ライフサイエンスコーパス: caesarean section

1 s >90th percentile for gestational age], and caesarean section).

2 en), and delivery method (any vaginal vs all caesarean sections).

3 ncomplicated pregnancy and were delivered by Caesarean section.

4 1-/- mice die shortly after natural birth or Caesarean section.

5 d 13.8% (9.0-20.7, I(2)=84%) of deaths after caesarean section.

6 e avoidance of medically unnecessary primary caesarean section.

7 ave birth in hospital and 8% had delivery by caesarean section.

8 d to receive either TAP or sham blocks after caesarean section.

9 ted in normal healthy babies born at term by Caesarean section.

10 managing the labour of women with a previous caesarean section.

11 er of women attempting a vaginal birth after caesarean section.

12 f follow-up, only nine delivered by elective caesarean section.

13 emature, and 27% of babies were delivered by caesarean section.

14 n section, and one failed forceps leading to caesarean section.

15 llbirths among women previously delivered by caesarean section.

16 to monitor trends associated with increased caesarean sections.

17 ction of labour (1.67, 1.31-2.11; I(2)=64%), caesarean section (1.40, 1.23-1.58; I(2)=66%), any prete

18 irths in 17754 women previously delivered by caesarean section (2.39 per 10000 women per week) and 24

19 -5.36, 32/261 [12%] vs 905/13 229 [7%]), and caesarean section (3.17, 1.07-9.40, 31/350 [9%] vs 22/67

20 Median CERs of caesarean sections ($315.12 per DALY) and orthopaedic su

21 come was similar apart from a higher rate of caesarean section (73 [35.1%] vs 53 [24.0%], p=0.015) an

22 (17% vs 69%) had at least four visits), and caesarean section (8% vs 44%).

23 Delivery by Caesarean section accounted for 27% of all births and wa

24 ants who became infected, those delivered by Caesarean section acquired S. mutans 11.7 mos earlier th

25 ; 95% CI 1.01-1.11, P = 0.020) and emergency caesarean section (adjRR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09, P = 0.0

26 as 1.1 per 1000 women who had had a previous caesarean section and 0.5 per 1000 in those who had not.

27 To avoid light exposure, the Caesarean section and all subsequent feedings and proced

28 s between AA and sex, birth weight, birth by caesarean section and several maternal characteristics i

29 ellitus, hypertension disorders, delivery by caesarean section and stillbirth.

30 ration of pregnancy is maintained even after Caesarean section and, if so, to define the responsible

31 y 25 operations associated with 1 additional caesarean section, and every 50 operations associated wi

32 deliveries, a short interval since the last caesarean section, and labour induction and/or augmentat

33 g to forceps, one failed ventouse leading to caesarean section, and one failed forceps leading to cae

34 bstetric interventions (induction, prelabour caesarean section, and overall caesarean section) increa

35 Women who have previously had a caesarean section are an increasingly important determin

36 If the findings on elective caesarean section are confirmed in other studies, the ca

37 uth Asia, where skilled birth attendance and caesarean sections are much lower than that for urban bi

38 obstetric hemorrhage, preterm delivery, and caesarean section (ARs, >/=637/100 000 person-years; IRR

39 ies (95% CI 235-283), excluding cataract and caesarean sections as these were not covered under the i

40 Fetal kidneys were collected following caesarean section at 90 dG, with samples flash frozen an

41 spontaneous labour, induction of labour, or caesarean section at a later gestation).

42 fetal monkeys were delivered prematurely by Caesarean section at embryonic day 157 (E157), 8 d befor

43 Embryos obtained through Caesarean section at embryonic day 18.5 were cyanotic, s

44 vaginal instrumental delivery in theatre and caesarean section, at full dilatation.

45 However, delivery by elective caesarean section before membrane rupture was associated

46 SPT was stronger in those children born via caesarean section (c-section) vs. vaginally (OR = 0.29,

47 4%] of 622 864 facility births) did not have caesarean section capacity (primary care facilities).

48 Facilities with caesarean section capacity, particularly those with birt

49 28 (42%) of 67 allograft recipients had caesarean section compared with 16% in the normal popula

50 t clear whether IOL in women with a previous caesarean section confers the same benefits.

