ライフサイエンスコーパス: carbon sequestration

1 etermines rates of biomass turnover and soil carbon sequestration.

2 the potential for even greater quantities of carbon sequestration.

3 a soil amendment is a potential strategy for carbon sequestration.

4 t be partially offset by increased ecosystem carbon sequestration.

5 p toward the safe implementation of geologic carbon sequestration.

6 nderestimated their contribution to European carbon sequestration.

7 ral important ecological functions including carbon sequestration.

8 te magnesium carbonates can result in stable carbon sequestration.

9 ry production, thus limiting the increase of carbon sequestration.

10 al shelves could become sites of significant carbon sequestration.

11 attractive repository for permanent geologic carbon sequestration.

12 mental safety and the efficacy of geological carbon sequestration.

13 rest species, and climate regulation through carbon sequestration.

14 major risk factor to the success of geologic carbon sequestration.

15 g, gas exchange, biological productivity and carbon sequestration.

16 reduce ecosystem productivity and associated carbon sequestration.

17 licy-making on risk associated with geologic carbon sequestration.

18 potentially reduce emissions and/or increase carbon sequestration.

19 ion for coastal cities, nutrient removal and carbon sequestration.

20 ally also on rates of primary production and carbon sequestration.

21 which land-use regimes optimize or increase carbon sequestration.

22 ble for massive nutrient transfer and global carbon sequestration.

23 ntion has been paid to the microbial role in carbon sequestration.

24 , in turn stimulating ocean productivity and carbon sequestration.

25 agriculture, ecosystem restoration, and soil-carbon sequestration.

26 composition, and ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration.

27 as water purification, flood mitigation, or carbon sequestration.

28 forestation attenuate global warming through carbon sequestration.

29 nking flux of this new production results in carbon sequestration.

30 ly through ocean fertilization, which alters carbon sequestration.

31 which in turn results in the stimulation of carbon sequestration.

32 y changes towards management of farmland for carbon sequestration.

33 greenhouse gas emissions and strategies for carbon sequestration.

34 primary production (NPP), water cycling, and carbon sequestration.

35 for carbonate mineral formation in geologic carbon sequestration.

36 lization of the oceans might increase future carbon sequestration.

37 t the negative forcing that is expected from carbon sequestration.

38 ide may represent the upper limit for forest carbon sequestration.

39 predictions of the long-term trend of global carbon sequestration.

40 from plant pathology and forest ecology, to carbon sequestration.

41 osystem services such as food production and carbon sequestration.

42 can have direct implications for atmospheric carbon sequestration.

43 est community biodiversity, composition, and carbon sequestration.

44 ion, flood mitigation, habitat provision and carbon sequestration.

45 tudied in situ, with relevance to geological carbon sequestration.

46 leakage of CO2 through caprocks in geologic carbon sequestration.

47 of plant residue and organic manure to soil carbon sequestration.

48 hese ecosystems through nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration.

49 tly in arid lands, thus may be important for carbon sequestration.

50 nderstanding of SIC dynamics and its role in carbon sequestration.

51 equipped with postcombustion CO2 capture for carbon sequestration.

52 ir blooms contributing disproportionately to carbon sequestration(1), and most phytoplankton producti

53 on reactions have important consequences for carbon sequestration: (1) CO(2) absorption by swelling c

54 on stocks not only directly through enhanced carbon sequestration (62 GtC by 2100) but also indirectl

55 n woody vegetation may be enhanced ecosystem carbon sequestration, although the responses of arid and

56 The annual carbon sequestration amount in surface soils reached 10.

57 ser (CG, Utah, USA), an established geologic carbon sequestration analogue, provides high volumes of

58 tmospheric CO(2) concentrations through soil carbon sequestration and afforestation; reducing predict

59 e potential for negative emissions from soil carbon sequestration and biochar addition to land, and a

60 Results indicate that soil carbon sequestration and biochar have useful negative em

61 e show that despite BECCS offering twice the carbon sequestration and bioenergy per unit biomass, BEB

62 he Populus-specific genes are candidates for carbon sequestration and biofuel research.

63 are of disproportionate importance to global carbon sequestration and carbon storage.

64 agricultural techniques, and better predict carbon sequestration and climate change.

65 rock formations considered for both geologic carbon sequestration and CO(2)-enhanced oil recovery ope

66 These results challenge our view of carbon sequestration and dissolution rates in the subsur

67 Their cell sizes impact carbon sequestration and energy transfer to higher troph

68 t are also essential to our understanding of carbon sequestration and exchange with the world ocean--

69 ht and precipitation leads to lower rates of carbon sequestration and favors broad-leaved deciduous t

70 ecosystem structure and function (declining carbon sequestration and forest stature).

