ライフサイエンスコーパス: caecum

1 ated compared with lumenal microbiota in pig caecum.

2 s, corpus or antrum/pylorus, the duodenum or caecum.

3 hR subtype on DMV neurones projecting to the caecum.

4 eurones projecting to the fundus, antrum and caecum.

5 anti-O4 antiserum in thin sections from the caecum.

6 pus or antrum/pylorus, or to the duodenum or caecum.

7 vating submucosal neurones of the guinea-pig caecum.

8 bacteria and Lactobacilli populations in the caecum.

9 he antrum/pylorus (3/13), duodenum (4/18) or caecum (1/13) were responsive to these peptides.

10 expression is induced in vivo in the murine caecum, a tissue in which a cognate receptor of this out

11 ted to the antioxidant status improvement in caecum and also to the 1.7-fold increase in anticoagulan

12 tose diet revealed massive dilatation of the caecum and colon, consistent with severe malabsorption,

13 yrate, present in high concentrations in the caecum and colon, had effects opposite to those of aceta

14 se microbes in hindgut chambers, such as the caecum and colon.

15 e Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) in the murine caecum and for efficient and prolonged shedding of the o

16 , including propionate, are generated in the caecum and large intestine, and when absorbed may elicit

17 e longitudinal (LM) layer of isolated murine caecum and proximal colon at 35 degrees C with fluo-4 AM

18 e expected MC hyperplasia in the jejunum and caecum and reject the adult worms from the small intesti

19 .9 vs. 20.8 +/- 1.4, P = 0.04) and in colon, caecum, and rectum (average reduction close to 50%).

20 upregulated in a more posterior region - the caecum anlage.

21 significant increase in Paneth cells in the caecum, ascending, transverse and descending colon in UC

22 oride ion transport is not replicated in the caecum, but the response to low chloride in the nose is

23 um, and reducing power measured in serum and caecum by FRAP method.

24 In neurones projecting to the caecum, currents resistant to alpha-BGT were significant

25 The caecum did not respond in this way to varied Na+ intake.

26 hed in the central nervous system and midgut caecum during embryo development, and its function is di

27 shown that resistance to infection with the caecum-dwelling helminth Trichuris muris is dependent on

28 The probability of a male from one caecum fathering an offspring in the other caecum was es

29 Neurones projecting to the caecum had the largest cell volume (5238 +/- 535 microm3

30 pattern differs from that observed following caecum implantation, which invariably involves peritonea

31 nt membrane in thin sections from the murine caecum in situ.

32 contributed to colonization of the ileum and caecum in the streptomycin-pretreated mouse model of col

33 an apicomplexan parasite infecting the mouse caecum, induces IDO1 in the epithelial cells of the orga

34 nd that in explant cultures GDNF produced by caecum is sufficient to attract NC cells residing in mor

35 The results were related to mouth-to-caecum (MCTT) and large bowel transit times (LBTTs) in 4

36 with cow rumen, termite hindgut and chicken caecum metagenome.

37 etabolites, and quantify their levels in the caecum of control and germ-free mice using two independe

38 larizing current (270 pA) when compared with caecum-projecting neurones (302 +/- 22 Momega; 23.5 +/-

39 eta4 subunit, evoked significant currents in caecum-projecting neurones that were previously exposed

40 Inward rectification was present only in caecum-projecting neurones, for example.

41 , in the submucosal plexus of the guinea-pig caecum, release of noradrenaline from extrinsic nerve te

42 entration of cholesterol transporters in the caecum tissue, although no changes were observed in the

43 ement of cell density and crypt formation in caecum tissue, being indicative of colon health benefits

44 dient of decreasing Paneth cell numbers from caecum to rectum.

45 e caecum fathering an offspring in the other caecum was estimated as 0.024 (95% CI 0.003-0.077), indi

46 The caecum was unable to absorb fluid against a significant

47 eurones projecting to the fundus, antrum and caecum were 149 +/- 38 (n = 25), 115 +/- 18 (n = 29) and

48 as produced when thin sections of the murine caecum were stained with antifibronectin antiserum.