ライフサイエンスコーパス: cardiopulmonary resuscitation

1 ypeople and healthcare providers who perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

2 st five minutes of emergency medical service cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

3 lation, a witnessed arrest, or had bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

4 eceived surface cooling at the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

5 e ICU, compared with receiving a pamphlet on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

6 ced cardiac arrest followed by 90 seconds of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

7 .5 mg of epinephrine at 4.5 and 9 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

8 n or impedance threshold device and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

9 dium nitroprusside at 1, 4, and 8 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

10 Defibrillation occurred after 10 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

11 ology and could correctly name components of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

12 ve neurological outcome after cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

13 on success after experimental cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

14 blood flow after experimental cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

15 for cardiogenic shock, and 3) extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

16 perfusion, as well as oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

17 are available to use ultrasound as a part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

18 isotonic saline was infused at the onset of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

19 were conducted 24 hours after cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

20 d similar oxygenation and ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

21 enation, and a normal mixed venous pH during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

22 No pharmacological agent was used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

23 easured for 180 minutes after cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

24 n for respiratory failure and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

25 w compared with vehicle after cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

26 n 24 hours after experimental cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

27 logic recovery is feasible despite prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

28 xygenation, and 412 underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

29 den cardiac arrest and could be treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

30 ation is an unreported beneficial outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

31 .5%) were recovered from donors who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

32 0 to 3 declines rapidly with each minute of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

33 compression devices as compared with manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

34 ary resuscitation and 5.2% for piston-driven cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

35 When asked about code status, 56% chose cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

36 en and were less likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

37 rsus 89% (8/9) after more than 30 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

38 attempted after 30 minutes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

39 n wild-type mice subjected to cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

40 asive cerebral oxygenation monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

41 determined at 24 hours after cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

42 vival rate and neurocognitive recovery after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

43 est and discuss the role of thrombolytics in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

44 Following experimental cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 1) continuous hypertonic

45 , the reason for cardiac arrest to assist in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1B-2C depending on rhythm

46 pport defined as any of the following: 1) no cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 2) do not reintubate, 3)

47 tnessed event (87% versus 53%; P<0.001) with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44% versus 25%; P=0.001)

48 tation resulted in fewer surrogates choosing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (48% vs 64%, odds ratio, 0

49 n alpha-Syn mice subjected to cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 7.5% hypertonic saline tr

50 th myoclonus had longer time to professional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (8.6 vs 7.0 min; p < 0.001

51 Within 16.1 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 89.7% (95% confidence int

52 mes more likely to meet targets of excellent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (95% CI, 2.9-10.6; p < 0.0

53 organs transplanted from donors who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation after a cardiac arrest in

54 The 2010 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation allow 5 seconds to give 2

55 ecompression plus impedance threshold device cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone, in the setting of i

56 citation was 8.3% for load-distributing band cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 5.2% for piston-driven

57 Rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external def

58 County-level rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external def

59 Additional adjustment of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external def

60 ghborhoods had the lowest rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automatic external def

61 he association between bystander treatments (cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automatic external def

62 are group received a standard pamphlet about cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiopulmonary resusc

63 n from the MRI suite, before the delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation, potent

64 life support and 1 pediatric Consensuses on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

65 annual series of International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

66 ican Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

67 10 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

68 Importance: The 2015 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascul

69 (116 +/- 4 vs 143 +/- 7 s; p < 0.001) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and enhanced myocardial pe

70 Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and era were not independe

71 A video depicting cardiopulmonary resuscitation and explaining resuscitati

72 suscitation is not reported as an outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and is therefore overlooke

73 ompare female and male rescuers in regard to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and leadership performance

74 During phase 1, quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patient outcomes were

75 higher rates of understanding the purpose of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation options

76 e been significant improvements in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival outcome for o

77 Significant variation in rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival were observed

78 n cardiac arrest is poor despite advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the use of therapeutic

79 l cardiac arrest in comparison with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to explore factors mod

80 ha-Syn mice were subjected to cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation and treated with either a

81 cal ventilation, feeding tube placement, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation), and discontinuation of d

82 myocardium, both in an acute setting during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and among patients with e

83 diopulmonary resuscitation or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and defibrillation.

84 rity of illness scores, higher prevalence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and greater resource util

85 heart beat, weanability from extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and left ventricular syst

86 xternal defibrillator application, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and location, 30-day surv

87 ected to 4-minute cardiac arrest followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and randomized either to

88 l heart rhythm, witnessed arrests, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and total ischemic time.

