ライフサイエンスコーパス: biotic

1 for some dryland communities to have limited biotic ability to retain augmented N inputs, possibly le

2 Here, we demonstrate a biotic-abiotic bioprotonic device with Pd contacts that

3 e Pd contact interface to produce responsive biotic-abiotic devices with increased functionality.

4 dology to extract insights from more complex biotic-abiotic hybrid systems.

5 stic investigations into the dynamics of the biotic-abiotic interface to drive the development of nex

6 onships relevant to developing materials for biotic/abiotic interfaces.

7 ee mortality and defoliation due to multiple biotic agents across United States forests during the pe

8 insects, other insects, pathogens, and other biotic agents) were calculated at 0.5 degrees resolution

9 ration of a complex biointerface between the biotic and abiotic components.

10 g compartmentalized habitats and an array of biotic and abiotic conditions, and by limiting dispersal

11 rtunity to investigate the relative roles of biotic and abiotic controls of species diversification,

12 E-99 and other lower brominated BDEs through biotic and abiotic degradation, and all age groups are e

13 ecies assemblages and identifying underlying biotic and abiotic determinants represent great ecologic

14 l engages in countless interactions with its biotic and abiotic environment during its lifetime.

15 ween rates of change in species richness and biotic and abiotic environmental change is a major goal

16 these plant-microbe interactions depends on biotic and abiotic environmental factors and on the geno

17 progression, incorporating the influence of biotic and abiotic environmental factors, evaluating the

18 as well as in the interaction of fungi with biotic and abiotic environments.

19 on, senescence, and plant responses to their biotic and abiotic environments.

20 Biotic and abiotic factors are increasingly acknowledged

21 tive importance, magnitude, and direction of biotic and abiotic factors in predicting population dens

22 However, the relative importance of biotic and abiotic factors in predicting species distrib

23 lution of insect sociality and highlight key biotic and abiotic factors influencing social insect gen

24 onses to changes in growth conditions due to biotic and abiotic factors involve reprogramming of gene

25 g paradigm shift, which recognizes that both biotic and abiotic factors shape species distributions a

26 ratios, together with land use, climate and biotic and abiotic factors, in determining regional scal

27 owth and development as well as responses to biotic and abiotic factors.

28 y a crucial role in plants interactions with biotic and abiotic factors.

29 l non-coding RNAs with emerging functions in biotic and abiotic interactions.

30 vulnerability is typically assessed through biotic and abiotic measurements at individual points on

31 uce microbial activity and partition between biotic and abiotic NO-producing processes (i.e., chemode

32 s because of trade-offs that develop between biotic and abiotic NO-producing processes when soils dry

33 If relevant biotic and abiotic parameters can be obtained, then bioe

34 Drought can shift the balance between the biotic and abiotic processes that produce NO, favoring c

35 tary structures produced by a combination of biotic and abiotic processes.

36 amino acids found in high abundance in both biotic and abiotic samples (seven enantiomer pairs d/l-A

37 egulates guard cell signaling in response to biotic and abiotic stimuli through jasmonic acid (JA)- a

38 being maintained due to a trade-off between biotic and abiotic stress adaptation.

39 ring photorespiration or as a consequence of biotic and abiotic stress as well as in the initiation o

40 ming to exploit genetic diversity to improve biotic and abiotic stress resistance and oil production,

41 The biotic and abiotic stress responses are conferred by ser

42 In plants, G-proteins affect multiple biotic and abiotic stress responses, as well as many dev

43 ggers the misregulation of genes involved in biotic and abiotic stress responses, the most prominent

44 are highly enriched in proteins involved in biotic and abiotic stress responses.

45 Plants need to cope with biotic and abiotic stress through well-coordinated cell-

46 st MG detoxifying capabilities, confers dual biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in model plant Nicot

47 in plant development, hormone signaling and biotic and abiotic stress tolerance through coordination

48 ction by the fungal endophytes often confers biotic and abiotic stress tolerance to their hosts.

49 hat show increased expression in response to biotic and abiotic stress treatments suggestive of a rol

50 profiles, protein structure and function of biotic and abiotic stress-resistance genes, and QTLs cou

51 proteins regulating stomatal aperture during biotic and abiotic stress.

52 ng for genes implicated in pathogen defense, biotic and abiotic stress.

53 growth and morphogenesis and defense against biotic and abiotic stress.

54 Traditional evaluation of crop biotic and abiotic stresses are time-consuming and labor

55 ial not simply for protection of spores from biotic and abiotic stresses but also for spore structura

56 volvement of ARFs in conferring tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in plant species.

