ライフサイエンスコーパス: bullying

1 ses in CRP compared with those uninvolved in bullying.

2 e) bullying; and perpetration of traditional bullying.

3 ut traumatic events such as maltreatment and bullying.

4 association and the temporal antecedence of bullying.

5 om 110 788 adolescents completed measures of bullying.

6 sex and visual problems in the prediction of bullying.

7 males to be both perpetrators and targets of bullying.

8 nd service development for dealing with peer bullying.

9 ce the health burden associated with sibling bullying.

10 g, and mental health consequences of sibling bullying.

11 cause they have no safe place to escape from bullying.

12 suicidal ideation compared with traditional bullying.

13 hould use evidence-based practices to reduce bullying.

14 ally exam) pressures (35 [27%] individuals), bullying (28 [22%]), bereavement (36 [28%]), suicide in

15 In an effort to address school bullying, 49 states have passed antibullying statutes.

16 p; 33 of 166 (19.9%) who engaged in frequent bullying, 58 of 251 (23.1%) frequently exposed to bullyi

17 indicated exposure to physical violence and bullying, about a third reported injury, about a quarter

18 pact the health of children and adolescents: bullying, adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and texti

19 prevalence of cyberbullying and traditional bullying among adolescents in England, and assess its re

20 Bullying and being exposed to bullying among children is prevalent, especially among c

21 e search for programs to prevent or diminish bullying among schoolchildren.

22 The prevalence of bullying among US youth is substantial.

23 (95% CI, 15%-32%) reduced odds of reporting bullying and 20% (95% CI, 9%-29%) reduced odds of report

24 Self-report of involvement in bullying and being bullied by others.

25 Bullying and being exposed to bullying among children is

26 re was substantial variation in the rates of bullying and cyberbullying across states.

27 Exposure to bullying and cyberbullying in the past 12 months.

28 h those adolescents who reported traditional bullying and cyberbullying once or twice in the past cou

29 Behavior Surveillance System on experiencing bullying and cyberbullying.

30 ated with decreased odds of exposure to both bullying and cyberbullying: statement of scope, descript

31 and 13 years using the previously validated Bullying and Friendship Interview Schedule.

32 ealth professionals should ask about sibling bullying and interventions are needed for families to pr

33 vention approaches designed to reduce school bullying and its harmful effects.

34 are of variance after adjustment for offline bullying and other covariates.

35 The causal relation between school bullying and psychopathologic behavior has been the focu

36 abuse did not affect the association between bullying and psychotic symptoms, but reduced the signifi

37 elationship was observed between severity of bullying and risk for psychotic experiences.

38 ell as online risks such as harassment/cyber bullying and sexual solicitation.

39 Early detection of bullying and use of treatments oriented towards its psyc

40 rents, decisions were influenced by: fear of bullying and, to a lesser degree, concerns around the im

41 s for childhood trauma (physical assault and bullying) and psychotic experiences.

42 ing, 58 of 251 (23.1%) frequently exposed to bullying, and 24 of 77 (31.2%) who both frequently engag

43 e, 66.9% for nonphysical violence, 39.7% for bullying, and 25% for sexual harassment, with 32.7% of n

44 hotic symptoms associated with maltreatment, bullying, and accidents in a nationally representative U

45 increases the risk of being involved in peer bullying, and is independently associated with concurren

46 on the precursors, factors relating to peer bullying, and mental health consequences of sibling bull

47 Information about bullying, exposure to bullying, and psychiatric symptoms were obtained from pa

48 w that online risks such as addiction, cyber bullying, and sexual solicitation are associated with ne

49 articularly large for assault victimization, bullying, and sexual victimization.

50 youth who are at risk for online addiction, bullying, and solicitation, we need more research to und

51 s, opticians should be aware of the risks of bullying, and strategies should be developed and discuss

52 victimization by traditional (face-to-face) bullying; and perpetration of traditional bullying.

53 nd friends; thriving at school; experiencing bullying; and romantic relationships.

54 Both bullies and victims of bullying are at risk for psychiatric problems in childho

55 ed and no national data on the prevalence of bullying are available.

56 Studies suggest that adolescents involved in bullying are more likely to carry weapons than their uni

57 nic medical conditions, and highlights cyber bullying as a rising issue.

