ライフサイエンスコーパス: cardiac rehabilitation

1 and 42 "control" patients who did not attend cardiac rehabilitation).

2 after CABG may be improved as a function of cardiac rehabilitation.

3 men, 46% age >70 years), 55% participated in cardiac rehabilitation.

4 population and cardiac patients eligible for cardiac rehabilitation.

5 ng PCI in the United States are referred for cardiac rehabilitation.

6 ssociated with increased odds of referral to cardiac rehabilitation.

7 This issue may affect cardiac rehabilitation.

8 ay help to enhance the beneficial effects of cardiac rehabilitation.

9 benefit, utilization, and implementation of cardiac rehabilitation.

10 vised for many patients, few patients attend cardiac rehabilitation.

11 harged from these hospitals were referred to cardiac rehabilitation.

12 eferral to, enrollment in, and completion of cardiac rehabilitation.

13 Dialysis patients who received cardiac rehabilitation after CABG had a 35% reduced risk

14 Only 10% of patients received cardiac rehabilitation after CABG, compared with an esti

15 imately half of the patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation after MI.

16 f this study was to examine participation in cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction (MI)

17 Rates of referral to cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary inter

18 heart disease and heart failure, to specific cardiac rehabilitation and ET programs.

19 ve patients before and after formal phase II cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs an

20 s the effects of three-month formal phase II cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs on

21 est an additional benefit of formal phase II cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs.

22 ed physician awareness about the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation and initiatives to overcome barri

23 r myocardial infarction (ie, new users), and cardiac rehabilitation and outpatient cardiologist visit

24 Medicare claims (1998 to 2002) for CABG and cardiac rehabilitation and patient information from the

25 determine whether HRR could be improved with cardiac rehabilitation and whether it would be predictiv

26 , was a pioneer in public health cardiology, cardiac rehabilitation, and cardiac psychology.

27 eventive care, management of osteoarthritis, cardiac rehabilitation, and diabetes care.

28 o 4 basic services (family doctor, pharmacy, cardiac rehabilitation, and pathology services) when a p

29 high-dose statin at discharge, attendance at cardiac rehabilitation, and the GRACE (Global Registry o

30 Cardiac rehabilitation appears beneficial in an increasi

31 Finally, recommendations for cardiac rehabilitation are addressed.

32 Smoking cessation and participation in cardiac rehabilitation are also priorities, as are lifes

33 il elders with CVD such as multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation are being actively tested.

34 iteria were: randomised controlled trials of cardiac rehabilitation as configured for a publicly fund

35 Overall, only 40,974 (56%) were referred to cardiac rehabilitation at discharge, ranging from 53% fo

36 ers of eligible patients are not referred to cardiac rehabilitation at hospital discharge despite pro

37 Cardiac rehabilitation can promote improved survival of

38 ass surgery, or valve surgery be referred to cardiac rehabilitation, cardiac rehabilitation is underu

39 s with coronary heart disease in 3 Norwegian cardiac rehabilitation centers.

40 bilitation was Rarely Appropriate except for cardiac rehabilitation clearance for heart failure patie

41 ECG was suggested as an Appropriate test for cardiac rehabilitation clearance or for exercise prescri

42 data from 4, adding unpublished data from a cardiac rehabilitation cohort.

43 Unfortunately, cardiac rehabilitation continues to be considerably unde

44 Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after acute myocardial infar

45 Communication between cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and primary care providers (

46 A multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and risk reduction program i

47 More than 80% of patients entering cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are overweight, and >50% hav

48 Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) decreases mortality rates bu

49 ll testing is commonly performed on entry to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for its prognostic value and

50 Importance: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves survival after acut

51 Current guidelines recommend cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in medically stable outpatie

52 Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an efficacious yet underu

53 Although numerous studies have reported that cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with reduced m

54 Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is effective in prolonging s

55 Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended after coronar

56 Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended for all patie

57 Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is the standard of care for

58 This study assessed the effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on survival in a large cohor

59 Many see the broadened eligibility of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) to include heart failure wit

60 rom existing meta-analyses of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

61 facilitate an improvement in the quality of cardiac rehabilitation delivered in clinical practice.

62 ational study suggests a survival benefit of cardiac rehabilitation for dialysis patients after CABG.

