ライフサイエンスコーパス: cardiology

1 is a decision-making tool in interventional cardiology.

2 an outstanding challenge in neurobiology and cardiology.

3 fields of positive psychology and preventive cardiology.

4 the best possible candidates to the field of cardiology.

5 ious diseases, immunology, rheumatology, and cardiology.

6 mains one of the greatest ongoing debates in cardiology.

7 and is a feared disease across the field of cardiology.

8 ently recommended by the European Society of Cardiology.

9 ut have largely been neglected in preventive cardiology.

10 emains a difficult problem in interventional cardiology.

11 th reference to contemporary major trials in cardiology.

12 s of multimodality imaging and critical care cardiology.

13 hed Science Award of the American College of Cardiology.

14 might be considered useful in interventional cardiology.

15 kills necessary to practice effective sports cardiology.

16 d what will be the effect on the practice of cardiology?

17 th RD, the safety of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm is high, but specificity o

18 ostic performance of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm using hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI

19 ed neurology (9% clinical, 12% research) and cardiology (3% clinical, 6% research).

20 ely to be specialized in general/noninvasive cardiology (53.1% vs. 28.2%), and a lower proportion (11

21 e catalyzed the development of critical care cardiology, a fledgling discipline that combines special

22 The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA

23 evaluation of FALD, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) sponsored a stakeholders meeting on Oct

24 Thoracic Surgeons (STS)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Regis

25 Thoracic Surgeons (STS)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Regis

26 The joint American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and

27 The American College of Cardiology (ACC), in collaboration with the National Boa

28 Two guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA),

29 The 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidel

30 In the 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association Guideline (A

31 of Cardiology Adult Congenital and Pediatric Cardiology (ACPC) Section had attempted to create qualit

32 ifferences in faculty rank exist in academic cardiology, adjusting for experience and research produc

33 undation and American Society for Preventive Cardiology adopt the position that there is moderate-qua

34 The American College of Cardiology Adult Congenital and Pediatric Cardiology (AC

35 f adult and pediatric hepatology, congenital cardiology (adult congenital and pediatric cardiology),

36 The European Society of Cardiology algorithm performance with each assay was ass

37 to differ substantially for men and women in cardiology, although differences have diminished.

38 The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Society for

39 ar ASCVD risk (using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Assocation pooled-cohort equat

40 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the

41 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Choleste

42 mpared with current 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) choleste

43 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) choleste

44 ce was compared with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) CVD risk

45 ations compared with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelin

46 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelin

47 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelin

48 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelin

49 The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Guidelin

50 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelin

51 The accuracy of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Pooled C

52 Task Force (USPSTF) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommen

53 py according to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) risk ass

54 We compared the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and 2004 Adult Tre

55 tailed review of current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and American Strok

56 m risk equation, and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association ASCVD Pooled Cohor

57 icting SCD than the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cardiovascular Dis

58 arkers cited in the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidel

59 x recommendations by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidel

60 plementation of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidel

61 use in patients with an American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class I indication

62 is reviewed, as are the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice

63 cipants did not meet the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association criteria for initi

64 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association endorses statins f

65 commended statins by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline but not

66 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline on the t

67 in the composite use of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline-recommen

68 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines advise

69 eligibility per the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and 201

70 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines define

71 bility based on the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for tre

72 The 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for val

73 Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recomme

74 Although the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recomme

75 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines were mo

76 ting than recommended by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines).

77 ility was determined per American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, and su

78 was defined by the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, and us

79 er with the most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, the ne

80 Usual care was based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.

81 arding the prevalence of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association HF stages among ol

82 scular Risk Score (FRS), American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort equa

83 ntal value over the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equa

84 lopes 0.06-1.12) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equa

85 chart, and the modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equa

86 icting SCD than the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort risk

87 of mtDNA-CN to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohorts Equ

88 specificity for the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommendations on

89 g and decision aids, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Risk Estimator app

90 the accuracy of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association statin eligibility

91 egories developed by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association to the Jones crite

92 Guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, as well as those

93 ment guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) reco

94 (CVD) risk based on the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association CVD prevention

95 accordance with the 2007 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association infective endo

96 test guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, released in f

97 isk Model (PCERM) of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association.

98 Risk in Adults from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association.

99 n tools are emerging but remain behind adult cardiology and cardiac surgery and leading to partial bl

100 f U.S. physicians who are board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine ("dual-boarded car

101 y all physicians who were board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine before July 2015.

102 8%) maintained active board certification in cardiology and critical care medicine, respectively.

103 ses from the field of neurology, psychiatry, cardiology and even urology.

