ライフサイエンスコーパス: biometry

1 for gestational age determination and fetal biometry.

2 vitreous length were obtained by ultrasound biometry.

3 nocular open-field autorefraction and ocular biometry.

4 maging and high-precision, noncontact ocular biometry.

5 ll patients underwent ocular examination and biometry.

6 to examine interocular differences in ocular biometry.

7 vidual differences in axial length by ocular biometry.

8 on was used for ethnic differences in ocular biometry.

9 1.0D in short and long eyes using ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification.

10 Using A-115 for ultrasound biometry and A-115.7 for optical biometry and SRK/T form

11 Using A-115 for ultrasound biometry and A-115.7 for optical biometry and SRK/T form

12 Ocular biometry and an eye model were used to estimate the reti

13 Combined analysis of fetal biometry and fetal growth velocity identified a subset o

14 outcome measures were the results of ocular biometry and gene analysis.

15 ociated with better outcomes included having biometry and having an eye department manager in the fac

16 s have spurred the continued improvements in biometry and intraocular lens calculations.

17 recent studies and advances in the field of biometry and intraocular lens power calculations.

18 ews recent advances in the field of clinical biometry and IOL power calculations.

19 djusting for ASOCT-measured anterior segment biometry and iris characteristics.

20 The repeatability and reproducibility of the biometry and keratometry measurements.

21 it was originally made in order to reconcile biometry and Mendelism and ever since has been used in p

22 visual field testing, autorefraction, A-scan biometry and optic disc assessment.

23 ual function testing, autorefraction, A-scan biometry and optic disc assessment.

24 Patients underwent biometry and peripapillary and macular OCT imaging.

25 Preoperative AL was measured by ultrasound biometry and SRK/T formula was used for IOL calculation.

26 ultrasound biometry and A-115.7 for optical biometry and SRK/T formula, +/-1.00 D of SE, is able to

27 ultrasound biometry and A-115.7 for optical biometry and SRK/T formula, the emmetropia (+/-1.00 D) o

28 Cross-sectional survey of ocular biometry and visual function in healthy eyes across the

29 ete examination including gonioscopy, A-scan biometry, and anterior segment optical coherence tomogra

30 patient selection, accurate keratometry and biometry, and appropriate intraocular lens power formula

31 Refraction, biometry, and corneal curvature were measured, before, a

32 Participants underwent gonioscopy, A-scan biometry, and imaging by anterior segment optical cohere

33 Subjects underwent a full eye examination, biometry, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomograp

34 e noted for growth, feed utilisation or fish biometry, and the fatty acid composition of fish fillets

35 ; the axial length was measured by immersion biometry, and the standard A-constant was used.

36 ad research ultrasonography, including fetal biometry at 28 and 36 weeks' gestational age.

37 n infants may be difficult, and preoperative biometry can be used to estimate CL power.

38 After their eyes were measured by ultrasound biometry, chicks wore either a +10-D lens over one eye f

39 siology, genetics, biochemistry, statistics, biometry, cosmology, and philosophy, although he himself

40 To report the biometry data of pediatric cataractous eyes (randomly se

41 eye in unilateral cases) and to compare the biometry data of the unilateral cataractous eye with the

42 toperative refraction using a single optical biometry device.

43 s and limitations of the currently available biometry devices allows prevention of high variability a

44 rea measures, based on individualized ocular biometry, eliminated the magnification effect.

45 clavation, A-constant, ultrasound or optical biometry, formula employed and refractive outcomes.

46 Optical biometry has shown to be superior to ultrasound biometry

47 The SS-OCT biometry has the potential to provide clinically useful

48 e association of maternal smoking with fetal biometry in different stages of pregnancy.

49 In response, using swept-source optical biometry in prepresbyopic and presbyopic eyes, we invest

50 effectiveness of universal ultrasonic fetal biometry in the third trimester as a screening test for

51 metry has shown to be superior to ultrasound biometry in vitrectomized eyes but still not achieving a

52 Ocular biometry including axial length (AL), anterior chamber d

53 Ocular biometry including diameters of the eye, vitreous chambe

54 Biometry indicated storage of 1.6 +/- 0.4 megagrams of c

55 eveloped low-coherence reflectometry optical biometry is comparable to older ultrasonic biometric and

56 RECENT FINDINGS: Immersion A-scan biometry is superior in measuring the axial length of ch

57 miologic and genetic study that included eye biometry, keratometry, and autorefraction.

58 Eyes were excluded for invalid biometry, lack of refractive data at the specified posto

59 A meta-analysis to compare ocular biometry measured by optical low-coherence reflectometry

60 etinal spectral-domain OCT system and ocular biometry measured.

61 s recent studies highlight difficulties with biometry measurement and IOL calculations in the entire

62 As a rule, biometry measurements taken by different devices should

63 his prospective study, 2 consecutive optical biometry measurements, before and after pupil dilation,

64 a chart review/analysis of immersion A-scan biometry measurements, excluding traumatic cataract or l

65 phics, clinical examination findings, ocular biometry measurements, treatment received, and pre- and

66 MES and SINDI subjects also completed ocular biometry measurements.

67 custom MATLAB programs that included ocular biometry measures (IOL Master).

68 Mendelism but evolution, natural selection, biometry, mutation, and cytology.

69 A-scan biometry (Nidek Echoscan Ultrasound US-800; Nidek Co., T

70 gth (measured either by immersion ultrasound biometry or partial coherence interferometry), target re

71 ophthalmic evaluation including gonioscopy, biometry, pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopy.

72 ead correlations between mRNA expression and biometry parameters including axial and astigmatic compo

73 uiring cataract surgery after SB should have biometry performed no earlier than 3 months post SB surg

74 Biometry prediction error was 1.11 diopters (D) for MFS

75 patient selection, accurate keratometry and biometry readings, as well as to the application of corr

76 s women with universal third trimester fetal biometry roughly tripled detection of SGA infants.

77 including applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, biometry, stereoscopic fundus examination, and automated

78 now achieved by directing close attention to biometry technique, through the use of third generation

79 ariables from corneal tomography and optical biometry using Oculus Pentacam and IOL Master were asses

80 valent (SE) refraction and that predicted by biometry using the SRK-T formula was calculated.

81 Fetal biometry was assessed by ultrasound at each research vis

82 on was then stimulated pharmacologically and biometry was measured continuously for 30 minutes.

83 Ultrasonic fetal biometry was performed at 20 weeks of gestation as per r

84 Optical biometry was performed by OLCR biometer (LenStar LS 900)

85 Biometry was performed on 20 healthy right eyes of volun

86 December 31, 2015, with Lenstar 900 optical biometry were eligible.

87 differences in refractive status and ocular biometry were examined in a multiethnic sample of Britis

88 refraction (without cycloplegia), and ocular biometry were measured in each eye.

89 Refraction and ultrasound biometry were performed before and after the 3-day-long

90 All subjects had biometry with the IOLMaster and disc/retinal nerve fiber