ライフサイエンスコーパス: calculus

1 and dental disease (gingivitis, plaque, and calculus).

2 4 mm) but not the more prevalent condition (calculus).

3 gingival bleeding index, and the presence of calculus.

4 ral, more cells attached to cementum than to calculus.

5 eriments were performed, both on subgingival calculus.

6 pregnant patient suspect of having a urinary calculus.

7 uli and 19 (38%) had an obstructing ureteral calculus.

8 e inferior sphere was coated with plaque and calculus.

9 , > or = 3 mm gingival recession, and dental calculus.

10 al plaque, gingival bleeding on probing, and calculus.

11 ghty-two patients each had a single ureteral calculus.

12 n a dentist infrequently and had subgingival calculus.

13 on of the disease, and extensive subgingival calculus.

14 per canine teeth scaled to remove plaque and calculus.

15 percentage of sites with only supragingival calculus.

16 gival calculus with or without supragingival calculus.

17 require basic college-level probability and calculus.

18 ules of inference akin to those of a logical calculus.

19 to navigate a more complicated public health calculus.

20 n probing, visual gingival inflammation, and calculus.

21 ets > or = 4 mm) and at least two sites with calculus.

22 sity and CAL among women without subgingival calculus.

23 cope resulted in significantly less residual calculus.

24 4.0 mm; P <0.01), and more sites with dental calculus (18.2 versus 6.4; P <0.001) than controls.

25 of the root surfaces in group 1 had residual calculus, 38.0% in group 2, and 61.0% in group 3.

26 xhibiting bleeding on probing, or plaque and calculus accumulation between HIV- and HIV+ subjects.

27 t level, bleeding on probing, and plaque and calculus accumulation.

28 n the teeth to locate supra- and subgingival calculus after extraction.

29 that showed no attachment to the subgingival calculus also had no cells attached to the adjacent ceme

30 e 2 diabetes had more supra- and subgingival calculus, an increased extent and severity of periodonta

31 ctors and effect modification by subgingival calculus and age.

32 Sites with subgingival calculus and bleeding on probing demonstrated more LCAL

33 icant effect on cLCAL/cPD, while subgingival calculus and bleeding on probing were negatively associa

34 ed with a high level of supragingival dental calculus and cigarette smoking.

35 ngival calculus and the extent of teeth with calculus and gingival bleeding.

36 med in order to assess dental plaque, dental calculus and gingival inflammation.

37 = 339) and young adults (n = 720) and dental calculus and periodontal probing depth among young adult

38 Each calculus and phlebolith along the course of the ureter w

39 Thus, elementary calculus and phylogenetics can be integrated into a pert

40 xis, which includes removal of supragingival calculus and plaque, has been shown to arrest the progre

41 n on sociodemographics, periodontal therapy, calculus and plaque, number of remaining teeth, smoking,

42 inal helical CT showed findings positive for calculus and suggestive of obstruction.

43 urea metabolism may promote the formation of calculus and that ammonia release from urea could exacer

44 of all root surfaces had detectable residual calculus and that the mean percentage of residual calcul

45 relationship between the presence of dental calculus and the extent of gingival bleeding and attachm

46 th age, as did the prevalence of subgingival calculus and the extent of teeth with calculus and gingi

47 te, characterization of ancient oral (dental calculus) and gut (coprolite) microbiota has been primar

48 mens of Neanderthal calcified dental plaque (calculus) and the characterization of regional differenc

49 es; periodontal status (bleeding on probing, calculus, and attachment loss); and OHRQoL/oral health i

50 illed Surfaces Index, gingival inflammation, calculus, and destructive periodontal disease measures.

51 The presence of gingival inflammation, calculus, and infectious dental diseases did not signifi

52 probing (BOP), visible plaque, supragingival calculus, and mean tooth loss.

53 al recession, gingival bleeding, subgingival calculus, and more teeth with total calculus than female

54 l procedures includes the removal of plaque, calculus, and perhaps contaminated cementum and dentin.