51 fetuses were either delivered immediately by caesarean section (control group) or exposed to 7.5 min

52 ts included a cost per operation, proxied by caesarean section cost estimates; hospital construction

53 d case selection for induction and prelabour caesarean section could also reduce caesarean section ra

54 t one third of diabetes cases and one in six Caesarean sections could be avoided in this population i

55 ours had slightly lower rates of intrapartum caesarean section (CS) (12.7% versus 13.4%, adjusted odd

56 Caesarean section delivery, antibiotic use in infancy, c

57 irths, preterm births, obstetric hemorrhage, caesarean section delivery, medical comorbidities, or a

58 transmission risk than vaginal or emergency caesarean-section delivery (odds ratio 0 [0-0.87], p=0.0

59 When delivered by Caesarean section, fasted RagA(GTP/GTP) neonates die alm

60 rtex delivery without instrumentation, 25 by caesarean section, four with forceps, 13 ventouse, 18 fa

61 examines TAP block analgesic efficacy after caesarean section in a poorly resourced setting.

62 Delivery by caesarean section in the first pregnancy could increase

63 Some centres with expertise perform the caesarean section in the radiology suite with obstetric,

64 Factors increasing the likelihood of caesarean section included maternal body-mass index grea

65 proportion of women who had previously had a caesarean section increased in moderate and low HDI coun

66 Use of induction and prelabour caesarean section increased in very high/high and low HD

67 on, prelabour caesarean section, and overall caesarean section) increased over time.

68 Moreover, caesarean section is an effective strategy for increasin

69 Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk o

70 Observationally, delivery by Caesarean section is associated with higher risk of chil

71 acenta, and fetal membranes collected during Caesarean section (n=14).

72 were trained in specialty activities such as caesarean section, ophthalmology, and anaesthesia.

73 born vaginally compared with those born via caesarean section (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.43 vs. OR

74 orbidity, even amongst women with a previous caesarean section planning a vaginal delivery, it is a r

75 ery high/high and low HDI countries, and the caesarean section rate after induction in multiparous wo

76 the relative size of each Robson group, the caesarean section rate in each Robson group, and the abs

77 n moderate and low HDI countries, as did the caesarean section rate in these women.

78 The caesarean section rate increased overall between the two

79 nce of placenta accreta is increasing as the caesarean section rate rises.

80 ve contributions made by each to the overall caesarean section rate.

81 coming more common, a sequelae to the rising caesarean section rate.

82 ncreasingly important determinant of overall caesarean section rates in countries with a moderate or

83 Caesarean section rates increased across most Robson gro

84 e average annual percentage change (AAPC) in caesarean section rates per country.

85 specific obstetric populations to changes in caesarean section rates, by using the Robson classificat

86 relabour caesarean section could also reduce caesarean section rates.

87 tifies the subpopulations driving changes in caesarean section rates.

88 undice, ten vs 12 after vaginal delivery and caesarean section, respectively).

89 For women with a previous caesarean section, risk of uterine rupture increases wit

90 ng to this model, the regular application of Caesarean sections since the mid-20th century has trigge

91 transmission rate after delivery by elective caesarean section suggest that HCV transmission occurs p

92 (170 deaths averted per $100,000 spent), and caesarean section surgery (141 deaths averted per $100,0

93 ons that avert the most cases of poverty are caesarean section surgery (98 cases averted per $100,000

94 Rates of caesarean section surgery are rising worldwide, but the

95 All nurses partook in a caesarean section surgery each, and their work processes

96 ent, malaria treatment, pneumonia treatment, caesarean section surgery, hypertension treatment, and t

97 0.9%) or cocaine (3 mg/kg) were delivered by Caesarean section, the fetal brains were dissected, and

98 difficult to test in epidemiological data on Caesarean sections, the model also implies that women bo

99 ; pinteraction with ethnicity=0.98), and for caesarean section they were 1.06 (0.97-1.16) and 1.11 (1

100 is model, we predict that the regular use of Caesarean sections throughout the last decades has led t

101 0.16 to 0.9G when fetuses were delivered by caesarean section under general anaesthesia.

102 t 31 full weeks and 5 days, and 16 h later a caesarean section was done because of abnormal cardiotoc

103 and unsupplemented nitrous oxide/oxygen for Caesarean section was first introduced 50 years ago.

104 from normal placentas delivered by elective caesarean section were cultured under normoxic condition

105 Women undergoing caesarean section were more likely to have a major haemo

106 Babies delivered by caesarean section were more likely to require admission

107 sues obtained from term, pre-labour elective Caesarean sections were exposed to receptor-independent

108 hat the observed associations of delivery by Caesarean section with childhood wheezing disorders may

109 use of interventional radiology for elective caesarean sections with suspected placenta accreta is ma