ライフサイエンスコーパス: cadaveric

1 iving-donor, 11,466 living-donor, and 32,416 cadaveric).

2 ial recipient received another organ (living/cadaveric) (20.0% versus 7.9%, P<0.01).

3 We undertook nine cadaveric abdominal wall composite allograft transplants

4 illed perpendicular to the cartilage of four cadaveric acetabula (two specimens).

5 arallel histologic analysis was performed on cadaveric Achilles tendon entheses to determine whether

6 work for Organ Sharing on 19,404 first-time, cadaveric, adult liver transplantations performed in the

7 StrataGraft and cadaveric allograft were placed side by side on 15 patie

8 ay be performed with autologous fascia lata, cadaveric allograft, or permanent suture material.

9 Data on 19,706 recipients of cadaveric allografts were obtained from the United State

10 All children received cadaveric allografts with rabbit anti-human thymocyte gl

11 dy involved 39 renal transplant patients (19 cadaveric and 20 living donor).

12 overcome this problem in seven recipients (2 cadaveric and 5 living donors) by constructing third-par

13 Validation for safety and efficacy on cadaveric and clinical models is necessary.

14 cross cultured RPE cells isolated from human cadaveric and fetal eyes.

15 maturing of liver transplantation using both cadaveric and living donors has allowed better results t

16 s might be most responsible for low rates of cadaveric and living related donation among the general

17 variety of techniques has been used in both cadaveric and living related transplants in an effort to

18 ate excellent 3-year graft survival for both cadaveric and living-donor renal-transplant patients rec

19 Materials and Methods: Ten cadaveric ankle specimens were obtained and used in acco

20 In this study of five cadaveric ankles, multi-detector row CT arthrography was

21 fold, may present a new alternative to these cadaveric biologic grafts.

22 However, the use of cadaveric biologic mesh has been expensive and plagued b

23 Despite widespread application of cadaveric biologic mesh, little data exist on the superi

24 nd value-based benefit compared with porcine cadaveric biologic mesh.

25 in the last decade after the introduction of cadaveric biologic scaffolds.

26 ts were in accord with recent dissections of cadaveric brains, and analysis of postoperative VFDs and

27 Ischemia-reperfusion injury in cadaveric (CAD) kidney allografts is associated with tub

28 ared the development of CAN in recipients of cadaveric (CAD), living-related donor (LRD), and living-

29 Fresh cadaveric canine femoral condyles were subjected to 20-2

30 ells and epithelial cells were obtained from cadaveric conjunctival tissue.

31 unctival epithelial cells were isolated from cadaveric conjunctival tissues and cultured in 24-well p

32 HCEs were acquired by enzymatic digestion of cadaveric conjunctival tissues.

33 ft substitute can alleviate this reliance on cadaveric corneal graft material.

34 The TM from human cadaveric corneal rim tissue was incised using 3 instrum

35 d from corneal epithelial cells scraped from cadaveric corneas and from cultured HCECs, and RT-PCR wa

36 All epithelial tissue collected from cadaveric corneas expressed mRNA for hBD-1.

37 Participants on cadaveric courses were highly satisfied with the teachin

38 acheal transplantation has advanced from the cadaveric decellularized scaffolds initially used to tru

39 nvestigations that compared radiographic and cadaveric dissection data with respect to identifying th

40 Current ECG criteria for RVH were based on cadaveric dissection in small studies.

41 Cadaveric donation rates have remained static, whereas t

42 Cadaveric donation was uncommon from within the Asian co

43 CI, 2.19 to 4.02), allograft rejection, and cadaveric donation were independently associated with ps

44 s have resulted in the critical appraisal of cadaveric donor acceptability criteria and the gradual r

45 heart, and liver transplants that a typical cadaveric donor generates.

46 Just prior to declamping, ischemic cadaveric donor grafts had higher expression of CXCL10/I

47 Minorities wait longer for a cadaveric donor kidney transplant than whites.

48 examined as a diagnostic aid for GvHD after cadaveric donor liver transplantation.

49 Cadaveric donor livers were subjected to IP prior to ret

50 In total, 9,449 patients were included (cadaveric donor n=6,011; living donor n=3,438).

51 5-yr survival (65.9 +/- 10.7%) compared with cadaveric donor organs (34.1 +/- 9.8%; P = 0.004).