55 by changes in gingival inflammation, plaque, calculus, and stain, while changes in clinical attachmen

56 sites with gingival bleeding and subgingival calculus, and the lowest percentage of sites with only s

57 on have gingival bleeding; 97.1 million have calculus; and 58.3 million have subgingival calculus; an

58 ported no need for cleaning who did not have calculus; and NPV(Gum): proportion who self-reported no

59 self-reported the need for cleaning who had calculus; and PPV(Gum): proportion who self-reported the

60 calculus; and 58.3 million have subgingival calculus; and the corresponding percentages are 22.5%, 5

61 difficulties of the conventional variational-calculus approach prevents the numerical calculation inv

62 ith moderate to severe calculus had areas of calculus ( approximately 5 x 5 mm) delineated with small

63 e that gingival inflammation and subgingival calculus are associated with early periodontal breakdown

64 Each calculus area was treated under 2.5x magnification to th

65 There was 2.14% (P < 0.001) more residual calculus at control versus test sites.

66 l, there was 1.16% (P = 0.097) less residual calculus at test versus control sites.

67 perinephric edema at CT and a nonobstructing calculus at urography, 21 had limited edema at CT and lo

68 stically significant differences in residual calculus between groups at deeper probing depths or at s

69 ogy and elemental composition of subgingival calculus between Indo-Pakistani and Caucasian patient gr

70 cit model specification, including the kappa-calculus, BioNetGen, the Allosteric Network Compiler, an

71 ight mandibular quadrants were evaluated for calculus, bleeding on probing (BOP) and loss of gingival

72 9 to 0.75 combining proportion of teeth with calculus, bleeding, or pocket with income; number of los

73 e use of US for detecting the full extent of calculus burden was evaluated in patients with multiple

74 Current male smokers had more teeth with calculus, but the differences in plaque, tooth mobility,

75 Plaque (PI), calculus (CI), gingival (GI), and bleeding on probing (B

76 lculus removal is associated with up to >90% calculus clearance rates.

77 resulted in a greater reduction of residual calculus compared to SRP alone in multirooted teeth.

78 ing (SRP) resulted in a decrease in residual calculus compared to SRP alone.

79 eding upon probing, or extent of subgingival calculus comparing subjects assigned to protocol therapy

80 median of 89% (range, 10%-100%) of the total calculus composition.

81 There is evidence that supragingival calculus contains unmineralized channels and lacunae.

82 , and rebalancing the underlying risk/reward calculus could help keep companies engaged in making CNS

83 ries, together with high incidence of dental calculus, could be attributed to elevated oral mucosal p

84 The amount of cell attachment to calculus-covered root surfaces was quantitatively compar

85 le, were derived with adjustment for plaque, calculus, crown coverage, age, income, education, marita

86 und within cavities/lacunae in supragingival calculus cryosections.

87 Subgingival calculus demonstrated differences in morphology between

88 e free gingiva and the attached gingiva, the calculus deposition over tooth surfaces, and the subging

89 ute hand scaling to remove easily accessible calculus deposits.

90 l field theories is combined with the formal calculus developed in Frenkel, Lepowsky, and Meurman's w

91 ontal surgery, age, gender, smoking, plaque, calculus, diabetes, and antidepressant medication were n

92 a case of a vesicourachal diverticulum with calculus diagnosed by multidetector computed tomography

93 Calculus diameter ranged from 0.14 to 1.32 cm (mean, 0.3

94 Currently, the volume of calculus disease can be better quantified and somewhat q

95 gh the incidence of kidneys lost to staghorn calculus disease has decreased considerably, stone disea

96 the maximally attenuating voxel within each calculus during measurement.

97 0 Caucasian teeth had sufficient subgingival calculus for analysis.

98 lly significant differences between residual calculus for test and control teeth at shallower probing

99 ide on this process, the mechanism of dental calculus formation and prevention, and the mechanism of

100 betes was associated with significantly more calculus formation and tooth loss and an increased exten

101 inflammation, (c) caries status, (d) dental calculus formation, (e) oral mucosal pH, and (f) salivar

102 the role of oral ureolysis in dental caries, calculus formation, and periodontal diseases.

