ライフサイエンスコーパス: carbon flux

1 which implicates these structures in marine carbon flux.

2 rpreting their global-scale implications for carbon flux.

3 ich can facilitate aggregation and stimulate carbon flux.

4 tmosphere, is the second-largest terrestrial carbon flux.

5 homeostasis in the face of large changes in carbon flux.

6 directly affect sugar signaling relative to carbon flux.

7 and an approximately 35% increase in sinking carbon flux.

8 map was used for the regional assessment of carbon flux.

9 oth leaf area and canopy phenology on tundra carbon flux.

10 that potentially represents a ~70-Gt organic carbon flux.

11 lmost completely explained this reduction in carbon flux.

12 orest management policies on regional forest carbon fluxes.

13 ibuting uncertainty to projections of global carbon fluxes.

14 ts to regional-scale models for inland water-carbon fluxes.

15 re combined with simple models for ecosystem carbon fluxes.

16 I over ketogenesis, CO2 production and total carbon flux (0.51 +/- 0.03; -1.30 +/- 0.26; 0.55 +/- 0.0

17 rlooked difference between how net and gross carbon fluxes affect the long-term carbon isotope mass b

18 echocystis endowing a non-native pathway for carbon flux amplification to isopentenyl-diphosphate (IP

19 ratio of photorespiratory to photosynthetic carbon flux and in turn adjusts stomatal conductance, ph

20 ways and the Calvin Benson cycle to increase carbon flux and redirect it towards carbon fixation.

21 pheric CO(2); hence, accurate assessments of carbon flux and storage in forests in a globally changin

22 of Ecology to examine the relative roles of carbon flux and temperature in influencing metabolic rat

23 cal vulnerability or (ii) external water and carbon fluxes and atmospheric feedbacks.

24 e sparse, resulting in high uncertainties in carbon fluxes and fluxes.

25 ical both for accurately quantifying surface carbon fluxes and for verifying the effectiveness of emi

26 measurements of passive and active cellular carbon fluxes and model simulations of these fluxes to b

27 del's ability to capture seasonal changes in carbon fluxes and outperforms acclimation of other singl

28 nces in techniques for mapping intracellular carbon fluxes and profiling global changes in enzyme exp

29 from a recently assembled global database of carbon fluxes and show that the classical view of the me

30 netics of seafloor weathering to investigate carbon fluxes and the evolution of atmospheric CO2 and o

31 ther historical reconstructions of ecosystem carbon fluxes and to a detailed carbon budget for the 19

32 l palm plantation development on land cover, carbon flux, and agrarian community lands in West Kalima

33 on the seawater carbonate system, the global carbon flux, and local ocean acidification.

34 henylalanine, leucine nitrogen flux, leucine carbon flux, and urea kinetics were quantified during a

35 Although lateral carbon fluxes are locally dominated by the imprint of me

36 During the PE phase, these carbon fluxes are reduced, and glucose also serves as an

37 tly more pronounced for boreal forests where carbon fluxes are smaller.

38 s the mechanism involved in the partition of carbon flux at the level of HS-CoA in central metabolism

39 is a homeostatic steady state for ecosystem carbon fluxes at a large scale.

40 ant implications (e.g., for global models of carbon fluxes based on relationships between leaf N and

41 equire a novel form of regulation to control carbon flux between amino acid and FA biosynthesis.

42 has implications for its role in regulating carbon flux between primary and secondary metabolism.

43 es show that, at a regional scale, simulated carbon flux between the atmosphere and vegetation can dr

44 d the basin net biome exchange (that is, the carbon flux between the non-burned forest and the atmosp

45 ent agree that climate warming will increase carbon fluxes between terrestrial ecosystems and the atm

46 ospheric CO(2) that should reflect the gross carbon fluxes between the atmosphere and terrestrial bio

47 hat post-transcriptionally regulates central carbon flux, biofilm formation and motility in E. coli.

48 is significant regional variation in aquatic carbon flux, but verify that emission across stream and

49 We propose that global regulation of central carbon flux by CsrA is an extremely important feature of

50 lakes are biogeochemical hotspots that alter carbon fluxes by sequestering particulate organic carbon

51 periment where the world ideally prices land carbon fluxes combined with biofuels (Energy+Land policy

52 d its production required severalfold higher carbon fluxes compared with NE leaves with almost zero i

53 I assembly factor candidates, and inorganic carbon flux components.

54 In total, hydrologic carbon fluxes contributed ~23 +/- 13 g C m(-2) yr(-1) to

55 The carbon flux delivered from the malic enzymes and PpsA in

56 Our ability to model global carbon fluxes depends on understanding how terrestrial c

57 How carbon flux differentially occurs in vascular plants fol

58 Our model proposes that MtdA regulates carbon flux due to differences in its kinetic properties

59 In this report, we probed carbon flux during autotrophic and mixotrophic growth of

60 flux during interglacials and a low organic carbon flux during glacial stages.

