ライフサイエンスコーパス: cardiologist

1 gy and critical care medicine ("dual-boarded cardiologists").

2 toring, which are relevant to the practicing cardiologist.

3 m the perspective of the consulting clinical cardiologist.

4 soon be relevant for the clinical pediatric cardiologist.

5 ith reduced ejection fraction diagnosed by a cardiologist.

6 of stable angina on initial assessment by a cardiologist.

7 CU admissions were treated by a dual-boarded cardiologist.

8 by a cardiac physiologist and/or consultant cardiologist.

9 ased management for both the patient and the cardiologist.

10 otocols were adopted by only 42% of surveyed cardiologist.

11 be managed by or with the assistance of ACHD cardiologists.

12 h were retrospectively assigned by 2 blinded cardiologists.

13 rization were seen among patients treated by cardiologists.

14 as not discussed with any patients by 71% of cardiologists.

15 adulthood and come to the attention of adult cardiologists.

16 epresent a challenge for rheumatologists and cardiologists.

17 l diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists.

18 final diagnosis adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists.

19 composed of six independent oncologists and cardiologists.

20 nue to be provided by general internists and cardiologists.

21 onsisting of anesthesiologists, surgeons and cardiologists.

22 sease continue to be a common occurrence for cardiologists.

23 community health centers have less access to cardiologists.

24 ) continues to be vigorously debated amongst cardiologists.

25 s, interventional radiologists, and invasive cardiologists.

26 %, continues to be a therapeutic dilemma for cardiologists.

27 d 200 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 100 cardiologists.

28 nical trials were available for all academic cardiologists.

29 ote and support the training of dual-boarded cardiologists.

30 rdiac ICU admissions treated by dual-boarded cardiologists.

31 independent, blinded gastroenterologists and cardiologists.

32 propriate TTEs ordered by attending academic cardiologists.

33 ing of outpatient TTEs by attending academic cardiologists.

34 nts were independently adjudicated by masked cardiologists.

35 and alterations to the training pathway for cardiologists.

36 ions independently classified by experienced cardiologists.

37 sted analyses (RR for nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.91-0.95]; RR for thoracic

38 elative risk [RR] for nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 1.11 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.01-

39 Among 473 dual-boarded cardiologists, 16 (3.4%) were women; 468 (99%) and 85 (1

40 ts, 24,399 (21.9%) by nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 1862 (1.7%) by thoracic surgeons, and 617

41 using a standardized data collection form, 3 cardiologists (2 interventional, H.S.G. and D.S.M.; 1 no

42 ition of categories of early career academic cardiologists; 2) general challenges to all categories a

43 Overall, 98 dual-boarded cardiologists (21%) submitted 1,215 total claims for cri

44 CI, 24.2%-25.3%] for nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists; 36.1% [95% CI, 34.3%-38.0%] for thoracic

45 , 3.5% [2743/78,857]; nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 4.0% [970/24,399]; thoracic surgeons, 5.8

46 767 included patients, 17% were evaluated by cardiologists, 58% were evaluated by PCPs alone, and 25%

47 (9.2% versus 10.6%; P<0.001) and weakest for cardiologists (6.4% versus 6.7%; P=0.485).

48 aculty appointments in 2014 (13.3% of all US cardiologists), 630 (16.5%) were women.

49 3.1% [21 303/25,635]; nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 75.8% [5950/7849]; thoracic surgeons, 57.

50 fessional Life Survey was completed by 2,313 cardiologists: 964 women (42%) and 1,349 men (58%).

51 es pediatric cardiologists, adult congenital cardiologists, a cardiac care associate, and a fellow-in

52 iographic examination, reviewed by an expert cardiologist, according to 2012 World Heart Federation c

53 the AC/PC Council, which includes pediatric cardiologists, adult congenital cardiologists, a cardiac

54 g a comprehensive, contemporary cohort of US cardiologists after adjustment for several factors that

55 The cardiologist agreed with the computer interpretation in

56 itivity to confidently rule-out AMI, whereas cardiologists aim to minimize false-positive results.

