ライフサイエンスコーパス: by comparing @3 (with|to)

1 Sequences were assigned to bacterial taxa by comparing them with 16s rRNA sequences in the Ribosom

2 Reproducibility was tested by comparing original test scores with 2-week retest sco

3 The model was calibrated and validated by comparing simulation results with 40 days of N2O emis

4 Significant associations were reanalyzed by comparing diLQTS patients with 515 ethnically matched

5 Criterion validity was assessed by comparing Adapted Cognitive Exam with a neurointensiv

6 Y. pestis, microarray studies were conducted by comparing Deltapgm strain R88 to a Deltapgm DeltaluxS

7 Results were analyzed by comparing each assay to a "consensus result," which w

8 s) in this illusion affected size perception by comparing each to a reference stimulus without any co

9 terize our system's computational capability by comparing its task performance with a standard machin

10 By comparing our data with a novel MVID patient, we conc

11 By comparing our experimental data with a random phase a

12 By comparing our results to a number of experiments on c

13 ee novel approach-related biases, formalized by comparing subject behavior to a dynamic programming m

14 equences not by any molecular signature, but by comparing the foreign sequence to a memory of previou

15 The analytic specificity, evaluated by comparing the HPV result with a combined comparator o

16 By comparing to a minimal physical model, we find, surpr

17 By comparing to a null model, we show that certain combi

18 rmed the validity of these structural models by comparing with a high-resolution structure of a NaChB

19 tion of these IL-10-producing CD8(+) T cells by comparing with a newly identified IL-10-producing CD8

20 can be recovered from extremely noisy images by comparing with a reference dictionary.

21 By comparing neuronal responses with acoustic and CI sti

22 quence for each type of motif was determined by comparing motif sequences shown to activate suspensor

23 Their performance was evaluated by comparing predicted with actual findings from histolo

24 maging features of PSR; triggers (identified by comparing PSR admissions with adjacent admissions wit

25 e specificity of Tunisian VOOs was evaluated by comparing the samples to Algerian, Moroccan and Frenc

26 By comparing and contrasting with all-2D vdW heterostruc

27 Here, we address the omission by comparing the circuits common to all seven columns to

28 We benchmark our design by comparing it to an existing design which has been the

29 Many learned motor behaviors are acquired by comparing ongoing behavior with an internal represent

30 By comparing parental B. pertussis to an rseA gene delet

31 ver the major croplands of the United States by comparing the results to an inventory of CO2 fluxes.

32 e sensitivity and specificity of the primers by comparing with an 18S ribosomal RNA-based nested PCR

33 Accuracy of the results is demonstrated by comparing with analytical solutions before breakdown,

34 By comparing cysteine accessibility with and without cho

35 per sample, assigning hemagglutinin density by comparing images with and without anti-HA Fab bound.

36 We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ITx by comparing models conducted with and without ITx and b

37 cations (excluding congenital malformations) by comparing pregnant women with and without epilepsy an

38 valuated each scenario's relative likelihood by comparing its output to available data.

39 The predictions of the model are verified by comparing simulations to available in vivo experiment

40 equently, measured diffusivity was validated by comparing to available literature data, showing good

41 By comparing our experimental results to band structure

42 We addressed the first question by comparing 19 patients with BD1 and 19 healthy control

43 the validity of this algorithm was assessed by comparing those estimated to be higher risk for PD wi

44 By comparing human behavior with behavior of ideal actor

45 f HPAI H5N1 has previously been investigated by comparing disease spread patterns with bird migration

46 By comparing Ir1 binding to BNT-II versus L-histidine, s

47 e GEM2005 study that addressed this question by comparing VMP with bortezomib plus thalidomide and pr

48 By comparing modeling predictions with both interferon a

49 expression, antigenicity, and immunogenicity by comparing unmodified A244 gp120 with both Delta11 del

50 ifts and fluorescence quenching is evidenced by comparing with both the single H-bonded and the non-H

51 By comparing computational simulations with Ca(2+) trans

52 tion and high mass accuracy measurements and by comparing experimental to calculated isotope profiles

53 factor-rich demineralized bone matrix (GDBM) by comparing with cancellous mineralized bone matrix (CM

54 lculated Strauss' dietary electivity indices by comparing these proportions with changing relative ab

55 ion of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) by comparing the cellular responses with commercially av

56 s without PSR); and risk factors (identified by comparing PSR cases with control cases from the Massa

57 LESA approach for in-depth lipidome analysis by comparing it to conventional lipid extraction of exci

58 ify the financial value volunteers can bring by comparing their unpaid contributions with counterfact