57 se responses of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) to biotic and abiotic stresses include the synthesis of pre

58 Plants are exposed to recurring biotic and abiotic stresses that can, in extreme situati

59 ucial function in the alleviation of diverse biotic and abiotic stresses.

60 nctions as a protective barrier against many biotic and abiotic stresses.

61 est plantation productivity and tolerance of biotic and abiotic stresses.

62 tional benefits and protecting hosts against biotic and abiotic stresses.

63 e-localized proteins perceive and respond to biotic and abiotic stresses.

64 of key developmental stages and tolerance of biotic and abiotic stresses.

65 plant growth, development, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses.

66 nts are typically confronted by simultaneous biotic and abiotic stresses.

67 e environment are continuously challenged by biotic and abiotic stresses.

68 luding senescence, and in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses.

69 on, as well as increase in tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses.

70 SlNACMTF3 and 8 were majorly regulated in biotic and abiotic stresses.

71 h as in hormone transport or defense against biotic and abiotic stresses.

72 ractive tool to engineer plants against both biotic and abiotic stresses.

73 that spores regulate their interactions with biotic and abiotic surfaces and represents potential new

74 inear modeling of UMRV infection overlaid on biotic and abiotic variables, we demonstrate that sympat

75 mals and responses to environmental stimuli (biotic and abiotic) in plants.

76 Extreme biotic and climatic events pose severe hazards to tropic

77 ghest astronomical tide datum - captured the biotic and edaphic marsh-upland ecotone.

78 The considered biotic and passive sampler phases include membrane and s

79 that can serve at the interface between the biotic and the abiotic worlds.

80 We capture biotic assembly rules by species-to-species association

81 eriods of carbon starvation, and (3) promote biotic attack due to low tissue carbon: nitrogen (C : N)

82 Angiosperms and trees that died due to biotic attacks (especially bark-beetles) typically showe

83 ittle is known about the role of MIAs during biotic attacks.

84 t only to protect plants against abiotic and biotic challenges, but have also been used extensively b

85 In response to abiotic and biotic challenges, plants rapidly attach small ubiquitin

86 Massive biotic change occurred during the Eocene as the climate

87 g rapidly and may contribute to considerable biotic change on islands by acting in synergy with direc

88 ) irradiance is a key driver of climatic and biotic change.

89 grey literature, for understanding long-term biotic changes in insular ecosystems.

90 ts varies both with the environment and with biotic changes in photosynthetic infrastructure, but our

91 Biotic changes include species invasions worldwide and a

92 of shallow marine carbonate production with biotic CO2 sequestration by 3,700 million years ago (Ma)

93 l sources of plastic materials available for biotic colonization and also interacts with climate chan

94 e to increased anthropogenic degradation but biotic communities provide multiple pathways for resista

95 poses a significant threat to plants and the biotic communities they support.

96 ected area networks in preserving the set of biotic components and ecological processes they harbor,

97 ition does not reflect ecosystem function or biotic composition.

98 hed that broad-scale patterns of abiotic and biotic conditions affect organisms' distributions and po

99 s that increased OA may indirectly alter the biotic conditions by modifying trophic interactions.

100 ity that are able to survive the abiotic and biotic conditions of a local ecosystem.

101 e complex interplay of climatic, edaphic and biotic conditions.

102 ll as plant adaptation to myriad abiotic and biotic conditions.

103 Striga is a major biotic constraint to sorghum production in semiarid trop

104 Little is known about the abiotic and biotic controls on microbial mercury methylation in pola

105 temperate forest soils, less is known about biotic controls over phosphorus (P) cycling.

106 Biotic COS production in bryophytes could result from sy

107 (Pl-To) boundaries demonstrating that these biotic crises are both associated with rapid change from

108 These shared patterns in both biotic crises suggest that mass extinctions have predict

109 strategies in other vertebrates during major biotic crises.

110 ht, circadian, and elevated temperature) and biotic (defense responses) pathways.

111 logenator growth (e.g., Dehalococcoides) and biotic degradation of chlorinated ethenes.

112 which are traditionally based on microbial (biotic) degradation enabled by precipitation as the main

113 Both abiotic and biotic denitrification processes use a single N source t

114 rs for dispersal, however little is known of biotic dispersal of marine angiosperms such as seagrasse

115 Biotic dispersal of tropical seagrass seeds by dugongs a

116 ) and general health deterioration after the biotic disturbance, rather than the direct activity of a

117 Biotic disturbances (BDs, for example, insects, pathogen

118 ble to competition (e.g. Populus spp.) or to biotic disturbances (e.g. Abies balsamea).