104 s of EA and 366 of AA in the MGH CAMP study (Cardiology and Metabolic Patient) were genotyped on a ge

105 al fibrillation who are attending outpatient cardiology and neurology clinics.

106 er internal medicine specialties, especially cardiology and oncology.

107 research interests and clinical practices of cardiology and oncology.

108 rt being launched by the American College of Cardiology and partnering professional organizations usi

109 He is currently Professor of Cardiology and senior physician at Wallenberg Laboratory

110 The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)

111 In November 2013, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association released a

112 erican Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology period

113 ogy, pathology, infectious disease medicine, cardiology, and oncology.

114 cians in family medicine, internal medicine, cardiology, and orthopedics who were observed for 430 ho

115 n Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the Heart Rhythm Society also was review

116 vey was developed by the American College of Cardiology Anticoagulation Work Group.

117 gy (adult and pediatric), and interventional cardiology, as well as a hospitalist and experts in alar

118 Shorenstein Endowed Chair in Cardiology at the University of California, San Francisc

119 with different levels of training (including cardiology attending physicians, cardiology fellows, int

120 the heart muscle is a promising strategy for cardiology because it is more specific than traditional

121 tmanteau cardio-oncology (also known as onco-cardiology) can now be found in many medical centers.

122 ng personnel staff working in interventional cardiology/cardiac electrophysiology and correlate them

123 a synergistic approach between the Pediatric Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Pediatric Intensive

124 HA2DS2-VASc score 2.6 +/- 1.7), 40% received cardiology care and 60% received primary care only.

125 30 days of PCI to enhance patient access to cardiology care in the emergency department.

126 In patients with newly diagnosed AF, cardiology care was associated with improved outcomes, p

127 After adjustment for covariates, cardiology care was associated with reductions in stroke

128 ial to improve quality and value in American cardiology care.

129 heart disease, were recruited in a tertiary cardiology center.

130 evaluated the Association of Interventional Cardiology certification with in-hospital outcomes of pa

131 patients were recruited from the outpatient cardiology clinic of the Beatrix Children's Hospital.

132 care planning), provided by primary care and cardiology clinicians, may be a vehicle to address unmet

133 to April 30, 2012) with 3-year follow-up at cardiology clinics (including HF subspecialty) in an aca

134 ting databases or outpatient respiratory and cardiology clinics at the Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS

135 Patients presenting to cardiology clinics have a high prevalence of obstructive

136 Most TTEs ordered in pediatric cardiology clinics were for indications rated A.

137 rdiovascular (CV) disease, a group common in cardiology clinics.

138 an be as comfortable as their interventional cardiology colleagues.

139 This discipline has gained interest from the cardiology community in recent years because of a remark

140 The cardiology community now requires phase 2 and 3 clinical

141 There is a common misperception in the cardiology community that most acute coronary events ari

142 nt initiatives, instituted by the practicing cardiology community, have succeeded in preserving life

143 c of ongoing debate and investigation in the cardiology community.

144 ardiology section of the American College of Cardiology conducted a voluntary anonymous survey.

145 undation and American Society for Preventive Cardiology convened an expert panel to evaluate the effe

146 n Heart Association, and European Society of Cardiology), convened a working group to develop a conse

147 HODS AND We assessed the Mayo Clinic nuclear cardiology database for all stress SPECT tests performed

148 ctional parameters around which contemporary cardiology decision making revolves.

149 m and transthoracic echocardiography) to the cardiology department were enrolled and followed up from

150 A 29-year-old male presented to the cardiology department with complaints of breathlessness,

151 The study was conducted within the cardiology division at the Massachusetts General Hospita

152 Staff members of the cardiology division were included; 66 cardiologists were

153 In interventional cardiology, drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown better

154 ssociation and included experts from general cardiology, electrophysiology (adult and pediatric), and

155 The American College of Cardiology Emerging Faculty program was developed in 200

156 et is as important to psychiatry as it is to cardiology, endocrinology, and gastroenterology.

157 try, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, cardiology, endocrinology, nephrology, psychiatry, and o

158 iation (ACC/AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines both recommend lipid-lowerin

159 es according to the 2010 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations and the Seattle and ref

160 lesterol and the current European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) gu

161 tion methods of the 2003 American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology guidelines and

162 Among cardiology faculty at US medical schools, women were les

163 (including cardiology attending physicians, cardiology fellows, internal medicine hospitalists, and

164 , we established a new follow-up clinic with cardiology fellows.

165 n levels, in-hospital cardiogenic shock, and cardiology follow-up within 2 weeks after discharge rela

166 neurysms require life-long and uninterrupted cardiology follow-up.

