1 t a central core laboratory also interpreted CT
angiography blinded to clinical data, site interpretation, and outcomes.
2 Patients were randomly
assigned (
blinded) to groups given counselling to follow a sham diet or
3 esult of bleeding, a cardiovascular cause, or another
cause blinded to treatment assignment.
4 nsive, infectious and thrombotic etiologies were
diagnosed,
blinded to exposure levels.
5 transcript was reviewed independently by 2
epileptologists,
blinded to relative or control status.
6 Attending
intensivists blinded to the clinical scenario reviewed these exams at a la
7 ta were abstracted from the medical record by a
neurologist blinded to radiologic data.
8 gnitive outcomes was done by independent
neuropsychologists blinded to group assignment.
9 The same two readers, who were
not blinded to histopathologic findings, retrospectively reviewed
10 Limitations: Participants were
not blinded to treatment assignment.
11 The survey fieldworkers who enrolled participants were
not blinded to trial arm allocation, but the statistician was bli
12 verity) was assessed at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 mo, by
nurses blinded to treatment allocation, using the Eczema Area and Se
13 Patients were examined by an
ophthalmologist blinded to the study group every 4 days and at the time of wi
14 odental status was analyzed by trained dental
practitioners blinded to the microorganism, using standardized clinical exa
15 Images were qualitatively analyzed by three
radiologists blinded to detector type.
16 All imaging findings were
rated blinded to clinical details.
17 ton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), administered by
raters blinded to treatment.
18 Performances were video recorded and assessed by two
raters blinded to group allocation using the modified Advocacy-Inqui
19 Two central
readers,
blinded to site read and reference standard, reviewed PET/CT
20 XRs with discordant interpretations at the primary
reading,
blinded to previous reports.
21 All outcomes were collected by
staff blinded to group randomization, and no participants withdrew
22 d BCS specimens were analyzed postoperatively by 2
surgeons blinded to the histopathology results, and mean radiance and
23 gnetic resonance, TTN sequencing, and adjudicated follow-
up blinded to genotype for the primary composite endpoint of car
24 Confocal evaluation
was blinded to clinical and dermoscopic diagnosis.
25 Pathology testing
was blinded to urine assay results.
26 Reviewers of angiography
were blinded to results of physiological testing.
27 Diagnostic assessments
were blinded to mass spectrometry results.
28 atients, providers, researchers, and outcome assessors
were blinded to treatment assignment.
29 Women and clinicians
were blinded to results unless cervical shortening less than 15 mm
30 farin were open label, but the patients and clinicians
were blinded to study group assignment.
31 Clinicians
were blinded to whether parents had received photography instructi
32 nded to the biopsy results, and all hepatopathologists
were blinded to the imaging results.
33 Participants, clinicians, and investigators
were blinded to group assignment.
34 All imaging observers
were blinded to the biopsy results, and all hepatopathologists wer
35 Investigators, participants, and study personnel
were blinded to group allocation and remained blinded until comple
36 Both participants and study personnel
were blinded to the specific generic products selected.
37 tients, caregivers, and those assessing blood pressure
were blinded to randomisation assignments.
38 Readers
were blinded to histopathology results during prospective reading.
39 Readers
were blinded to their original scores, and then they rescored each
40 Automated pupillometry results
were blinded to clinicians involved in patient care.
41 Patients, investigators, and sponsors
were blinded to the treatment.
42 All participants and study staff
were blinded to polyunsaturated fatty acid or placebo assignment,
43 Surgeons
were blinded to randomized treatment and no specific surgical proc
44 Patients and the outcome assessment team
were blinded to group assignment.
45 They
were blinded to the laterality of microneedle and sham roller assi
46 estigators assessing the participants during follow-up
were blinded to treatment assignment.
47 The technologist and volunteer
were blinded to the agent.
48 Two radiologists who
were blinded to the image acquisition technique semiquantitatively
49 ated by 2 independent, trained research assistants who
were blinded to the test results.
50 ists and neuropathologists, respectively, both of whom
were blinded to the clinical data.