戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                                             Calculated S values were in good agreement with OLINDA/EXM 2.
2                                                     We also calculated IRs and IRRs of HZ complications by immunocompromi
3                                                     We also calculated the density of color names along the color wheel a
4 on stress, however successful fragile site repair cannot be calculated using existing techniques.
5                      None of the resting energy expenditure calculated from predictive equations showed very good agreeme
6 SI response, signal intensity ratios of a metabolic feature calculated between two samples may not reflect their real met
7                     The temperature parameter as originally calculated for the PBS was not independently associated with
8                                     Four highly sensitized (calculated panel reactive antibody [cPRA] class I and/or II >
9                                        DO fluxes at the SWI calculated from the simulated profiles with the negative-flux
10                                                    From the calculated energies of higher-order groupings of dimers disce
11                                   We found that some of the calculated structural observables, such as the relative acces
12  and nonbeating Langendorff perfusions had no effect on the calculated HBP flux at ~2.3 and 2.5 nmol/g of heart protein/m
13 inuclear NMR spectroscopy, X-ray analysis, as well as their calculated NICS values, underlining their aromatic character.
14                                To assess relative validity, calculated dietary folate intakes were compared between the M
15                            An LC50 of 7.41 x 10-4% AFFF was calculated, representing a dilution of the 3% formulation.
16                                           Cumulative BP was calculated as the area under the curve (mm Hgxyears) from bas
17 ordance between FISH and CMA among the CMA-tested cases was calculated.
18 eoperative mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was calculated in both groups.
19 ndahl-Hirschman index, a measure of market competition, was calculated.
20                                The functional component was calculated with a linear model of VF measurements over time.
21        The thermal challenge response (DeltaSBF/DeltaT) was calculated using the following formula: (SBF37-SBFBT)/(37-bas
22 rmined for each lesion, and then the mean of each group was calculated.
23                                                     HRR was calculated as the maximal HR achieved minus the HR at: 30-s (
24                      The risk of lymph node involvement was calculated using the Roach formula and compared with the PSMA
25   The enthalpy of vaporization of n-eicosane at 359.0 K was calculated to be Delta(vap)H = 91.27 +/- 0.28 kJ/mol compared
26 r layer, and the exchange of water between these layers was calculated using the van Genuchten equation.
27 nd K(app) to discriminate malignant from benign lesions was calculated, as was specificity at a sensitivity level of 100%
28  found between 5 and 400 ng/mL, and the detection limit was calculated as 22 ng/mL (n = 6) using the 3 Sb/m formula.
29 solute error in counts (manual versus automated method) was calculated and error types were categorized as false positive
30                                     Predicted morbidity was calculated using the American College of Surgeons National Su
31                                          Occupancy rate was calculated and hospitals were categorized into quartiles.
32 tions were tallied every minute and a disturbance score was calculated for each sampling period.
33 t deposition flux of 190 mug/m(2) or approximately 68 t was calculated for the sampling period from February 2018 to Janu
34                                                          We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and
35                                                          We calculated neonatal (age 0-27 days), post-neonatal (age 28-36
36  signal was determined and then TVC values (CFU/cm(2)) were calculated using the calibration equation.
37        Incremental Z-score values between -2.5 and 2.5 were calculated to establish upper and lower limits of normal.
38  were noted, and their apparent diffusion values (ADC) were calculated.
39                               Widths of tissue bridges were calculated from midsagittal T2-weighted images and compared a
40           The casewise concordance rates for mutations were calculated to assess genetic predisposition.
41                                      Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated as part of the logistic regression analysis.
42         Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters were calculated from resulting volumes.
43                                    The estimated rates were calculated by age, sex and according to the Socio-Demographic
44  percentage of the realization of mineral requirements were calculated.
45 nd relative SI changes from baseline to interval scans were calculated.
46                                        PREMM(5) scores were calculated from personal/family cancer history.
47 ies performed percentage, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.
48 ection and those requiring further inpatient treatment were calculated, and 95% binomial proportion CIs were obtained usi
49                            Intraocular pressure values were calculated from the deep learning-predicted tonometer and mir
50 tomic structures were segmented, and median R2* values were calculated in the neocortex and cortical lobes, basal ganglia