52 Human islets isolated from three cadaveric donor organs were cultured in M-SFM for 1, 3,

53 relative hazard of 3-year graft failure for cadaveric donor patients taking tacrolimus versus Neoral

54 At 3 years posttransplant, the proportion of cadaveric donor recipients experiencing all causes of gr

55 The cadaveric donor related tumor mortality rate is 0.007% (

56 t increases during reperfusion of living and cadaveric donor renal allografts.

57 This study determines whether cadaveric donor renal transplantation (CRT) can demonstr

58 PK can represent a successful alternative to cadaveric donor SPK.

59 rently severely limited by the reliance upon cadaveric donor tissue.

60 ained by metal stents, but, after failure, a cadaveric donor tracheal scaffold was decellularised.

61 antation using separate grafts from the same cadaveric donor.

62 study consisted of African Americans (71%), cadaveric donors (100%), donors aged more than 50 years

63 Analysis of human islets from cadaveric donors (age 16-70 years) was performed using g

64 Human articular chondrocytes isolated from cadaveric donors (mean +/- SD age 38 +/- 13 years) were

65 ted islets from pancreata of type 2 diabetic cadaveric donors (n = 14) and compared them with islets

66 pients of livers procured from heart-beating cadaveric donors (P=0.74, log-rank test).

67 rformed more transplantations of livers from cadaveric donors and more transplantations from living d

68 ultivated by using eyes harvested from adult cadaveric donors and were assessed by Northern blot anal

69 ncreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) from cadaveric donors has become a widely accepted therapeuti

70 However, a scarcity of cadaveric donors has led to a critical shortage of organ

71 3) Do recipients of whole pancreata from cadaveric donors have twice the amount of insulin secret

72 Presently, cadaveric donors remain the sole source of pancreatic ti

73 infused with pancreatic islets from multiple cadaveric donors simultaneously receive immunosuppressiv

74 Islets from cadaveric donors were cultured in FPCM, CM, or two-dimen

75 ed in Italy, 108 of them with organs from 59 cadaveric donors with various risk of neoplasia.

76 easing rates of renal allograft failure from cadaveric donors, independent of renal function.

77 in adverse pathophysiologic effects in many cadaveric donors, resulting in cardiovascular instabilit

78 the donor pool include expanded criteria for cadaveric donors, such as older or sicker donors and so-

79 gand (CCL2) was observed in the pancreata of cadaveric donors, suggesting that beta-cells are prone t

80 from confirmed diabetic BTBR mice and human cadaveric donors, with increased EP3 expression, PGE2 pr

81 01 for the first time exceeded the number of cadaveric donors.

82 than for those recipients receiving standard cadaveric donors.

83 nsplants of islets isolated from two to four cadaveric donors.

84 te antigen-typed allolimbal transplants from cadaveric donors.

85 Fifty consecutive liver transplants (47 cadaveric donors; 3 living donors) were analyzed.

86 Specimens from 49 cadaveric entheses were processed for histologic study,

87 s (SpA) with microanatomic studies of normal cadaveric entheses, with the aim of exploring the relati

88 on) on the surface of both porcine and human cadaveric epidermis.

89 We use cadaveric experiments and computational models to perfor

90 th ICL exposed were prepared from five human cadaveric eyes (donor ages, 69-84 years) and treated wit

91 Total RNA was isolated from TM of cadaveric eyes derived from donors with diagnosed glauco

92 re initiated from tissue isolated from human cadaveric eyes or trabeculectomy specimens.

93 Lastly, the use of cadaveric fascia lata as an alternative to polypropylene

94 al tape (n = 6), colposuspension (n = 1) and cadaveric fascia transvaginal sling (n = 1) procedure re

95 cho MR imaging of 48 lesser MTP joints of 12 cadaveric feet was performed.

96 In two cadaveric feet, the region of the lateral component of t

97 In one cadaveric femur, imaging and histologic analysis were pe

98 To test the proposed method, ten human cadaveric femurs with and without simulated defects were

99 tion in patients with RA corresponded to the cadaveric findings.

100 dy evaluates early and late risk factors for cadaveric graft loss in pediatric recipients.