119 cted, will trigger massive hydrophysical and biotic disturbances that will affect the Amazon basin's

120 ution among organisms can result from purely biotic drivers.

121 to 25% relative to individual CUE, with this biotic effect being greater than the observed variation

122 robial dynamics, it is unclear whether these biotic effects can translate into altered soil pore stru

123 lts, [corrected] and suggest that studies of biotic effects on GHG emissions from dung pats on a glob

124 ty of the sensor to decouple geochemical and biotic effects on phosphate dynamics in fluvial environm

125 The biotic elicitor treatment could thus prove to be an impo

126 extraction, with different concentrations of biotic elicitors such as chitosan and jasmonic acid also

127 a significant challenge to disentangling the biotic environmental factors affecting plant disease sev

128 l function requires knowledge of abiotic and biotic environmental factors.

129 standing the interaction between climate and biotic evolution is crucial for deciphering the sensitiv

130 ihydrite transformation rate observed in the biotic experiments relative to the analogous abiotic con

131 ccount the influences of non-climatic and/or biotic factors (e.g., novel pests) on plant development.

132 , and especially emphasizes that abiotic and biotic factors affect the BEF relationships in alpine gr

133 ns and competitor sensing are among the main biotic factors affecting the production of bacterial sec

134 Results on biotic factors further suggested that organic matter gai

135 Predation is among the most important biotic factors influencing natural communities, yet we h

136 Because many different environmental and biotic factors may covary with changes in the geographic

137 ate analysis indicates that both abiotic and biotic factors may promote viral infection.

138 local climatic changes and other abiotic and biotic factors operating across species ranges.

139 Incorporating diverse biotic factors, including agriculture, vegetation cover,

140 In particular, biotic factors, such as predation and vegetation, includ

141 cting organisms may be shaped by abiotic and biotic factors.

142 about whether it is controlled by abiotic or biotic factors.

143 es, can be advanced by incorporating diverse biotic factors.

144 Abiotic and biotic forces shape the structure and evolution of micro

145 Our approach distinguishing biotic from environmental variability can help to resolv

146 ant, but underappreciated, role in mediating biotic homogenisation and biodiversity responses to envi

147 an those in FD and PD, suggesting increasing biotic homogenization of avian assemblages throughout th

148 larity of species compositions across sites (biotic homogenization).

149 eventually lead to increasing regional-scale biotic homogenization, the extinction of less-competitiv

150 imate drying will act together to exacerbate biotic homogenization.

151 was driven by mixing of multiple sources and biotic (i.e., nitrification) processes.

152 also directly influenced the pH, and so the biotic impacts of DO and pH shifts are correlated.

153 features to infer macro-invertebrates based biotic indices.

154 alpine specialist herbivore with substantial biotic inertia due to dispersal reluctance.

155 ise (biotic velocity), and their difference (biotic inertia).

156 We show that biotic influx from mainland Asia onto the Indian subcont

157 eneral theory about the relationship between biotic interaction strength and the intensity of selecti

158 We tested the hypothesis that biotic interaction strength increases toward the equator

159 egional scales suggest consistent drivers of biotic interaction strength, a finding that needs to be

160 Competition is an important biotic interaction that influences survival and reproduc

161 types and during responses to nitrogen and a biotic interaction, we found that common transcriptional

162 armer, lower-altitude sites, suggesting that biotic interactions (absent from cages) drive ecological

163 However, local adaptation and biotic interactions also influence range limits and thus

164 ole in shaping community composition through biotic interactions although their role and mode of regu

165 litter decomposition stage, community-level biotic interactions and altered environment, will influe

166 del shows a combined contribution of altered biotic interactions and dispersal lags to plant communit

167 exciting developments in the field of algal biotic interactions and identify challenges for scientis

168 hts into the feedbacks between range shifts, biotic interactions and local demography: brood parasiti

169 ngs highlight the potential stronger role of biotic interactions and neutral processes in structuring

170 ators are likely to mediate several types of biotic interactions between human-introduced plants and

171 ant phenology, we know very little about how biotic interactions can affect flowering times, a signif

172 Of these, altered biotic interactions could contribute substantially to es

173 es, supporting the notion that their role in biotic interactions extends beyond toxicity to the micro

174 Latitudinal gradients in biotic interactions have been suggested as causes of glo

175 of existing street lights on moths and their biotic interactions have not previously been studied.

176 We show that including biotic interactions in distribution models for species f

177 A general framework for including biotic interactions in macroecological models would help

178 This finding highlights the importance of biotic interactions in shaping geographic diversity patt

179 e address how population-level variation and biotic interactions may affect range shifts by transplan

180 lishment and extinction lags, yet impacts of biotic interactions on range dynamics are poorly underst

181 as been successful in testing the effects of biotic interactions on the rapid divergence of phenotype

182 ipitation may weaken the average strength of biotic interactions over time, thereby increasing ecosys

183 allow for rigorous testing of the role that biotic interactions play in determining species ranges.