58 Involvement in bullying as a victim, bully, or bully-victim is related

59 reported moderate or frequent involvement in bullying, as a bully (13.0%), one who was bullied (10.6%

60 imate may moderate the forms and severity of bullying, as well as predict its prevalence across count

61 l and emotional difficulties associated with bullying, as well as the potential long-term negative ou

62 tent with causal contribution of exposure to bullying at 11 years to concurrent anxiety, depression,

63 Participants who were bullies and exposed to bullying at 8 years of age had a high risk for several p

64 chopathologic behavior that led to new-onset bullying at follow-up were also present at follow-up, ma

65 with chronic medical problems by addressing bullying at well child visits.

66 in identifying patients who are involved in bullying, at risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus

67 en with complete information about childhood bullying behavior was followed up from 8 to 29 years of

68 participants, 4540 (90.2%) did not engage in bullying behavior; of these, 520 (11.5%) had received a

69 Recent literature shows that bullying behaviors are common in children as young as ki

70 adolescents may also experience teasing and bullying behaviors based on their weight.

71 perpetrators, reasons for and the nature of bullying behaviors, and how recipients react to and mana

72 iors, and how recipients react to and manage bullying behaviors.

73 idered to be relevant to suicide (eg, abuse, bullying, bereavement, academic pressures, self-harm, an

74 milial factors most strongly associated with bullying between siblings.

75 lt (relative risk=3.16, 95% CI=1.92-5.19) or bullying by peers (relative risk=2.47, 95% CI=1.74-3.52)

76 both ethnic similarities (physical abuse and bullying by peers) and differences (sexual abuse and dis

77 igher rates of sexual abuse, physical abuse, bullying by peers, and discrimination than healthy compa

78 examined whether sexual and physical abuse, bullying by peers, and ethnicity-based discrimination ar

79 en had experienced maltreatment by an adult, bullying by peers, or involvement in an accident.

80 , rates of sexual abuse, physical abuse, and bullying by peers-but not discrimination-were significan

81 Early intervention among those involved in bullying can prevent long-term consequences.

82 Determining to what extent exposure to bullying contributes to mental health is an important co

83 Furthermore, bullying data also suggest that the CLASH model may appl

84 Bullying data support the CLASH model of aggression by s

85 Recent research on bullying emphasizes its impact on children with chronic

86 e likely to be victims of physical or verbal bullying, even after adjustment for social class and mat

87 Exposure to bullying, even in the absence of childhood psychiatric s

88 t, however, up to 40% are exposed to sibling bullying every week, a repeated and harmful form of intr

89 additional evidence for the causal effect of bullying experience on the later development of psychopa

90 at follow-up were associated with antecedent bullying experience.

91 At age 12, children were asked about bullying experiences and psychotic symptoms.

92 ems, is a consequence rather than a cause of bullying experiences.

93 om 7,771 participants whose parents reported bullying exposure at ages 7 and 11 years, and who partic

94 Interventions need to reduce bullying exposure in childhood and minimize long-term ef

95 Information about bullying, exposure to bullying, and psychiatric symptoms

96 Victims of frequent bullying had higher rates of depression (odds ratio=1.95

97 ly engaged in and were frequently exposed to bullying had received psychiatric diagnoses at follow-up

98 to both maltreatment and bullying or whether bullying has a unique effect.

99 Maltreatment by peers (ie, bullying) has also been shown to have long-term adverse

100 ychiatric disorder with frequent exposure to bullying (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5) and b

101 I, 1.4-2.5) and being a bully and exposed to bullying (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4).

102 behaviors (e.g., precocious sexual activity, bullying, illicit substance use).

103 rect detrimental contribution of exposure to bullying in childhood to mental health is provided.

104 characterize the contribution of exposure to bullying in childhood to mental health using a twin diff

105 Placing bullying in context, we consider the unique features of

106 Whether childhood bullying or exposure to bullying in the absence of childhood psychiatric symptom

107 he highest rates of nonphysical violence and bullying in the Middle East.

108 695 [24%] boys) reported any form of regular bullying in the past couple of months.

109 ctim or perpetrator for overt and relational bullying, in a standard interview.