63 ferral systems, and the option of home-based cardiac rehabilitation for some patients may all help to

64 Cardiac rehabilitation has been established as an effect

65 Lesser participation in cardiac rehabilitation has been reported for women and t

66 The core components of cardiac rehabilitation have been delineated in detail.

67 with coronary heart disease, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improves survival rate and has be

68 This review indicates that cardiac rehabilitation improves the quality of life for

69 lood pressure during 631 repeated visits for cardiac rehabilitation in 62 Boston residents with cardi

70 e of and factors associated with referral to cardiac rehabilitation in a national PCI cohort, and to

71 the quality of life and mortality effects of cardiac rehabilitation in older people.

72 h is supportive of the beneficial effects of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure as

73 Heart rate recovery improved after phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation in the overall cohort.

74 d with dialysis patients who did not receive cardiac rehabilitation, independent of sociodemographic

75 Inadequate reporting of cardiac rehabilitation interventions is a substantial pr

76 tematic review was to explore the effects of cardiac rehabilitation interventions on the quality of l

77 Cardiac rehabilitation is increasingly recognized as an

78 rgery be referred to cardiac rehabilitation, cardiac rehabilitation is underused.

79 ies have found that HRR can be improved with cardiac rehabilitation, it is unknown whether an improve

80 Physical domain outcomes suggest that cardiac rehabilitation may improve physical well-being a

81 The Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the American Heart Association

82 Additionally, we determined the effects of cardiac rehabilitation on HSCRP independent of statin th

83 group with normal HRR at baseline and after cardiac rehabilitation (P=0.143).

84 In cardiac rehabilitation patients, particles were associat

85 Hospitals having an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program explained only 10% of PCI

86 November 2009, who participated in a 10-week cardiac rehabilitation program following a recent (withi

87 style changes effected through a three-month cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improved nu

88 patients were enrolled in a standard 3-month cardiac rehabilitation program.

89 ing before and after completion of a phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation program.

90 ned to participate in a six-month structured cardiac-rehabilitation program (exercise group, 14 patie

91 y heart disease who are attending structured cardiac rehabilitation programmes.

92 Timely access, adherence, and efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP) are important give

93 Cardiac rehabilitation programs and increasing levels of

94 Although cardiac rehabilitation programs often contain a nutritio

95 uce HSCRP levels, the independent effects of cardiac rehabilitation programs on HSCRP are not well es

96 ndomized controlled trials of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation published until December 2013.

97 ; 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 1.26) and cardiac rehabilitation referral (rate ratio: 1.40; 95% c

98 y was to examine hospital-level variation in cardiac rehabilitation referral after PCI, coronary arte

99 We identified factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation referral at discharge and perform

100 etic treatment, smoking cessation advice, or cardiac rehabilitation referral at discharge compared wi

101 Cardiac rehabilitation referral at discharge was less pr

102 hical logistic regression for the outcome of cardiac rehabilitation referral at discharge, clustered

103 for hospital-level interventions to improve cardiac rehabilitation referral rates after PCI.

104 Cardiac rehabilitation referral rates were 59.2% and 66.

105 Cardiac rehabilitation referral rates, and patient and i

106 Efforts to improve cardiac rehabilitation referral should focus on increasi

107 Cardiac rehabilitation referral was reported in 48% (34

108 The strongest predictor of cardiac rehabilitation referral was the hospital perform

109 ermine factors independently associated with cardiac rehabilitation referral, which are currently not

110 ities were associated with decreased odds of cardiac rehabilitation referral.

111 h factors were independently associated with cardiac rehabilitation referral.

112 Medical directors of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention (CR/SP) prog

113 Pulmonary Rehabilitation recognize that all cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs sho

114 d outcomes in each of the core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs, in

115 ubstantial morbidity and mortality benefits, cardiac rehabilitation services are vastly underutilized

116 5+ were significantly less likely to receive cardiac rehabilitation services.

117 161 elderly patients who attended at least 1 cardiac rehabilitation session between January 1, 2000,

118 e relationship existed between the number of cardiac rehabilitation sessions and long-term outcomes.

119 utive patients with CHD who were referred to cardiac rehabilitation, stratified as Low (</=25% in men

120 imited insurance coverage for HF patients in cardiac rehabilitation, tailoring of exercise programs t

121 lockade and an exercise prescription through cardiac rehabilitation to further improve and sustain cl

122 Cardiac rehabilitation was defined by Current Procedural

123 e prescription or prior to the initiation of cardiac rehabilitation was Rarely Appropriate except for

124 sits after discharge and who participated in cardiac rehabilitation were more likely to take high-int

125 ns unclear, both exercise and multifactorial cardiac rehabilitation with psychosocial interventions h

126 iplatelet agent prescriptions, and attending cardiac rehabilitation within 30 days following discharg