59 ne group A Streptococcus assay was evaluated by comparing it to culture using 437 consecutive throat

60 entally verify the validity of this approach by comparing our estimates with data obtained using conf

61 We tested this widely adopted strategy by comparing predictions from modeling with data from a

62 validity of FT-PWR measurements are verified by comparing the results to data from profilometry and a

63 Moreover, by comparing these data with data from 1772 soils from t

64 al ODE models can be used in these contexts, by comparing these models with detailed reaction-transpo

65 ature of the atoms in the lattice is deduced by comparing the light scattering to determinant quantum

66 gate an assembly in any region of the genome by comparing it to different datasets and evaluating the

67 trachain coupling has also been demonstrated by comparing POMeOPT aggregates with different polymer c

68 ore used two different analytical strategies by comparing siblings with different birth-order positio

69 By comparing them with diverse bilaterian genomes, we id

70 termined the impact of this c-Jun activation by comparing C3 mice with double mutant mice, namely C3

71 thelial NO synthase activation were observed by comparing B-treated with drug-untreated failing heart

72 identify function's underlying determinants by comparing related proteins to each other.

73 By comparing wild-type NapA with engineered variants, we

74 Concurrent validity was tested by comparing scores with error counts as identified by o

75 By comparing our results with existing data for mouse li

76 By comparing these models with existing X-ray structures

77 tem features that contribute to this debate, by comparing kinetic model outputs with experimental hum

78 e demonstrate the generality of the approach by comparing our predictions to experimental data on a d

79 odel and its predictive capacity were tested by comparing programmed simulations with experimental ob

80 In this study, by comparing theoretical results with experimental data,

81 By comparing with experimental results we can rapidly es

82 elf-consistency of the model are established by comparing our results with experimentally measured vi

83 arts in Arabidopsis and validated our method by comparing transient expression with expression in sta

84 interrogate all integrated data and interact by comparing with external sequences, thus serving as an

85 Further investigation by comparing famLBL with Family-Based Association Test (

86 Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing findings with final diagnosis.

87 l positions of peaks in the photocurrent and by comparing them with first-principles calculations, we

88 oherence factor of |mu 12| >/= 0.75 is found by comparing a reconstruction with fixed support to a co

89 various clinically useful simplified methods by comparing them with full kinetic analysis.

90 methylation and expression was investigated by comparing the MeDIP data with gene expression profile

91 By comparing their ability to generate transgene-specifi

92 By comparing gene expression data with global cytosine-5

93 By comparing mice with global overexpression of Trx and

94 ovide quantitative validation of our results by comparing to gold-standard data when available.

95 the presence of hazardous contents, but also by comparing estimated exposures with health-based stand

96 ion of neural signals.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT By comparing brain tumor patients to healthy children, w

97 effective antiviral control were determined by comparing donors with high and low infection frequenc

98 Here we test this theory experimentally by comparing whether populations with histories of stron

99 predictors of newly diagnosed HIV infections by comparing newly diagnosed with HIV-negative participa

100 model to capture sequence evolution in vivo by comparing our simulated sequences to HIV-1 envelope s

101 rion validity of the Read-Right was examined by comparing it with Humphrey 10-2 and 24-2 perimetry us

102 By comparing cognitive assessments to imaging findings,

103 Our model is validated by comparing simulations to in vivo data obtained from t

104 By comparing translation regulatory divergence to inters

105 We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of IR by comparing 1 scenario with IR with 1 scenario without

106 us and examined the contribution of hepcidin by comparing wild-type (WT) to iron-depleted hepcidin-1

107 rs across multiple bromodomain families, and by comparing the results to isothermal titration calorim

108 Here, we tackle this question by comparing an enzyme with its heavy ((15)N, (13)C, (2)

109 bility influence the degree of binge-feeding by comparing field observations with laboratory experime

110 nt memory effects (DM effects) were measured by comparing ERP waveform associated with later memory b

111 ted with reduced colorectal cancer incidence by comparing highest to lowest quintiles for all indexes

112 By comparing normal B cells to malignant B cells from 26

113 fully automatic MR-based segmentation method by comparing it to manually defined sub-volumes by exper

114 at can be assigned to charge-transfer states by comparing them to marker bands of radical cation and

115 By comparing to matched germline DNA, we catalogued soma

116 By comparing images with mathematical models, we evaluat

117 ed and MU number estimates (MUNEs) were made by comparing average surface MUP with maximal electrical