57 Interventional cardiologists also reported beliefs for study patients w

58 minutes) (19.3 minutes), having an attending cardiologist always on site (14.6 minutes), and having s

59 SMR lower by 0.70 percentage points), having cardiologists always on site (lower by 0.54 percentage p

60 t devices as well as the American College of Cardiologists/American Heart Association guidelines on p

61 This paper summarizes a discussion between a cardiologist and an internist about how each clinician w

62 ose of this study is to update the perinatal cardiologist and obstetrical care provider on the presen

63 and postdischarge collaborative care with a cardiologist and primary care physician (AMI and CHF coh

64 rioperative communication with the patient's cardiologist and surgeon is critical in reducing adverse

65 e the exclusive domain of the interventional cardiologist and the coronary circulation, now in 2001 n

66 a, we tested associations between density of cardiologists and 30-day and 1-year mortality for each c

67 Twenty-one cardiologists and 66 of their outpatients 18 years and o

68 comes a growing need for intensivist-trained cardiologists and a push for the development of critical

69 of patients for cardiac surgery, surveys of cardiologists and analysis of market share data indicate

70 articular, will require the collaboration of cardiologists and cardiac surgeons in centers with excel

71 believe that by utilizing these parameters, cardiologists and cardiac surgeons will be offered a bet

72 es were reviewed by a team of interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons within 72 hours of an

73 s, and endocrinologists, in conjunction with cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons.

74 as confirmed by 2 experienced interventional cardiologists and categorized as type 1 (multiple lumen)

75 xposed personnel included 218 interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists (168 males; 46+/-

76 litates direct communication between offsite cardiologists and EMS personnel, allowing for patient tr

77 ient participation and collaboration between cardiologists and gastroenterologists.

78 eater interaction between diabetologists and cardiologists and highlighted more strongly the relevanc

79 is the most common arrhythmia encountered by cardiologists and is a major cause of morbidity and mort

80 y to remain a significant challenge for both cardiologists and oncologists in the future due to an in

81 s and Relevance: Close collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists is required to meet the de

82 opportunity for closer collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists to study the cardiovascula

83 terms of race, ethnicity, age, and sex, many cardiologists and other health care providers are unawar

84 and the tools that will be made available to cardiologists and others treating cardiovascular disease

85 ge of medical personnel, including pediatric cardiologists and pediatricians, adult cardiologists, in

86 IV-infected patients is a challenge for both cardiologists and physicians involved in HIV care.

87 The authors randomized cardiologists and primary care providers to receive eith

88 l intervention on outpatient TTE ordering by cardiologists and primary care providers.

89 Both surgeons and interventionalists (cardiologists and radiologists) are involved in endovasc

90 the relationship between regional density of cardiologists and risk of death after hospitalization fo

91 results were shared at meetings attended by cardiologists and sonographers.

92 ures demand increasing collaboration between cardiologists and surgeons in order to achieve optimal o

93 s require specialized care and there are few cardiologists and surgeons, as well as other subspeciali

94 C) ratings among a broad range of practicing cardiologists and the AUC Technical Panel.

95 fession regarding the plight of early career cardiologists and to suggest possible solutions.

96 Association class III or IV, confirmed by a cardiologist, and a significant LVEF drop, or death of d

97 reful discussion with the patient, referring cardiologist, and cardiac surgeon.

98 es available to the pediatric interventional cardiologist, and to review the outcomes from past endea

99 (2) change in market share for hospitals and cardiologists, and (3) proportion of physicians leaving

100 rships between primary care physicians,adult cardiologists, and ACHD specialists to provide optimal c

101 ialists, including non-invasive and invasive cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons), who carefully judg

102 2.4%, and 67.0% for primary care physicians, cardiologists, and electrophysiologists, respectively; P

103 ltidisciplinary teams of interventionalists, cardiologists, and geneticists in tertiary centers with

104 o practice in academic centers, be pediatric cardiologists, and have a noninvasive subspecialty.

105 with congenitally-trained cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, and other medical subspecialists are requ

106 be feasible to improve TTE utilization among cardiologists, and this type of intervention warrants st

107 between pharmacist and primary care provider/cardiologist; and (4) 2 types of voice messaging (educat

108 device diagnostic evaluations by nurses and cardiologists; and (2) selected decisional trees.

109 Dual-boarded cardiologists appear to deliver a small proportion of al

110 act on patient care and it is important that cardiologists appreciate the value and approaches to ass

111 Cardiologists are distributed unevenly across regions of

112 Interventional cardiologists are increasingly exposed to radiation-indu

113 hildren with Kawasaki disease grow up, adult cardiologists are likely to see increasing numbers of th

114 Given that most female cardiologists are pregnant at some point during their ca

115 Although cardiologists are the primary source of referral of pati

116 espiratory function has long been applied by cardiologists as a measure of function that depended pri

117 exercise present distinct challenges to the cardiologist asked to evaluate athletes.

