ライフサイエンスコーパス: board

1 l studies committee and institutional review board.

2 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

3 sis by the masked Data and Safety Monitoring Board.

4 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

5 008 to 2015 was approved by the local ethics board.

6 t under approval of the institutional review board.

7 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

8 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

9 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

10 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

11 University's Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.

12 statistics of the trajectories traced on the board.

13 PAA and approved by the institutional review board.

14 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

15 study was exempted from the internal review board.

16 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

17 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

18 roved by the university institutional review board.

19 d use committee and the institutional review board.

20 udy was approved by the institutional review board.

21 were assessed and verified by an independent board.

22 After approval by the institutional review board, 1,022 LNs in the PET/CT examinations of 148 patie

23 dependent Pharmacy Compounding Accreditation Board-accredited pharmacy).

24 mprising a high-precision bioinstrumentation board and amperometric sensors, produced exclusively usi

25 udy was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA and included BCSC screeni

26 udy was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.

27 udy was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.

28 udy was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.

29 udy was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.

30 ion were overseen by an institutional review board and conformed to HIPAA guidelines on patient data

31 iant with HIPAA and the institutional review board and required written consent from the participants

32 ctively, with nonvolatile reagents stored on-board and smartphone for detection.

33 lls was approved by the institutional review board and the stem cell research oversight committee, an

34 e study approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant with waiver of informed co

35 uded, which was approved by the local ethics board and written informed consent was obtained from all

36 M, whereas the combustion of printed circuit boards and copper-core cables emitted large amounts of O

37 ng common protocols for institutional review boards and data sharing, creating protocols for referrin

38 cells were constructed with printed circuit boards and installed within a single superconducting mag

39 ools such as 3D printers and microcontroller boards and only a few "off-the-shelf" parts to deliver a

40 udy was approved by the institutional review board, and all participants gave written informed consen

41 tive study was approved by the ethics review board, and informed consent was obtained.

42 udy was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived.

43 udy was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement to obtain informed consent wa

44 ctive study was approved by an ethics review board, and the requirement to obtain informed written co

45 udy was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from al

46 y was approved by the institutional research board, and written informed consent was obtained.

47 udy was approved by the institutional review boards, and all participants gave informed consent.

48 and Methods This is an institutional review board- and U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved pr

49 ion and is exempt from Human Subjects Review Board approval (11-DRDS-NR03).

50 hods The study received institutional review board approval and all patients gave written informed co

51 spective study received institutional review board approval and fully complied with HIPAA regulations

52 erials and Methods With institutional review board approval and Health Insurance Portability and Acco

53 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained.

54 s and Methods Following institutional review board approval and informed consent, 26 subjects (16 men

55 After institutional review board approval and informed consent, consecutive LT reci

56 Methods This study had institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant.

57 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent from all par

58 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtaine

59 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtaine

60 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtaine

61 s HIPAA compliant, with institutional review board approval and written informed consent.

62 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed patient consent were

63 ver metastases, whereas institutional review board approval is required before glass microspheres can

64 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was given and patient consent was not req

65 as accessed; therefore, institutional review board approval was not sought.

66 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent waived

67 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and the requirement for info

68 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for active or passive consen

69 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant stu

70 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant, re

71 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this prospective multi-i

72 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study

73 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study; all patients

74 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained from Leipzig University.

75 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained with waiver of consent.

76 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was wa

77 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained, and patient consent was wai

78 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained, and the requirement to obta

79 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained, with waiver of informed con

80 informed consent after institutional review board approval was obtained.

81 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained.

82 Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained.

83 : Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was waived, as the study used publicly av

84 ods This study received institutional review board approval with waiver of consent.

85 PAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and all participants gave written inform

86 Methods This study had institutional review board approval, and informed consent was obtained from 7

87 ods This study received institutional review board approval, and patients gave informed consent.

88 hods The study received institutional review board approval, and patients in the CLQ cohort provided

89 PAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and the need for informed consent was wa

90 SUBJECTS AND Following ethics board approval, second year residents were randomized to

91 antemortem consent and institutional review board approval, the authors compared postmortem neuronal

92 With institutional review board approval, we searched our prospectively acquired d

93 spective study received institutional review board approval, with a waiver of the HIPAA requirement f

94 s and Methods Following institutional review board approval, with waiver of consent and with HIPAA co

95 l study was exempt from institutional review board approval.

96 ase were evaluated with institutional review board approval.