89 ing renal insufficiency, cardiac arrest with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and ventricular arrhythmi

90 rtality and morbidity rates after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation are still a major clinical

91 32-0.87]), as did framing the alternative to cardiopulmonary resuscitation as "allow natural death" r

92 Framing no cardiopulmonary resuscitation as the norm rather than ca

93 ity of those who died following unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts or brain death di

94 s, cardiac arrest characteristics, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, automated external defibr

95 ta on the prevalence or outcome of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) in children 18 year

96 dication for ECMO after a cardiac procedure, cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ECMO placement, and

97 pital mortality were age (odds ratio, 1.02), cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ICU admission (odds

98 were metastatic disease (odds ratio, 1.99), cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ICU admission (odds

99 cerebral oxygenation greater than 50% during cardiopulmonary resuscitation best predicted cerebral pe

100 ral oxygenation during the last 5 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation best predicted the return

101 pontaneous circulation following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation but remain at risk for rec

102 ma following experimental cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation by exerting its effect via

103 tomatic external defibrillator recordings of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by rescuers who had receiv

104 1 million units, and control extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (c-ECPR), which did not re

105 mpare survival of organs from donors who had cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cardiopulmonary resuscita

106 ather than the surrogate's did not influence cardiopulmonary resuscitation choice.

107 Compared with manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation, combining both mechanical

108 th increased mortality during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with normoxia (od

109 arrest patients demonstrated that increased cardiopulmonary resuscitation compression depth is stron

110 ociation guidelines suggested an increase in cardiopulmonary resuscitation compression depth with a t

111 resuscitation alone, in the setting of intra-cardiopulmonary resuscitation cooling.

112 The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affects hemodynamics

113 t is associated with low survival, but early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation c

114 he American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardio

115 To describe temporal trends in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and first-responder

116 ary prevention, notably prompt initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the use of an au

117 alized children in the United States receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) annually.

118 Outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in hospitalized pati

119 During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with out

120 survival effects of type-specific bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the community.

121 Bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases patient su

122 On the basis of laboratory cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) investigations and l

123 focus on methods to ensure that high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed in all

124 induction of therapeutic hypothermia during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may improve neurolog

125 The effect of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on the family member

126 nalyzed risks according to whether bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or defibrillation wa

127 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by bystand

128 Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly improv

129 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in high sch

130 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training rates in th

131 pital cardiac arrest, less likely to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and less likely to

132 the potential to help maintain high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but despite their i

133 hree million people in Sweden are trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

134 enhances oxygenation and circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

135 Conversations about goals of care and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)/intubation for patie

136 elivered per minute during each 2 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation cycle were measured, and t

137 Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR), in which 9-1-1 d

138 ticipants felt that the video was helpful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making (98%) and

139 minutes of basic life support with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, and if ne

140 minutes of basic life support with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, and if ne

141 Cardiac arrest is potentially reversible by cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, cardiover

142 n of spontaneous circulation with mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices (odds ratio, 1.53

143 pulmonary resuscitation, external mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices designed to augmen

144 ary resuscitation, combining both mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices produced a signifi

145 For many patients who suffer cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation does not result in long-te

146 ng for prehospital and inpatient covariates, cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration (minutes) is inde

147 Distribution of cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration differed by outco

148 For cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration up to 37.0 minute

149 tients who received more than one episode of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during a hospitalization w

150 epinephrine to sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiopulmonary res

151 zed data from 421,394 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the study period.

152 Although extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) can result in surv

153 In particular, measurement of cardiopulmonary resuscitation elements and neurological

154 rends, increasing use of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, emerging field treatments

155 s models to predict the outcome of inpatient cardiopulmonary resuscitation episodes and data from 200

156 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation epochs for patients who ar

157 urn of spontaneous circulation following the cardiopulmonary resuscitation event.