184 ANN models that incorporated biotic interactions predicted reactor performance outcom

185 tal differences in the nature of local-scale biotic interactions that contribute to the maintenance o

186 Root architecture is also modified through biotic interactions that include soil fungi and neighbou

187 h enables the direct and indirect effects of biotic interactions to be modelled as propagating condit

188 Biotic interactions underlie ecosystem structure and fun

189 678 678 References 678 Biotic interactions underlie life's diversity and are th

190 but inversely the latter processes affected biotic interactions via the modification of co-occurrenc

191 nditions, and (ii) considering the effect of biotic interactions when predicting species' responses t

192 Biotic interactions with neighbouring species can impose

193 urthermore discuss environmental effects and biotic interactions within plant microbiota that influen

194 demographic responses, by effects of altered biotic interactions, and by aspects of the physical envi

195 isturbances including habitat modifications, biotic interactions, habitat heterogeneity, novel distur

196 such effects occur through the mediation of biotic interactions, including mutualisms, is unknown.

197 in microbial population ecology, especially biotic interactions, is related to variation in key biog

198 ther than climate - for example photoperiod, biotic interactions, or edaphic conditions - might limit

199 we illustrate how density dependence and key biotic interactions, such as competition and predation,

200 , mortality, reproduction, disturbances, and biotic interactions.

201 ive species, but these effects may depend on biotic interactions.

202 species are linked to other species through biotic interactions.

203 ng control exerted by community dynamics and biotic interactions.

204 Biotic interchange after the connection of previously in

205 thod to investigate the temporal dynamics of biotic interchange based on a phylogeographical meta-ana

206 es has remained elusive because this abiotic-biotic interface is inaccessible to traditional structur

207 of methods for extracting information about biotic/intrinsic contributions to patterns of genetic va

208 on in temperature and irradiance, as well as biotic invasions which can cause costly crop instabiliti

209 ed Drosophila melanogaster larvae exposed to biotic (larval competition, bacteria infection) and abio

210 00 root observations of >1,000 species along biotic (life form, genus) and abiotic (precipitation, so

211 The modeling of metal complexation by the biotic ligand has received little attention relative to

212 Biotic ligand models (BLMs) for metals are useful for ri

213 Biotic Ligand Models (BLMs) for metals are widely applie

214 ing sites of dissolved organic carbon or for biotic ligand sites.

215 ong with saturation kinetics to the internal biotic ligand(s) in the cytoplasm, they indicated that N

216 studying metal complexation directly at the biotic ligand.

217 ifically: partition coefficients for diverse biotic media and passive sampler phases; aquatic baselin

218 a [6], but the composition of VLPs and their biotic nature have remained mysterious.

219 plant for impending challenges from specific biotic or abiotic stresses.

220 Biofilm formation on biotic or abiotic surfaces has unwanted consequences in

221 Adherence of bacteria to biotic or abiotic surfaces is a prerequisite for host co

222 hen, as a result of gradual changes in their biotic partners and enemies, the 'old' plant compounds w

223 pond to both abiotic (ocean temperature) and biotic (phytoplankton prey) drivers.

224 Biotic pollination is the presumed ancestral condition,

225 2-4 years) likely due to predation and other biotic pressures.

226 n hardwood forests is strongly influenced by biotic processes in soil and that these are driven by pl

227 between amino acids formed by abiotic versus biotic processes it is possible to use chemical distribu

228 formation pathways, but also for abiotic and biotic processes with, the presumed, same formal chemica

229 ieved through the combination of abiotic and biotic processes.

230 flux over timescales relevant to climatic or biotic processes.

231 This finding is based on both abiotic and biotic proxies obtained from the most comprehensive geoc

232 end-Triassic mass extinction and subsequent biotic recovery.

233 isotope signatures, consistent with largely biotic reduction of U((VI)) to U((IV)).

234 Fe oxides, precipitation with phosphate, and biotic reduction.

235 200, 400, 600 and 800 degrees C) followed by biotic reductive incubation (150 d) and examine aqueous-

236 onments across regions may confound tests of biotic resistance based solely on native species richnes

237 nd to host fewer invaders and exert stronger biotic resistance compared to low-connectance webs.

238 ystems must be considered when investigating biotic resistance hypotheses.

239 Evidence for the theory of biotic resistance is equivocal, with experiments often f

240 native species dispersal may influence local biotic resistance to invasion by non-native species.