101 Cadaveric graft survival rates at 2 years were 85% for g

102 ictors of renal allograft loss included HCV, cadaveric graft, PRA >20%, HLA mismatch > or =5, retrans

103 vely to 500 implantation biopsy specimens of cadaveric grafts, and death-censored graft survival was

104 rence between recipients of living donor and cadaveric grafts.

105 aft loss: age less than 6 months and reduced cadaveric grafts; and of patient loss: age less than 6 m

106 images of 22 wrists derived from fresh human cadaveric hands were obtained after tricompartmental art

107 sts rated artifacts on CT and MR images of a cadaveric head specimen with no grid, a conventional gri

108 ics board approval was not necessary because cadaveric hearts from individuals who donated their bodi

109 ensity and sprouting were also quantified in cadaveric hearts.

110 MR arthrographic images of 10 fresh human cadaveric hips were obtained by using a positioning devi

111 ARC overexpression increases IOP in perfused cadaveric human anterior segments resulting from a quali

112 Islets from healthy cadaveric human donors released HIP/PAP protein into the

113 Osteochondral cores from femoral condyles of cadaveric human donors were harvested.

114 Cadaveric human islet cells were encapsulated with algin

115 ed paclitaxel absorption and distribution in cadaveric human peripheral arteries.

116 Reconstruction using cadaveric iliac artery was successful in 19 of 21 (90%)

117 cting third-party "vascular extenders" using cadaveric iliac vessels retrieved previously and preserv

118 The full potential of cadaveric islet transplantation will only be realized by

119 Here, we probed effects of Isx on human cadaveric islets and MIN6 pancreatic beta cells.

120 Pancreas transplantation and the infusion of cadaveric islets are currently implemented clinically, b

121 However, the dearth of cadaveric islets available for transplantation hampers t

122 lternative to pancreatic progenitor cells or cadaveric islets for the treatment of diabetes.

123 diabetes, the limited availability of human cadaveric islets for transplantation will preclude its w

124 ng differentiated hESCs as an alternative to cadaveric islets for treating patients with diabetes.

125 Adult cadaveric islets were transduced with doxycycline (Dox)-

126 ng lost beta-cell mass is transplantation of cadaveric islets; however, this approach is limited by l

127 nable to corneal transplantation using human cadaveric keratoplasty techniques.

128 Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive t

129 arable or increased compared with CRT if the cadaveric kidney donor is much younger or with fewer HLA

130 2002 and August 2004, 43 dialysis dependent cadaveric kidney recipients were enrolled into a study u

131 F) occurs in 15 to 25% (range, 10 to 62%) of cadaveric kidney transplant recipients and up to 9% of l

132 One had received a cadaveric kidney transplant, one a simultaneous kidney-p

133 renal disease patients who underwent either cadaveric kidney transplantation alone or simultaneous p

134 ts of only certain sets of patients awaiting cadaveric kidney transplantation unless ECDs dramaticall

135 Eleven patients underwent simultaneous cadaveric kidney transplantation.

136 sion analysis was conducted on 19246 primary cadaveric kidney transplants during 1995 to 1998.

137 age, > or =16 yr) recipients having solitary cadaveric kidney transplants from adult donors with vali

138 short-term graft survival rate of pediatric cadaveric kidney transplants has significantly improved,

139 All cadaveric kidney transplants performed between 1994 to 1

140 nine, we reviewed our database of almost 500 cadaveric kidney transplants.

141 no significant difference between living and cadaveric kidney transplants.

142 justment for age, race, and sex, receiving a cadaveric kidney, having an estimated glomerular filtrat

143 January 1994 to December 2002, 2,597 primary cadaveric kidney-alone transplants (donor age 5-45 years

144 The authors analyzed 202 cadaveric kidney-only recipients that underwent transpla

145 ntially wait 10 or more years for a suitable cadaveric kidney.

146 rom ambulatory blood pressure and receipt of cadaveric kidney.