118 mple recovery efficiency, etc.) were updated by comparing model predictions with measurements of B. a

119 This is confirmed by comparing our model predictions with measurements of

120 The model is validated by comparing the predicted results with measurements fro

121 By comparing the immune response to MI in mice at P1 and

122 By comparing gliding assays with microtubules polymerize

123 Construct validity was assessed by comparing Adapted Cognitive Exam with Mini-Mental Sta

124 By comparing experimental results with model predictions

125 residue to a preexisting helix were obtained by comparing the experimental results with Monte Carlo s

126 atric surgery (postoperative mothers [POMs]) by comparing them with mothers without operations (nonop

127 F-PSMA-1007 for the staging of local disease by comparing it with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and rad

128 on in biofilms during their development, and by comparing them to multiple planktonic reference state

129 By comparing the other subsets to naive and memory CD8(+

130 The performance of the VGP was evaluated by comparing the data to nearby air monitoring stations

131 explain previous solution-phase experiments by comparing them with new ultrafast transient absorptio

132 By comparing mice with no or mild (0%-5% mean necrotic a

133 training on this response were investigated by comparing musicians to non-musicians.

134 long-term musical training was investigated by comparing musicians to nonmusicians.

135 ters to changes in geometry was investigated by comparing free linear oligomers with oligomers bound

136 animal multicellularity may be reconstructed by comparing animals with one of their closest living re

137 otoreceptors in early vertebrate progenitors by comparing lamprey to other vertebrates.

138 f the retina of early vertebrate progenitors by comparing lamprey to other vertebrates.

139 By comparing the cinereous vulture to other avian genome

140 By comparing them with other functional groups of genes,

141 By comparing VAF of EZH2 with other mutation targets (CR

142 By comparing with other state-of-the-art tools (BisMark,

143 dy is to clear the clinical efficacy of SLIT by comparing with other therapies, such as subcutaneous

144 l efficacy of SLIT in the third treated year by comparing with other therapies, such as subcutaneous

145 efficacy of SLIT in the second treated year by comparing with other therapies, such as subcutaneous

146 Performance of FLULUM was evaluated by comparing it to our real-time RT-PCR influenza virus

147 By comparing the current findings with our previous resu

148 The model was validated by comparing the results with our experimental data (bas

149 ormance of multiple Web-available algorithms by comparing their predictions with our results--obtaine

150 We validate EVmutation by comparing its predictions with outcomes of high-throu

151 We evaluate the theory by comparing theoretical predictions with outputs of num

152 By comparing these ALT cells with parental telomerase po

153 h coverage short-read data and, in parallel, by comparing with parental genomes, we interrogated the

154 ative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by comparing AUS findings to pathology results.

155 tudy, we investigated the role of appraisals by comparing individuals with persistent psychotic exper

156 By comparing DOPC- with POPC-made membranes, we observed

157 The outcome evaluation was completed by comparing planned outcomes with postoperative outcome

158 ean and Indo-Pacific algal species/types and by comparing them to potential pathogens of two dominant

159 Bias was estimated for the internal models by comparing treatment effect predictions to predictions

160 The model was then quantitatively validated by comparing its results with previously published physi

161 By comparing our retinal data with previously published

162 27me3 patterns and validated the predictions by comparing with public ChIP-seq data.

163 nnections between areas of macaque neocortex by comparing its results with published data from retrog

164 Additionally, by comparing the Qbeta virion with Qbeta virus-like part

165 ese version, and evaluated usefulness of UAS by comparing with QOL score.

166 e orientation of bio-receptors was addressed by comparing sensors with randomly oriented VHH (with mu

167 we perform an initial analysis of this issue by comparing human antibody binding to red blood cells (

168 Their performance has been benchmarked by comparing structure predictions to reference secondar

169 We also confirmed these observations by comparing them to reference spectra obtained by cell

170 By comparing with reference images of bacteria observed

171 s and subsequent mass fragmentation data, or by comparing with reference substances and literature.

172 al genomic determinants of wood colonization by comparing them with related cereal pathogens.

