ライフサイエンスコーパス: caregiver burden

1 n productivity and other indirect costs (eg, caregiver burden).

2 ining interventions and strategies to reduce caregiver burden.

3 group returned to work quicker and had less caregiver burden.

4 by slowing functional decline and decreasing caregiver burden.

5 hysicians have a responsibility to recognize caregiver burden.

6 er, including patients' knowledge, mood, and caregiver burden.

7 QOL, and patient satisfaction, with reduced caregiver burden.

8 ut significantly increased indirect costs or caregiver burden.

9 nce limitations on morbidity, mortality, and caregiver burden.

10 cision makers and interventions to alleviate caregiver burden.

11 dherence to medication, self-management, and caregiver burden.

12 nal ability and pain were related to partner caregiver burden.

13 tion of care have resulted in an epidemic of caregiver burden.

14 t quality of life, institutionalization, and caregiver burden.

15 shown mild to modest efficacy in mitigating caregiver burden and associated manifestations of caregi

16 eased life satisfaction after adjustment for caregiver burden and demographic and medical variables f

17 aregiver HR-QoL, satisfaction with care, and caregiver burden and reduced hospital readmissions at 6

18 This should include a focus on caregiver burden and the predictable tensions that careg

19 ers independently reported on their sense of caregiver burden and their supportiveness toward the pat

20 pairment, higher service utilization, higher caregiver burden, and increased mortality.

21 dies are needed to quantify anxiety, stress, caregiver burden, and posttraumatic stress disorder outc

22 les, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, caregiver burden, and social problem-solving abilities w

23 Effective interventions to reduce family caregiver burden are poorly understood but family caregi

24 Health-care costs and, importantly, caregiver burden, are also reported to be higher in deme

25 Many studies showed improvements in caregiver burden-associated symptoms (eg, mood, coping,

26 mographics, psychosocial characteristics and caregiver burden at 2 months posttransplant, and HRQOL a

27 7.45; 95% CI, -11.08 to -3.81; P < .001) and caregiver burden (b = -0.50; 95% CI, -1.09 to 0.08; P =

28 Quality of life, caregiver burden, behavioral and psychological symptoms

29 improvement in cognition, functional status, caregiver burden, CGI scores, and depression in the meth

30 also improved cognition, functional status, caregiver burden, CGI scores, and depression.

31 ses and female caregivers experience greater caregiver burden, distress, increased rates of depressio

32 Practical assessment strategies for caregiver burden exist to evaluate caregivers, their car

33 titude, and experiences) of palliative care, caregiver burden, family function, patient quality of li

34 ody dementia, such as autonomic symptoms and caregiver burden, have not been investigated, nor have t

35 Evidence was weak for improving caregiver burdens in cancer and was absent for heart fai

36 Risk factors for caregiver burden include female sex, low educational att

37 a-analyses to summarize the effectiveness of caregiver burden interventions were identified by search

38 Caregiver burden is frequently overlooked by clinicians.

39 Although caregiver burden is well described in chronic illness, f

40 (eg, mood, coping, self-efficacy) even when caregiver burden itself was minimally improved.

41 Caregiver burden may result from providing care for pati

42 There were significant improvements in caregiver burden, mental health, and depression after po

43 dividual circumstances and contexts in which caregiver burden occurs.

44 at delaying placement, such as reduction of caregiver burden or difficult patient behaviors, need to

45 icantly in QoL measures and reported reduced caregiver burden (P=.008).

46 Greater caregiver burden predicted poorer caregiver HRQOL in sev

47 Outcomes were caregiver burden, quality of life, and depression.

48 The caregiver burden scale did not differ between groups eit

49 ported burden at 6 months, measured with the caregivers burden scale (CBS).

50 quality of life, knowledge and satisfaction, caregiver burden, time tradeoffs, and out-of-pocket cost

51 Partner caregiver burden was related to lower levels of partner

52 social risk factors and adverse outcomes of caregiver burden were reviewed.

53 e of people with dementia living at home and caregiver burden (when available).

54 For families, predictors included caregiver burden, worse self-reported health, working ou

55 y (Clinical Global Impressions Scale [CGI]), caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Scale), and depression (C