118 Early cardiologist assessment and assistance with triage was e

119 We examined the quality performance of 351 cardiologists at 48 hospitals in New York State, using p

120 ssor of Medicine, University of Sydney and a Cardiologist, at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, all based

121 up of 15 centers (the ANGELS of AF centers), cardiologists attending to follow-up visits were supplie

122 Patients' and cardiologists' beliefs about benefits of PCI.

123 Cardiologists' beliefs about PCI reflect trial results,

124 For the scenarios, 63% of cardiologists believed that the benefits of PCI were lim

125 ms as analyzed by independent interventional cardiologists blinded for clinical data.

126 diagnoses were adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists blinded to copeptin results.

127 f aneurysms and coronary artery disease by 2 cardiologists blinded to the history.

128 Scans were performed by experienced nuclear cardiologists blinded to the subjects' cohort assignment

129 ve of myocardial infarction by 2 independent cardiologists by 2 1 method required the presence of cor

130 emphasis on how such differentiation by the cardiologist can result in increased rate of mitral valv

131 ood Institute (NHLBI) convened a workshop of cardiologists, cardiac electrophysiologists, cell biophy

132 ging experts, MV surgeons and interventional cardiologists, clinical trial specialists and statistici

133 ibe the working activities and pay of female cardiologists compared with their male colleagues and to

134 Many cardiologists consider it reasonable to assume in clinic

135 Many cardiologists consider it reasonable to assume that PCI

136 Early career academic cardiologists currently face unprecedented challenges th

137 More and more, cardiologists' decisions are based on images created fro

138 The cardiologist disagreed with the computer interpretation

139 We defined density as the number of cardiologists divided by population aged>/=65 years with

140 performed at the discretion of the invasive cardiologist during cardiac catheterization.

141 ute heart failure and included heart failure cardiologists, emergency physicians, laboratory medicine

142 Cardiologists encounter depression among 25-30% of their

143 Results: Of the 66 cardiologists enrolled in the study, 65 were included in

144 s view, how should the prudent, cutting edge cardiologist evaluate the data and manage their patients

145 Medical Imaging Division convene a panel of cardiologists experienced in a variety of imaging modali

146 AMI and HF in regions with a low density of cardiologists experienced modestly higher 30-day and 1-y

147 After adjustment, cardiologist follow-up was associated with significantly

148 ther evaluated by a blinded, board-certified cardiologist for agreement or disagreement with the inte

149 ecommended by the catheterization laboratory cardiologist for patients undergoing catheterization wit

150 ces the options available to the surgeon and cardiologist for patients with complex coronary artery d

151 Older athletes will approach clinical cardiologists for advice regarding their fitness for par

152 ts ECGs simultaneously to the ED and offsite cardiologists for the early evaluation and triage of pat

153 Before AUC publication, 85 cardiologists from 10 U.S. institutions assessed the app

154 Data regarding cardiologists from 161 U.S. practices were included, and

155 The management of heart failure by cardiologists has recently expanded from pharmacological

156 Interventional cardiologists have quickly replaced bare metal stents wi

157 known whether patients in regions with fewer cardiologists have worse outcomes after hospitalization

158 that combines expertise from interventional cardiologists, heart failure specialists, cardiac surgeo

159 eral research articles (143 vs 100) than did cardiologists; however, cardiologists published more cas

160 geons, interventional and non-interventional cardiologists, imaging specialists, neurologists, geriat

161 singly recognizing the important role of the cardiologist in making the diagnosis.

162 A survey of New York cardiologists in 1996 found that these report cards had

163 one-third of patients followed routinely by cardiologists in clinic have suboptimally controlled BP,

164 as radiologists wrote more articles than did cardiologists in Germany (126 vs 53) and The Netherlands

165 Catheterization laboratory cardiologists in hospitals with PCI capability were more

166 We surveyed cardiologists in New York State in 2011 to determine the

167 ss of cardiac surgeon report cards, in 2011, cardiologists in New York State made little use of this

168 tionnaire was administered to interventional cardiologists in NYS with specific emphasis on how modif

169 likely to remain a significant challenge for cardiologists in the future because the patient populati

170 Dopamine was preferentially selected by cardiologists, in the Southern United States, at nonteac

171 is 10-year period, the number of claims from cardiologists increased 44% (from 2082-2997 per 1000 ben

172 The majority of interventional cardiologists indicated that the exclusion of patients w

173 docarditis team, including cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, infectious diseases specialists, neurolog

174 e, nurturing the development of early-career cardiologists interested in global health is essential t

175 scular Exchange Database, a new resource for cardiologists interested in pursuing short-term clinical

176 y was to assess how general and subspecialty cardiologists, internists, gastroenterologists, and orth

177 atric cardiologists and pediatricians, adult cardiologists, internists, obstetricians, nurses, and th

178 n is increasingly performed by intensivists, cardiologists, interventional radiologists, and related

179 cal history or family history, referral to a cardiologist is indicated.