167 l development of QMs in ambulatory pediatric cardiology for a range of ambulatory domains.

168 ledged as one of the major challenges facing cardiology for the past four decades.

169 ely 3 months later), the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association

170 ASCERT (American College of Cardiology Foundation and the Society of Thoracic Surgeo

171 Primary Funding Source: American College of Cardiology Foundation's National Cardiovascular Data Reg

172 rican Heart Association, American College of Cardiology Foundation, European Heart Network, and Europ

173 an Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation," which published online November

174 Although there is an American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Class I

175 logy guidelines and 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guideli

176 nd is recommended by the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guideli

177 udies (QUADAS-2) tool or American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association methodo

178 recommended by the 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Fo

179 rithm recommended in the European Society of Cardiology guideline combining LOD and 1-hour algorithm.

180 an College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology guidelines and 2011 American College of Cardi

181 l arterial access in the European Society of Cardiology guidelines compared with the American Heart A

182 dations from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology guidelines for (99m)Tc-labeled MPS is highly

183 e recently released 2014 European Society of Cardiology guidelines of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC

184 The American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend 3 months of anticoagulat

185 HD patients and the 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines specified recommendations for ICD

186 The new European Society of Cardiology guidelines to rule-in and rule-out acute myoc

187 calculated for the 2014 European Society of Cardiology guidelines, and risk stratification methods o

188 erican Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines.

189 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines: Of one hundred fifty-seven cases

190 n the care of CAHAP, the American College of Cardiology has recently established a Sports and Exercis

191 ility of key variables, CPET applications in cardiology have grown impressively to include all forms

192 l cardiology (adult congenital and pediatric cardiology), heart failure/transplant, epidemiology, and

193 erican Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society atrial fibrillation (AF)

194 erican Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society atrial fibrillation guid

195 thPCI Registry and determined interventional cardiology (ICARD) certification status using American B

196 with a standard technique of interventional cardiology in a clinically relevant animal model, suppor

197 y was done at 21 centres (all departments of cardiology in the UK, Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germ

198 Men and women practicing cardiology in this national sample had different job act

199 The American College of Cardiology In-Training Exam (ACC-ITE) is incorporated in

200 n Women Committee of the American College of Cardiology, in conjunction with interested parties (from

201 an international group of experts in sports cardiology, inherited cardiac disease, and sports medici

202 We describe the American College of Cardiology International Cardiovascular Exchange Databas

203 which combines expertise from interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, cardiac surgery, c

204 an evolution of contemporary interventional cardiology is necessary to treat the increasingly higher

205 However, unlike in oncology or cardiology, it is unknown whether PROs are associated wi

206 As a result, computational cardiology, largely driven by the Physiome project, now

207 erican Heart Association/American College of Cardiology lifestyle guidelines and the 2015 to 2020 Die

208 To investigate the impact that a career in cardiology may have on the family planning decisions of

209 Geriatric cardiology melds cardiovascular perspectives with multim

210 l number of early-career American College of Cardiology members have benefited as funding of the enti

211 Most cardiology models are modified fee-for-service or addres

212 sectional study used the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)

213 Using the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry's CathP

214 with AF enrolled in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry's outpa

215 with AF enrolled in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry's PINNA

216 studies involving disorders which stem from cardiology, neurology and psychiatry: Congestive Heart F

217 Patients with coronary disease from 25 US cardiology outpatient practices completed the Seattle An

218 We compared the European Society of Cardiology pathway (<99th centile at presentation or at

219 way was greater than the European Society of Cardiology pathway overall (P<0.001) and in all subgroup

220 ile at presentation, the European Society of Cardiology pathway ruled out myocardial infarction in 28

221 to focus on this metric to improve value for cardiology patients.

222 ge of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology periodically release practice guidelines to g

223 Sc >/=2) enrolled in the American College of Cardiology PINNACLE (Practice Innovation and Clinical Ex

224 In contemporary cardiology practice, echocardiography and cardiac magnet

225 ught to develop QMs for ambulatory pediatric cardiology practice.

226 results that have influenced every aspect of cardiology practice.

227 nistered to 2 academic and 2 community-based cardiology practices in the Chicago, Illinois, metropoli

228 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Management Guideline in cardiology practices was modest.

229 Among 161 cardiology practices, trends in the use of moderate-inte

230 om, a subscription-based service provider to cardiology practices.

231 adoption of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline in US cardiology practices.

232 termediate to high stroke risk in real-world cardiology practices.