97 udy was completed after institutional review board approval.

98 retrospective study had institutional review board approval; written informed consent was obtained fr

99 Methods This study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant.

100 als and Methods The clinical research ethics board approved chart review, and the requirement to obta

101 ods This was a HIPAA-compliant institutional board approved multicenter study, and all participants p

102 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved the study.

103 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved this cross-sectional study.

104 s and Methods The local institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective single

105 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective cohort study, with a w

106 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and informed con

107 aterials and Methods An institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waiver of in

108 The institutional review board approved this study and waived the need for inform

109 terials and Methods The institutional review board approved this study.

110 erials and Methods This institutional review board approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective review inc

111 y was HIPAA compliant and institution review board approved.

112 Methods The respective institutional review boards approved this HIPAA-compliant study and waived in

113 nd Methods The relevant institutional review boards approved this HIPAA-compliant study, with waiver

114 s prospective study was institutional review board- approved and HIPAA compliant.

115 In this institutional review board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Acco

116 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant protocol, 408 patient

117 s and Methods This was an intuitional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant retrospective review

118 and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant study.

119 section (MLNR) under an Institutional Review Board-approved common protocol from 1992 to 2014.

120 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective analysis, 9

121 ls and Methods For this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, adul

122 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, pict

123 nd NHL (n = 2) onto the Institutional Review Board-approved investigation of (11)C-MET PET/CT.

124 r this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved prospective blinded pilot study, patients

125 ses were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective clinical trial.

126 included in this institutional human ethics board-approved prospective study between January 2015 an

127 and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved prospective study in 29 patients (15 men,

128 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, 27 patients with COPD

129 ethods In this institutional research ethics board-approved prospective study, healthy volunteers und

130 n this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study, an institutio

131 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved retrospective review of prospectively acq

132 aterials and Methods An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed, inclu

133 s This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective study included 108 patients

134 ds This HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved retrospective study included 159 patients

135 s This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective study included 51 patients

136 In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, subjects were select

137 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved retrospective study, with waived informed

138 and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective study, with waiver of the n

139 o October 2012 for this institutional review board-approved study after they provided written informe

140 This institutional review board-approved study from June 2007 to December 2013 inv

141 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved study included 125 women with invasive br

142 hods This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included 24 patients with prostate

143 s This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study measured the performance of digital

144 hods This retrospective institutional review board-approved study received a waiver of informed conse

145 pective HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved study was exempt from informed consent.

146 s This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study was performed at a tertiary care, a

147 ctive, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study was performed by using the same DSS

148 In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study, 120 patients who underwent cardiac

149 ctive, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study, 136 consecutive patients (95 men a

150 In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study, 33 patients who underwent at least

151 In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study, 41 pediatric patients (age range,

152 s was a HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved study, with informed consent from patient

153 or to inclusion in this institutional review board-approved study.

154 n this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study.

155 nformed consent in this institutional review board-approved study.

156 in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study.

157 T were enrolled in this institutional review board-approved study.

158 ods In this binational, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 158 s

159 r, multi-institutional, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective analysis o

160 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study of p

161 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study included 144 pedia

162 als and Methods In this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, 58 patients under

163 is was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study.

164 In an institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant, prospective study from

165 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study inc

166 erials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study was

167 and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved, prospectively conducted (written informe

168 d Methods SIESTA was an institutional review board-approved, single-center, prospective, randomized,

169 The California Air Resources Board (ARB) and the City of Sacramento undertook this st

170 patibility with the standard printed circuit board assembly processes, a variety of commercially avai

171 February 29, 2016, at Maryland State Anatomy Board cadaver laboratories included 40 surgical resident

172 ncy (USEPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) through their respective greenhouse gas rep

173 ardiac ICU admissions were treated by a dual-boarded cardiologist.

174 Overall, 98 dual-boarded cardiologists (21%) submitted 1,215 total claims

175 Dual-boarded cardiologists appear to deliver a small proporti

176 hysicians' characteristics and compared dual-boarded cardiologists with and without active board cert

177 Compared to dual-boarded cardiologists without active board certification

178 cardiology and critical care medicine ("dual-boarded cardiologists").

179 Among 473 dual-boarded cardiologists, 16 (3.4%) were women; 468 (99%) a

180 to promote and support the training of dual-boarded cardiologists.

181 icare Cardiac ICU admissions treated by dual-boarded cardiologists.