103 eptible to bacterial plaque accumulation and calculus formation, and thus at risk of developing peri-

104 ctor promoting crystal adhesion and favoring calculus formation.

105 sing teeth, full crown coverage, presence of calculus, frequency of dental visits, and dental examine

106 nd a specificity of 92% for distinguishing a calculus from a phlebolith.

107 We then apply this method to human dental calculus from Greenland's medieval Norse colonies, and r

108 ctoglobulin (BLG), preserved in human dental calculus from the Bronze Age (ca. 3000 BCE) to the prese

109 Dental calculus, gingival bleeding, and gingival recession are

110 nstrated more LCAL and PD, and supragingival calculus had an apparently protective effect.

111 xtracted human teeth with moderate to severe calculus had areas of calculus ( approximately 5 x 5 mm)

112 trast to the outcomes LCAL/PD, supragingival calculus had no significant protective effect on cLCAL/c

113 Supragingival calculus harvested from patients with moderate to severe

114 gular intervals to detect complications like calculus, hydronephrosis, etc.

115 evalence of gingival inflammation and dental calculus in adolescents with early-onset periodontitis a

116 s property, in which case numerical operator calculus in higher dimensions becomes feasible.

117 equires an appreciation of growers' decision calculus in managing disease problems and, more broadly,

118 h more efficient than HAND or US in removing calculus in moderate-deep probing depths on single-roote

119 a function of the low amount of root surface calculus in the experimental sample.

120 val recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus in United States adults, using data collected i

121 Detection threshold size for each type of calculus increased up to 1.17-fold at lower kilovolt set

122 tion of malrotation of the renal pelvis with calculus increases the risk of hematuria and/or hydronep

123 Mean calculus index (CI) scores were lower for the PB at 3 (P

124 laque index (PI); 3) gingival index (GI); 4) calculus index (CI); 5) caries index (DMFS); and 6) pres

125 All the teeth were scored by the calculus index of the periodontal disease index.

126 depth, attachment loss, bleeding on probing, calculus index, and furcation involvement were evaluated

127 cators included the gingival bleeding index, calculus index, and periodontal disease status (defined

128 gival index, probing depth, attachment loss, calculus index, plaque index, and microbial colonization

129 With the exception of the calculus indices and the incidence of cervical restorati

130 of treatment needs (CPITN) probe, debris and calculus indices were recorded per participant.

131 Supragingival plaque and calculus indices, salivary flow rates, pH, ionic and tot

132 ment was measured by percentage of remaining calculus, instrument efficiency, modified instrument eff

133 alized, severe periodontitis with plaque and calculus-laden pockets.

134 ever, no significant improvement in residual calculus levels was noted with greater experience.

135 y greater for older patients whereas BOP and calculus levels were relatively constant across age cate

136 t, since incomplete removal of supragingival calculus may expose these reservoirs of possible pathoge

137 a notch in the root at the apical extent of calculus; mechanical root planing; conditioning with cit

138 Age, calculus, NIDDM status, time to follow-up examination, a

139 ion of the region coronal to the base of the calculus notch showed evidence of regeneration (new ceme

140 roportion of teeth with pocket, bleeding, or calculus; number of DMFT; toothbrushing frequency; blood

141 ve a data-based core, which can be used as a calculus of evidence.

142 xamination of starch grains preserved in the calculus of human teeth from these sites that provides d

143 sis of the starch record entrapped in dental calculus of Mesolithic human teeth at the site of Vlasac

144 iths and starch grains recovered from dental calculus of Neanderthal skeletons from Shanidar Cave, Ir

145 In addition, the proposed calculus of revenge is less sensitive to absolute magnit

146 Methods from the geometric calculus of variations are useful for studying a number

147 g: (1) analysis of phase space geometry, (2) calculus of variations, and (3) analysis of responses to

148 The construction uses Kuperberg's calculus of webs on marked surfaces with boundary.

149 ingival fibroblast attachment to subgingival calculus on contaminated root surfaces.

