this group challenging to pr

190 il to account for the complex ecological and biogeochemical interactions that govern reefs.

191 acetate and soluble Mn(3+) represents a new biogeochemical link between carbon and manganese cycles.

192 Understanding biogeochemical mechanisms affecting decomposition in pea

193 ng conditions in natural waters by combining biogeochemical microcosm experiments and X-ray absorptio

194 ated soil exposed to sea and river waters in biogeochemical microcosm reactors across field-validated

195 We developed a mercury (Hg) biogeochemical model for the Baltic Sea and used it to i

196 lace our phosphorus record in a quantitative biogeochemical model framework and find that a combinati

197 By integrating a detailed biogeochemical model that projects future ecological rec

198 In this study, we applied a biogeochemical model that simulates dissolved oxygen con

199 dividual-based model coupled to an ice-ocean-biogeochemical model was utilized to simulate temperatur

200 omic and metaproteomic sequence data, into a biogeochemical model, as shown here, enables holistic in

201 utions of metabolic processes predicted by a biogeochemical model, suggesting that these groups perfo

202 Using a process-based biogeochemical model, we predicted that low levels of Nd

203 Biogeochemical modeling shows a 3.2-fold increase in the

204 major lineages currently underrepresented in biogeochemical models and identifies radiations that are

205 ncorporating historical climate effects into biogeochemical models simulating future global change sc

206 Biogeochemical models that incorporate nitrogen (N) limi

207 However, biogeochemical models that simulate simultaneous competi

208 full calibration (stage 5), 24 process-based biogeochemical models were assessed individually or as a

209 ect that merging such an approach with hydro-biogeochemical models will provide important constraints

210 urrent paradigm, widely incorporated in soil biogeochemical models, is that microbial methanogenesis

211 the application of a series of quantitative biogeochemical models, we find that large spatiotemporal

212 s in drylands are higher than predictions by biogeochemical models, which are traditionally based on

213 Phytoplankton (eutrophication, biogeochemical) models are important tools for ecosystem

214 teractions between microbial communities and biogeochemical oxidation-reduction reactions.

215 e (here, > 35 degrees ) forests is a central biogeochemical paradox.

216 S SSU rRNA genes, average 10,000 reads), and biogeochemical parameters are monitored by quantifying 5

217 Guidelines based on measurable biogeochemical parameters have been proposed, but contem

218 Microorganisms control key biogeochemical pathways, thus changes in microbial diver

219 phosphorus in their rhizosphere via multiple biogeochemical pathways.

220 Differences in biogeochemical potential between two production well com

221 coupling between underlying hydrological and biogeochemical process dynamics.

222 The model reproduces measured biogeochemical process rates as well as DNA, mRNA, and p

223 however, that the groups associated with one biogeochemical process, sulfate reduction, contained onl

224 The mixed-layer pump is a physically-driven biogeochemical process7-11 that could further contribute

225 hermally altered DOM (TA-DOM) are altered by biogeochemical processes (e.g., transformed by growing a

226 itat in modulating the relationships between biogeochemical processes and Hg bioaccumulation.

227 drive fundamental submicron- to global-scale biogeochemical processes and influence carbon-climate fe

228 t remains uncertain, however, to what extent biogeochemical processes can suppress global GPP growth.

229 the negative impacts of aridity on important biogeochemical processes controlling carbon (C), nitroge

230 better understand the relationship of tau to biogeochemical processes in a dynamic estuarine system,

231 igation of a large panel of hydrological and biogeochemical processes in aquatic systems.

232 ention ponds) has the potential to influence biogeochemical processes in downstream water bodies beca

233 ng the complex linkages among time-dependent biogeochemical processes in hydrodynamically complex env

234 e occurrence and timing of physiological and biogeochemical processes in natural populations.

235 oves our ability to represent ecological and biogeochemical processes in oligotrophic oceans.

236 ool in order to improve our understanding of biogeochemical processes in soil-plant systems.

237 nutrients to alpine watersheds and influence biogeochemical processes in these remote settings.

238 ionation patterns provide information on the biogeochemical processes in these systems.

239 nt and play an important role in a number of biogeochemical processes including microbial activity, s

240 nction, but linking community composition to biogeochemical processes is challenging because of high

241 interactions, is related to variation in key biogeochemical processes like soil carbon formation.

242 olubility of jarosite at near-neutral pH and biogeochemical processes occurring downstream could affe

243 activities and climate change can affect the biogeochemical processes of natural wetland methanogenes

244 t loads are consistent with hydrological and biogeochemical processes such as denitrification.