61 clic sediment deposition with a high organic carbon flux during interglacials and a low organic carbo

62 ear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to study carbon fluxes during spore germination and the metabolic

63 New calculations of carbon fluxes during the Phanerozoic eon (the past 550 m

64 did not significantly contribute to changing carbon fluxes during the studied period.

65 n leaf and wood, dominated equatorial Amazon carbon flux dynamics and were deficient or absent from c

66 s have a role as gatekeepers for terrestrial carbon fluxes, either causing its release to the atmosph

67 Such plasticity in the parasite's carbon flux enables a growth-and-survival trade-off in a

68 e uncertainty of tropical and temperate zone carbon flux estimates.

69 be resolved to have confidence in ecosystem carbon flux estimates.

70 rticulating the scales may cause substantial carbon flux estimation errors.

71 on glucose as the sole carbon source or when carbon flux exceeds the capacity of the central metaboli

72 36-110) TgCy(-1) or 65% of the total aquatic carbon flux for the conterminous United States.

73 el includes a biochemical description of the carbon fluxes for growth and polymer production, and it

74 assessment, to our knowledge, of freshwater carbon fluxes for the conterminous United States, where

75 that include both methane (CH4 ) and lateral carbon fluxes for these ecosystems are rarely available.

76 lications for future deforestation dynamics, carbon fluxes, forest fragmentation, and other ecosystem

77 an half of the entire annual fluvial organic carbon flux from all European peatlands.

78 ng cost) can only be achieved by redirecting carbon flux from central metabolism to the product-formi

79 We find that the total fluvial organic carbon flux from disturbed peat swamp forest is about 50

80 step of flavonoid biosynthesis by directing carbon flux from general phenylpropanoid metabolism to f

81 Analysis of radioisotope-labeled carbon flux from glucose to CO(2) indicates that the HMS

82 We found previously that increased carbon flux from glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) through the p

83 model system, we measured CPT I activity and carbon flux from palmitate to ketone bodies and to CO2 i

84 A major component of carbon flux from plants to soil occurs through networks

85 in a 32 per cent increase in fluvial organic carbon flux from southeast Asia--an increase that is mor

86 The net carbon flux from the atmosphere to the land was higher,

87 nhibitor, CP12, whose host homologue directs carbon flux from the Calvin cycle to the pentose phospha

88 acco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants by diverting carbon flux from the cytosolic mevalonate pathway or the

89 llets, represent primary vehicles of organic carbon flux from the surface to the deep sea.

90 oring the role of AOM in governing inorganic carbon flux from these sediments.

91 We find that carbon fluxes from a highly productive, naturally iron-f

92 Ocean are two to three times larger than the carbon fluxes from an adjacent high-nutrient, low-chloro

93 the potential effects of climate changes on carbon fluxes from carbonate-rich hardwater and saline l

94 organic carbon is responsible for the large carbon fluxes from land to water to atmosphere in the hu

95 were also sensitive to nutrient and organic carbon fluxes from lateral boundaries.

96 nin content of the fruits was not related to carbon fluxes from leaves.

97 spectively), and can be utilized to estimate carbon fluxes from remote at temperate bog ecosystems.

98 However, spatial variability in carbon fluxes from these features remains grossly unders

99 Carbon fluxes from tropical deforestation and regrowth a

100 We estimate net mean annual carbon fluxes from tropical deforestation and regrowth t

101 ospheric CO2 concentrations will affect tree carbon fluxes, generating potential feedbacks between fo

102 t approximately 100 million years, these two carbon fluxes have been modulated by the relative abunda

103 tation growth the total residual terrestrial carbon flux (i.e., the net land flux minus LUC flux) wou

104 This study proposes that carbon fluxes identified as being from land use and land

105 h AOM contributes to net dissolved inorganic carbon flux, (ii) AOM and sulfate reduction (SR) rates a

106 We conclude that central carbon flux imbalance, inhibition of amino acid uptake,

107 provide kinetic driving forces that promote carbon flux in a desirable direction.

108 ct modern patterns of forest composition and carbon flux in Amazonian forests.

109 will be used for analysis of sucrose-derived carbon flux in bacterial, fungal, plant, and animal cell

110 o the circadian regulation of photosynthetic carbon flux in CAM plants.

111 le of throttling and selectively redirecting carbon flux in Escherichia coli We anticipate this strat

112 Carbon catabolite control, which modulates carbon flux in response to environmental nutritional lev

113 t in controlling biological productivity and carbon flux in the oceans.

114 aired eddy-covariance (EC) system to measure carbon fluxes in adjacent fenced (FM) and grazed (GM) me

115 To explore grazing effects on carbon fluxes in alpine meadow ecosystems, we used a pai

116 n regulating DOM composition, reactivity and carbon fluxes in Arctic river watersheds.

