ライフサイエンスコーパス: brain-dead

1 and simple behavioral tests (best = 100 and brain dead = 0).

2 70 years or younger who is legally declared brain dead and does not exhibit any excluding factors) w

3 d lung grafts from donors that were rendered brain dead and mechanically ventilated for 4 h before pr

4 ents: PATIENTS < or = 70 yrs of age who were brain dead and medically suitable for donation.

5 ining treatments, 30 (16%) were diagnosed as brain dead, and 26 (14%) died following an unsuccessful

6 all 78 patients (10%) who died qualified as brain dead; and 81% of all patients (63 of 78) who died

7 Tracheotomized brain-dead animals and anesthetized controls were mechan

8 Non-brain dead (BD) donors served as controls.

9 Deciding about the organ donation of one's brain-dead beloved often occurs in an unexpected and del

10 The success rate of transplanted organs from brain-dead cadaver donors is consistently inferior to th

11 atients with severe brain injury who are not brain-dead can donate organs after they are removed from

12 o norepinephrine in managing the hypotensive brain dead donor.

13 lating CD4+ cells in the HIV-negative (HIV-) brain-dead donor (BDD) is not known.

14 f sC5b-9 from the reperfused kidney graft in brain-dead donor and cardiac dead donor kidney transplan

15 n 3 hours after placement and reperfusion of brain-dead donor grafts, significant neutrophil infiltra

16 cytokines was significantly increased in all brain-dead donor grafts.

17 This complex process was accelerated in brain-dead donor kidneys.

18 living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) or brain-dead donor liver transplantation (BDLT) across 5 F

19 study was to examine the effect of HR on the brain-dead donor on the number of organs transplanted pe

20 Living and brain-dead donor strategies are not mutually exclusive a

21 A brain-dead donor strategy is more acceptable from an eth

22 Compared with a brain-dead donor strategy, a living donor strategy offer

23 Long-term survival of brain-dead donor transplants was significantly less than

24 er transplantation with a liver graft from a brain-dead donor whose cause of death was not hanging or

25 ical kidney transplantation in living donor, brain-dead donor, and cardiac dead donor kidney transpla

26 rom DCD donors compared to 89.6%, 64.8% from brain dead donors (DBD) (P = 0.7).

27 ere compared with liver grafts from standard brain dead donors (n = 50), also matched to the balance

28 swine transplanted with lung allografts from brain dead donors all rejected their grafts by postopera

29 h allografts and isografts from normotensive brain dead donors and anesthetized LD.

30 Over a period of 10 months, 23 consecutive brain dead donors screened for liver procurement underwe

31 normotension, the transplanted kidneys from brain dead donors showed a significantly longer interval

32 We report 2 transplants with kidneys from brain dead donors with known DIC.

33 nors without a heartbeat (DWHB), 55,206 were brain dead donors, and 1,298 were unspecified donors.

34 nization-reported eligible deaths (potential brain-dead donors </= 70 yr of age) from January 1, 2008

35 ese expression levels with those observed in brain-dead donors (BDD).

36 Ds were compared with those procured from 10 brain-dead donors (BDDs).

37 Of 10,292 consecutive brain-dead donors analyzed, 701 received three-drug HR.

38 Hormonal resuscitation stabilizes certain brain-dead donors and is associated with significant inc

39 HR stabilizes certain brain-dead donors and is associated with significant inc

40 ually the front-line providers for potential brain-dead donors and their next-of-kin, and these data

41 Kidneys from brain-dead donors are cold preserved until transplanted.

42 dy suggests that a preoperative selection of brain-dead donors based on a combination of both Control

43 tion significantly increased in kidneys from brain-dead donors before storage and after 4 hr of reper

44 s that develop within kidney allografts from brain-dead donors could be normalized using a recombinan

45 Animals bearing kidneys from brain-dead donors died of renal failure secondary to acu

46 after first adult lung transplantation from brain-dead donors done between July 1, 1999, and Dec 31,

47 the pros and cons of using living donors or brain-dead donors in uterus transplantation programs, 2

48 Splitting of livers from appropriate brain-dead donors into right and left lobes is technical

49 However, the yield of pancreatic islets from brain-dead donors is negatively affected by the up-regul

50 Acute rejection evolved in hearts from brain-dead donors more intensely and at a significantly

51 f interventions to stabilize hemodynamics in brain-dead donors or to improve organ function and outco

52 polation of these probabilities to the 5,921 brain-dead donors recovered in 2001 was calculated to yi

53 A retrospective analysis of all brain-dead donors recovered in the United States from Ja

54 This study suggests that 3HR treatment of brain-dead donors results in increased numbers of transp

55 s of the proteomic signature of kidneys from brain-dead donors revealed large-scale changes in mitoch

56 ultivariate studies on hormonal treatment of brain-dead donors revealed significant increases in orga

57 ecision making by the relatives of potential brain-dead donors reveals possibilities for improving th

58 expression of key inflammatory mediators in brain-dead donors should be evaluated as a new approach

59 tively steatosis and fibrosis in livers from brain-dead donors to be potentially used for transplanta

60 e obtained in patients receiving organs from brain-dead donors under standard procurement techniques.

