ライフサイエンスコーパス: board-certified

1 tes in the study sample, 37,054 (87.3%) were board certified.

2 ver require a general pediatrician to become board certified.

3 revious year to 6.9% for physicians who were board certified 31 years before the visit.

4 lack patients visited were less likely to be board certified (77.4 percent) than were the physicians

5 orted moderate or substantial influence were board certified (91% versus 99%; P=0.003).

6 ience, and whether the patient's surgeon was board certified, a 10% increase in the proportion of nur

7 xaminations were interpreted by one of eight board-certified abdominal radiologists (mean number of C

8 2 Clinical Knowledge were more likely to be board certified; adjusted odds ratios (AORs) varied by s

9 o board-certified pediatricians, including a board-certified allergist/immunologist, independently re

10 Among board-certified American psychiatrists, there currently

11 as mailed to a random national sample of 367 board-certified American psychiatrists.

12 Analysis of the survival rates of board-certified and nonboard-certified surgeons demonstr

13 ttempt the ABPN process are likely to become board certified, and the majority will do so by passing

14 obstetrics/gynecology were less likely to be board certified (AOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96), and grad

15 osing family medicine were more likely to be board certified (AOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26).

16 did not require general pediatricians to be board certified at initial privileging; however, 111 (70

17 11 (70%) did require pediatricians to become board certified at some point during their tenure.

18 s do not require general pediatricians to be board certified at the time of initial credentialing, an

19 tively interpreted by radiology residents or board-certified body imaging fellows over a 12-month per

20 ms were then further evaluated by a blinded, board-certified cardiologist for agreement or disagreeme

21 of physical examinations (PEs) performed by board-certified cardiologists with the results of point-

22 complete cardiovascular examination by four board-certified cardiologists.

23 sifiers were in disagreement, an independent board-certified cardiothoracic radiologist blindly inter

24 d their conditions clinically diagnosed by a board-certified dermatologist at a large tertiary referr

25 d their conditions clinically diagnosed by a board-certified dermatologist at a large tertiary referr

26 plication that sends the image directly to a board-certified dermatologist for analysis; the lowest,

27 E dermatologic condition as established by a board-certified dermatologist.

28 sed, multiple-reader-multiple-case study, 45 board-certified dermatologists each evaluated 60 clinica

29 We test its performance against 21 board-certified dermatologists on biopsy-proven clinical

30 c consults were independently evaluated by 2 board-certified dermatologists, who provided diagnoses a

31 ures, are safe when performed by experienced board-certified dermatologists.

32 S grading system and physical examination by board-certified dermatologists.

33 Population-based survey mailed to all Board-certified female internists and a matched group of

34 An anonymous questionnaire was sent to board-certified forensic psychiatrists between August an

35 righam and Women's Hospital in Boston and is board certified in both disciplines.

36 e characteristics of U.S. physicians who are board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine

37 database to identify all physicians who were board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine

38 and 26% diagnostic subspecialists; 92% were board certified in radiology; 48% had postresidency fell

39 (40%) ever require subspecialists to become board certified in their subspecialty.

40 e comanaged with an intensivist (a physician board-certified in critical care).

41 in pulmonary medicine and only 1% of current board-certified intensivists are trained in ID.

42 al intensive care units should be managed by board-certified intensivists in a closed environment.

43 ur coverage of our intensive care units, the board-certified intensivists we do have are being stretc

44 the surgical critical care team (ABS or ABA board-certified intensivists).

45 We presented 503 board-certified internists with abstracts that we design

46 One International Board Certified Lactation Consultant carried out the int

47 One hundred board-certified medical oncologists were given a brief c

48 ated on the basis of source documentation by board-certified neurologists masked to subjects' ethnici

49 nd had brain autopsies that were approved by board-certified neuropathologists.

50 ation of lesion composition was performed by board-certified neuropathologists.

51 A board-certified neuroradiologist classified different RO

52 All images were reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist, and MRI reports were s

53 workstations by 2 radiology residents and 1 board-certified nuclear medicine physician independently

54 rate data sets, both graded by at least 7 US board-certified ophthalmologists with high intragrader c

55 c chemotherapy orders to physicians who were board-certified or -eligible in hematology or medical, p

56 Each case was initially interpreted by a board-certified or board-eligible radiologist during eva

57 were considered to have a PICU if they had a board-certified pediatric intensivist on staff, and eith

58 Two board-certified pediatricians, including a board-certifi

59 which could diminish quality of care if non-board-certified physicians expand their role in cardioth

60 to be generalists, osteopaths, older, male, board-certified, practicing in the Northeast, and in sol

61 commercial plans had a higher proportion of board-certified primary care physicians (81% vs 73%; P =

62 erformed during the past 5 years by the same board-certified private practice periodontist (DH).

63 IV was administered to all participants by a board-certified psychiatrist.

64 st-estimate final diagnoses were made by two board-certified psychiatrists.

65 OR], 9.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 45.0), at least one board-certified radiation oncologist (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1

66 as positive were reviewed by an experienced board-certified radiologist.

67 A majority of board certified radiologists preferred CXRs taken with t

68 Four board-certified radiologists analyzed 60 CT examinations

69 performed and retrospectively reviewed by 2 board-certified radiologists and a radiology resident in

70 Diagnoses given by board-certified radiologists at nonfocused abdominopelvi

71 is measured as a diminution in uncertainty, board-certified radiologists contribute substantial valu

72 The composite group of board-certified radiologists demonstrated performance su

73 Two board-certified radiologists determined iliac vein compr

74 Two board-certified radiologists independently evaluated BH

75 Board-certified radiologists provided initial preliminar

76 Two board-certified radiologists reviewed the examinations o

77 st 3 months were retrospectively reviewed by board-certified radiologists to determine the presence o

78 Five board-certified radiologists were then asked to compare

79 minorities (vs white) were less likely to be board certified, ranging from 83.5% vs 95.6% in the pedi

80 the creation of Child Abuse Pediatrics as a board certified specialty in the United States.

81 merican Board of Surgery, currently 13.5% of board-certified surgeons are women.

82 that patients with RAAAs who were treated by board-certified surgeons had significantly better surviv

83 We used a modified Delphi procedure with 5 board-certified surgeons to further refine this list by

84 decreased from 26.7% for physicians who were board certified the previous year to 6.9% for physicians

85 eve that this procedure is best performed by board-certified thoracic surgeons.

86 ographic results were analyzed by one of two board-certified ultrasonographers without knowledge of v

87 New England division for having at least one board-certified urologist (odds ratio [OR], 9.2; 95% CI,

88 A case review by a board-certified urologist suggested they could be IC.

89 Stroke was adjudicated by a panel of board-certified vascular neurologists with secondary cen