117 t stand age plays a major role in regulating carbon fluxes in boreal and temperate ecosystems.

118 is information is relevant for understanding carbon fluxes in cold coastal environments and provides

119 INST-MFA) has been previously applied to map carbon fluxes in photoautotrophic bacteria, which involv

120 Earth System Models used to forecast future carbon fluxes in recent climate assessments.

121 What is the future trajectory of tundra carbon fluxes in response to climate change?

122 Carbon fluxes in subduction zones can be better constrai

123 Nitrogen, sulfur and carbon fluxes in the terrestrial subsurface are determin

124 Efforts to model climate change impacts on carbon fluxes in tropical forests have not reached a con

125 mportant role in documenting changes in land carbon flux, including those related to widespread droug

126 C, surface productivity and benthic organic carbon flux increased, and benthic oxygenation decreased

127 tmosphere and provide constraints on the net carbon flux independent from national inventories derive

128 itrogen flux substantially more than leucine carbon flux, indicating increased leucine transamination

129 Overall, carbon fluxes integrated over latitudinal zones are stro

130 n of IDH1 and, in cells with oncogenic IDH1, carbon flux into 2-HG.

131 hat HMGR and SMT1 work in concert to control carbon flux into end-product sterols and that the sterol

132 t3456 knock-out additionally greatly reduced carbon flux into fiber cells.

133 ep can thus profoundly differentially affect carbon flux into lignins in distinct anatomical regions

134 cing power in the form of NAPDH or directing carbon flux into lipid precursors.

135 One-carbon flux into methionine and S-adenosylmethionine (Ad

136 odulation of the transcriptome, with reduced carbon flux into the shikimate pathway propagating down

137 e energy status of the cells and by reducing carbon flux into the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and

138 n indicated that ADT5 preferentially affects carbon flux into the vascular bundles, whereas the adt34

139 hese changes were attributed to differential carbon flux into vascular bundles versus that into fiber

140 e atmosphere (NBE), which represents nonfire carbon fluxes into and out of biomass and soils.

141 the level of IDH activity determines whether carbon flux is directed through the glyoxylate bypass (f

142 Only one-third of this carbon flux is fixed photosynthetically, and the rest is

143 The change in carbon fluxes is another important contributing factor u

144 The carbon flux legacy of 2000-2009 outbreaks will continue

145 over ketogenesis specifically and over total carbon flux (< 0.6) are not consistent with the enzyme b

146 the interannual variability (IAV) of global carbon fluxes may be dominated by semi-arid ecosystems,

147 in conjunction with the long-term record of carbon fluxes measured at Harvard Forest.

148 e the ability of a spatially explicit canopy carbon flux model, MAESTRA, to predict eddy covariance d

149 ge new approaches for interpreting ecosystem carbon flux observations in complex terrain to quantify

150 primary production (GPP) by applying in situ carbon flux observations.

151 arding the size and distribution of regional carbon fluxes obtained using this approach, partly owing

152 y estimates, the seasonal changes in the net carbon flux of a tropical rainforest which experiences a

153 estimated contribution to the total aquatic carbon flux of between 8 and 48%, evasion estimates had

154 Changes in plant phenology affect the carbon flux of terrestrial forest ecosystems due to the

155 m respiration to seasonal changes in the net carbon flux of tropical forests remains poorly quantifie

156 Ecosystem Demography model (ED2) to predict carbon fluxes of a Puerto Rican tropical forest under re

157 ught to be the result of fluctuations in the carbon fluxes of tropical land areas.

158 ed leading to estimates of land cover change carbon fluxes of unknown precision which may undermine e

159 er the impact of respiratory and/or membrane carbon flux on sugar signaling.

160 We report annual particulate carbon fluxes out of the surface layer, at three kilomet

161 Recently, a novel pathway concept termed carbon flux paths (CFPs) was introduced and benchmarked

162 ns of relevant biogeochemical variables like carbon fluxes, pH, or marine primary productivity remain

163 een groups can substantially improve organic carbon flux predictions.

164 Photorespiratory carbon flux reaches up to a third of photosynthetic flux

165 A model describing carbon flux rerouting was formulated that (i) provides a

166 est that the extent to which fungal-mediated carbon fluxes respond to environmental change may be inf

167 In addition, different carbon fluxes responded unequally to climate variability

168 obal GPP operationally using the Southampton CARbon Flux (SCARF) model at high spatial resolution.

169 exchange diagnostic model [i.e. Southampton CARbon Flux (SCARF) model] for estimating daily gross pr

170 c respiration to accurately simulate the net carbon flux seasonal tropical forest.