147 The cohort consisted of all cadaveric kidneys (n= 3,444) with reported biopsy result

148 ce (CrCl) of both discarded and transplanted cadaveric kidneys and examined their effect on graft sur

149 2.0-4.0 mm) were randomly placed in 14 human cadaveric kidneys and scanned with a 16-detector CT scan

150 for kidney transplantation, more than 10% of cadaveric kidneys are discarded each year because of mar

151 abolomic profile of HMP perfusate from human cadaveric kidneys awaiting transplantation and to identi

152 matching as a priority for the allocation of cadaveric kidneys could reduce the existing racial imbal

153 servation has greatly facilitated the use of cadaveric kidneys for transplantation but damage occurs

154 st are the primary criteria used to allocate cadaveric kidneys for transplantation in the United Stat

155 Retrospective review of 14 cadaveric kidneys imported for repeat PP at our center a

156 Perfusate of 26 transplanted cadaveric kidneys was analyzed; 19(73%) with IGF and 7(2

157 andated the national sharing of well-matched cadaveric kidneys with payback to the national pool.

158 the sole criterion for discarding recovered cadaveric kidneys.

159 t of the steadily expanding waiting list for cadaveric kidneys.

160 equal to 5 years with 69 recipients of adult cadaveric kidneys.

161 Embalmed cadaveric knees were used for the study.

162 MATERIAL/METHODS: 20 human cadaveric L3 vertebrae were included in the study.

163 dactic lectures, participating in a hands-on cadaveric laboratory, and being provided an instructiona

164 stom-made device was designed to mount human cadaveric lenses, with the zonule, ciliary body, and scl

165 H and low-dose Tac to 40 adult recipients of cadaveric liver allografts between December 2001 and Apr

166 neutrophil infiltration after reperfusion of cadaveric liver allografts.

167 etitive repopulation experiments showed that cadaveric liver cells had a repopulation capacity simila

168 Cadaveric liver transplant recipients were enrolled from

169 tional biliary surgery and at our center for cadaveric liver transplant.

170 Both liver resection (LR) and cadaveric liver transplantation (CLT) are potentially cu

171 nfused with 30 mg alemtuzumab before primary cadaveric liver transplantation and maintained afterward

172 d Network for Organ Sharing on 50,306 adult, cadaveric liver transplantations performed in the United

173 lysis on data collected prospectively of 397 cadaveric liver transplants.

174 ing donor LDL/SBT an alternative to combined cadaveric liver-small bowel transplant.

175 A patient status-postorthotopic cadaveric-liver transplant, with an uncomplicated immedi

176 antation (LDLT) is the expense compared with cadaveric-liver transplantation.

177 the comprehensive cost of LDLT with that of cadaveric-liver transplantation.

178 methods for the management of large-for-size cadaveric livers and determine the feasibility of splitt

179 Prolonged waiting times for cadaveric livers, however, may lead to dropout from the

180 tation other than those from discarded human cadaveric livers.

181 adjusting for potential confounders, DLT and cadaveric LT had a similar 5-year survival rate (59% vs

182 feasible and achieves equivalent results to cadaveric LT.

183 is more severe compared with the results of cadaveric LTx (CLTx), because the smaller sized graft in

184 Thirty-four samples of three cadaveric lumbar spines (from subjects who died at ages

185 Five cadaveric lumbar spines (mean age, 61 years +/- 11) were

186 uman small airways dissected from allogeneic cadaveric lungs.

187 ty of autologous grafts, infectious risks of cadaveric materials, and durability of synthetic substit

188 Five cadaveric (mean age, 86 years +/- 4) patellae were image

189 Ten human cadaveric menisci were imaged with high-spatial-resoluti

190 cutive contiguous group treated with porcine cadaveric mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstruction

191 (6.5% vs 23.8%; P < 0.049) than the porcine cadaveric mesh group (n = 42).

192 e analysis for infection identified: porcine cadaveric mesh odds ratio 2.82, length of stay odds rati

193 plications: drinker odds ratio 6.52, porcine cadaveric mesh odds ratio 4.03, African American odds ra

194 s ratio 1.11; and hernia recurrence: porcine cadaveric mesh odds ratio 5.18, drinker odds ratio 3.62,

195 in $9570.07 per case advantage over porcine cadaveric mesh.

196 solated from the livers of non-heart-beating cadaveric mice long after death and transplanted into fu

197 Cadaveric models currently provide the best value for tr

198 ese consisted of bench, virtual reality, and cadaveric models.

