ライフサイエンスコーパス: boar

1 cus on livestock, but must also include wild boar.

2 deer, red deer, roe deer, reindeer and wild boar.

3 e knowledge about the disease status in wild boar.

4 ffective CSF surveillance strategies in wild boar.

5 l studies committee and institutional review board.

6 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

7 sis by the masked Data and Safety Monitoring Board.

8 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

9 008 to 2015 was approved by the local ethics board.

10 t under approval of the institutional review board.

11 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

12 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

13 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

14 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

15 University's Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.

16 PAA and approved by the institutional review board.

17 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

18 study was exempted from the internal review board.

19 statistics of the trajectories traced on the board.

20 ant and approved by the institutional review board.

21 sis was approved by the institutional review board.

22 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

23 roved by the university institutional review board.

24 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

25 d use committee and the institutional review board.

26 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

27 were assessed and verified by an independent board.

28 After approval by the institutional review board, 1,022 LNs in the PET/CT examinations of 148 patie

29 dependent Pharmacy Compounding Accreditation Board-accredited pharmacy).

30 gies for Classical Swine Fever (CSF) in wild boar and compared them with the currently implemented co

31 mprising a high-precision bioinstrumentation board and amperometric sensors, produced exclusively usi

32 udy was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA and included BCSC screeni

33 udy was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.

34 udy was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.

35 udy was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.

36 udy was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.

37 ion were overseen by an institutional review board and conformed to HIPAA guidelines on patient data

38 Materials and Methods Institutional review board and informed consent were waived for this study.

39 iant with HIPAA and the institutional review board and required written consent from the participants

40 ctively, with nonvolatile reagents stored on-board and smartphone for detection.

41 lls was approved by the institutional review board and the stem cell research oversight committee, an

42 e study approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant with waiver of informed co

43 uded, which was approved by the local ethics board and written informed consent was obtained from all

44 udy was approved by the institutional review board, and all participants gave written informed consen

45 tive study was approved by the ethics review board, and informed consent was obtained.

46 udy was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived.

47 udy was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement to obtain informed consent wa

48 ctive study was approved by an ethics review board, and the requirement to obtain informed written co

49 udy was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from al

50 y was approved by the institutional research board, and written informed consent was obtained.

51 and Methods This is an institutional review board- and U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved pr

52 escribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 and 6 mo or at 0, 6, and

53 ion and is exempt from Human Subjects Review Board approval (11-DRDS-NR03).

54 hods The study received institutional review board approval and all patients gave written informed co

55 spective study received institutional review board approval and fully complied with HIPAA regulations

56 erials and Methods With institutional review board approval and Health Insurance Portability and Acco

57 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained.

58 s and Methods Following institutional review board approval and informed consent, 26 subjects (16 men

59 After institutional review board approval and informed consent, consecutive LT reci

60 Methods This study had institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant.

61 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent from all par

62 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtaine

63 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtaine

64 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtaine

65 s HIPAA compliant, with institutional review board approval and written informed consent.

66 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed patient consent were

67 ver metastases, whereas institutional review board approval is required before glass microspheres can

68 new drug submission and institutional review board approval standards.

69 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was given and patient consent was not req

70 as accessed; therefore, institutional review board approval was not sought.

71 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent waived

72 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and the requirement for info

73 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for active or passive consen

74 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant stu

75 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant, re

76 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this prospective multi-i

77 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study

78 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study; all patients

79 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained from Leipzig University.

80 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained with waiver of consent.

81 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was wa

82 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained, and patient consent was wai

83 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained, and the requirement to obta

84 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained, with waiver of informed con

85 informed consent after institutional review board approval was obtained.

86 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained.

87 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained.

88 : Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was waived, as the study used publicly av

89 ods This study received institutional review board approval with waiver of consent.

90 PAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and all participants gave written inform

91 Methods This study had institutional review board approval, and informed consent was obtained from 7

92 ods This study received institutional review board approval, and patients gave informed consent.

93 hods The study received institutional review board approval, and patients in the CLQ cohort provided

94 PAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and the need for informed consent was wa

95 SUBJECTS AND Following ethics board approval, second year residents were randomized to

96 antemortem consent and institutional review board approval, the authors compared postmortem neuronal

97 With institutional review board approval, we searched our prospectively acquired d

98 spective study received institutional review board approval, with a waiver of the HIPAA requirement f

99 s and Methods Following institutional review board approval, with waiver of consent and with HIPAA co

100 l study was exempt from institutional review board approval.