171 the spatial distribution of in situ data for carbon fluxes, stocks and plant traits globally and also

172 DOC represented the largest aquatic carbon flux term (19.3 +/- 4.59 g C m(-2) yr(-1) ), foll

173 phate-dependent acetylation is a response to carbon flux that could regulate central metabolism.

174 ll bottom-up accounting of NEE (the vertical carbon flux) that is suitable for integration with atmos

175 bal regulatory circuits that control central carbon flux, the production of extracellular products, c

176 lic block at the pyruvate node, and enhanced carbon flux through both glycolysis and the tricarboxyli

177 the intracellular redox state by decreasing carbon flux through central metabolic pathways.

178 rometry proteomics measurements suggest high carbon flux through Geobacter respiratory pathways, and

179 Annual carbon flux through soil respiration is ten times greate

180 signal in a regulatory network that adjusts carbon flux through the Calvin-Benson cycle in response

181 xcess glycine is efficiently used to provide carbon flux through the citric acid cycle and maintain a

182 Inhibitors of both lactate formation and carbon flux through the Embden-Meyerhof pathway signific

183 ethylobacterium extorquens AM1 involves high carbon flux through the ethylmalonyl coenzyme A (ethylma

184 phate, a potent effector of the direction of carbon flux through the gluconeogenic and glycolytic pat

185 tructures carbohydrate metabolism by driving carbon flux through the glyoxylate shunt and gluconeogen

186 id levels, and presumably similar changes in carbon flux through the pathway.

187 ave been proposed to be key steps regulating carbon flux through the sterol biosynthesis pathway.

188 The current work explores carbon flux through these pathways, focusing primarily o

189 Therefore, the TCA cycle involves numerous carbon fluxes through central metabolism to produce redu

190 ing patterns are consistent with significant carbon fluxes through gluconeogenesis, the glyoxylate cy

191 th of upwelling may alter basic nutrient and carbon fluxes through marine food webs.

192 tope 13C-labeling technique, we analyzed the carbon fluxes through the MEP pathway and into the major

193 the phenylpropanoid pathway, which controls carbon flux to a variety of bioactive small-molecule aro

194 ith blockages in the pathway simply redirect carbon flux to atypical HCEs.

195 mbinations thereof) differentially modulated carbon flux to lignins, proteins, etc.

196 r gene, barley SUSIBA2, conferred a shift of carbon flux to SUSIBA2 rice, favouring the allocation of

197 Plant respiration constitutes a massive carbon flux to the atmosphere, and a major control on th

198 urface ocean represents 20% of total organic carbon flux to the deep ocean, which constitutes a prima

199 rtilization that results in enhanced organic carbon flux to the deep ocean.

200 Estimates of carbon flux to the deep oceans are essential for our und

201 is highly sensitive to variations in organic carbon flux to the surface shelf sediments that may lead

202 lyltransferase (CPCT) has a major control in carbon flux to this lipid.

203 Despite evidence that warming enhances carbon fluxes to and from the soil, the net global balan

204 in regulating biological dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes to the deep ocean from the organic-poor, m

205 Possibly related to this shift in one-carbon fluxes, total folate levels are doubled in yeast

206 enhancing biomass production, and rerouting carbon flux toward desirable end products.

207 tion of malonyl-CoA and efficiently redirect carbon flux toward FA biosynthesis.

208 at ADT1 suppression led to downregulation of carbon flux toward shikimic acid.

209 t NRF2 regulates miR-1 and miR-206 to direct carbon flux toward the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) a

210 the shikimate pathway, and a redirection of carbon flux toward the shikimate-derived aromatic amino

211 ffects of CidBC by redirecting intracellular carbon flux towards acetoin formation.

212 regulation could partly explain an increased carbon flux towards starch accumulation and reduced cyan

213 difficult to distinguish between air-to-sea carbon flux trends that are due to anthropogenic climate

214 en and plant starch synthesis as it controls carbon flux via its allosteric regulatory behavior.

215 distribution of periplasmic and cytoplasmic carbon fluxes was studied in glucose cultures of this ba

216 al complexation alter amino acid and organic carbon fluxes we experimented with (13)C-labelled amino

217 Also, grassland carbon fluxes were more variable due to occasional flood

218 eservoir is modern and supported by a 1 Pg/y carbon flux, which is 10 times higher than inferred from

219 Predictions of future tropical carbon fluxes will need to account for the changing comp

220 soil and accurately predict how terrestrial carbon fluxes will respond to changing climatic conditio

221 constraints to our understanding of regional carbon fluxes will therefore require improvements in tra

222 mechanistically influences plant growth and carbon flux within and across diverse ecosystems.

223 n, NE leaves drastically reduced the overall carbon flux within the MEP pathway.

224 would reduce the effect of including aquatic carbon fluxes within calculations of terrestrial NEP.

225 Currently existing uncertainties regarding carbon fluxes within terrestrial systems can be addresse