71 These include the global public good of carbon sequestration and local and national level contri

72 otoassimilate into mannitol and glycerol for carbon sequestration and osmolyte production appear to d

73 t) contribute to plant growth, productivity, carbon sequestration and phytoremediation.

74 valuable insights linking nitrogen inputs to carbon sequestration and remobilization in terrestrial e

75 tain biochars are safe and benign for use as carbon sequestration and soil amendment.

76 concerns in the context of global change for carbon sequestration and soil health.

77 ntives designed to increase the provision of carbon sequestration and species conservation across het

78 ed with the maximum feasible combinations of carbon sequestration and species conservation on the lan

79 vation payment policies produce increases in carbon sequestration and species conservation that appro

80 e Basin, Oregon, we compare the provision of carbon sequestration and species conservation under five

81 ms in mitigating climate change by promoting carbon sequestration and storage and by buffering agains

82 ulomonas spp., a process that was coupled to carbon sequestration and storage in a curdlan-type biofi

83 ng biochar production are not compensated by carbon sequestration and that briquette making is labor-

84 Soil carbon sequestration and the conservation of existing so

85 ved in many important soil processes such as carbon sequestration and the solubility of plant nutrien

86 cean that can enhance ocean productivity and carbon sequestration and thus influence atmospheric carb

87 ily increase water supply, but does increase carbon sequestration and timber production.

88 terms of mitigating global warning (through carbon sequestration) and as a strategy to manage soil p

89 idual trapping, and safe-storage in geologic carbon sequestration, and currently is the factor impart

90 carcinogenics) linked to energy recovery and carbon sequestration, and environmental impacts worse th

91 oles of giant panda nature reserves (NRs) in carbon sequestration, and explore the co-benefits of hab

92 atersheds are primary sources of freshwater, carbon sequestration, and other ecosystem services.

93 ause they increase vegetative cover, enhance carbon sequestration, and reduce dust to other countries

94 ests such as water provision, flood control, carbon sequestration, and sources of livelihood for rura

95 T-P-X conditions likely to be encountered in carbon sequestration applications.

96 ns of disease transmission, and processes of carbon sequestration are all altered by changes in speci

97 Estimates of the magnitude of carbon sequestration are uncertain, however, depending o

98 Limitations of soil carbon sequestration as a NET centre around issues of si

99 while grazing does decrease potential future carbon sequestration as a result of lower NEP, it does n

100 are sensitive to the timing of emissions and carbon sequestration as well as the time horizon over wh

101 1) in the context of the LandCarbon national carbon sequestration assessment.

102 agricultural land and their significance for carbon sequestration at a global level, along with recen

103 Most terrestrial carbon sequestration at mid-latitudes in the Northern He

104 The rate of carbon sequestration at some mine sites appears to be li

105 ecosystem processes such as productivity or carbon sequestration because of diversity change and com

106 ime particle fluxes and fuels more efficient carbon sequestration because of low remineralization dur

107 aralleled contributions to peatland ecology, carbon sequestration, biogeochemistry, microbiome resear

108 on water use efficiency and growth enhanced carbon sequestration but did not greatly influence woody

109 well-known for their ecological functions in carbon sequestration, but complete carbon budgets that i

110 at terrestrial ecosystems can be managed for carbon sequestration, but it is not certain to what exte

111 rsion to organic farming contributes to soil carbon sequestration, but until now a comprehensive quan

112 doubles the previous estimates of deep-ocean carbon sequestration by biological processes in the Nort

113 assessments of management effects on future carbon sequestration by forests in other locations.

114 ed to be a major mechanism facilitating soil carbon sequestration by increasing carbon inputs to soil

115 Carbon sequestration by land ecosystems across the regio

116 Grazing exclusion did not increase carbon sequestration capacity for this alpine grassland

117 global change has affected food security and carbon sequestration capacity in China.

118 vegetation feedbacks of nutrient addition on carbon sequestration capacity, we investigated vegetatio

119 t tropospheric ozone may not diminish forest carbon sequestration capacity.

120 In geologic carbon sequestration, capillary pressure (Pc)-saturation

121 .70) or Class C (R(50) < 0.50) recalcitrance/carbon sequestration classes.

122 olicies aimed at increasing the provision of carbon sequestration do not necessarily increase species

123 thern Ocean, which played a critical role in carbon sequestration during glacial times.

124 as been implicated as the likely location of carbon sequestration during Pleistocene glaciations.

125 generated much concern, driving the ongoing carbon sequestration effort.

126 Carbon sequestration experiments were conducted on uncem

127 The importance of managing land to optimize carbon sequestration for climate change mitigation is wi

128 ing nutrient limitations, large increases in carbon sequestration from carbon dioxide (CO2) fertiliza

129 Carbon sequestration from large sources of fossil fuel c

130 Carbon sequestration from P. antarctica blooms may influ

131 Estimates of potential carbon sequestration from tree (15) N recovery amounted

132 ng thermal, hydrological, water quality, and carbon sequestration functions, were predicted by the fo

133 r-brine interactions in a simulated geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) environment at 100 atm of CO(

134 Geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) in deep saline aquifers resul

135 lved CO2 for leakage detection at a geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) site.