150 was classified as a phlebolith or a ureteral calculus on the basis of clinical and imaging findings a

151 The residual calculus on the root surface of each tooth was measured

152 ts and percents of the surfaces covered with calculus on the scaled and unscaled teeth.

153 d t tests showed that mean percent remaining calculus on treated versus control surfaces was HAND 4.6

154 tes with gingival bleeding and supragingival calculus only and subgingival calculus with or without s

155 of human gingival fibroblasts to subgingival calculus or contaminated root surfaces.

156 bleeding (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 0.21 to 18.94), calculus (OR = 2.05; 95% CI: 0.91 to 4.61), and plaque (

157 or =10% versus <10% sites with supragingival calculus (OR = 3.6).

158 anical bowel obstruction caused by a biliary calculus originating from a bilioenteric fistula.

159 ngival bleeding (P <0.05), and supragingival calculus (P <0.0001) than normal subjects.

160 ined for individual calculi and at least one calculus per examination.

161 The mean calculus per root surface for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 3.0

162 lus and that the mean percentage of residual calculus per root surface was 4.41% following root plani

163 rectly datable and nearly ubiquitous, dental calculus permits the simultaneous investigation of patho

164 al attachment loss (CAL), pocket depth (PD), calculus, plaque, and bleeding.

165 Calculus, pocket, or bleeding presence at age 24 years s

166 ed the presence of the prevalent conditions (calculus/pockets > or = 3 mm).

167 lysis was used to determine percent residual calculus present in a masked fashion.

168 ant, photographed at 10X, and the percent of calculus present in the area of the pocket or on a compa

169 Subgingival calculus present on the 22 teeth was classified into six

170 Calcified dental plaque (dental calculus) preserves for millennia and entraps biomolecul

171 Calculus prevalence = 85%: corresponding PPV(Clean) = 88

172 arginal bleeding index, supragingival dental calculus, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level

173 gival plaque, gingival bleeding, subgingival calculus, probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL)

174 ely provides clinical benefits in plaque and calculus reduction over a manual brush even in subjects

175 ence in some domains of mathematics, such as calculus, relies on symbolic representations that are un

176 he results of this study showed that percent calculus remaining was <5% with all the instruments give

177 There were no differences in percent calculus remaining, surface roughness, or time spent amo

178 gnificant difference in the effectiveness of calculus removal between single and multiple episodes of

179 Several studies have found incomplete calculus removal during periodontal treatment with tradi

180 istically significant overall improvement in calculus removal during SRP, which was most evident in d

181 The results demonstrated effective calculus removal in all treatment groups with no differe

182 These results indicate that subgingival calculus removal in deep pockets is enhanced with short-

183 l SRP provided no significant improvement in calculus removal in multirooted molar teeth.

184 Efficient calculus removal is a primary goal in periodontal therap

185 Endoscopic renal calculus removal is associated with up to >90% calculus

186 The mean time required for clinical calculus removal was 29.7 seconds for DIs, 91.9 seconds

187 In vitro calculus removal was faster with DIs, followed by HIs an

188 d the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal with new diamond-coated ultrasonic tips

189 or the total amount of calculus removed, the calculus removed from individual surfaces, and the calcu

190 us removed from individual surfaces, and the calculus removed from various probing depth levels.