180 Now, his cardiologist is moving and Mr A must select a new physic

181 ew era in collaboration between surgeons and cardiologists is discussed and the potential role of the

182 ased risk and require long-term follow-up by cardiologists knowledgeable about management issues in t

183 warrant adequate understanding by practicing cardiologists: long QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polym

184 Both radiologists and cardiologists make important contributions; however, con

185 ular or noncardiovascular by a panel of WISE cardiologists masked to angiographic data.

186 Although some assume that a cardiologist may instinctively cultivate some of these s

187 four-dimensional imaging that the pediatric cardiologist may not be exposed to in the clinical envir

188 Cardiologists may also refer women to evidence-based com

189 Consultation with cardiologists may improve the quality of ambulatory care

190 ce of pregnancy and early parenthood for all cardiologists may secure the best possible candidates to

191 cancer therapy, the team of oncologists and cardiologists must be better equipped with an evidence-b

192 Interventional cardiologists (n = 20) participating in the Emory NeuroA

193 Cardiologists need to understand emerging payment models

194 Cardiologists need to understand the risks and therapeut

195 Improvement was seen in mean door-to-cardiologist notification (-14.6 vs. 61.4 min, p < 0.001

196 id having the angiogram by an interventional cardiologist (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval,

197 Image quality was assessed by two cardiologists on a four-point scale.

198 with hyperlipidemia and those cared for by a cardiologist or cared for in a teaching hospital were mo

199 vascular disease (P<0.01), prescription by a cardiologist or nonprimary care provider (P<0.01), stati

200 s implanted by either nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists or thoracic surgeons were at increased ris

201 tiary centers were more often consulted by a cardiologist (OR, 8.6 [5.0-15]), had an echocardiography

202 nch block, definite STEMI (according to both cardiologists) or an ambiguous reading.

203 Most of the growth in services provided by cardiologists over the past decade is the result of incr

204 d among cardiology trainees and early-career cardiologists over the past decade.

205 Only 22% of PCPs and 42% of cardiologists (p = 0.0477) felt extremely well prepared

206 Early payment reforms were voluntary and cardiologists' participation is variable.

207 ential confounding between physician groups (cardiologist, PCP, or none).

208 sease (ACHD) care, as perceived by pediatric cardiologists (PCs).

209 se mix (11%, 15%, and 18%) and the number of cardiologists per capita (12%, 14%, and 15%).

210 died in hospitals and in counties with more cardiologists per capita were more likely to be assigned

211 me of death, reflected by place of death and cardiologists per capita, reduces the use of the ill-def

212 e community-level variable was the number of cardiologists per capita.

213 Cardiac anesthesiologists or cardiologists perform these examinations, facilitating s

214 ing payment and delivery reforms that affect cardiologists, present 4 emerging examples, and consider

215 g the development process from radiologists, cardiologists, primary care physicians, and other stakeh

216 s view, how should the prudent, cutting-edge cardiologist proceed?

217 143 vs 100) than did cardiologists; however, cardiologists published more case reports (50 vs 29) and

218 of the genotype-positive family members, the cardiologist queries a database for current knowledge on

219 The cardiologists rated 256 (64%) of 400 nuclear stress test

220 Interventional cardiologists receive one of the highest levels of annua

221 The influence of the report cards on cardiologists' referral decisions was limited, with 25%

222 These findings help surgeons and cardiologists refine the indications, timing, prognostic

223 mber of recommendations to both surgeons and cardiologists regarding use of the RA in cardiovascular

224 sts that the status of early-career academic cardiologists remains challenging; therefore, the author

225 an intervention is successful with attending cardiologists remains unknown.

226 All cardiologists reported beliefs about PCI for patients in

227 referral decisions was limited, with 25% of cardiologists reporting a moderate or substantial influe

228 The mean age of cardiologists reporting moderate or substantial influenc

229 Services provided by cardiologists represent a major portion of Medicare expe

230 ere included in the analysis (1 intervention cardiologist retired from practice during the study).

231 Two core laboratory cardiologists reviewed presenting ECGs to identify left

232 -year), of which 273 (18%) were submitted to cardiologists' reviews during the second period (P<0.001

233 -year), of which 376 (33%) were submitted to cardiologists' reviews, compared with, 1522 alerts in 56

234 The supervising cardiologist (S.C.) made a management plan based on CA (

235 clinical genetic test results modify the way cardiologists should approach and manage affected patien

236 ates, scientists, and medical professionals, cardiologists should appropriately take the lead.