199 Biopsies were obtained from cadaveric (n=23) and living-related donor (LRD) (n=10) l

200 All children received cadaveric (n=53) or live donor (n=25) liver allografts w

201 ) matching and the development of GvHD after cadaveric OLT, we undertook a retrospective, single-cent

202 During the study period, 1522 adult cadaveric OLTs were performed, and 169 patients (13%) ha

203 50-patient, randomized, three-armed trial in cadaveric or human leukocyte antigen non-identical livin

204 pancreas donation in conjunction with either cadaveric or live donor renal transplant.

205 The frequency of DGF was evaluated in first cadaveric or living donor kidney allograft recipients (n

206 1,241 patients had received either a living, cadaveric, or combined kidney-pancreas transplant at our

207 ecimens from patients without TED as well as cadaveric orbital fat served as controls.

208 es the benefits and costs that accrue when a cadaveric organ donor is procured.

209 s obtained from pubertal and adult age group cadaveric organ donors were harvested and profiled using

210 A types on a series of 10,000 consecutive UK cadaveric organ donors.

211 ys in 50 patients with HCC transplanted with cadaveric organs during the same time period (P = 0.0001

212 Despite the acute shortage of cadaveric organs for kidney transplantation, more than 1

213 Shortage of available cadaveric organs is a significant limiting factor in liv

214 The availability of cadaveric organs is the major problem in transplantation

215 Given the scarcity of cadaveric organs, efforts are intensifying to increase t

216 iver transplantation and a limited supply of cadaveric organs, there is renewed interest in the use o

217 38-year-old male who received a simultaneous cadaveric pancreas and live donor kidney transplant.

218 nsplant is the most common approach, using a cadaveric pancreas donation in conjunction with either c

219 ase 1 was a 27-year-old female who underwent cadaveric pancreas transplant 9 months after a successfu

220 marked beta-cells were rarely found in human cadaveric pancreases but were in the range of 0.2-0.5% i

221 eatitis studies in human acini isolated from cadaveric pancreata from organ donors.

222 urative approach are an inadequate supply of cadaveric pancreata, lifelong immunosuppression, and chr

223 transplantation is an insufficient supply of cadaveric pancreata.

224 In conclusion, human cadaveric pancreatic acini maintain physiological functi

225 Twenty human cadaveric patellae were evaluated by using ultrashort-TE

226 ly infused into coronary artery walls of six cadaveric pig hearts with MR monitoring and an MR imagin

227 re was locally infused into CBD walls of six cadaveric pigs using a microporous balloon catheter.

228 reatment, typically in childhood, with human cadaveric pituitary-derived growth hormone contaminated

229 umber of liver allografts available from the cadaveric pool.

230 based artificial tears (LBAT)-were tested in cadaveric porcine eyes imaged with hand-held spectral-do

231 Cadaveric porcine eyes were pressurized and stabilized f

232 Ten cadaveric porcine eyes with exposed corneal stroma and p

233 medial and lateral equatorial regions of 60 cadaveric porcine eyes.

234 Corneas were dissected from 90 cadaveric porcine eyes.

235 e, intraretinal, and subretinal maneuvers in cadaveric porcine eyes.

236 Control subjects (n = 10) performed 5 cadaveric porcine LCs each; VR-trained subjects (n = 10)

237 The cadaveric portion of this study was approved by the inst

238 able hepatocytes also could be isolated from cadaveric primate liver (monkey and human) efficiently.

239 Fresh cadaveric rabbit eyes with intact epithelium were left f

240 LDLT and cadaveric recipient costs include medical care 90 days p

241 institution were recorded for 24 LDLT and 43 cadaveric recipients with greater than 1 year follow-up

242 Two hundred forty-six first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were enrolled, and

243 We retrospectively reviewed 145 cadaveric renal allograft recipients who received either

244 information that may aid in the selection of cadaveric renal allografts for transplantation.

245 his study is a retrospective analysis of all cadaveric renal allografts procured locally by our cente

246 8 human serum samples from patients awaiting cadaveric renal allotransplantation for reactivity again

247 ients who were administered no induction and cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) recipients who were adm

248 risk factors for DGF in adult (age >/=16 yr) cadaveric renal transplant recipients by means of a mult

249 rical cohort study was conducted of US adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients from January 1, 19

250 ween January 2001 and January 2002, 58 adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomized to

251 ative Thymoglobulin administration, in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients, is associated wit

252 of Thymoglobulin induction therapy in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients.