191 r results were found for the total amount of calculus removed, the calculus removed from individual s

192 DNA preserved within dental calculus represents a notable source of information abou

193 s between bone density, CAL, and subgingival calculus require further research, particularly in longi

194 al microbiome from the well-preserved dental calculus samples of four human individuals who lived dur

195 Similar results were obtained from whole calculus samples using CLSM.

196 ults of this study do not support the use of calculus scaling gel as an adjunct to root instrumentati

197 The effect of a calculus scaling gel was evaluated as an adjunct to inst

198 n gingival index (P=0.0001), and higher mean calculus score (P=0.003) were found in the transplanted

199 s < or =6 mm was significantly less residual calculus seen in roots treated with endoscopy (P = 0.020

200 urolithiasis in patients with an obstructing calculus), sensitivities of US and CT increased to 92% a

201 Calculus size based on US and CT measurements was concor

202 bacteria may be present within supragingival calculus, specifically within the internal channels and

203 ial profiles observed in four ancient dental calculus specimens previously analyzed by amplicon seque

204 Renal calculus (tau = 98.7%; kappa = 0.97) and obstructive upp

205 oth surfaces formerly covered by subgingival calculus than all other groups (P <0.001).

206 surfaces, test roots had 2.63% less residual calculus than control roots (P = 0.003), whereas test ro

207 hereas test roots had slightly more residual calculus than controls at buccal/lingual surfaces (0.36%

208 gingival calculus, and more teeth with total calculus than females.

209 antly more gingival bleeding and subgingival calculus than the controls.

210 ion over tooth surfaces, and the subgingival calculus that enables the enlargement of the gingival su

211 he detection threshold size (ie, the size of calculus that had a 50% probability of being detected) r

212 ning (SRP) in patients free of supragingival calculus, the chip was placed in target sites with PD 5

213 ots were notched at the apical extent of the calculus, the osseous defects were thoroughly debrided,

214 oking, race, education, body mass index, and calculus, there was no association between number of tee

215 Among women without subgingival calculus, there were consistent inverse associations bet

216 Among women with subgingival calculus, there were no associations between systemic BM

217 The application of differential calculus to a model of oxygen physiology of patients wit

218 ret that information through a sophisticated calculus to achieve optimum responses to any nutritional

219 lem, using this knowledge with probabilistic calculus to combine multiple lines of evidence, and mini

220 Finally, we formulate a calculus to compute on distributions that is complete fo

221 p-based harmonic analysis (e.g., convolution calculus) to deal with problems concerning the truncated

222 d at mucous membranes followed by removal of calculus using curets (full-mouth GPAP) or scaling and r

223 icated group showed significantly lower mean calculus values than the non-medicated group at both exa

224 With 3D spiral CT, calculus volumes were determined with a mean error of -4

225 Overall, the mean percentage of residual calculus was 6.3% for DIs, 5.4% for PIs, and 3.1% for HI

226 Presence or absence of subgingival calculus was a strong effect modifier.

227 The percentage of residual calculus was determined via stereomicroscopy and digital

228 Supramarginal on submarginal calculus was found only in the Indo-Pakistani group.

229 More residual calculus was found with the DIs; however, the 1% to 3% d

230 at the buccal than mesial surfaces, whereas calculus was most often present at the mesial than bucca

231 The percentage of sites with supragingival calculus was not different between the groups, but varie

232 Subgingival calculus was present in 67% of the population.

233 The Mueller calculus was used to model the polarization optics of SL

234 Subgingival calculus was zoned: coronal, mid, and apical.

235 ximal surfaces, mean differences in residual calculus were 1.30% (P <0.015) and 2.93% (P < 0.001), re

236 val recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus were assessed at the mesio-buccal and mid-bucca

237 al area treated and the area of the residual calculus were calculated using an imaging analysis progr

238 cession level, periodontal pocket depth, and calculus were made by dental examiners.

239 lap in each quadrant, subgingival plaque and calculus were removed.

240 Socioeconomic status, smoking, and dental calculus were significant risk indicators of aggressive

241 arette smoking and presence of supragingival calculus were the factors most significantly associated

242 In experiment 2, teeth with subgingival calculus were treated with DHV, VC, scaling and root pla

243 In experiment 1, teeth with subgingival calculus were treated with either doxcycycline hyclate i

244 and extent of gingival recession and dental calculus, whereas Mexican Americans had the highest prev

245 in a form allowing analysis by differential calculus, which allows broader conclusions to be drawn t

246 supragingival calculus only and subgingival calculus with or without supragingival calculus.