237 Cardiologists should be aware of this special subset of

238 Interventional cardiologists should be committed to optimal stent choic

239 context of sporting or military activities, cardiologists should undergo specific training in these

240 ntial risk-averse behavior of interventional cardiologists subject to public reporting, and offer sev

241 pation of various specialties (intensivists, cardiologists, surgeons) in AKI clinical studies and by

242 e on the family planning decisions of female cardiologists, the Women in Cardiology section of the Am

243 An interventional cardiologist then measured FFR in all patent coronary ar

244 The practicing cardiologist, therefore, needs to be familiar with the c

245 r a small proportion of referrals to a fetal cardiologist, they may be associated with significant mo

246 electrophysiologists, nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, thoracic surgeons, and other specialists.

247 diagram in any RCT to enable the practicing cardiologist to interpret how the results should influen

248 present a simple algorithm that enables the cardiologist to stratify degenerative mitral valves into

249 it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery

250 Thus, it is important for practicing cardiologists to be knowledgeable about the diagnosis, p

251 It is an invitation to action for cardiologists to become familiar with this emerging subs

252 on the morphofunctional phenotypes, allowing cardiologists to conveniently group them in broad descri

253 ortant, our study found a notable failure by cardiologists to correctly recognize which of their pati

254 the ethical principles that should obligate cardiologists to discuss and use outcomes data, when ava

255 ty for collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists to improve the care of oncology patients r

256 ors expanding quickly, the time has come for cardiologists to work closely with cancer specialists to

257 It calls on clinicians, researchers, and cardiologists to work with other healthcare providers, c

258 or HCM make it essential that the modern-day cardiologist understand the diagnostic, prognostic, and

259 s was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including

260 s was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including

261 s was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including

262 to the emergency department (ED) and offsite cardiologists via smartphones was developed.

263 ith dual Medicare/Medicaid coverage and more cardiologist visits after discharge and who participated

264 ), and cardiac rehabilitation and outpatient cardiologist visits after discharge.

265 en and patients with diabetes, those who had cardiologist visits, and among those taking statins.

266 for chest pain in Ontario, follow-up with a cardiologist was associated with a decreased risk of all

267 tery disease, the catheterization laboratory cardiologist was the final source of recommendation for

268 Consensus classification by 2 cardiologists was considered the operational gold standa

269 he latter group, both the patients and their cardiologist were unaware of the findings on FFR.

270 nitors with ST-segment analysis by a blinded cardiologist were used to detect myocardial ischemia.

271 Almost all (94%) cardiologists were aware of report cards of cardiac surg

272 teristics of a national sample of practicing cardiologists were described according to sex.

273 Cardiologists were more than twice as likely as family p

274 of the cardiology division were included; 66 cardiologists were randomized.

275 Although cardiologists were the most common providers of echocard

276 system was developed to automatically notify cardiologists when patients presented to the emergency d

277 h low-risk defects can be managed by general cardiologist,whereas those with more complex defects sho

278 esults were reviewed by a blinded panel of 3 cardiologists who adjudicated the outcome of Chagas card

279 interventional cardiology, with noninvasive cardiologists who have already completed fellowship trai

280 Of cardiologists who identified no benefit of PCI in 2 scen

281 Fewer cardiologists who reported moderate or substantial influ

282 Cardiologists who take primary responsibility for cardia

283 Early-career academic cardiologists, who many believe are an important compone

284 Adult cardiologists will be increasingly involved in the manag

285 Invasive cardiologists will have to refamiliarize themselves with

286 oexisting heart diseases, expert advice from cardiologists will improve clinical outcome.

287 Interventional cardiologists will require dedicated training in the spe

288 ment that involved active participation of a cardiologist with responsibility for the patients worked

289 rs, a cardiac surgeon, and an interventional cardiologist with TAVR experience was conducted on April

290 agement team, the hospital's location, and a cardiologist with whom he feels comfortable and who can

291 This presents cardiologists with a cohort of patients for whom the ris

292 ntiplatelet drugs, and to provide practicing cardiologists with an updated instrument to guide their

293 s' characteristics and compared dual-boarded cardiologists with and without active board certificatio

294 CV imaging subspecialty track that provides cardiologists with expertise in all imaging modalities i

295 ialists, MV cardiac surgeons, interventional cardiologists with expertise in structural heart disease

296 Among 3810 cardiologists with faculty appointments in 2014 (13.3% o

297 We identified all US cardiologists with medical school faculty appointments i

298 Images were compared qualitatively by three cardiologists with regard to diagnostic value, presence

299 Compared to dual-boarded cardiologists without active board certification in crit

300 Cardiologists wrote more articles than did radiologists