253 s with chronic hepatitis C virus prohibiting cadaveric renal transplantation (CRT).

254 creased patient and allograft survival after cadaveric renal transplantation and that other factors b

255 reviewed to identify all patients undergoing cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States fro

256 The median waiting times to cadaveric renal transplantation were also significantly

257 hese bioflavonoids improve early outcomes in cadaveric renal transplantation, possibly through HO-1 i

258 r prolong delayed graft function (DGF) after cadaveric renal transplantation.

259 olate mofetil (CI-free regimen) in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation.

260 idney survival results for 3642 SPK and 2374 cadaveric renal transplants (CRT) in type I diabetic pat

261 DGF) is frequently observed in recipients of cadaveric renal transplants.

262 Adult cadaveric renal-transplant recipients who received trans

263 ically strong enough to penetrate into human cadaveric sclera and that the drug coating rapidly disso

264 f diffusion were measured in strips of human cadaveric sclera for up to 1 week.

265 n, and DNA; inserted into nonpreserved human cadaveric sclera; and imaged.

266 eal transplantation, suggesting that current cadaveric screening protocols are effective in preventin

267 Four fresh cadaveric shoulder specimens (two male subjects, 40 and

268 Histologic examination and US of the cadaveric shoulders demonstrated an articular-sided fibr

269 Cadaveric specimens demonstrated fatty infiltration from

270 ies of the inferior alveolar nerve have used cadaveric specimens in small patient groups.

271 CNRs in cadaveric specimens were higher for double R-R than for

272 Sagittal MR images of 49 human calcaneus cadaveric specimens were obtained (mean age of donors, 7

273 In cadaveric specimens, MRI and histologic measurements of

274 es obtained from corresponding regions in 40 cadaveric specimens.

275 instability have been described, and recent cadaveric studies are now guiding surgical interventions

276 ility and Accountability Act-compliant human cadaveric study was approved by the Department of Anatom

277 Clinical data on patients and cadaveric subjects were reviewed.

278 rozen pancreas samples were obtained from 45 cadaveric T1D donors with disease durations ranging from

279 Absence of a bare area was noted in cadaveric tissue at the periligamentous erosion-prone re

280 ndral cores were harvested from the knees of cadaveric tissue donors and from discarded fragments fro

281 The sites of cadaveric tissue microdamage corresponded to CT-determin

282 ion coefficients between living and embalmed cadaveric tissues were within 3% for the tissues investi

283 92,053) transplant patients, followed by the cadaveric transplant ($229,449) and dialysis ($250,348)

284 atients, followed by the dialysis ($73,730), cadaveric transplant ($70,369), and living-donor transpl

285 Total mean cadaveric transplant costs (pretransplant recipient care

286 age, diabetes, higher body mass index, and a cadaveric transplant donor.

287 living-donor, laparoscopic living-donor, and cadaveric transplant patients compared with the dialysis

288 alysis of a large and modern cohort of adult cadaveric transplant recipients with DGF, induction immu

289 risk of death for patients receiving a first cadaveric transplant versus all patients on dialysis lis

290 ibodies (PRA), were more likely to receive a cadaveric transplant, and were more likely to develop de

291 g-donor transplant, living-donor transplant, cadaveric transplant, or dialysis patients.

292 m recurrence are comparable to results after cadaveric transplant.

293 rcent did not meet criteria for receipt of a cadaveric transplant; cancer, retransplantation, and acu

294 c donor nephrectomy compared with living and cadaveric transplantation and continued dialysis.

295 LDLT is a more complex procedure than cadaveric transplantation and the cost of donor evaluati

296 omprehensive cost of LDLT is 21% higher than cadaveric transplantation, although this difference is n

297 ntional open donor nephrectomy procedure and cadaveric transplantation, and it provides considerable

298 dney transplants, higher PRA, and to receive cadaveric transplants.

299 In this study, cadaveric VOCs were collected from the decomposition hea

300 Many patients on the cadaveric waiting list have a prospective live kidney do