101 ase were evaluated with institutional review board approval.

102 udy was completed after institutional review board approval.

103 retrospective study had institutional review board approval; written informed consent was obtained fr

104 Methods This study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant.

105 als and Methods The clinical research ethics board approved chart review, and the requirement to obta

106 ods This was a HIPAA-compliant institutional board approved multicenter study, and all participants p

107 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved the study.

108 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved this cross-sectional study.

109 s and Methods The local institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective single

110 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved this prospective hypotheses-generating st

111 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective cohort study, with a w

112 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and informed con

113 aterials and Methods An institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waiver of in

114 The institutional review board approved this study and waived the need for inform

115 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved this study.

116 erials and Methods This institutional review board approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective review inc

117 y was HIPAA compliant and institution review board approved.

118 s prospective study was institutional review board- approved and HIPAA compliant.

119 In this institutional review board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Acco

120 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant protocol, 408 patient

121 s and Methods This was an intuitional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant retrospective review

122 and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant study.

123 section (MLNR) under an Institutional Review Board-approved common protocol from 1992 to 2014.

124 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective analysis, 9

125 ls and Methods For this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, adul

126 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, pict

127 nd NHL (n = 2) onto the Institutional Review Board-approved investigation of (11)C-MET PET/CT.

128 r this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved prospective blinded pilot study, patients

129 ses were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective clinical trial.

130 included in this institutional human ethics board-approved prospective study between January 2015 an

131 and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved prospective study in 29 patients (15 men,

132 In this HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved prospective study in which all subjects p

133 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, 27 patients with COPD

134 ethods In this institutional research ethics board-approved prospective study, healthy volunteers und

135 n this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study, an institutio

136 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved retrospective review of prospectively acq

137 aterials and Methods An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed, inclu

138 s This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective study included 108 patients

139 ds This HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved retrospective study included 159 patients

140 s This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective study included 51 patients

141 In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, subjects were select

142 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved retrospective study, with waived informed

143 and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective study, with waiver of the n

144 o October 2012 for this institutional review board-approved study after they provided written informe

145 This institutional review board-approved study from June 2007 to December 2013 inv

146 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved study included 125 women with invasive br

147 hods This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included 24 patients with prostate

148 s This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study measured the performance of digital

149 hods This retrospective institutional review board-approved study received a waiver of informed conse

150 pective HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved study was exempt from informed consent.

151 s This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study was performed at a tertiary care, a

152 ctive, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study was performed by using the same DSS

153 In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study, 120 patients who underwent cardiac

154 ctive, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study, 136 consecutive patients (95 men a

155 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved study, 20 patients with chronic thromboem

156 In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study, 33 patients who underwent at least

157 In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study, 41 pediatric patients (age range,

158 s was a HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved study, with informed consent from patient

159 or to inclusion in this institutional review board-approved study.

160 n this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study.

161 nformed consent in this institutional review board-approved study.

162 in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study.

163 T were enrolled in this institutional review board-approved study.

164 ods In this binational, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 158 s

165 r, multi-institutional, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective analysis o

166 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study of p

167 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study included 144 pedia

168 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, 58 patients under

169 is was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study.

170 In an institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant, prospective study from

171 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study inc

172 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study was

173 and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved, prospectively conducted (written informe

174 d Methods SIESTA was an institutional review board-approved, single-center, prospective, randomized,

175 The California Air Resources Board (ARB) and the City of Sacramento undertook this st

176 patibility with the standard printed circuit board assembly processes, a variety of commercially avai

177 February 29, 2016, at Maryland State Anatomy Board cadaver laboratories included 40 surgical resident

178 ncy (USEPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) through their respective greenhouse gas rep

179 emphasized as are the principles underlying board certification and the standards that guide it to s

180 en; 468 (99%) and 85 (18%) maintained active board certification in cardiology and critical care medi

181 oarded cardiologists with and without active board certification in critical care medicine and estima

182 to dual-boarded cardiologists without active board certification in critical care medicine, those wit

183 e charged with overseeing the development of board certification programs from the ABO's inception in

184 llence in practice evolved into a program of board certification through the creation of what is toda

185 iscipline from gastroenterology with its own board certification.