173 f fibrosis quantification using FTIR imaging by comparing results with renal function at 3 months aft

174 ss (one minus the odds ratio of vaccination) by comparing infants with rotavirus gastroenteritis with

175 in clinically relevant experimental designs by comparing with SAMtools and GATK on whole-genome and

176 chia and Choreotrichia (class Spirotrichea), by comparing pyrosequencing to Sanger-sequenced clone li

177 r for the Dopamine D2 receptors in the brain by comparing patients diagnosed with Schizophrenia takin

178 hat predict the occurrence of hallucinations by comparing patients with schizophrenia who have experi

179 and lag of temperature records was assessed by comparing dive computers with scientific conductivity

180 the sequence specificity of the interactions by comparing adhesion sequences with scrambled peptide s

181 By comparing the sensitivity to selenomethionine of muta

182 e relative importance of these contributions by comparing Cry1Ab adsorption to seven humic substances

183 When corrected by comparing men and women with similar clinical activit

184 By comparing the mEP to simultaneously recorded single u

185 By comparing stochastic simulations with single cell rec

186 nd demonstrate the accuracy of this approach by comparing it with situations in which an analytical s

187 Additionally, by comparing with small RNA-seq data, we found 42 lncNAT

188 complex formation in solution and gas phases by comparing nonselective lipid binding with soluble and

189 By comparing our results with solvation free energies fo

190 lus timing-dependent plasticity was measured by comparing responses to sound before and after paired

191 Prevalence of TDR was assessed over time by comparing the results to SPREAD data from 2002 to 200

192 al sensor data were verified in our examples by comparing with standard lab-based measurements of sel

193 tified in solutions of sugars and vitamin C, by comparing with standards.

194 nvironments, and we benchmark these examples by comparing them to state-of-the-art commercially avail

195 CH) at hyperacute, acute and subacute stages by comparing with susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI).

196 We performed a case-control study of VE by comparing rotavirus case patients with test-negative

197 By comparing ancient sequence data to that of modern spe

198 hat is much smaller than the value predicted by comparing fitness to that of a mutation-free genotype

199 identified these remains to be those of Kent by comparing his genetic data to that of two known livin

200 The specificity of ES7 was demonstrated (1) by comparing its action with that of known inhibitors su

201 te the quantitative capabilities of our tool by comparing its performance to that of a calibrated, si

202 or specificity to simazine has been assessed by comparing its response to that of isoproturon.

203 zones (TZs) was mapped and disorder defined by comparing their actual location with that predicted b

204 likelihood of transient oral CMV infections by comparing their observed frequency to that of establi

205 By comparing these genomes to that of another filarial p

206 By comparing allele-frequency dynamics to the trajectori

207 By comparing BEESEM with the published motifs estimated

208 culated the failure potential of 283 hollows by comparing colluvium depths to the minimum (critical)

209 By comparing cultivated tissue slices with the correspon

210 st the control (0 h) and time-lapse analysis by comparing each time point with the previous one.

211 lapsed mediastinal lymphoma was investigated by comparing EBUS-TBNA diagnosis with the final diagnosi

212 Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing image results with the standard of truth (i

213 hogenesis of inhalational anthrax in rabbits by comparing infection with the Ames strain versus isoge

214 estigated human cytomegalovirus pathogenesis by comparing infection with the low-passage, endotheliot

215 evaluating the naive human pluripotent state by comparing it to the human embryo.

216 Then the laser deflection method is assessed by comparing it with the hydrophone method.

217 By comparing iterative reconstruction to the consensus o

218 he functionality of our fate model is proved by comparing our computed results with the reported scen

219 We further validated our assay by comparing our microchip results with the standard cul

220 By comparing our observations to the 10 articles and rep

221 By comparing our results to the human EBV immune respons

222 By comparing our results to the partial phase diagrams o

223 Validity was determined by comparing scoring results with the evaluations of the

224 Smo as it relates to the activation of G(i), by comparing Smo with the 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) (5-HT(

225 ication of the multiscale study is fulfilled by comparing the analytical solutions with the FEA resul

226 ctron transfer chain affects the voltammetry by comparing the data obtained with the FeFe hydrogenase

227 ee trajectories which we use as a validation by comparing the generated ones to the experimental data

228 r growth on human blood agar were identified by comparing the mutants to the parental strain.

229 GLLM is validated by comparing the present results with the existing theor

230 The accuracy of this method was confirmed by comparing the results to the co-crystal structure of

231 e performance of our technique was validated by comparing the results with the measurements obtained

232 By comparing the simulation results with the results of

233 By comparing the specific DNA with the nonspecific in un

234 ed Enrichr to analyze nine cancer cell lines by comparing their enrichment signatures to the enrichme

235 hese species during the chick-rearing period by comparing their foraging behaviors with the distribut

236 or example, juvenile songbirds learn to sing by comparing their song with the memory of a tutor song.

