ライフサイエンスコーパス: bone grafting

1 T) with and without alveolar corticotomy and bone grafting.

2 nstructed with Le Fort I osteotomy and iliac bone grafting.

3 Case 1 did not need additional bone grafting.

4 efects contain skeletal components requiring bone grafting.

5 our quest to find new techniques to enhance bone grafting.

6 engineering is an exciting new technique in bone grafting.

7 ntities normally associated with periodontal bone grafting, although they do support the use of this

8 Advances concerning bone grafting and arthroplasty procedures have resulted

9 and CBVT images were taken prior to initial bone grafting and at the 6-month reentry surgery for 35

10 onv) alveolar decortication and augmentation bone grafting, are matched in this case-control study fo

11 Bone grafting as a gold standard of bone repairing is li

12 Bone grafting at time of placement was required in 25% o

13 after the removal of an LPC, GTR, along with bone grafting, can be a very useful tool for its treatme

14 e Fort I osteotomy and interpositional iliac bone grafting could be considered a viable protocol to r

15 Adults scheduled to receive bone grafting in maxillary, non-molar, single-tooth extr

16 One of the major challenges in bone grafting is the lack of sufficient bone vasculariza

17 Porous hydroxyapatite (HA) bone grafting material has a clinically satisfactory res

18 Porous hydroxyapatite (HA) bone grafting material has been used to fill periodontal

19 ermine the effect that socket filling with a bone grafting material has on the prevention of postextr

20 Total protein adsorption to bone grafting material was quantified using an enzyme-li

21 Autologous bone is the most successful bone-grafting material; however, limited supply and dono

22 valuate and compare the healing of different bone grafting materials adjacent to titanium plasma-spra

23 tion of exogenous proteins to the surface of bone grafting materials and the subsequent cellular beha

24 General trends in synthetic bone grafting materials are shifting towards approaches

25 tion of EMD combined with different types of bone grafting materials in periodontal regenerative proc

26 ity of adsorbed amelogenin to the surface of bone grafting materials when enamel matrix proteins were

27 nt; 2) surgical resection; 3) application of bone grafting materials; and 4) guided bone regeneration

28 safe prophylactic antimicrobial protocol in bone grafting may enhance osseous volume outcomes.

29 used in conjunction with pliable atraumatic bone grafting mixture and hydraulic pressure from a surg

30 is to retrospectively evaluate the effect of bone grafting of the defect between the bone crest and t

31 ncrease after decortication and augmentation bone grafting offsets the concerns of orthodontic procli

32 cally correct regenerate that is better than bone grafting or revascularised free-tissue transfer.

33 NBM and DFDBA and adsorb to the interior of bone grafting particles.

34 l therapeutic modalities, such as autologous bone grafting, present myriad limitations and carry with

35 quelae related to implant placement/advanced bone grafting procedures are a result of injury to surro

36 Bone grafting procedures were performed at 194 sites in

37 However, millions of oral and non-oral bone-grafting procedures are performed annually, and onl

38 Bone grafting remains the standard treatment for bone de

39 with alveolar decortication and augmentation bone grafting resulted in a significant increase in KT h

40 ll remains the undisputed "gold standard" in bone grafting, the realization that bone requirement in

41 with the exception of defect fill following bone grafting, the reduction in variability in clinical

42 e treated with Le Fort I osteotomy and iliac bone grafting to allow for implant-borne prosthetic reha

43 of the detached cementum in combination with bone grafting using a minimally invasive surgical approa

44 parison of computed tomographic scans before bone grafting versus 4 to 6 months after bone grafting w

45 ore bone grafting versus 4 to 6 months after bone grafting was performed.

46 esents a promising alternative to autologous bone grafting, which is considered the current gold stan

47 rnover and inflammation after extraction and bone grafting with or without local simvastatin (SIM).

48 ded that the minimally invasive approach for bone grafting yielded results that were equivalent to mo