186 database to identify all physicians who were board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine

187 e characteristics of U.S. physicians who are board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine

188 sifiers were in disagreement, an independent board-certified cardiothoracic radiologist blindly inter

189 d their conditions clinically diagnosed by a board-certified dermatologist at a large tertiary referr

190 sed, multiple-reader-multiple-case study, 45 board-certified dermatologists each evaluated 60 clinica

191 We test its performance against 21 board-certified dermatologists on biopsy-proven clinical

192 c consults were independently evaluated by 2 board-certified dermatologists, who provided diagnoses a

193 nd had brain autopsies that were approved by board-certified neuropathologists.

194 All images were reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist, and MRI reports were s

195 performed and retrospectively reviewed by 2 board-certified radiologists and a radiology resident in

196 Board-certified radiologists provided initial preliminar

197 In addition, the printed circuit board combustion released toxic metals containing Pb, Zn

198 to receive A&F: (i) with or without a health board comparator comprising the addition of a line to th

199 Nevertheless, studies of editorial board composition remain rare, especially those focusing

200 t on individual board members and collective board decision making.

201 , the independent data and safety monitoring board detected an unanticipated imbalance across blinded

202 al was stopped by the data safety monitoring board due to higher treatment failure rate and the occur

203 An institutional review board exemption and a waiver for informed consent were g

204 Institutional review board exemptions were granted prior to the collection of

205 a pH sensor on a biocompatible and wearable board for healthcare applications.

206 ed from the centralized institutional review board for this prospective single-arm study, and patient

207 We designed a board game called "Gut Check: The Microbiome Game" to fi

208 such as object recognition, video games, and board games, achieving performance that equals or even b

209 sis, and review by a multidisciplinary tumor board (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.90), were associated wit

210 The invasive potential of wild boar in the Neotropics is probably higher than in other

211 on statement, which was approved by the ASHG Board in March 2017.

212 rch was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) and was HIPAA compliant.

213 who participated in an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved randomised double-blind trial compa

214 The development of a board-level capacitance readout system is presented, as

215 y (eELISA), using a Lab-on-a-Printed Circuit Board (LoPCB) approach, for TB diagnosis based on cytoki

216 netic bit cell in a standard printed circuit board managed and powered at ambient conditions by a com

217 rototyping at low-cost using printed circuit board material by benchtop equipment.

218 (24%) owing to increased costs from room and board (mean [SD] cost, MP $11940 [MP $8820]), consultati

219 (20%), associate editors (18%), or editorial board members (60%).

220 d as having significant impact on individual board members and collective board decision making.

221 well as those selected by the JACC Editorial Board members.

222 atients and rehabilitation access across the board, mitigating or even eradicating disparities in cer

223 s The study was approved by the local review board (NL42888.029.13).

224 On-board observations and mortality events corroborated thi

225 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors approved the ASCO Strategic Plan to I

226 proved by the Executive Committee of the ADA Board of Directors, which includes health care professio

227 proved by the Executive Committee of the ADA Board of Directors, which includes health care professio

228 e also in the realm of the zoning board, the board of education, and the board of health.

229 In November 2013, the Board of Gavi (the Vaccine Alliance) approved the provis

230 oning board, the board of education, and the board of health.

231 ysicians initially certified by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) who passed the Interna

232 relationship to performance on the American Board of Internal Medicine Cardiovascular Disease (ABIM

233 ion is a central requirement of the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM's) Maintenance of Cer

234 h the creation of what is today the American Board of Ophthalmology (ABO).

235 and, ultimately, to service on the American Board of Ophthalmology.

236 ull report can be obtained from the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology ( www.abpn.com ).

237 d version of the 2016 Report of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc.

238 ce and Quality Committee and approved by the Board of Regents on 21 January 2017, reports policy reco

239 white) randomly selected from the California Board of Registered Nursing list.

240 rgery Certifying Examination of the American Board of Surgery (ABS) were collected.