110 mponents (eg, responsibilities for reporting bullying incidents), and additional components (eg, how

111 n those adolescents who reported traditional bullying (including physical, verbal, and relational bul

112 Sibling bullying increases the risk of being involved in peer bu

113 psychopathology, substance use, child abuse, bullying, internet use, and youth suicidal behavior.

114 n to programs that aim to reduce exposure to bullying, interventions may benefit from addressing pree

115 Structured interviews were used to assess bullying involvement and relevant covariates at all chil

116 rained psychologists assessed the children's bullying involvement as either victim or perpetrator for

117 Bullying is a common childhood experience that involves

118 Because school bullying is a known correlate of youth violence, such a

119 Bullying is a major public health problem.

120 Bullying is a pervasive problem affecting school-age chi

121 orbidity Surveys to test the hypothesis that bullying is associated with individual psychotic phenome

122 Exposure to bullying is associated with poor mental health.

123 INTERPRETATION: Traditional bullying is considerably more common among adolescents i

124 e among US youth is a current major concern, bullying is infrequently addressed and no national data

125 even after their involvement in face-to-face bullying is taken into account.

126 Bullying is the most widespread form of peer aggression

127 A novel predictor of bullying may be underlying regional weather conditions (

128 ings also suggest that childhood exposure to bullying may partly be viewed as a symptom of preexistin

129 A child's role in bullying may serve as either a risk or a protective fact

130 ative outcomes for these youth, the issue of bullying merits serious attention, both for future resea

131 al, verbal, and relational (ie, traditional) bullying only, while 406 (<1% total, 276 [<1%] girls, 13

132 ntisocial activities (p=0.004 and p<0.0001), bullying or being bullied (p=0.005 and p<0.0001), low ed

133 Whether childhood bullying or exposure to bullying in the absence of child

134 ue to being exposed to both maltreatment and bullying or whether bullying has a unique effect.

135 (including physical, verbal, and relational bullying) or cyberbullying 2-3 times a month or more com

136 ted greater increases in CRP levels, whereas bullying others predicted lower increases in CRP compare

137 stressful events to identify experiences of bullying over the entire lifespan.

138 Reviewing the latest findings on bullying perpetration and victimization, we highlight th

139 If reported at baseline, bullying predicted emergence and maintenance of persecut

140 portant topics in pediatric office practice: bullying, screening for the prediabetic state, and pedia

141 ypes of violence were physical, nonphysical, bullying, sexual harassment, and combined (type of viole

142 using a nursing sample, and include data on bullying, sexual harassment, and/or violence exposure ra

143 these associations disappeared when baseline bullying status was adjusted.

144 The link between sibling and peer bullying suggests interventions need to start at home.

145 e highlight the social dominance function of bullying, the inflated self-views of bullies, and the ef

146 ental school was based on zero tolerance for bullying; the control school received only regular psych

147 and longitudinal contribution of exposure to bullying to mental health in childhood and adolescence u

148 ect detrimental contributions of exposure to bullying to mental health remains uncertain, as noncausa

149 Bullying victimisation increases the risk of individual

150 m the GSMS cohort provided information about bullying victimisation, maltreatment, and overall mental

151 sure to maternal domestic violence, frequent bullying victimization and physical maltreatment by an a

152 Childhood bullying victimization was associated with a lack of soc

153 nt after controlling for known correlates of bullying victimization.

154 thors examined midlife outcomes of childhood bullying victimization.

155 School bullying was assessed by peer nomination, and 7 subscale

156 Bullying was associated with a diagnosis of probable psy

157 Bullying was associated with presence of persecutory ide

158 Bullying was associated with psychiatric outcomes only i

159 School bullying was categorized into 4 groups: victims, perpetr

160 Traditional bullying was defined as repeated, intentional aggression

161 The frequency of bullying was higher among 6th- through 8th-grade student

162 Bullying was most strongly associated with the presence

163 Exposure to bullying was specifically associated with depression (HR

164 While both forms of bullying were associated with poorer mental well-being,

165 Perpetrating and experiencing bullying were associated with poorer psychosocial adjust

166 nglo countries, and nonphysical violence and bullying were most prevalent in the Middle East.

167 In GSMS, both maltreatment and bullying were repeatedly assessed with annual parent and