245 Understanding linked hydrologic and biogeochemical processes such as nitrate loading to agri

246 ed effects of cumulative nutrient inputs and biogeochemical processes that occur in freshwater under

247 table isotopes to examine the ecological and biogeochemical processes underlying THg bioaccumulation

248 changes in winter range occupancy may shape biogeochemical processes via shifts in microbial communi

249 our entire planet and have a crucial role in biogeochemical processes, agriculture, biotechnology, an

250 Despite being key contributors to biogeochemical processes, archaea are frequently outnumb

251 perature, an important driver of terrestrial biogeochemical processes, depends strongly on soil albed

252 the hydrologic regime are expected to impact biogeochemical processes, including contaminant mobility

253 sent an integrated signal from anthropogenic/biogeochemical processes, including fossil fuel burning,

254 that affect plant growth and influence many biogeochemical processes, the impact of future changes i

255 ties are the key drivers of many terrestrial biogeochemical processes.

256 tand can provide integrative proxies for key biogeochemical processes.

257 s importance in pollutant redox dynamics and biogeochemical processes.

258 ultiscale modeling of hyporheic exchange and biogeochemical processes.

259 operate in microbial communities to regulate biogeochemical processes.

260 rming may ultimately lead to changes in soil biogeochemical processes.

261 xample of how biological diel rhythms affect biogeochemical processes.

262 atchment hydrology or habitats, and internal biogeochemical processes.

263 differences that could differentially impact biogeochemical processes.

264 wetland sediments that affect ecological and biogeochemical processes.

265 impacts on litter decomposition and further biogeochemical processes.

266 s between microbial iron reduction and other biogeochemical processes.

267 sions have been reported to influence global biogeochemical processes; however, in the literature the

268 chnique for the investigation of very subtle biogeochemical processing of bulk DOM.

269 pportunities for elucidating the origins and biogeochemical properties of FDOM.

270 dertaken in conjunction with analysis of key biogeochemical properties of two mats (smooth and pustul

271 ain size distribution is a good predictor of biogeochemical properties, and that subsets of the overa

272 ng and water sources, explicitly calculating biogeochemical rates, and exploring the complex linkages

273 correlated with interstation variability in biogeochemical rates; however, bioturbation potential ex

274 methane emissions to the atmosphere, but the biogeochemical reactions driving such fluxes are less we

275 Microorganisms catalyze carbon cycling and biogeochemical reactions in the deep subsurface and thus

276 groups and have a 1.5 V potential range for biogeochemical reactions that invoke electron transfer p

277 of many contaminants through a wide range of biogeochemical reactions.

278 l variably saturated flow and multicomponent biogeochemical reactive transport modeling, based on pub

279 uable tool for the field characterization of biogeochemical reactivity, aquifer transport properties,

280 indicated the urban aquifer also serves as a biogeochemical reactor.

281 uctive Cr(VI) immobilization under different biogeochemical regimes were tested for their susceptibil

282 We also show that the biogeochemical response of the aquifer system has not mo

283 tion to address the nature and timing of the biogeochemical response to oxygenation directly.

284 autotrophically with iron, indicating a new biogeochemical role for this ubiquitous microorganism.

285 studied extensively due to their significant biogeochemical roles in the marine ecosystem.

286 To understand the biogeochemical roles of microorganisms in the environmen

287 Despite the biogeochemical significance of the interactions between

288 ct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) has biogeochemical significance, and practical applications

289 nterpretation of paleo-proxy data as well as biogeochemical simulations, we show that a sea level fal

290 In balance, most biogeochemical studies that aim at molecularly fingerpri

291 tocks and turnover times we developed a soil biogeochemical testbed that forces three different soil

292 tanding, evaluation, and improvement of soil biogeochemical theory and models at regional to global s

293 rk elucidates spatio-temporal aspects of the biogeochemical transformation of copper mobilized from m

294 (California, USA) to identify Hg sources and biogeochemical transformations downstream of a historica

295 y, the role of the genus in soil ecology and biogeochemical transformations is of agricultural and en

296 re to establish the sequence of physical and biogeochemical transitions and lags during the vernal wi

297 Peatlands frequently serve as efficient biogeochemical traps for U.

298 udies, wherever an improved understanding of biogeochemical turnover processes is necessary.

299 versity in relation to spatial, temporal and biogeochemical variation, within and across lakes locate

300 the SBB we hypothesize a dynamic and annular biogeochemical zonation by which the bacteria capitalize