ライフサイエンスコーパス: breath holding

1 nostic data even in patients with difficulty breath holding.

2 ed with measurements on images obtained with breath holding.

3 planes anatomic to the fetus during maternal breath holding.

4 e obtained with conventional, end-expiratory breath holding.

5 sition and display without cardiac gating or breath-holding.

6 ges/s without the need for cardiac gating or breath-holding.

7 and immediately following maximal periods of breath-holding.

8 With breath-holding, all subjects obtained some respiratory r

9 a 28% decrease in imaging time compared with breath holding and a 33% decrease compared with the 3-mm

10 We studied the effect of breath holding and inspiratory speed on airflow during t

11 lding and irregular heart rhythm; and 4, non-breath holding and irregular heart rhythm.

12 2, non-breath holding and steady gating; 3, breath holding and irregular heart rhythm; and 4, non-br

13 imaging is appropriate for MI detection with breath holding and regular heart rhythm, while subsecond

14 techniques in four conditions: condition 1, breath holding and steady gating; 2, non-breath holding

15 1, breath holding and steady gating; 2, non-breath holding and steady gating; 3, breath holding and

16 piratory-gated MRCA can be performed without breath holding and with only limited subject cooperation

17 diving marine mammals is accomplished while breath-holding and often exceeds predicted aerobic capac

18 physiological and physical challenges while breath-holding and pursuing prey at depth.

19 were obtained with gadoteridol enhancement, breath holding, and a three-dimensional spoiled gradient

20 icknesses of 0.8-3.0 mm were achieved during breath holding, and images were reconstructed with a 50%

21 system allow the patient to perform reliable breath holding at a preselected level.

22 s covering the entire heart, obtained during breath holding at end-tidal volume (baseline), deep insp

23 )) is the product of two measurements during breath holding at full inflation: (1) the rate constant

24 e bronchoscope was measured with the subject breath-holding at FRC.

25 Images were acquired without breath holding by using multiplanar half-Fourier single-

26 Submersion and the release of breath holding can activate two powerful and antagonisti

27 Under control conditions, breath holding caused increases in PET,CO2 (7 +/- 1 mmHg

28 fast SE imaging is applied in vivo, however, breath-holding constraints limit the spatial resolution

29 Arterial phase breath-holding duration and motion artifacts after each

30 rial, whether maximal hepatic arterial phase breath-holding duration is affected by gadoxetate disodi

31 istration in healthy volunteers, and reduced breath-holding duration is associated with motion artifa

32 Conclusion Maximal hepatic arterial phase breath-holding duration is reduced after gadoxetate diso

33 Arterial phase breath-holding duration was timed after each injection,

34 sed on injection rates or the performance of breath holding during the timing examination (P > .1).

35 material injection rate and the influence of breath holding during the timing examination also were e

36 age quality equivalent to that obtained with breath holding, even with the 7-mm gating window.

37 rdiac MRI sequences were used, with periodic breath holding for image stabilization.

38 protocols with free breathing and those with breath holding for measurement of volumetric parameters.

39 image quality similar to that obtained with breath holding for the 3- and 5-mm windows and resulted

40 s that inspiratory speed and the duration of breath holding have significant implications in the perf

41 il-induced decreases in the BOLD response to breath holding in the left dorsolateral prefrontal corte

42 The effects of inspiratory speed and breath holding in the patients with asthma were not sign

43 iate with an irregular heart rhythm and when breath holding is not possible.

44 Irrespective of breath holding, LV end-diastolic mass was overestimated

45 Breath holding may be eliminated by gating image acquisi

46 ented three-dimensional sequence with either breath holding (n = 4) or respiratory gating (n = 4).

47 In contrast, voluntary breath holding of similar duration caused severe dyspnea

48 whether the effects of inspiratory speed and breath holding on expiratory flow were greater in patien

49 sitivity (worsening of the pain by coughing, breath-holding or sudden head movement).

50 Whole-lung CT was performed during two breath-holding pressures (5 and 45 cm H2O).

51 MR imaging was performed with breath holding, respiratory gating, and respiratory gati

52 tory motion of the heart, techniques such as breath holding, respiratory gating, section tracking, ph

53 t whole-lung computed tomography (CT) during breath-holding sessions at airway pressures of 5, 15, an

54 ating with two signals acquired and 11.9 for breath holding) supported the results of the image revie

55 s elicited during every inspiration, whereas breath holding suppressed it.

56 han those of conventional free-breathing and breath-holding techniques.

57 Breath holding was adequate in 812 cases, and ECG trigge