158 Regional and temporal trends in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, event survival, and survi

159 Undergoing multiple cardiopulmonary resuscitation events during a hospitaliz

160 Over time, significantly more of these cardiopulmonary resuscitation events occurred in the ICU

161 relative frequency of pediatric in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation events occurring in ICUs c

162 proportion of total ICU versus general ward cardiopulmonary resuscitation events over time evaluated

163 The relative incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation events was higher for card

164 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation events were defined as ext

165 Among 5,870 pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation events, 5,477 (93.3%) occu

166 culation includes efforts to optimize manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation, external mechanical cardi

167 onstrates that sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation facilitates intra-cardiopu

168 Dantrolene infusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation facilitates successful def

169 rauma, abdominal surgery, pancreatitis, post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation, fluid resuscitation > 5 L

170 The improved outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation following administration o

171 Animals received manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 10 minutes before the

172 on cardiac arrest followed by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 6 hours.

173 ll Code during follow-up, 22 (4.6%) received cardiopulmonary resuscitation for an in-hospital cardiac

174 0,078 children enrolled, 139 (1.4%) received cardiopulmonary resuscitation for more than or equal to

175 on with rates between 100 and 120/min during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardia

176 s greater than 20 mm Hg during 10 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillati

177 st, age 18 years old or older, and prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation greater than or equal to 5

178 itation in the sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation group (83+/-15 mL/min vs 2

179 itation in the sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation group.

180 nutes of advanced life support with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation; group B-3 minutes of basi

181 All animals received manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation guided by audiovisual feed

182 ing that the 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guideline target may be to

183 Influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines on nationwide s

184 he impact of 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines on survival.

185 ant change in survival before and after 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines.

186 nge in survival trends before and after 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines.

187 monary arrest, sepsis survivors who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation had a greater risk of all-

188 monary resuscitation, load-distributing band cardiopulmonary resuscitation had significantly greater

189 1.79 (95% CI, 1.17-2.76); and (5) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, HR, 1.38 (95% CI, 1.02-1.

190 diopulmonary resuscitation facilitates intra-cardiopulmonary resuscitation hypothermia.

191 Survival trends after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ICPR) for cardiac arrest

192 ygenation was deployed during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 31 patients (21% of the

193 arrest in 53.8%, 51.1%, and 52.1%; bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 44.7%, 30.3%, and 23.4%

194 rdiac dysfunction in 3,005 patients (66.5%), cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 877 patients (19.4%), a

195 her burden of chronic illness, and receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a larger or metropolita

196 tegy versus chest compression depth-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of card

197 n, allowing selective initial treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an effort to improve ov

198 or impedance threshold device with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac

199 ogy death (CED) immediately after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients without ST-seg

200 ode of cardiopulmonary arrest and undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital.

201 tubation in the last 30 days of life, and no cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the last 30 days of lif

202 Carotid blood flow was higher during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the sodium nitroprussid

203 No epinephrine was used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the sodium nitroprussid

204 ruption at 24 hours following cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation in wild-type mice but not

205 Sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation included active compressio

206 These data establish that contemporary PICU cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including long durations

207 O in elderly patients and patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation indicates that less invasi

208 Mdivi-1 administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation inhibited dynamin-related

209 than 35 degrees C beginning from the time of cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation.

210 ify patients>/=18 years of age who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (International Classificat

211 nimizing pauses in chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a focus of current guid

212 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a lifesaving technique

213 Higher cerebral oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with return

214 In-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation is much more commonly prov

215 Organ transplantation after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is not reported as an outc

216 ventricular dilatation on ultrasound during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is particularly associated

217 hort-term outcome were time from collapse to cardiopulmonary resuscitation less than or equal to 3 mi

218 Compared with manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation, load-distributing band ca

219 , age, witnessed status, attempted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, location of arrest, chest

220 l discharge; only 2 (9.1% of those receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation) made a complete recovery

221 ary embolism and use of thrombolytics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may need to be more routin

222 partially be explained by fewer unsolicited cardiopulmonary resuscitation measures and inferior fema

223 e in different domains and fewer unsolicited cardiopulmonary resuscitation measures compared with mal

224 ics and survival rates of patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation more than once during a si

225 There were 7,991 patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation more than once during the

226 with lower survival among patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation more than once.

227 n=49) were compared with other patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n=116) and to patients wi

228 ent protocols: sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n=8), sodium nitroprussid

229 n=73/112) and 74.6% in patients who required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n=91/122).

230 he risk-adjusted odds of receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio [OR], 2.96; 95

231 the effect of sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation on heat exchange during su

232 housand four hundred three patients received cardiopulmonary resuscitation once during a hospitalizat

233 survival compared with patients who undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation once.