136 a major risk factor associated with geologic carbon sequestration (GCS).

137 bonate mineral precipitation during geologic carbon sequestration (GCS).

138 supercritical (sc) CO2 following geological carbon sequestration (GCS).

139 eyburn-Midale, Bass Islands, and Grand Ronde carbon sequestration geologic formations.

140 As well as enhancing food security, carbon sequestration has the potential to offset fossil

141 olubility in brine at conditions relevant to carbon sequestration (i.e., high temperature, pressure,

142 This association implies that organic carbon sequestration in a representative oil-prone black

143 lighted the importance of crop management on carbon sequestration in agricultural lands.

144 which contributed an estimated 43% of total carbon sequestration in all of China's cropland on just

145 work in which to comprehensively assess soil carbon sequestration in biochars.

146 f long-term enhancement by elevated CO(2) of carbon sequestration in biomass.

147 It appears that carbon sequestration in diverse and structurally complex

148 An unparalleled interval of carbon sequestration in Earth's history occurred during

149 oxide and ozone will impact productivity and carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems.

150 , we suggest that significant, long-term net carbon sequestration in forest soils is unlikely.

151 tion, and atmospheric pollutants will impact carbon sequestration in forested ecosystems.

152 one and methane concentrations and enhancing carbon sequestration in forests.

153 ods of apparent nutrient exhaustion enhances carbon sequestration in frontal regions of the northern

154 of land use and land use change (LULUC) and carbon sequestration in grasslands.

155 loyed in ex situ reactors or during geologic carbon sequestration in magnesium-rich formations.

156 This time lag caused net ecosystem carbon sequestration in previously warmed ecosystems to

157 Carbon sequestration in recovering forests is estimated

158 particles (NPs) under conditions specific to carbon sequestration in saline aquifers.

159 s the first step toward implementing in situ carbon sequestration in serpentinite mine tailings via m

160 Carbon sequestration in soil organic matter may moderate

161 The implications of these results for carbon sequestration in soils as a climate change mitiga

162 undant plant symbiont and a major pathway of carbon sequestration in soils.

163 such fungi contribute to soil structure and carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems.

164 uld alter productivity, marine food webs and carbon sequestration in the Arctic Ocean.

165 reases in atmospheric carbon dioxide and net carbon sequestration in the biosphere have the potential

166 ponsible for over a quarter of total organic carbon sequestration in the California Current and other

167 rface risks associated with commercial-scale carbon sequestration in the Kevin Dome, Montana.

168 The contribution of DOC to the carbon sequestration in the North Atlantic Ocean (62 Tg-

169 Linking microbial metabolomics and carbon sequestration in the ocean via refractory organic

170 implications for the potential management of carbon sequestration in the United States.

171 eakage can be eliminated by supplying forest carbon sequestration incentives to non-Annex I countries

172 major role in global primary production and carbon sequestration into the deep ocean.

173 iverse as the dynamics of disease, wildfire, carbon sequestration, invasive species, and biogeochemic

174 ce in ecosystem services of water supply and carbon sequestration is expected to intensify under high

175 tic of old-growth forests, it is likely that carbon sequestration is lower than has been inferred fro

176 ce because of higher food costs after forest carbon sequestration is promoted at a global scale.

177 the R(50), for assessing biochar quality for carbon sequestration is proposed.

178 om unconventional oil and gas development or carbon sequestration is subsurface fluid leakage in the

179 e episodic disturbances on long-term on-site carbon sequestration is unclear.

180 than previously thought and thus its role in carbon sequestration may also be underestimated.

181 ossible that increasing crop albedo and soil carbon sequestration might contribute towards mitigation

182 ies to scavengers; altered disease dynamics; carbon sequestration; modified stream morphology; and cr

183 h can have detrimental consequences for soil carbon sequestration, nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate p

184 backbone of important soil functions (e.g., carbon sequestration, nutrient and contaminant storage,

185 uctivity of AM fungi, thereby modifying soil carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling and host plant su

186 ing future patterns of primary productivity, carbon sequestration, nutrient fluxes to aquatic systems

187 The negative effects of N saturation on carbon sequestration occurred primarily in temperate for

188 d land-use change, there is a small foregone carbon sequestration of 0.2-0.4 Pg CO(2)-e by natural fo

189 e, such as temperature anomalies, on NEE and carbon sequestration of ecosystems at interannual timesc

190 sent evidence that estimates of increases in carbon sequestration of forests, which is expected to pa

191 bally, this is equivalent to a difference in carbon sequestration of more than 3 petagrams of carbon

192 toral and silvopastoral systems can increase carbon sequestration, offset greenhouse gas (GHG) emissi

193 s the capacity to alter our understanding of carbon sequestration on a global scale.