233 Ps versus physicians in a national sample of cardiology practices.

234 imulate a collaboration between oncology and cardiology practitioners and researchers, and the portma

235 evention Councils of the American College of Cardiology provides background information on the clinic

236 an Heart Association and American College of Cardiology published the "Guideline on Lifestyle Managem

237 In 2016, the American College of Cardiology published the first expert consensus decision

238 In the fall of 2012, the European Society of Cardiology published their latest guidelines for the man

239 y collected data from the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative from 2008 t

240 The sensitivity of the European Society of Cardiology rapid assessment 0-/1-hour algorithm to rule-

241 Since the original 2010 European Society of Cardiology recommendations for ECG interpretation in ath

242 The European Society of Cardiology recommends a 0/1-hour algorithm for rapid rul

243 pportunities to all stakeholders involved in cardiology research and practice.

244 results and decades of investigation by the cardiology research community, the only treatment with p

245 in achieving data sharing's full potential, cardiology research has the potential to lead the way.

246 -directed echocardiograms, 110 with complete cardiology-reviewed transthoracic echocardiography withi

247 European Society of Cardiology risk score was higher in those failing screen

248 We compared the European Society of Cardiology rule-out pathway with a pathway that incorpor

249 New tools, such as the American College of Cardiology's in-training examination, restructured Core

250 Within the American College of Cardiology's PINNACLE Registry, we compared quality of c

251 nter for Rare Diseases and the Department of Cardiology, Salpetriere University Hospital, Paris, Fran

252 isions of female cardiologists, the Women in Cardiology section of the American College of Cardiology

253 Setting: Secondary and tertiary care cardiology services.

254 e of U.S. patients with ATTR amyloid seen at cardiology sites had wild-type disease than the ROW (50.

255 hrough strengthening collaboration among the cardiology, sleep medicine, and clinical trial communiti

256 Heart Association class (P=0.067), Canadian Cardiology Society class (P=0.106), or syncope (P=0.426)

257 o 4 was reduced from 86% to 10%; in Canadian Cardiology Society class 3 to 4 from 26% to 2%; and with

258 h New York Heart Association class, Canadian Cardiology Society class, or syncope.

259 The American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and I

260 udy evaluated variations in use of pediatric cardiology specialty care centers (PCSCC) for pediatric

261 ety of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology (STS/ACC) Transcatheter Valve Therapies Regis

262 n physician age, sex, years since residency, cardiology subspecialty, publications, National Institut

263 an Heart Association and American College of Cardiology support the program.

264 is Professor of Medicine in the Division of Cardiology, the Truth Initiative Distinguished Professor

265 The American College of Cardiology third decennial Professional Life Survey was

266 The American College of Cardiology, through the College's Anticoagulation Initia

267 ientific Sessions of the American College of Cardiology titled, "The Academic Medical Center of the F

268 nterest in global health has increased among cardiology trainees and early-career cardiologists over

269 versity of North Carolina (Chapel Hill), and cardiology training at the University of California, San

270 He received his cardiology training in the Sahlgrenska University Hospit

271 The latest iteration of the Core Cardiology Training Statement (COCATS 4) [Corrected] pro

272 ety of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (STS/ACC TVT) Reg

273 Thoracic Surgeons (STS)/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Registry ca

274 ety of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Registry fr

275 ety of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry (Novembe

276 ety of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry on patie

277 iety of Thoracic Surgery/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry on patie

278 ety of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry was used

279 ety of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry were use

280 ety of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

281 TAVR trials and the STS/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

282 ety of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

283 All is put in the context of topical cardiology trial examples and is geared to help trialist

284 pretation are illustrated by recent, topical cardiology trial results.

285 cs are illustrated by relevant examples from cardiology trials.

286 ety of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry.

287 activity data for encounters in an inpatient cardiology unit from Northwestern Medicine's Enterprise

288 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Gentofte.

289 atric endocrinology, and adult and pediatric cardiology used the patient-centered Strength of Recomme

290 tment visit (63% versus 58%), and outpatient cardiology visit (23% versus 21%) did not differ.

291 Cardiology was consulted for 23 patients and started on

292 oronary syndromes and invasive procedures in cardiology, we practically consider 2 broad categories o

293 to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology were recruited.

294 ding working activities and pay, of women in cardiology, which is a predominantly male specialty.

295 dedicated specialists within interventional cardiology who are trained with the cognitive and techni

296 eserve (MPR) is an emerging topic in nuclear cardiology with an expected diagnostic and prognostic in

297 en are a consistent minority in the field of cardiology, with concerns regarding balancing career and

298 opean Heart Network, and European Society of Cardiology, with expanded representation from Asia, Afri

299 mic Working Group of the American College of Cardiology, with senior leadership support, assessed the

300 1 outpatient encounter with primary care or cardiology within 90 days of the AF diagnosis.