234 iated with improved knowledge of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation options and cardiopulmonar

235 ge of patients with OHCA receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation or a lay automatic externa

236 between 2005 and 2011, defined as receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation or defibrillation from a p

237 carbonate, and heparin), ventilation, either cardiopulmonary resuscitation or extracorporeal cardiopu

238 opathy (OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.88 to 2.94), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR: 3.50; 95% CI: 2.20 to

239 Patients who had cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or extracorporeal membran

240 efined as PE- or bleeding-related mortality, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or intensive care unit ad

241 Graft survival of cardiopulmonary resuscitation organs versus noncardiopul

242 Graft survival of cardiopulmonary resuscitation organs was not significant

243 onors who had cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cardiopulmonary resuscitation organs) versus donors who

244 dependent (p = 0.01), and not have bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (p = 0.05).

245 resuscitation and measured durations of all cardiopulmonary resuscitation pauses.

246 We searched for any clinical study assessing cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance on adult cardi

247 ences, with female rescuers showing inferior cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance, which can par

248 upport with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus an impedance threshol

249 sus control or sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus epinephrine (24+/-6 m

250 itation (n=8), sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus epinephrine (n=10), a

251 Control and sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus epinephrine groups re

252 he control and sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus epinephrine groups, r

253 hlet about cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation preference options plus ro

254 lity were age, severity of illness, previous cardiopulmonary resuscitation, previous ICU admission, m

255 was a composite variable, termed "excellent cardiopulmonary resuscitation," prospectively defined as

256 ypothesized that the proportion of pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation provided in ICUs versus ge

257 Background- Evidence has accrued that cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality affects cardiac ar

258 m was significantly associated with improved cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and survival with

259 Results- We sought to measure the effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality on cardiac arrest

260 Animals underwent asphyxial cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation, randomized to groups with

261 Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommend a chest compress

262 nhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation reduced its improvement in

263 monary resuscitation as the norm rather than cardiopulmonary resuscitation resulted in fewer surrogat

264 y resuscitation, including long durations of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, results in high rates of

265 threshold device in comparison with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI,

266 tions summary articles that will include the cardiopulmonary resuscitation science reviewed by the In

267 on has initiated a near-continuous review of cardiopulmonary resuscitation science that replaces the

268 requirements, intensive care unit therapies, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, shared decision making, m

269 al care plus an 8-minute video that depicted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, showed a simulated hospit

270 e addition of thrombolytic to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation significantly improved car

271 (n = 3,207) of sepsis patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation survived to discharge.

272 to two experimental groups: t-extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (t-ECPR) group, which rece

273 objective of this study was to determine if cardiopulmonary resuscitation-targeted to arterial blood

274 al cardiopulmonary resuscitation options and cardiopulmonary resuscitation terminology among patients

275 survivors of sepsis who received in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation than in those who did not,

276 Specifically, greater than or equal to 60% cardiopulmonary resuscitation time with regional cerebra

277 ance of survival during the first minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to enable prompt orientati

278 After 8 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, up to three 2-J defibrill

279 ciation, have focused on promoting bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, use of automated external

280 rhythm, witnessed status, type of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, use of public access auto

281 d to hospital discharge after 1-3 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus 28% (9/32) after mo

282 decreased with sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus control or sodium n

283 Surrogate's code status decision (cardiopulmonary resuscitation vs do not resuscitate/allo

284 return of spontaneous circulation rates from cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 8.3% for load-distribu

285 Shorter duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with higher

286 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was continued for 307 minu

287 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated after 6 minu

288 Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was not independently asso

289 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was then commenced for 3 m

290 -year postdischarge survival rates following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were 28%, 23%, and 14%, re

291 utcomes of ICU sepsis survivors who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation were compared with those o

292 sk factors for long-term mortality following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were male sex, older age,

293 thm, witnessed cardiac arrest, and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation were more likely to surviv

294 nal cerebral oxygen saturation levels during cardiopulmonary resuscitation were observed in patients

295 ry OH VF/VT cardiac arrest requiring ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation were transported by emerge

296 hereas older adults were more likely to want cardiopulmonary resuscitation when unable to consent (83

297 n automated ventilator is recommended during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a secured airway.

298 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with chest compressions mu

299 othesized that sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation would decrease the time re

300 ephrine during sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation would mitigate heat exchan