194 rather than in biogas, offering yet another carbon sequestration opportunity during biosolids handli

195 ated assessment models do not represent soil carbon sequestration or biochar.

196 (2) amplitude is attributed to reductions in carbon sequestration over North America associated with

197 f tremendous relevance to biomineralization, carbon sequestration, paleogeochemistry, and the vulnera

198 ystem functions--specifically decomposition, carbon sequestration, pollination, pest control and cult

199 cted SOC dynamics indicated that the average carbon sequestration potential across the entire region

200 in order to estimate the future soil organic carbon sequestration potential and related ecosystem ser

201 effectiveness of NT depends not only on its carbon sequestration potential but also on soil-derived

202 metric tons of stored carbon and will reduce carbon sequestration potential by 5,734-7,241 metric ton

203 Class A and Class C biochars would have carbon sequestration potential comparable to soot/graphi

204 rates geographical and climatic variation in carbon sequestration potential during forest regrowth.

205 Terrestrial carbon sequestration potential is widely considered as a

206 Consequently, ESMs overestimated the carbon sequestration potential of soils by a factor of n

207 blooms elsewhere and consequently the biotic carbon sequestration potential of the entire ocean.

208 ll wall polymer lignin affect plant fitness, carbon sequestration potential, and agro-industrial proc

209 eas Class B biochars would have intermediate carbon sequestration potential.

210 for these forests, possibly further limiting carbon sequestration potential.

211 cal recalcitrance, density and porosity) and carbon sequestration potentials of PyC materials formed

212 formed at the highest temperatures had lower carbon sequestration potentials than most slow-pyrolysis

213 analogues for each other to infer respective carbon sequestration potentials, production conditions,

214 l carbon stock for comparison with estimated carbon sequestration potentials.

215 al forest growth and expansion are important carbon sequestration processes globally.

216 g of unconventional reservoirs, and geologic carbon sequestration produces a complex geochemical sett

217 (e.g., aeolian transport) for biochar-based carbon sequestration programs.

218 ions for the Illinois Basin-Decatur Geologic Carbon Sequestration Project.

219 Research on geologic carbon sequestration raises questions about potential im

220 on using the water chemistry data produced a carbon sequestration rate of 33.34 t of C/ha per year.

221 creased soil OM accumulation, accretion, and carbon sequestration rates even with modest levels of sa

222 uggest that a warmer climate may change soil carbon sequestration rates in forest ecosystems owing to

223 Subsidizing afforestation for carbon sequestration reduced crop cover and increased na

224 dress climate change and soil degradation by carbon sequestration, reducing soil-borne greenhouse-gas

225 Groups providing decomposition and carbon sequestration remain relatively stable, as fewer

226 er conservation, ecosystem productivity, and carbon sequestration represent important components of f

227 Geologic carbon sequestration represents a promising option for c

228 Terrestrial carbon sequestration represents an important option for

229 Unintended release of CO(2) from carbon sequestration reservoirs poses a well-recognized

230 Assessments of carbon sequestration resources that have been made for N

231 and when productivity exceeds decomposition, carbon sequestration results.

232 Assessment of future carbon sequestration should consider the limitations imp

233 environmental impacts of As mobilization at carbon sequestration sites.

234 ential CO2 leakage into shallow sediments at carbon sequestration sites.

235 osystem services, including food production, carbon sequestration, soil retention, sandstorm preventi

236 Carbon sequestration strategies highlight tree plantatio

237 Novel carbon sequestration strategies such as large-scale land

238 ial to their successful deployment as a soil carbon sequestration strategy.

239 res, and ionic strengths typical of geologic carbon sequestration systems.

240 has resulted in its production and use as a carbon sequestration technique (biochar).

241 st worldwide for its potential use as both a carbon sequestration technique and soil amendment.

242 soils are widely recognized to be capable of carbon sequestration that contributes to mitigating CO2

243 urial in marine sediments more strongly than carbon sequestration through silicate weathering.

244 may serve to maximize biomass production and carbon sequestration, thus merging calls to conserve evo

245 fertility can restrain the response of wood carbon sequestration to increased atmospheric CO2.

246 indicate that the sensitivity of terrestrial carbon sequestration to mean annual temperature (T) brea

247 In this case, the positive effects of carbon sequestration to the soil and the economic value

248 munity resistance to drought via stimulating carbon sequestration, whereas neither daytime nor nightt

249 The rate of soil organic carbon sequestration with adoption of recommended techno

250 ration is thought to be mitigated in part by carbon sequestration within forest ecosystems, where car

251 of reservoirs are pressure limited, geologic carbon sequestration would require approximately twice t