182 emphasized as are the principles underlying board certification and the standards that guide it to s

183 en; 468 (99%) and 85 (18%) maintained active board certification in cardiology and critical care medi

184 oarded cardiologists with and without active board certification in critical care medicine and estima

185 to dual-boarded cardiologists without active board certification in critical care medicine, those wit

186 e charged with overseeing the development of board certification programs from the ABO's inception in

187 llence in practice evolved into a program of board certification through the creation of what is toda

188 iscipline from gastroenterology with its own board certification.

189 database to identify all physicians who were board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine

190 e characteristics of U.S. physicians who are board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine

191 sifiers were in disagreement, an independent board-certified cardiothoracic radiologist blindly inter

192 d their conditions clinically diagnosed by a board-certified dermatologist at a large tertiary referr

193 sed, multiple-reader-multiple-case study, 45 board-certified dermatologists each evaluated 60 clinica

194 We test its performance against 21 board-certified dermatologists on biopsy-proven clinical

195 c consults were independently evaluated by 2 board-certified dermatologists, who provided diagnoses a

196 nd had brain autopsies that were approved by board-certified neuropathologists.

197 All images were reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist, and MRI reports were s

198 performed and retrospectively reviewed by 2 board-certified radiologists and a radiology resident in

199 Board-certified radiologists provided initial preliminar

200 training (OR, 3.13 as compared with surgery-boarded clinicians; 95% CI, 2.50-3.85).

201 In addition, the printed circuit board combustion released toxic metals containing Pb, Zn

202 Nevertheless, studies of editorial board composition remain rare, especially those focusing

203 t on individual board members and collective board decision making.

204 , the independent data and safety monitoring board detected an unanticipated imbalance across blinded

205 al was stopped by the data safety monitoring board due to higher treatment failure rate and the occur

206 An institutional review board exemption and a waiver for informed consent were g

207 Institutional review board exemptions were granted prior to the collection of

208 a pH sensor on a biocompatible and wearable board for healthcare applications.

209 ed from the centralized institutional review board for this prospective single-arm study, and patient

210 We designed a board game called "Gut Check: The Microbiome Game" to fi

211 such as object recognition, video games, and board games, achieving performance that equals or even b

212 f solder pastes on Cu-plated printed circuit boards has been studied by synchrotron radiography.

213 sis, and review by a multidisciplinary tumor board (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.90), were associated wit

214 on statement, which was approved by the ASHG Board in March 2017.

215 shorter half-life pharmacotherapies and who boarded in the emergency department.

216 datory target to safely reduce mental health boarding in the EDs.

217 onal independent risk factors were inpatient boarding in the emergency department (odds ratio, 2.67;

218 rch was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) and was HIPAA compliant.

219 who participated in an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved randomised double-blind trial compa

220 l review of research by institutional review boards (IRBs) due to the rush to enter the disaster fiel

221 The development of a board-level capacitance readout system is presented, as

222 y (eELISA), using a Lab-on-a-Printed Circuit Board (LoPCB) approach, for TB diagnosis based on cytoki

223 netic bit cell in a standard printed circuit board managed and powered at ambient conditions by a com

224 rototyping at low-cost using printed circuit board material by benchtop equipment.

225 Another finding of note was that executive boards may not be permanently fixed as either unsupporti

226 (24%) owing to increased costs from room and board (mean [SD] cost, MP $11940 [MP $8820]), consultati

227 (20%), associate editors (18%), or editorial board members (60%).

228 d as having significant impact on individual board members and collective board decision making.

229 well as those selected by the JACC Editorial Board members.

230 atients and rehabilitation access across the board, mitigating or even eradicating disparities in cer

231 s The study was approved by the local review board (NL42888.029.13).

232 On-board observations and mortality events corroborated thi

233 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors approved the ASCO Strategic Plan to I

234 proved by the Executive Committee of the ADA Board of Directors, which includes health care professio

235 proved by the Executive Committee of the ADA Board of Directors, which includes health care professio

236 e also in the realm of the zoning board, the board of education, and the board of health.

237 In November 2013, the Board of Gavi (the Vaccine Alliance) approved the provis

238 oning board, the board of education, and the board of health.

239 ysicians initially certified by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) who passed the Interna

240 relationship to performance on the American Board of Internal Medicine Cardiovascular Disease (ABIM

241 ion is a central requirement of the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM's) Maintenance of Cer

242 h the creation of what is today the American Board of Ophthalmology (ABO).