241 were de-identified and linked with American Board of Surgery data to determine residency completion

242 The American Board of Surgery has designated 132 procedures as being

243 e been at the helm of the Duke-UNC Editorial Board of the Journal of Clinical Investigation and have

244 e study was obtained from the ethical review board of the Netherlands Association for Medical Educati

245 The advisory board of the study proposed using the fraction of inspir

246 tained operative case logs from the American Board of Urology and identified urologists performing at

247 of European Medical Specialists Section and Board on allergology is to promote and to establish a fu

248 A multidisciplinary board opted for a second endovascular attempt, this time

249 but not review by a multidisciplinary tumor board (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.98-1.46), was associated with

250 mmendation of the data and safety monitoring board, owing to a low likelihood of benefit and evidence

251 uences were immobilized on a printed circuit board (PCB) manufactured electrode array and exposed to

252 Printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing techniques have several advant

253 fabricated via standardized printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing techniques.

254 -built low-cost miniaturized printed circuit board (PCB) to provide an electrical connection and to w

255 y Materials and Methods Institutional review board permission was obtained to use deidentified CT col

256 king electrodes of polyimide printed circuit board platforms, resulting in the generation of high den

257 In June 2014, the Polio Oversight Board (POB) agreed to make available a maximum envelope

258 arming and game-hunting has led to high wild boar population growth rates.

259 ing the drivers of change on the exotic wild boar population's niches, we found strong evidence for n

260 er Go that uses 'value networks' to evaluate board positions and 'policy networks' to select moves.

261 obots or devices, in that they often lack on-board power, sensing, computation, and control.

262 were collected under an institutional review board protocol 2 hours after portal reperfusion, followe

263 the Columbia University Institutional Review Board, Protocol ID# AAAO3003.

264 by an independent data and safety monitoring board, randomisation was stopped and immediate vaccinati

265 Our multidisciplinary tumor board recommended adjuvant chemotherapy, postmastectomy

266 Our multidisciplinary tumor board recommended adjuvant chemotherapy, postsurgical ra

267 The data and safety monitoring board recommended early reporting of the study results b

268 The data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping the study for futility when 8

269 (P = .0061), the data and safety monitoring board recommended study termination on September 26, 201

270 e and castrated male pigs that were sired by boars represented by 4 breeds.

271 tive study was approved by the institutional board review; written informed consent was obtained from

272 thics committee, frequently giving rise to a board's bureaucratic excesses, which might slow down cre

273 tions and ribotype distributions in a health board serving 11% of the Scottish population.

274 The data and safety monitoring board stopped the study early because of a low likelihoo

275 on, and it requires an efficient and safe on-board storage system.

276 the world's worst invasive species: the wild boar Sus scrofa.

277 0-fold increases in crop-raiding native wild boar (Sus scrofa), (ii) wild boar used thousands of unde

278 ing proved a promising technique for masking boar taint and preventing consumer dissatisfaction.

279 ing effects of production-related factors on boar taint are necessary.

280 , indicating that AEON is the most offensive boar taint compound for sensitive assessors.

281 meat and dry fermented sausage) or moderate boar taint compound levels (dry-cured ham) occurred.

282 , androstenone: 121-342microgkg(-1)) for the boar taint compounds were estimated in minced meat, dry

283 ted to entire male pigs is the occurrence of boar taint, an off-odour, which compromises meat consuma

284 stration, entails the possible occurrence of boar taint.

285 and reducing strategies on the perception of boar taint.

286 By using a printed circuit board that carries an electric current as a device under

287 Visible and InfraRed Mapping Spectrometer on board the Dawn spacecraft show a clear detection of an o

288 ls from sea spray over the North Atlantic on board the exhaust-free solar-powered vessel "PlanetSolar

289 romotion are also in the realm of the zoning board, the board of education, and the board of health.

290 udy was approved by the institutional review board; the requirement to obtain informed consent was wa

291 The invasive potential of the wild boar therefore probably lies on the reproductive, dietar

292 ch players have to find a target hidden on a board, to investigate how the rounds are influenced by t

293 ing native wild boar (Sus scrofa), (ii) wild boar used thousands of understory plants to construct bi

294 perties also give rise to a magnetic writing board using graphene suspension and a bar magnet as a pe

295 r research investment into more effective on-board vector control, health screening, and risk communi

296 The institutional review board waived the need for consent.

297 this device in a tunable mechanical circuit board, we realize the complete set of mechanical logic e

298 pted from review by the institutional review board, which consisted of 1007 posteroanterior chest rad

299 Three members of PLOS Medicine's editorial board who are leading researchers in implementation scie

300 tation to a wide array of climates, the wild boar world-wide invasion does not exhibit evidence of ni