241 tacommunities can differentially alter local biotic resistance to invasion.

242 pal mechanism for tracking temporal peaks in biotic resources.

243 t REE weathering was carbonation enhanced by biotic respiration, the denudation patterns being largel

244 What generated this biotic response across Palaeozoic seascapes is a matter

245 arsh using detailed hydrologic, edaphic, and biotic sampling along marsh-to-upland transects in both

246 ation of spatial variability in climatic and biotic shifts is necessary in order to properly describe

247 A consistent biotic signature was observed in La:phosphate and mobili

248 revealed a rapid transition from abiotic to biotic signatures of weathering, the latter associated w

249 hanism by which genetic diversity can affect biotic soil feedback and nutrient cycling.

250 We explore diverse biotic sources that can drive the emergence of the Red Q

251 In contrast, biotic specialization of plants is not related to climat

252 ies are exposed to a plethora of abiotic and biotic stimuli during their development.

253 as well as in response to environmental and biotic stimuli.

254 Maternal biotic stress alters offspring defence phenotypes, but w

255 etabolites in responses to abiotic stress or biotic stress factors like pathogens and herbivores.

256 815 abiotic and biotic stress genes, 223 transcriptional factors (TFs),

257 conditions, addition of methyl jasmonate, a biotic stress hormone, induced expression in all leaf ti

258 arts robust stress tolerance against diverse biotic stress inducers such as viruses, bacteria and fun

259 asm improvement programs targeting optimized biotic stress resistance.

260 volved in signaling, hormone, cell wall, and biotic stress responses are over-represented in differen

261 the wild sample were limited to abiotic and biotic stress responses.

262 gests that typical defense reactions towards biotic stress take place in ARD affected plants but they

263 d plants suggested defense reactions towards biotic stress to occur which did not lead to adequate re

264 iotic stress-induced elRs in recent decades, biotic stress-triggered elRs have been widely ignored.

265 e-off between metabolism and defense against biotic stress.

266 implicated in protection against abiotic and biotic stress.

267 tors, such as climate, soil composition, and biotic stress.

268 mponent of inducible plant tolerance against biotic stress.

269 Two biotic-stress-related SlNACMTFs have been characterized

270 sting abiotic (freshwater vs. saltwater) and biotic stresses (low rates of food provisioning).

271 n specific tissues and their response to two biotic stresses (watermelon mosaic virus and downy milde

272 Abiotic and biotic stresses cause significant yield losses in all cr

273 the proteins involved, for responses to both biotic stresses caused by insects and numerous microbial

274 that CsDof may be involved in resistance to biotic stresses in cucumber.

275 abiotic stresses, MG levels increase during biotic stresses in plants, likely contributing to enhanc

276 volved in the plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses, such as drought, temperature, salinity,

277 involved in responses to various abiotic and biotic stresses.

278 ase in tolerance toward multiple abiotic and biotic stresses.

279 for plant-specific responses to abiotic and biotic stresses.

280 d by the functional interactions among these biotic stresses.

281 ray time series data obtained under multiple biotic stresses.

282 tly or indirectly, counteract abiotic and/or biotic stresses.

283 nts but they did not allow responding to the biotic stressors attack adequately, leading to the obser

284 For biotic stressors, post-stress reductions in ID are consi

285 ch did not lead to adequate responses to the biotic stressors.

286 o tolerate a continuous range of abiotic and biotic stressors.

287 domonas aeruginosa biofilm susceptibility on biotic surfaces, using a three-dimensional (3-D) lung ep

288 A shift from biotic to abiotic pollination is clearly implicated in t

289 Pollination syndrome and fruit type, both biotic traits known to facilitate mutualisms, played an

290 Abiotic and biotic transformation of toxaphene (camphechlor) results

291 to simulate diffusive transport, abiotic and biotic transformation, and partitioning of drug biomarke

292 Although more As was mobilized in biotic treatments than controls ( approximately 3-20x),

293 elRs, a specific influence of the applied (a)biotic trigger, the impact of the technical approach, an

294 r-ice lake ecology, including 36 abiotic and biotic variables from 42 research groups and 101 lakes,

295 el parameters that govern photosynthesis and biotic variation in canopy photosynthetic light-use effi

296 scales, it explained only 3%, much less than biotic variation in canopy photosynthetic light-use effi

297 enclosed the posterior distributions of all biotic velocities.

298 of climate velocity on lapse rate and derive biotic velocity as a rigid elevational shift.

299 Biotic velocity was estimated as the difference between

300 onal rise (climate velocity), observed rise (biotic velocity), and their difference (biotic inertia).