61 Changes in isografts from brain-dead donors were less marked and developed at a sl

62 inferior outcomes after lung transplant from brain-dead donors who have had a period of cardiac arres

63 without heartbeats in addition to those from brain-dead donors with beating hearts.

64 ion after circulatory death [DCD] and 3 from brain-dead donors), median Donor Risk Index 2.15, were s

65 sent rates for organ donation from potential brain-dead donors, and to identify factors associated wi

66 ecision making of the relatives of potential brain-dead donors, its evaluation, and the factors influ

67 of 4,543 recipients of hearts recovered from brain-dead donors, reported to the United Network for Or

68 re performed at outside institutions, all on brain-dead donors.

69 interventions focusing on the management of brain-dead donors.

70 rial of preload optimization is warranted in brain-dead donors.

71 to stabilize and improve cardiac function in brain-dead donors.

72 instability and poor organ perfusion in many brain-dead donors.

73 are similar to those of LT using grafts from brain-dead donors.

74 Brain-dead Fisher rats were treated for 6 hours with eit

75 systolic and diastolic LV/RV function in the brain-dead, heart-beating cadaver, which may contribute

76 Compared with kidneys from neurologically brain dead (NBD) donors, DCD kidneys had a higher adjust

77 cipients sustained by kidney allografts from brain-dead, normal anesthetized, and anesthetized ventil

78 Outcomes using advanced age brain-dead or cardiac-dead donor kidneys are similar.

79 ere obtained from patients who were declared brain-dead or had emergent splenectomy due to trauma; co

80 Conditioning the brain-dead organ donor by altering metabolism could be a

81 of organ function in the critically unstable brain-dead organ donor to salvage organs for transplanta

82 ungs, intestines) sites from a population of brain-dead organ donors (2 months-93 years; n = 291) acr

83 We recruited 30 consecutive brain-dead organ donors and 78 recipients between April

84 the inflammatory response characteristics in brain-dead organ donors and examine associations with or

85 Preload responsiveness is common in brain-dead organ donors and is associated with higher in

86 y specimens from the costal diaphragms of 14 brain-dead organ donors before organ harvest (case subje

87 size and composition of the national pool of brain-dead organ donors during a three-year period and,

88 Diaphragm and biceps specimens obtained from brain-dead organ donors who underwent MV (15-176 h) and

89 Among brain-dead organ donors, older age donors contribute few

90 Using functional hemodynamic monitoring in brain-dead organ donors, we test the hypothesis that don

91 Upper limbs were procured from brain-dead organ donors.

92 The first paradox is the brain dead patient whose 'phenotype' betrays the ultimat

93 recent controversies over the assessment of brain dead patients into a scientific and wider societal

94 Seventeen brain-dead patients and 20 control patients undergoing p

95 1.52-2.21; p < 0.001), care of relatives of brain-dead patients as complex (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% CI

96 During the study period, there were 22,270 brain-dead patients diagnosed in France, of whom 161 wit

97 Brain-dead patients had higher serum concentrations of T

98 Immunohistochemical analyses showed that brain-dead patients had increased TNF protein levels com

99 Ten brain-dead patients had significantly decreased low-freq

100 and showed that desmopressin administered to brain-dead patients was not advantageous with respect to

101 All non-brain-dead patients who became non-heart-beating organ d

102 lute contraindication to organ donation from brain-dead patients who have sustained a fatal ingestion

103 4) concentrations when compared with six non-brain-dead patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3

104 Brain-dead patients with ongoing extracorporeal membrane

105 Brain-dead patients with ongoing extracorporeal membrane

106 e organ procurement organization, caring for brain-dead patients, managing a candidate for donation a

107 ipidus, an almost universal occurrence among brain-dead patients, on hepatic function.

108 arts were obtained from 12 transplant and 13 brain-dead patients.

109 Hormonal therapy to the brain-dead potential organ donor can include thyroid hor

110 ine administration of thyroid hormone in the brain-dead potential organ donor.

111 We identified a total of 18,524 brain-dead potential organ donors during the study perio

112 The predicted annual number of brain-dead potential organ donors is between 10,500 and

113 cribing administration of thyroid hormone to brain-dead potential organ donors.

114 organ-procurement organizations to identify brain-dead potential organ donors.

115 commendations regarding organ support of the brain-dead pregnant woman are reviewed.

116 Hearts from brain-dead rats (Fisher, F344) were rejected significant

117 ve and antioxidative processes in kidneys of brain-dead rats after fast and slow BD induction.

118 Healthy non-brain-dead rats served as reference values.

119 Brain-dead rats were monitored for 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 hours

120 Hemoadsorption for removal of cytokines in brain-dead subjects is feasible.

121 ized, open-label, feasibility study in which brain-dead subjects were randomized to two treatment gro

122 One patient became brain dead; the condition of two patients subsequently i

123 Patients were excluded if they were declared brain dead, were organ donors, required high-frequency v