237 By comparing them to the reference pig assembly, we unco

238 By comparing them with the full numerical solution and M

239 By comparing these genomes with the genomes of two Late

240 By comparing this new genome to the existing D. melanoga

241 By comparing this probabilistic map to the locations of

242 ide 1-42 (Abeta42) as a function of time and by comparing to the reference methods atomic force micro

243 d the role of the LDLR in the HCV life cycle by comparing virus entry to the mechanism of lipoprotein

244 prepared and their cytotoxicity was examined by comparing with the corresponding micron-sized emulsio

245 al samples and its performance was validated by comparing with the data obtained by GC analyses of th

246 By comparing with the human genome, we not only confirm

247 By comparing with the oxidation of NiAl(110) that exhibi

248 By comparing with the protein profile obtained from the

249 equent filtering of these packing structures by comparing with the reference structures yields dozens

250 By comparing with the results of commercial equipment, w

251 By comparing with the traditional method in computationa

252 features of conjunctival tumors in children by comparing benign tumors with their malignant counterp

253 We estimated dietary niche shift by comparing island species to their mainland relatives.

254 festyle-related factors were also considered by comparing patients with their partners.

255 By comparing children with themselves over time, we over

256 By comparing the experimental spectra with theoretical c

257 enerality of these differences were assessed by comparing the responses to these CSFs, either alone o

258 captured and the concentration was predicted by comparing color values with those collected in a data

259 hylogenetic distance (MPD) among species and by comparing empirical phylogenetic distances to those b

260 computational efficiency, we evaluated this by comparing execution times with those of pRESTO, a wid

261 PBIF is typically validated by comparing its quantification results with those obtai

262 ebrafish neuroectoderm and paraxial mesoderm by comparing its results with those derived from human i

263 We estimated attributable burden by comparing observed health outcomes with those that wo

264 By comparing our findings with those of the Psychiatric

265 By comparing our results with those from previous studie

266 Tonometer skills were assessed by comparing participants' readings with those of an oph

267 By comparing results to those obtained through available

268 ic impedance cytometer (MIC) was then tested by comparing same-site measurements to those obtained wi

269 By comparing simulation results with those from a simple

270 e solution was 1.0%.The method was validated by comparing the obtained results to those provided by t

271 being cognitively resilient vs nonresilient by comparing their cognitive trajectories with those of

272 By comparing their expression with those in epithelial,

273 n factors based on average levels of service by comparing them to those reflecting a distribution of

274 By comparing these frequencies with those measured from

275 By comparing these J-couplings to those reported previou

276 By comparing these results with those from studies on le

277 , mineral water, and alcoholic beverages and by comparing with those results obtained by graphite fur

278 By comparing yapK and yapJ to three homologous genes in

279 riment 3, we examined anatomical specificity by comparing TMS over EBA with TMS over scene-selective

280 hole-genome sequencing of a HapMap trio, and by comparing lobSTR results to traditional molecular tec

281 We evaluated the quality of PPFBM by comparing it experimentally with two other systems.

282 titative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) by comparing it with two 7-day dietary records (7DDRs) o

283 These developments were assessed by comparing with two data sets on volatilization of tri

284 By comparing affected to unaffected siblings, we show th

285 a large number of potential confounders) and by comparing exposed children with unexposed siblings.

286 The role of disease process was uncovered by comparing HS-TLE to unilateral TLE with normal clinic

287 re was further validated by recovery studies by comparing with UV spectroscopic method of phytic acid

288 We tested this hypothesis by comparing lateral pulvinar to V2 and V1 to V2 project

289 We did subgroup analyses by comparing studies according to vaccine type, vaccinat

290 cond-order analytical uncertainty approaches by comparing analytical variances to variances from stat

291 By comparing structures with various crystallization con

292 f these assembly processes can be elucidated by comparing local communities to variously circumscribe

293 ish exposed to pulp and paper mill effluents by comparing effluents from countries with varying level

294 ampus were evaluated as the reference region by comparing baseline VT with VT under full blocking con

295 equencing study can gain biological insights by comparing their data with well-annotated data sets po

296 signed to examine the mechanism of allostery by comparing the degree to which opioid ligand structure

297 congruence among these three main approaches by comparing the degree to which tundra plant community

298 udy, gBcyt-regulated fusion was investigated by comparing melanoma cells infected with wild-type-like

299 ever, has not been comprehensively validated by comparing these speciation results with XANES, which

300 d the redox properties of human AIF and AMID by comparing them with yeast Ndi1, a type 2 NADH:ubiquin