243 ull report can be obtained from the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology ( www.abpn.com ).

244 d version of the 2016 Report of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc.

245 ce and Quality Committee and approved by the Board of Regents on 21 January 2017, reports policy reco

246 white) randomly selected from the California Board of Registered Nursing list.

247 rgery Certifying Examination of the American Board of Surgery (ABS) were collected.

248 were de-identified and linked with American Board of Surgery data to determine residency completion

249 The American Board of Surgery has designated 132 procedures as being

250 e been at the helm of the Duke-UNC Editorial Board of the Journal of Clinical Investigation and have

251 e study was obtained from the ethical review board of the Netherlands Association for Medical Educati

252 tained operative case logs from the American Board of Urology and identified urologists performing at

253 al representation on the 1985-2014 editorial boards of 24 environmental biology journals.

254 terials and Methods The institutional review boards of each center approved this retrospective, HIPAA

255 terials and Methods The institutional review boards of the four participating centers approved this H

256 col was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating centers.

257 of European Medical Specialists Section and Board on allergology is to promote and to establish a fu

258 A multidisciplinary board opted for a second endovascular attempt, this time

259 but not review by a multidisciplinary tumor board (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.98-1.46), was associated with

260 mmendation of the data and safety monitoring board, owing to a low likelihood of benefit and evidence

261 uences were immobilized on a printed circuit board (PCB) manufactured electrode array and exposed to

262 Printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing techniques have several advant

263 fabricated via standardized printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing techniques.

264 -built low-cost miniaturized printed circuit board (PCB) to provide an electrical connection and to w

265 y Materials and Methods Institutional review board permission was obtained to use deidentified CT col

266 king electrodes of polyimide printed circuit board platforms, resulting in the generation of high den

267 The scholars comprising journal editorial boards play a critical role in defining the trajectory o

268 In June 2014, the Polio Oversight Board (POB) agreed to make available a maximum envelope

269 er Go that uses 'value networks' to evaluate board positions and 'policy networks' to select moves.

270 obots or devices, in that they often lack on-board power, sensing, computation, and control.

271 were collected under an institutional review board protocol 2 hours after portal reperfusion, followe

272 the Columbia University Institutional Review Board, Protocol ID# AAAO3003.

273 by an independent data and safety monitoring board, randomisation was stopped and immediate vaccinati

274 Our multidisciplinary tumor board recommended adjuvant chemotherapy, postmastectomy

275 Our multidisciplinary tumor board recommended adjuvant chemotherapy, postsurgical ra

276 The data and safety monitoring board recommended early reporting of the study results b

277 The data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping the study for futility when 8

278 (P = .0061), the data and safety monitoring board recommended study termination on September 26, 201

279 tive study was approved by the institutional board review; written informed consent was obtained from

280 thics committee, frequently giving rise to a board's bureaucratic excesses, which might slow down cre

281 tions and ribotype distributions in a health board serving 11% of the Scottish population.

282 ubling time; that national quality assurance boards should be set up to oversee technical standards;

283 arch, investigators and Institutional Review Boards should consider a deferred consent process if the

284 The data and safety monitoring board stopped the study early because of a low likelihoo

285 on, and it requires an efficient and safe on-board storage system.

286 By using a printed circuit board that carries an electric current as a device under

287 As members of 3 community advisory boards that provide input into TB drug trials, we offer

288 ortive as participants described how certain boards that were initially unsupportive adopted a more s

289 Visible and InfraRed Mapping Spectrometer on board the Dawn spacecraft show a clear detection of an o

290 ls from sea spray over the North Atlantic on board the exhaust-free solar-powered vessel "PlanetSolar

291 romotion are also in the realm of the zoning board, the board of education, and the board of health.

292 udy was approved by the institutional review board; the requirement to obtain informed consent was wa

293 y on Raspberry Pi microcomputers and Arduino boards to provide affordable and flexible hardware.

294 ch players have to find a target hidden on a board, to investigate how the rounds are influenced by t

295 perties also give rise to a magnetic writing board using graphene suspension and a bar magnet as a pe

296 r research investment into more effective on-board vector control, health screening, and risk communi

297 The institutional review board waived the need for consent.

298 this device in a tunable mechanical circuit board, we realize the complete set of mechanical logic e

299 pted from review by the institutional review board, which consisted of 1007 posteroanterior chest rad

300 Three members of PLOS Medicine's editorial board who are leading researchers in implementation scie