戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 songbird (zebra finch) and a parrot species (budgerigar).
2 , which abolishes yellow pigmentation in the budgerigar.
3 low-matched carotid artery of the Australian budgerigar.
4  used real optical mapping data for rice and budgerigar.
5 production in a small Australian parrot, the budgerigar.
6 e much more extensively studied domesticated budgerigar.
7 s and 80% of locally misassembled contigs in budgerigar.
8 may be important vocal control nuclei in the budgerigar.
9  their echoes, have been recently studied in budgerigars.
10 auditory processing of conspecific sounds in budgerigars.
11 n of mature, patterned food-begging calls in budgerigars.
12 al Henle 407, chick kidney, chick ovary, and budgerigar abdominal tumor cells.
13                                              Budgerigars also show a spatial masking release of 9 dB
14 al organization of vocal control pathways in budgerigars and songbirds.
15                                              Budgerigars and zebra finches were tested, using operant
16 onic signals were measured in zebra finches, budgerigars, and humans.
17        The distributions of ChAT and AChE in budgerigars appeared similar to that in oscine songbirds
18 to vocal control and auditory nuclei because budgerigars are a psittacine species in which both males
19                                              Budgerigars are parrots that have been extensively bred
20 eads we saw reads address 63% of gaps in our budgerigar assembly, of which 32% were closed and 63% im
21 y be a general property of this cell type in budgerigars because a similar gender difference was foun
22                             In contrast, the budgerigars categorized both novel combinations of famil
23                     By 4 weeks postfledging, budgerigar contact call repertoires often contained more
24 obscura, an assembly of the Assemblathon 2.0 budgerigar dataset, and a preliminary assembly of the So
25 critical ratio functions for the wild-caught budgerigars decreased at frequencies of 1.0 kHz-2.86 kHz
26              Despite these similarities, the budgerigar dorsal striatopallidum (lobus parolfactorius,
27 to other avian thermoregulatory behaviors in budgerigars (e.g., panting, wing venting).
28 t calls of both wild-caught and domesticated budgerigars falls almost exclusively in the frequency of
29 und that all vocal control nuclei within the budgerigar forebrain exhibit prominent mENK-like immunor
30  examined the course of vocal development in budgerigars from hatching to about 4 weeks postfledging
31 lolly pine, Francisella tularensis, rice and budgerigar genomes.
32  thresholds were similar across all species, budgerigars had slightly higher overall levels of discri
33                                              Budgerigars have a complex vocal repertoire, some of whi
34                                           In budgerigars, HVo is connected to both the anterior foreb
35 lular nucleus of the lobus parolfactorius in budgerigars, like the area X in songbirds, contained man
36 entral nucleus of the lateral neostriatum in budgerigars, like the higher vocal center (HVC) in songb
37 ralaminar area of the frontal neostriatum in budgerigars, like the RA and the magnicellular nucleus o
38 H) was mapped out in cells and fibers of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) brain.
39 he telencephalic vocal control system in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) that has been hypot
40 rale (HVo), were mapped out in a parrot, the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) to determine the re
41                             The brain of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus), a small parrot tha
42 in the brain of a vocal learning parrot, the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus), was examined using
43 kHz, similar to that previously found in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).
44 investigated in a vocal learning parrot, the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).
45 he vocal control nuclei of a psittacine, the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).
46  and contact calls of wild-caught Australian budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and compared these
47                                         When budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) are briefly held,
48                          The warble songs of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) are composed of a
49 periments revealed that yawning increased in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) as ambient tempera
50 1 days posthatch were assessed in 5 nestling budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) to determine if au
51                                   Adult male budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) were stimulated to
52  dimorphism in vocal control nuclei of adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), a parrot species
53 d in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
54  green cone opsins in two avian species, the budgerigar, Melopsittacus undulatus, and the mallard duc
55                  The apparent counterpart in budgerigars of the mammalian nucleus basalis of Meynert
56 ed multiple copies of endogenous HBVs in the budgerigar (order Psittaciformes), designated eBHBV.
57                    Two binaural phenomena in budgerigars related to the detection of tones in noise w
58 rior lifelong vocal learning ability in male budgerigars rests largely on larger volumes of vocal con
59                                          The budgerigar septal region is theorized to be homologous a
60                                              Budgerigars show 8 dB of free-field binaural masking rel
61 reflect neural specializations unique to the budgerigar that contribute to the extraordinary flexibil
62 ed in other regions which may be involved in budgerigar vocal behavior, including the basal forebrain
63 es between the morphology of ELI elements in budgerigar vocal control nuclei and that described previ
64 had been previously described as part of the budgerigar vocal control pathway.
65 rough the basal forebrain also exists in the budgerigar vocal system that is similar to the anterior
66 gs, humans assigned the acoustic elements in budgerigar warble from several birds to eight broad, ove
67            In a repeated measures design, 16 budgerigars were exposed to 4 separate 10-min periods of
68                   However, zebra finches and budgerigars were extraordinarily sensitive to the mistun
69 rant conditioning and a psychophysical task, budgerigars were tested on large sets of these elements

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。